[00:12] <teward> ooh wow pymssql landed in artful o.O
[03:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: vala [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.36.3-1~git1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[03:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: vala [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.36.3-1~git1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[03:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: vala [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.36.3-1~git1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[03:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: vala [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.36.3-1~git1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[03:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: vala [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.36.3-1~git1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[03:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: vala [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.36.3-1~git1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[05:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted htmlmin [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.1.10-1]
[05:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pymssql [amd64] (artful-proposed) [2.1.3+dfsg-1]
[05:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pymssql [armhf] (artful-proposed) [2.1.3+dfsg-1]
[05:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pymssql [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [2.1.3+dfsg-1]
[05:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted slick-greeter [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.0.3-1]
[05:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted slick-greeter [armhf] (artful-proposed) [1.0.3-1]
[05:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted slick-greeter [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [1.0.3-1]
[05:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-stream-array [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.1.2-1]
[05:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pymssql [i386] (artful-proposed) [2.1.3+dfsg-1]
[05:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted slick-greeter [arm64] (artful-proposed) [1.0.3-1]
[05:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted slick-greeter [s390x] (artful-proposed) [1.0.3-1]
[05:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pymssql [arm64] (artful-proposed) [2.1.3+dfsg-1]
[05:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted slick-greeter [i386] (artful-proposed) [1.0.3-1]
[05:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pymssql [s390x] (artful-proposed) [2.1.3+dfsg-1]
[09:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libzen (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.4.34-1 => 0.4.34-1ubuntu0.16.04.1] (no packageset)
[09:35] <LocutusOfBorg> [02:18:41 AM] <rbasak> mapreri: looking, but also, that sounds like a missing Breaks clause then, no?
[09:35] <LocutusOfBorg> ^^ wrt virtualbox, rbasak did you spot an issue I'm not aware of?
[09:35] <LocutusOfBorg> BTW thanks for releasing the update so quickly :)
[09:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lxc [source] (zesty-proposed) [2.0.8-0ubuntu1~17.04.1]
[09:47] <rbasak> <mapreri> rbasak: Gianfranco asked me to tell you please move virtualbox-ext-pack to release too, not only virtualbox (as otherwise update in systems with both installed is broken)
[09:47] <rbasak> ...
[09:47] <rbasak> <rbasak> mapreri: looking, but also, that sounds like a missing Breaks clause then, no?
[09:48] <rbasak> LocutusOfBorg: ^
[09:48] <rbasak> Also, thank infinity. I didn't touch Zesty wrt. these packages I don't think.
[09:50] <LocutusOfBorg> I read the discussion log, but I don't understand where is the missing break... in ext-pack?
[09:52] <rbasak> I don't know, but if a user updates an SRU package A that without also installing the SRU for B causes B to break, then surely there needs the SRU for A needs to declare a "Breaks: B (<< sru-version)"?
[09:52] <rbasak> In other words, we should never end up in that situation (if we know of it in advance, of course) because the SRU package should always be able to declare a Breaks to ensure proper ordering.
[09:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lxc [source] (yakkety-proposed) [2.0.8-0ubuntu1~16.10.1]
[09:54] <LocutusOfBorg> the problem is: virtualbox *works* without the ext pack
[09:55] <LocutusOfBorg> but if you save a machine, uninstall the ext pack, start it again, you loose the saved state, because a running machine can't unplug devices (e.g. usb) without rebooting
[09:55] <LocutusOfBorg> so, I can't force people having the ext pack, and if they already have, they are forced to 1) upgrade it, 2) remove it
[09:55] <LocutusOfBorg> not sure how britney let vbox migrate by breaking ext-pack
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lxc [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.0.8-0ubuntu1~16.04.1]
[09:56] <LocutusOfBorg> I'm pretty sure if I don't update the ext pack, vbox can't migrate (e.g. in artful)
[09:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected apt [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.4.2~17.04.1]
[10:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-shell [source] (zesty-proposed) [3.24.2-0ubuntu0.1]
[10:16] <rbasak> LocutusOfBorg: no britney for SRUs.
[10:17] <LocutusOfBorg> ok names sense
[10:17] <rbasak> LocutusOfBorg: so it sounds like a newer virtualbox package in updates should Breaks all older ext packs?
[10:18] <rbasak> LocutusOfBorg: then apt would not update until both are available.
[10:18] <rbasak> (unless the user has none installed)
[10:19] <LocutusOfBorg> actually it is the ext pack that breaks older vbox
[10:19] <LocutusOfBorg> s/break/depends on a strict version
[10:19] <rbasak> Perhaps I don't understand what the actual problem was then.
[10:20] <LocutusOfBorg> you are probably right, you understood the problem
[10:20] <LocutusOfBorg> I should suggest the ext pack, and break for older versions
[10:20] <LocutusOfBorg> but again, the ext pack is not installable if the version is not the same, so it just gets removed
[10:20] <LocutusOfBorg> since it is optional
[10:21] <LocutusOfBorg> I can't force people installing it, because non-free
[10:21]  * LocutusOfBorg goes back to dailywork
[10:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted vlan [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.9-3.2ubuntu2.17.04.1]
[10:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted vlan [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.9-3.2ubuntu2.16.10.1]
[10:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted vlan [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.9-3.2ubuntu1.16.04.2]
[10:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted vlan [source] (trusty-proposed) [1.9-3ubuntu10.2]
[12:42] <jbicha> sil2100: I replied on LP: #1672175
[12:42] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1672175 in gnome-shell (Ubuntu Yakkety) "gnome-shell should recommend chrome-gnome-shell" [Low,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1672175
[13:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: percona-xtradb-cluster-5.5 (trusty-proposed/universe) [5.5.37-25.10+dfsg-0ubuntu0.14.04.2 => 5.5.37-25.10+dfsg-0ubuntu0.14.04.3] (no packageset)
[13:57] <sil2100> jbicha: thanks, looking!
[14:16] <sil2100> jbicha: all clear, thanks, didn't read it fully it seems - I guess we might want to think about switching the main gnome-shell task to something different than Fix Released
[14:16] <sil2100> jbicha: since otherwise it might give the wrong info
[14:17] <sil2100> That being said, all's good otherwise
[14:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-shell [source] (yakkety-proposed) [3.20.4-0ubuntu3]
[14:31] <slashd> sil2100, good day could you please have a look at LP: 1657256 ? it is waiting in the Trusty upload queue  : https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/trusty/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=percona-xtradb-cluster-5.5
[14:31] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1657256 in percona-xtradb-cluster-5.5 (Ubuntu Trusty) "Percona crashes when doing a a 'larger' update" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1657256
[14:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-shell [source] (xenial-proposed) [3.18.5-0ubuntu0.3]
[14:36] <sil2100> slashd: hey! Sure thing
[14:37] <slashd> sil2100, thanks, much appreciated
[14:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted percona-xtradb-cluster-5.5 [source] (trusty-proposed) [5.5.37-25.10+dfsg-0ubuntu0.14.04.3]
[14:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lxc [source] (trusty-proposed) [1.0.10-0ubuntu1]
[14:51] <slashd> thanks sil2100
[15:08] <sil2100> yw!
[15:16] <slashd> sil2100, can I ask you to sponsor a patch in devel release ? I only have the right for stable release ?
[15:16] <sil2100> slashd: sure, I can take a look at it and see if I can help - what's the bug number?
[15:17] <slashd> sil2100, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/artful/+source/ebtables/+bug/1645324 patch: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/319813794/artful_lp1645324.debdiff
[15:17] <ubot5> Ubuntu bug 1645324 in ebtables (Ubuntu Artful) "ebtables: Lock file handling has races" [Medium,In progress]
[15:18] <slashd> sil2100, It has been made by a colleague of mine before he goes to paternity leave, it look good on my side but note that upstream project of ebtables is almost dead in favour of nft, and debian upstream doesn't answer to our request to include the patch in debian, I talked to apw, and he said that he didn't see a problem for us to upload it in Ubuntu
[15:18] <slashd> sil2100, so the patch will be in ubuntu only and hopefull debian if they respond to the bug
[15:34] <sil2100> slashd: ok, will dive in in a minute, just need to finish up some tasks while my SRU hat is still on
[15:38] <slashd> sil2100, sure thanks
[15:42] <sil2100> slashd: I'm very liberal in such cases, so as long as it's been submitted to Debian I'm fine with releasing to Ubuntu - sooner or later we'll just get rid of the delta
[15:42] <sil2100> And sometimes it's taking a bit too long
[15:43] <slashd> sil2100, yep it was submitted to Debian via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=860590
[15:43] <ubot5> Debian bug 860590 in ebtables "ebtables: Use real locking in ebtables (LP: #1645324)" [Normal,Open]
[15:44] <sil2100> Yeah, saw that, also saw not much movement, so in my eyes that's even more of a +1 - anyway, looking at the debdiff now
[15:44] <slashd> sil2100, ok
[15:50] <sil2100> slashd: all good, uploading - I just added a Bug-Debian field to the dep-3 header of the patch
[15:51] <slashd> sil2100, ok thanks again, enough request for me today ;)
[15:51] <sil2100> slashd: no worries, I'm here to help ;)
[16:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libzen (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.4.34-1 => 0.4.34-1ubuntu0.17.04.1] (no packageset)
[16:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libzen (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.4.33-3 => 0.4.33-3ubuntu0.16.10.1] (no packageset)
[16:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libzen (xenial-proposed/universe) [0.4.32-1 => 0.4.32-1ubuntu0.16.04.1] (no packageset)
=== NCommander is now known as mcasadevall
[18:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ebtables (trusty-proposed/main) [2.0.10.4-3ubuntu1 => 2.0.10.4-3ubuntu1.14.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[18:36] <slashd> For SRU, I took over a bug from someonelse and I have uploaded a fix for something that has been already uploaded accidentally, could you please, if possible, remove the one uploaded in "2017-04-03" and keep the one I did a few minutes ago ? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/trusty/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=ebtables
[18:41] <slashd> infinity^
[18:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ebtables (zesty-proposed/main) [2.0.10.4-3.5ubuntu1 => 2.0.10.4-3.5ubuntu1.17.04.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-server)
[18:45] <infinity> slashd: I'm sure I can manage that.
[18:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ebtables [source] (trusty-proposed) [2.0.10.4-3ubuntu1.14.04.1]
[18:47] <slashd> infinity, thank you sorry for the inconvenient
[18:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxc (xenial-proposed/main) [2.0.8-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 => 2.0.8-0ubuntu1~16.04.2] (ubuntu-server)
[18:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ebtables (yakkety-proposed/main) [2.0.10.4-3.5ubuntu1 => 2.0.10.4-3.5ubuntu1.16.10.1] (ubuntu-server)
[18:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxc (zesty-proposed/main) [2.0.8-0ubuntu1~17.04.1 => 2.0.8-0ubuntu1~17.04.2] (ubuntu-server)
[18:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxc (yakkety-proposed/main) [2.0.8-0ubuntu1~16.10.1 => 2.0.8-0ubuntu1~16.10.2] (ubuntu-server)
[18:51] <stgraber> those lxc uploads are follow-up to the previous round of SRUs, works around a build failure on ppc64el with older gcc/glibc (not sure which is to blame but it builds fine in artful)
[20:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ebtables (xenial-proposed/main) [2.0.10.4-3.4ubuntu1 => 2.0.10.4-3.4ubuntu2] (ubuntu-server)
[21:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: unittest++ [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.0.0-1~exp2] (no packageset)
[21:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: unittest++ [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.0.0-1~exp2] (no packageset)
[21:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: unittest++ [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.0.0-1~exp2] (no packageset)
[21:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: unittest++ [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.0.0-1~exp2] (no packageset)
[21:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: unittest++ [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.0.0-1~exp2] (no packageset)
[21:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: unittest++ [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.0.0-1~exp2] (no packageset)
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-safe-buffer [amd64] (artful-proposed/none) [5.0.1-2] (no packageset)