[03:47] <FourDollars> Hi, could you help to check the SRU for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-power/+bug/1100546?
[05:39] <cpaelzer> nacc: no it is not an official dep3 field, but it helps a lot especially if the patch needs to be maintained
[05:39] <cpaelzer> nacc: it is just a way to attribute it to the right author, while putting the burden to be contacted to keep it in shape to who wrote the patch for the package
[05:40] <cpaelzer> nacc: spec-wise you'd do multiple Author lines, but then it turned out to often be misleading
[05:40] <cpaelzer> nacc: allso it is close to bikeshedding :-) I'm happy to find patches which have headers at all - what we discuss here is minor optimization
[05:40] <cpaelzer> nacc: but lets open up this topic next week
[05:41] <cpaelzer> good morning btw
[10:31] <sil2100> smoser: hey! I was looking at the cloud-init SRU just now and sadly I noticed most of the bugs don't have the required SRU information in their description...
[10:31] <sil2100> smoser: could you fix that or poke people to add those?
[10:32] <sil2100> smoser: there's a lot of bugs so I guess we need to make sure each of them can be easily validated and reviewed
[15:21] <sil2100> cpaelzer: hey! Could you take a look at the two autopkgtest failures for the new postgresql-9.5
[15:21] <sil2100> in yakkety?
[15:22] <sil2100> cpaelzer: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/yakkety/update_excuses.html#postgresql-9.5
[15:23] <sil2100> cpaelzer: I see that the armhf one for postgresql itself also happened for packages like openssl
[15:27] <sil2100> cpaelzer: ah, I see your bug comments now
[15:35] <cpaelzer> sil2100: hi, was busy in a call - now I'm with you
[15:36] <sil2100> cpaelzer: it's all good, your comments had all I needed
[15:36] <cpaelzer> sil2100: yeah I tried to outline the known issues in the comment
[15:36] <cpaelzer> sil2100: to at least slightly believe we will one day have less o fthose transient issues I even opened two bugs :-)
[15:36] <cpaelzer> yet I know that working on these is unlikely given usual priorities
[15:37] <cpaelzer> I just don't like writing every quarter "known issue" :-)
[15:37] <sil2100> hah, very good indeed! Yeah, I saw some of those failures being around since ages now, would be nice to get those fixed up one day
[15:37] <cpaelzer> sil2100: Trusty will need to age more in proposed to be considered, thanks for accepting the others
[15:39] <sil2100> cpaelzer: yeah, I know, since I almost accidentally accepted it
[15:39] <sil2100> ;)
[15:39] <sil2100> Ctrl+C'd my way out of it in the right moment though
[16:19] <Alfro> Where can I see how the gnome-control-center changes the default audio source? I thought it was similar to using pactl, but I am getting different behaviour in a particular case.
[20:25] <jtaylor> is firefox in ubuntu built in some form of debug mode?
[20:26] <jtaylor> I get real bad performance and the assembly used is horrible
[20:27] <jtaylor> no inlining of tiny functions un libyuv
[20:28] <jtaylor> oh no mystery ... -Os is used
[21:25] <jtaylor> seems to also affect debian bug 863672
[22:48] <ddstreet> cyphermox hey, sorry again...my change to vlan for bug 1573272 was not quite correct, I put details in the bug and attached v2 devdiffs, which apply on top of the current -proposed code...can you review and upload to artful if it looks correct?
[22:49] <ddstreet> slashd uploaded the SRU releases, he can handle re-uploading the SRU releases again if you can upload to artful
[22:51] <cyphermox> sure
[22:53] <slashd> cyphermox, thanks
[22:55] <ddstreet> thanks!