[10:08] <acheronUK> is there an issue with the ppa publisher? seems to be taking extra long the last day or 2?
[11:42] <cjwatson> acheronUK: There was a large uncoordinated test rebuild performed in a PPA rather than using the usual dedicated arrangements for such things, and the system has been having some trouble keeping up as a result.
[11:50] <acheronUK> cjwatson: that would do it if the effects linger. thanks
[16:23] <CarlFK> not sure who's problem this is... I'll go log an issue if someone will tell me where:
[16:24] <CarlFK> https://paste.ubuntu.com/24738955/  click "Download as text"  https://paste.ubuntu.com/24738955/plain/
[16:24] <CarlFK> "Plain form not available for deep linking."
[16:27] <cjwatson> It has nothing to do with Launchpad.  #canonical-sysadmin or rt@ubuntu.com
[16:32] <CarlFK> thanks - I remember someone in IRC explaining why I needed to log in. and this is irc.. soo... ;)
[16:44] <bdmurray> cjwatson: I just reported bug 1695031 regarding a timeout I'm seeing regularly. I may have mentioned the same timeout yesterday.
[17:04] <cjwatson> ack, thanks
[17:16] <sergio-br2> hi
[17:16] <sergio-br2> how can I specify a commit in the git recipe?
[17:16] <sergio-br2> I want to use a specific commit to build a package
[17:17] <sergio-br2> hey cjwatson
[17:20] <cjwatson> doesn't the documentation cover that?
[17:21] <cjwatson> https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/SourceBuilds/Recipes#Specifying_revisions
[17:22] <sergio-br2> for bzr you use revno:1234 for example, for git I'm not sure what to do
[17:22] <cjwatson> "For git, a revision specifier may be anything that you could pass to git rev-parse in a clone of the given repository."
[17:22] <cjwatson> no need for a revno: prefix or anything
[17:23] <sergio-br2> that's greek for me
[17:23] <cjwatson> man gitrevisions
[17:24] <cjwatson> you can just put a SHA-1 there for instance
[17:24] <sergio-br2> something like
[17:25] <sergio-br2> lp:~libretro/libretro/+git/RetroArch master f14473f
[17:25] <sergio-br2> or the full hash?
[17:25] <cjwatson> drop the "master" there.  you either mean master (which means the tip of the master branch) or you mean a specific commit, not both
[17:25] <sergio-br2> humm
[17:26] <cjwatson> you can truncate the hash if you like
[17:26] <rbasak> Repeatedly getting OOPS-5b689b57381685b4549dbc5f55d66212 for a few minutes trying to file a bug against ubuntu pygit2. Known issue?
[17:26] <rbasak> IllegalTarget: Package pygit2 not published in Ubuntu
[17:26] <cjwatson> it's an ungraceful failure mode, but it's true.  you mean python-pygit2 I think
[17:26] <rbasak> Thanks
[17:27] <cjwatson> I think if you use the JS picker it will present you with the source package name as an option if you search for the binary package name
[17:28] <rbasak> Filed now, thank you.
[17:28] <cjwatson> (this is a slight regression as a result of the work done in http://blog.launchpad.net/beta/beta-test-new-package-picker)
[17:28] <rbasak> Would you like a bug on the ungracefulness?
[17:28] <cjwatson> I think there's one already, but let me check
[17:28] <rbasak> BTW, you might be interested in the bug too - pygit2 giving bad results, resulting in a corrupted import for us: bug 1695049
[17:29] <rbasak> nacc will try to follow up upstream next week.
[17:29] <rbasak> (we're working around for now)
[17:30] <cjwatson> https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/1635118
[17:30] <rbasak> Thanks
[17:32] <cjwatson> I think we normally diff by full commit IDs, but would have to check
[17:40] <sergio-br2> it worked cjwatson, thanks
[17:40] <cjwatson> good
[20:38] <nacc> cjwatson: is LP: #1669712 showing the nominations for series where it has already been opened a bug? If i click on approve/decline and approve it, I get an oops (OOPS-c4f79485d4d8b208eff2688148cdca15)
[21:24] <cjwatson> nacc: that's certainly a bug-worthy head-scratcher
[21:24] <nacc> cjwatson: ok, will file -- against launchpad itself, i assume?
[21:31] <cjwatson> yeah
[21:34] <nacc> cjwatson: done, LP: #1695097
[21:37] <cjwatson> ta