/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2017/05/31/#ubuntu-devel.txt

=== NCommander is now known as mcasadevall
=== Hirppa_ is now known as Hirppa
=== tinoco_ is now known as tinoco
=== marlinc_ is now known as marlinc
jamespagexnox: morning09:06
jamespagexnox: quick q for you - which boost version are we going to default for artful?09:07
=== alan_g is now known as alan_g|errand
jamespageif there is an archive-admin around - please could vine be promoted to main (approved under bug 1688091)10:43
ubottubug 1688091 in vine (Ubuntu) "[MIR] vine" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/168809110:43
jamespagethat will help with unblocking the proposed migration of openstack pike1 updates before I start on pike2 this week10:43
ograsince when is this channel +r ? thats quite annoying10:59
=== ogra is now known as ogra_
=== alan_g|errand is now known as alan_g
cjwatsonogra_: spammers ruin things for everyone, probably11:12
ogra_yeah11:13
cjwatsonwe had a *lot* of junk over the last few days11:13
ogra_i noticed and i guess i'll live with +r ... just annoying11:23
mdeslauris there a way to make hexchat wait until after identification before trying to join?11:35
Laneyyou can authenticate during connection11:37
Laneyhttps://freenode.net/kb/answer/hexchat11:37
mdeslaurLaney: oh! cool, thanks11:51
mdeslaurLaney: that worked, thanks11:54
Laneymdeslaur: ♥11:54
=== klebers__ is now known as klebers
juliankOK, so I opened both bug 1694702 and bug 1694697 for tracking the issue slangasek reported yesterday. We can SRU both, but validation might get a bit complicated because the patch for apt also works around the off-by-one problem in python-apt13:06
ubottubug 1694702 in python-apt (Ubuntu) "off-by-one error when translating source records build depends" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/169470213:06
ubottubug 1694697 in apt (Ubuntu) "build-depends keeps OR flag if end of or group is ignored" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/169469713:06
juliankThat is, you'll have to test python-apt without the coming proposed apt, otherwise you don't see the issue at all13:08
mdeslaurcpaelzer: hi! think you could merge strongswan to get the security fixes?13:12
cpaelzermdeslaur: hi did they update Debian - let me check13:32
cpaelzermdeslaur: you don't mean the 5.5.2-1 in experimental but the 5.5.1-4 in unstable right?13:34
mdeslaurright, -4 in unstable has the security fixes13:34
cpaelzeryeah I can look at it mdeslaur13:39
mdeslaurcpaelzer: thanks!13:39
cpaelzernext time when libvirt is compiling an hour ...13:39
Laneysword fight time13:40
cpaelzerLaney: https://xkcd.com/303/ ?13:42
* Laney nod13:43
Laney:)13:43
Laneyinfinity: Stealing the debhelper/exp merge13:47
cpaelzermdeslaur: the cve patches are not the nicest14:10
cpaelzermdeslaur: would this cause you any headache http://paste.ubuntu.com/24726825/ ?14:11
cpaelzerI mean buildpkg is happy, yet I wanted to ask you at least14:11
mdeslaurI don't mind if that's how they are in the debian package14:13
mdeslaurcpaelzer: ^14:13
=== koza is now known as koza|away
bmwrbasak: I just wanted to check on the status of certbot packages16:23
bmwdo you know if Peter submitted the documents you need?16:23
rbasakbmw: o/16:24
rbasakbmw: not that I know about16:24
bmwhmm okay16:24
bmwhe'll be somewhat MIA for the next week or two, but I'll get a hold of him and ask him to do it or write it up myself16:24
rbasakbmw: I've started pushing SRU branches to alioth. So far I've done python-acme for all three stable Ubuntu releases, and the special python-letsencrypt to cover the rename in Xenial.16:24
rbasakbmw: thanks!16:24
bmwis the document from Peter a blocker for pushing the SRU packages live or just necessary for updates in the future?16:27
rbasakGood question.16:32
rbasakIt's not technically a blocker, but it will duplicate work I think - because we'd have to lay out our justifications twice.16:32
bmwah that makes sense16:33
bmwwe'll get it written up to avoid duplicating work16:34
bmwthe other thing from my end is finding someone to build the packages in the future16:34
bmwI've gotten some interest from coworkers, but no commitment yet16:34
bmwI'll keep badgering people and I'm sure we'll find someone to do it16:35
rbasakThanks!16:44
infinityLaney: Given the changelog, I didn't have a lot of confidence in debhelper/experimental...17:25
=== semiosis_ is now known as semiosis
=== Elimin8r is now known as Elimin8er
naccrbasak: hrm, something is wrong with the import of python-acme that you pushed, i think18:08
naccrbasak: i think true for src:gosa as well -- it's like you weren't current to launchpad18:10
=== JanC_ is now known as JanC
naccrbasak: we should sync up on this, as something is funky. your gosa import is really weird. the tags exist, but the branches weren't moved for later versions18:30
naccrbasak: yeah, python-acme is fubar. It would appear you pushed / committed the queue syncs? e.g. https://git.launchpad.net/~racb/ubuntu/+source/python-acme/commit/?id=2de942f7a60d7a04900eedacbf68d8e736fd9b1a18:35
naccbah, nm, that's me looking in the wrong repo!18:35
nacchttps://git.launchpad.net/~usd-import-team/ubuntu/+source/python-acme/commit/?h=debian/experimental&id=cc8febe8e4f44e9d582fed976cace9c1d26c8358 seems odd, though, there's no tag for that version18:36
naccwhich then breaks the patches-applied import18:37
rbasaknacc: got to run, but if it helps, http://paste.ubuntu.com/24729486/ is my gosa tag list in my local tree from the importer run.19:36
jdstrandtyhicks: hey, curious on your thoughts about click-apparmor and apparmor-easyprof-ubuntu in artful21:11
jdstrandtyhicks: they used to be in main and have been demoted to universe this cycle21:11
jdstrandtyhicks: the security team is listed as the maintainers. the only thing keeping them is a recommends from click. my preference would be to remove them or somehow get them off our plate21:12
cjwatsonit may make sense to remove click21:13
jdstrandtyhicks: so removal or move to another owner. motu?21:13
jbichawhy would anyone use click in 18.04?21:15
tyhicksjdstrand: good question - I'd think that click could go away21:15
jdstrandjbicha: precisely. I just don't know if someone is going to do a unity8 flavor or something21:15
jbichais click needed for unity8?21:16
jdstrandaiui, there is an open click store and other projects (free phone?) are using it. but I don't know if they're built from the archive21:16
jdstrandjbicha: not strictly. but that's where the apps are21:16
jdstrandI mean, I'm fine with removing click and click-apparmor. they aren't used in Ubuntu by anything I know of and there is nothing saying that a flavor couldn't bring them back21:17
jbichaI believe unity8 stuff is being removed from Ubuntu, but they could be reintroduced if someone steps up to maintain them21:17
tyhicksthat'd be my preference21:18
tyhicksremove it and then allow anyone else to jump in and restore the package21:18
jdstrandI just know that if it is in the archive, regardless of universe or main, we'll feel obligated to fix issues, but that isn't the best use of our time21:18
tyhicksagreed21:19
jdstrandcjwatson: what are your thoughts on that? ^21:19
cjwatsonI agree21:20
cjwatsonI guess I'd say that it can be removed together with unity8, if and when it is removed21:20
jdstrandthat probably makes the most sense. I'll talk to the desktop team about their plans21:21
jdstrandtyhicks: in the meantime, I'm going to adjust LP to show the upstream projects are not active and break the link from the ubuntu project to the upstream21:23
tyhicksjdstrand: good idea21:23
tyhicksjdstrand: think we should do an upload to update the Maintainer? IMO, that's not needed unless someone else takes over maintenance and/or the package is to remain in the archive for 17.1021:24
jdstrandtyhicks: I could probably do a quick upload. I'll talk to the desktop team and get more details21:25
tyhicksthanks21:27
naccrbasak: ah interesting -- so i was able to import gosa, but the empty directory fix makes `git ubuntu merge` not work -- let's sync up on it tmrw23:02
naccrbasak: also, could you peek at LP: #1693954  -- is /etc/mysql/debian.cnf a generated file normally? I can't tell if it's a configuration issue (apt-file doesn't indicate it's owned by the package)23:15
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1693954 in mysql-5.7 (Ubuntu) "package mysql-server-5.7 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/169395423:15

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!