[09:36] <Mirv> Mirv: hi! I started with dropping the Ubuntu (touch) specific changes in the ubuntu branches of Qt in Debian's git, but other than that it's up to the community to package it (of which I may or may not be part of depending on if I have time). Debian is working on it. Qt 5.8 was skippped altogether since upstream dropped support for it early.
[09:37] <Mirv> mardy: ^ that was to you of course :)
[09:38] <Mirv> there's a volunteer from Kubuntu people (oh well, who's from where originally, it doesn't matter) helping Debian with the 5.9
[09:38] <mardy> Mirv: cool!
[09:42] <Mirv> the big thing will be merging it to Ubuntu and getting everything to build against it or drop. there are still AFAIK more Qt using packages in Ubuntu than in Debian.
[09:43] <Mirv> the migration to release pocket might hold a surprise or a hundred, also thanks to the gles twin packages that should be dropped at the same time
[09:44] <Mirv> s/Qt using packages/Qt private ABI using packages/ (requiring rebuild)
[09:46] <Mirv> mardy: re: ubports, I thought they used xenial with stable-phone-overlay, which has Qt 5.6 LTS at least
[09:47] <Mirv> as my last paid feat I landed also Qt Quick Controls 2 backport (from 5.7) made to work with Qt 5.6's qtbase/qtdeclarative in there
[09:47] <Mirv> granted, if not planning to ship actual end-user products then it does not make too much sense to stick to even LTS release of Qt. it's only once it's tried to stabilize things that one needs to select a version.
[09:48] <Mirv> Qt Quick Controls 2 was supposed to gain Ubuntu theme (UITK2) and a couple of new features, that'd been the future of UX building. even though a version of it is in overlay PPA it's still just 5.7, and eg some of our Ubuntu changes were contributed to QQC2 5.9
[11:17] <jbicha> mardy: Oxide is being removed from 17.10 which means that Unity's Online Accounts panel will stop working
[11:18] <jbicha> do you have any objections about removing UOA completely from 17.10?
[11:42] <mardy> jbicha: oh, sorry, forgot to reply to your e-mail
[11:42] <mardy> jbicha: no objections; will be packages still be available in the universe?
[11:46] <cjwatson> not much point keeping something in universe if it doesn't work
[11:51] <jbicha> mardy: oxide will not be in Ubuntu at all (not universe) and we're talking about removing UOA completely too
[11:52] <mardy> jbicha: no objections if you mean removing unity-control-center-signon, but signon-ui can work without oxide, and is still used by KDE
[11:53] <jbicha> what does KDE use signon-ui for?
[11:56] <jbicha> without u-c-c-signon, I think it makes sense to drop UOA support from evolution-data-server too
[12:00] <mardy> jbicha: KDE has its own online account integration, using signon-ui
[12:01] <mardy> jbicha: about UOA+eds I don't know, whether it's used by KDE or others
[12:05] <jbicha> it seems very unlikely for Kubuntu to care about e-d-s
[14:59] <jbicha> !dmb-ping
[14:59] <jbicha> meeting today?
[15:01] <cyphermox> technically, there is, but a lot of us are at a sprint and maybe not available. it's kind of early
[15:17] <mwhudson> morning
[19:32] <sergiusens> slangasek: hey, mind looking at https://bileto.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/2790 for me?
[19:52] <luis30> anyone know if there is going to be a kernel update for ubuntu 17.04 today?
[22:13] <slangasek> sergiusens: https://bileto.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/2790 what are you wanting me to look at?  Are you asking for me to click 'publish'?
[22:21] <sergiusens> slangasek: my first time using bileto... I think I need someone to do that... I wouldn't particularly ask you aside from the fact that you are familiar with what this solves
[22:21] <sergiusens> so, yes, long sentence to say, can you click publish?
[22:21] <sergiusens> if that indeed is the next step in this process
[22:21] <sergiusens> actually, you are probably one of the few still familiar with bileto too :-P
[22:24] <slangasek> sergiusens: sil2100 is also familiar with it :)
[22:25] <sergiusens> ah, good
[22:34] <sil2100> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bileto <- this is always the first place when in doubt
[22:35] <sil2100> But yeah, feel free to poke me as well
[22:39] <sergiusens> sil2100: well I just need that ticket I mention above in :-)
[22:39] <sergiusens> as in someone to click on "publish"
[22:40]  * sil2100 looks
[22:41] <sil2100> Ok, looks goodish, let me do the buttonz
[22:44] <luis30> where is this kernel update that was supposed to happen today? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1691146
[22:46] <sergiusens> sil2100: goodish, I'll tell Colin you said that :-P
[22:46] <sergiusens> thanks btw
[22:48] <luis30> is this the dev channel?
[22:48] <wxl> luis30: as the topic says, yep.
[22:49] <luis30> great know anything about that bug i posted or any kernel update today particularly for ubuntu 17.04
[22:49] <wxl> i know nothing about a bug that you posted.
[22:49] <wxl> a bug number would be helpful.
[22:49] <luis30> i just posted the link
[22:49] <luis30> it goes right to the page
[22:50] <wxl> ah didn't notice
[22:50] <luis30> its fine
[22:50] <nacc> luis30: it's in zesty-proposed and artful right now (it seems)
[22:50] <luis30> seth had a project release date of today but that was not set in stone..
[22:50] <nacc> luis30: are you asking why it's not in zesty release yet?
[22:50] <luis30> yes it was scheduled for today assuming no major issues
[22:51] <nacc> luis30: might be better to ask in #ubuntu-kernel
[22:51] <luis30> good idea