[00:04] time for coffee, lunch, then tasks [01:09] thumper: you around? [01:09] yeah [01:09] thumper: can you join me and eric in a team standup ho? [01:10] yeah [01:12] wallyworld thumper: so I can merge my storage stuff into develop now, yeah? [01:12] axw: yep [01:12] sweet [01:47] :-( [01:47] I just tried 'juju login jaas' [01:48] that bit worked, but then... [01:48] $ juju models [01:48] ERROR cannot list models: unable to connect to API: x509: cannot validate certificate for 162.213.33.28 because it doesn't contain any IP SANs [01:53] how come this hasn't been tested before? [01:53] FFS [01:57] thumper: Are you possibly using an IP address for a JAAS endpoint when others are using a DNS name? [01:57] babbageclunk: I just did 'juju login jaas' using the latest rc [01:57] I expect it should DTRT [01:58] thumper: Ah, ok - no specific setup for the jaas controller then. [01:58] no [01:59] thumper: are you up to date on develop? that was suppoed to be fixed by roger's latest PR [02:01] yes [02:01] perhaps his latest PR didn't land? [02:01] oh... [02:01] maybe I didn't merge [02:01] * thumper checks [02:01] no, I'm behind [02:02] * thumper updates and tries again [02:04] hah, works now [02:04] thank god [02:04] well, than rog [02:04] what's more, I have my first jaas model running [02:04] a canonical k8s model [02:06] thumper: woot! [02:07] rick_h: I'm doing a meetup this afternoon [02:07] thumper: nice, I got a talk accepted at pyohio [02:07] thumper: so will be fun to plug some stuff [02:10] cool [02:17] babbageclunk: i made some suggested tweaks to the first pr, you ok for me to land? [02:18] wallyworld: forgot to ask, did I miss anything in standup/yesterday? [02:18] axw: nah, same old, same old [02:18] all about the release [02:18] wallyworld: cool. any news on the 2.1 hot fix? [02:19] wallyworld: yup yup [02:19] tyvm for the review [02:21] wallyworld: by the way, sorry not to roundtrip back to you about your review comments on https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/7441 - wanted to get it landed. Maybe have a look to see if the changes are what you meant? [02:21] sure, looking [02:21] babbageclunk: too late now anyway, i trusted whomever gave it a +1 :=) [02:26] wallyworld: yeah, I figured that would be ok in the circumstances. [02:27] babbageclunk: we just have to hope people don't run out of disk space wen upgrading [02:27] wallyworld: yeah, true. [02:28] wallyworld: maybe we should reinstate the deletion - thumper, I know you were looking at performance when running the upgrade step, were you also looking at disk usage? [02:33] babbageclunk: ideally we'd run some tests on a system with the 4GB logs and see how much disk space is gobbled up during the upgrade [02:39] babbageclunk: yes I was looking at disk usage [02:41] thumper: and the delete-as-we-go version didn't really help with that? Maybe we need to do something like compact the old collection as we go to get Mongo to release the space? [02:48] babbageclunk: not sure what speed impact that has [02:48] thumper: hmm, true - probably not good. [02:59] * babbageclunk goes for a run === thumper is now known as thumper-afk === thumper-afk is now known as thumper [05:24] wallyworld burton-aus: the 2.2.0 bump was made to develop, shouldn't that be on the 2.2 branch...? [05:25] axw: oh shit [05:25] yes [05:25] i'll fix develop [05:25] wallyworld, axw: ugh good catch, sorry that wasn't reflected in the release process doc. [05:25] wallyworld: ok, thanks. just making sure I didn't send my changes in too early :) [05:25] veebers: cool cool [05:25] nah, i didn't notice the merge target [05:26] wallyworld: does burton-aus need to re-do the pr? [05:26] yup [05:29] sweet he's on it [05:29] axw: this should fix develop https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/7453/ [05:29] wallyworld: thanks, LGTM [05:30] and merged [16:52] heyo juju dev, is there a way for me to "pick" which interface the unit will use for bootstrapping the controller? I'm having a jim dandy time trying to figure out why maas is reporting the management interface only during the bootstrap of the controller phase. the unit has 2 nic's available, both are online, one is addressable one is not, and it never seems to return that addressable interface. [22:02] externalreality: still in a call,running late [22:17] thumper, wallyworld: created a PR against 2.2 for the TestPruneLogsBySize failure - should it have been against develop? https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/7458 [22:24] babbageclunk: sorry, in call, but yeah, develop for now [22:27] wallyworld: ok, I created it against 2.2 because it was in the 2.2.1 release blockers category [22:27] babbageclunk: that works too [22:27] better actually === mup_ is now known as mup [22:41] sweet [22:44] Anyone not in that call who wants to do a trivial review for me? https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/7458 [23:24] babbageclunk: gh seems to be uphappy this evening. :-/ i can’t see the diff [23:24] babbageclunk: instead i’m getting angry unicorns [23:24] hml: oh yeah - wow! [23:25] that's pretty annoying [23:25] hml: congratulations on the three months by the way! [23:25] babbageclunk: ty! [23:26] https://status.github.com/ [23:26] oops [23:27] That's going to make a lot of things more difficult. [23:30] hml: for reference, here it is as an old school patch: http://paste.ubuntu.com/24797094/ [23:31] * hml looking [23:34] babbageclunk: any idea why 5000 was chosen originally? [23:35] hml: That's the threshold in the pruning code - it doesn't try to prune unless there are more than 5000 rows in the collection. [23:36] hml: but obviously it wasn't a good choice in the test, because sometimes it'll end up with slightly more than 5000, getting pruned down to just under 5000. [23:37] babbageclunk: that’s what I was just thinking…. the threshold doesn’t mean you can’t have less. [23:39] babbageclunk: i’d approve if i could get to the correct page to do so [23:39] hml: Thanks! [23:40] hml: Ooh, the status just changed, and I can get to the PR now - try again? [23:48] hml? [23:49] babbageclunk: done [23:49] hml: yaythanks [23:50] hmm, not sure whether I'll be allowed to merge it though, since it's on the 2.2 branch. [23:50] babbageclunk, thank you for https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/7458 [23:51] babbageclunk, i was just about to tell you about it. It's needed on develop too [23:51] balloons: cool - I'll forward-port it now. Held up by the github outage! [23:52] externalreality: re bug 1696242, yes it is by design [23:52] Bug #1696242: `juju debug log --help` shows both flags "--tail" and "--no-tail" as having a default value of `false`. [23:53] balloons: Am I right that there's no mergebot watching 2.2? So I'll need to hassle someone to merge it? [23:54] thumper, :-D [23:54] externalreality: I'm leaving detailed comment [23:54] perhaps we should update the help [23:54] babbageclunk, yes. And veebers can help land it [23:55] babbageclunk: aye, Just need to figure out the parameters to fire the job off with [23:57] babbageclunk: was the one you need to land fix-prune-test