=== NCommander is now known as mcasadevall | ||
=== Hirppa_ is now known as Hirppa | ||
=== tinoco_ is now known as tinoco | ||
=== marlinc_ is now known as marlinc | ||
jamespage | xnox: morning | 09:06 |
---|---|---|
jamespage | xnox: quick q for you - which boost version are we going to default for artful? | 09:07 |
=== alan_g is now known as alan_g|errand | ||
jamespage | if there is an archive-admin around - please could vine be promoted to main (approved under bug 1688091) | 10:43 |
ubottu | bug 1688091 in vine (Ubuntu) "[MIR] vine" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1688091 | 10:43 |
jamespage | that will help with unblocking the proposed migration of openstack pike1 updates before I start on pike2 this week | 10:43 |
ogra | since when is this channel +r ? thats quite annoying | 10:59 |
=== ogra is now known as ogra_ | ||
=== alan_g|errand is now known as alan_g | ||
cjwatson | ogra_: spammers ruin things for everyone, probably | 11:12 |
ogra_ | yeah | 11:13 |
cjwatson | we had a *lot* of junk over the last few days | 11:13 |
ogra_ | i noticed and i guess i'll live with +r ... just annoying | 11:23 |
mdeslaur | is there a way to make hexchat wait until after identification before trying to join? | 11:35 |
Laney | you can authenticate during connection | 11:37 |
Laney | https://freenode.net/kb/answer/hexchat | 11:37 |
mdeslaur | Laney: oh! cool, thanks | 11:51 |
mdeslaur | Laney: that worked, thanks | 11:54 |
Laney | mdeslaur: ♥ | 11:54 |
=== klebers__ is now known as klebers | ||
juliank | OK, so I opened both bug 1694702 and bug 1694697 for tracking the issue slangasek reported yesterday. We can SRU both, but validation might get a bit complicated because the patch for apt also works around the off-by-one problem in python-apt | 13:06 |
ubottu | bug 1694702 in python-apt (Ubuntu) "off-by-one error when translating source records build depends" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1694702 | 13:06 |
ubottu | bug 1694697 in apt (Ubuntu) "build-depends keeps OR flag if end of or group is ignored" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1694697 | 13:06 |
juliank | That is, you'll have to test python-apt without the coming proposed apt, otherwise you don't see the issue at all | 13:08 |
mdeslaur | cpaelzer: hi! think you could merge strongswan to get the security fixes? | 13:12 |
cpaelzer | mdeslaur: hi did they update Debian - let me check | 13:32 |
cpaelzer | mdeslaur: you don't mean the 5.5.2-1 in experimental but the 5.5.1-4 in unstable right? | 13:34 |
mdeslaur | right, -4 in unstable has the security fixes | 13:34 |
cpaelzer | yeah I can look at it mdeslaur | 13:39 |
mdeslaur | cpaelzer: thanks! | 13:39 |
cpaelzer | next time when libvirt is compiling an hour ... | 13:39 |
Laney | sword fight time | 13:40 |
cpaelzer | Laney: https://xkcd.com/303/ ? | 13:42 |
* Laney nod | 13:43 | |
Laney | :) | 13:43 |
Laney | infinity: Stealing the debhelper/exp merge | 13:47 |
cpaelzer | mdeslaur: the cve patches are not the nicest | 14:10 |
cpaelzer | mdeslaur: would this cause you any headache http://paste.ubuntu.com/24726825/ ? | 14:11 |
cpaelzer | I mean buildpkg is happy, yet I wanted to ask you at least | 14:11 |
mdeslaur | I don't mind if that's how they are in the debian package | 14:13 |
mdeslaur | cpaelzer: ^ | 14:13 |
=== koza is now known as koza|away | ||
bmw | rbasak: I just wanted to check on the status of certbot packages | 16:23 |
bmw | do you know if Peter submitted the documents you need? | 16:23 |
rbasak | bmw: o/ | 16:24 |
rbasak | bmw: not that I know about | 16:24 |
bmw | hmm okay | 16:24 |
bmw | he'll be somewhat MIA for the next week or two, but I'll get a hold of him and ask him to do it or write it up myself | 16:24 |
rbasak | bmw: I've started pushing SRU branches to alioth. So far I've done python-acme for all three stable Ubuntu releases, and the special python-letsencrypt to cover the rename in Xenial. | 16:24 |
rbasak | bmw: thanks! | 16:24 |
bmw | is the document from Peter a blocker for pushing the SRU packages live or just necessary for updates in the future? | 16:27 |
rbasak | Good question. | 16:32 |
rbasak | It's not technically a blocker, but it will duplicate work I think - because we'd have to lay out our justifications twice. | 16:32 |
bmw | ah that makes sense | 16:33 |
bmw | we'll get it written up to avoid duplicating work | 16:34 |
bmw | the other thing from my end is finding someone to build the packages in the future | 16:34 |
bmw | I've gotten some interest from coworkers, but no commitment yet | 16:34 |
bmw | I'll keep badgering people and I'm sure we'll find someone to do it | 16:35 |
rbasak | Thanks! | 16:44 |
infinity | Laney: Given the changelog, I didn't have a lot of confidence in debhelper/experimental... | 17:25 |
=== semiosis_ is now known as semiosis | ||
=== Elimin8r is now known as Elimin8er | ||
nacc | rbasak: hrm, something is wrong with the import of python-acme that you pushed, i think | 18:08 |
nacc | rbasak: i think true for src:gosa as well -- it's like you weren't current to launchpad | 18:10 |
=== JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
nacc | rbasak: we should sync up on this, as something is funky. your gosa import is really weird. the tags exist, but the branches weren't moved for later versions | 18:30 |
nacc | rbasak: yeah, python-acme is fubar. It would appear you pushed / committed the queue syncs? e.g. https://git.launchpad.net/~racb/ubuntu/+source/python-acme/commit/?id=2de942f7a60d7a04900eedacbf68d8e736fd9b1a | 18:35 |
nacc | bah, nm, that's me looking in the wrong repo! | 18:35 |
nacc | https://git.launchpad.net/~usd-import-team/ubuntu/+source/python-acme/commit/?h=debian/experimental&id=cc8febe8e4f44e9d582fed976cace9c1d26c8358 seems odd, though, there's no tag for that version | 18:36 |
nacc | which then breaks the patches-applied import | 18:37 |
rbasak | nacc: got to run, but if it helps, http://paste.ubuntu.com/24729486/ is my gosa tag list in my local tree from the importer run. | 19:36 |
jdstrand | tyhicks: hey, curious on your thoughts about click-apparmor and apparmor-easyprof-ubuntu in artful | 21:11 |
jdstrand | tyhicks: they used to be in main and have been demoted to universe this cycle | 21:11 |
jdstrand | tyhicks: the security team is listed as the maintainers. the only thing keeping them is a recommends from click. my preference would be to remove them or somehow get them off our plate | 21:12 |
cjwatson | it may make sense to remove click | 21:13 |
jdstrand | tyhicks: so removal or move to another owner. motu? | 21:13 |
jbicha | why would anyone use click in 18.04? | 21:15 |
tyhicks | jdstrand: good question - I'd think that click could go away | 21:15 |
jdstrand | jbicha: precisely. I just don't know if someone is going to do a unity8 flavor or something | 21:15 |
jbicha | is click needed for unity8? | 21:16 |
jdstrand | aiui, there is an open click store and other projects (free phone?) are using it. but I don't know if they're built from the archive | 21:16 |
jdstrand | jbicha: not strictly. but that's where the apps are | 21:16 |
jdstrand | I mean, I'm fine with removing click and click-apparmor. they aren't used in Ubuntu by anything I know of and there is nothing saying that a flavor couldn't bring them back | 21:17 |
jbicha | I believe unity8 stuff is being removed from Ubuntu, but they could be reintroduced if someone steps up to maintain them | 21:17 |
tyhicks | that'd be my preference | 21:18 |
tyhicks | remove it and then allow anyone else to jump in and restore the package | 21:18 |
jdstrand | I just know that if it is in the archive, regardless of universe or main, we'll feel obligated to fix issues, but that isn't the best use of our time | 21:18 |
tyhicks | agreed | 21:19 |
jdstrand | cjwatson: what are your thoughts on that? ^ | 21:19 |
cjwatson | I agree | 21:20 |
cjwatson | I guess I'd say that it can be removed together with unity8, if and when it is removed | 21:20 |
jdstrand | that probably makes the most sense. I'll talk to the desktop team about their plans | 21:21 |
jdstrand | tyhicks: in the meantime, I'm going to adjust LP to show the upstream projects are not active and break the link from the ubuntu project to the upstream | 21:23 |
tyhicks | jdstrand: good idea | 21:23 |
tyhicks | jdstrand: think we should do an upload to update the Maintainer? IMO, that's not needed unless someone else takes over maintenance and/or the package is to remain in the archive for 17.10 | 21:24 |
jdstrand | tyhicks: I could probably do a quick upload. I'll talk to the desktop team and get more details | 21:25 |
tyhicks | thanks | 21:27 |
nacc | rbasak: ah interesting -- so i was able to import gosa, but the empty directory fix makes `git ubuntu merge` not work -- let's sync up on it tmrw | 23:02 |
nacc | rbasak: also, could you peek at LP: #1693954 -- is /etc/mysql/debian.cnf a generated file normally? I can't tell if it's a configuration issue (apt-file doesn't indicate it's owned by the package) | 23:15 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1693954 in mysql-5.7 (Ubuntu) "package mysql-server-5.7 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1693954 | 23:15 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!