=== chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun [10:08] is there an issue with the ppa publisher? seems to be taking extra long the last day or 2? [11:42] acheronUK: There was a large uncoordinated test rebuild performed in a PPA rather than using the usual dedicated arrangements for such things, and the system has been having some trouble keeping up as a result. [11:50] cjwatson: that would do it if the effects linger. thanks === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk === pbek_ is now known as pbek [16:23] not sure who's problem this is... I'll go log an issue if someone will tell me where: [16:24] https://paste.ubuntu.com/24738955/ click "Download as text" https://paste.ubuntu.com/24738955/plain/ [16:24] "Plain form not available for deep linking." [16:27] It has nothing to do with Launchpad. #canonical-sysadmin or rt@ubuntu.com [16:32] thanks - I remember someone in IRC explaining why I needed to log in. and this is irc.. soo... ;) [16:44] cjwatson: I just reported bug 1695031 regarding a timeout I'm seeing regularly. I may have mentioned the same timeout yesterday. [16:44] bug 1695031 in Launchpad itself "apport retracing service regularly encountering timeouts" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1695031 [17:04] ack, thanks [17:16] hi [17:16] how can I specify a commit in the git recipe? [17:16] I want to use a specific commit to build a package [17:17] hey cjwatson [17:20] doesn't the documentation cover that? [17:21] https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/SourceBuilds/Recipes#Specifying_revisions [17:22] for bzr you use revno:1234 for example, for git I'm not sure what to do [17:22] "For git, a revision specifier may be anything that you could pass to git rev-parse in a clone of the given repository." [17:22] no need for a revno: prefix or anything [17:23] that's greek for me [17:23] man gitrevisions [17:24] you can just put a SHA-1 there for instance [17:24] something like [17:25] lp:~libretro/libretro/+git/RetroArch master f14473f [17:25] or the full hash? [17:25] drop the "master" there. you either mean master (which means the tip of the master branch) or you mean a specific commit, not both [17:25] humm [17:26] you can truncate the hash if you like [17:26] Repeatedly getting OOPS-5b689b57381685b4549dbc5f55d66212 for a few minutes trying to file a bug against ubuntu pygit2. Known issue? [17:26] https://oops.canonical.com/?oopsid=OOPS-5b689b57381685b4549dbc5f55d66212 [17:26] IllegalTarget: Package pygit2 not published in Ubuntu [17:26] it's an ungraceful failure mode, but it's true. you mean python-pygit2 I think [17:26] Thanks [17:27] I think if you use the JS picker it will present you with the source package name as an option if you search for the binary package name [17:28] Filed now, thank you. [17:28] (this is a slight regression as a result of the work done in http://blog.launchpad.net/beta/beta-test-new-package-picker) [17:28] Would you like a bug on the ungracefulness? [17:28] I think there's one already, but let me check [17:28] BTW, you might be interested in the bug too - pygit2 giving bad results, resulting in a corrupted import for us: bug 1695049 [17:28] bug 1695049 in python-pygit2 (Ubuntu) "In some cases pygit2.Repository.diff() returns no difference between trees that are actually different" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1695049 [17:29] nacc will try to follow up upstream next week. [17:29] (we're working around for now) [17:30] https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/1635118 [17:30] Ubuntu bug 1635118 in Launchpad itself "Submitting bug for non-existent distro source package triggers OOPS on submission, should not allow you to start" [Undecided,New] [17:30] Thanks [17:32] I think we normally diff by full commit IDs, but would have to check [17:40] it worked cjwatson, thanks [17:40] good [20:38] cjwatson: is LP: #1669712 showing the nominations for series where it has already been opened a bug? If i click on approve/decline and approve it, I get an oops (OOPS-c4f79485d4d8b208eff2688148cdca15) [20:38] Launchpad bug 1669712 in sssd (Ubuntu) "Newline characters (\n) must be sanitized before LDAP requests take place." [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1669712 [20:38] https://oops.canonical.com/?oopsid=OOPS-c4f79485d4d8b208eff2688148cdca15 [21:24] nacc: that's certainly a bug-worthy head-scratcher [21:24] cjwatson: ok, will file -- against launchpad itself, i assume? [21:31] yeah [21:34] cjwatson: done, LP: #1695097 [21:34] Launchpad bug 1695097 in Launchpad itself "LP: #1669712 shows nomination for series already nominated for" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1695097 [21:37] ta