[15:31] <manjo> smb, ping.. there were a couple of iommu related patches that I had submitted for SRU (two separate patch series) .. I think I have satisfied the regression testing requests also.. could you guys please review those? 
[15:32] <manjo> smb, these are on the critical path for cert .. and feature requests that came from multiple vendors
[15:38] <smb> manjo, maybe (I don't want to make promises as there were many things and little time)
[15:39] <manjo> smb, 1680549	[Zesty] QDF2400 ARM64 server - NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#8 stuck for 22s!
[15:39] <manjo> smb 1688158	[SRU][Zesty] Support SMMU passthrough using the default domain
[15:39] <manjo> smb, the 1st one is critical for the QDF2400 platfrom to function correctly without softlockups 
[15:40] <manjo> smb, and the 2nd one is feature that both QDF2400 and thunder-x platform is requesting 
[15:42] <manjo> smb, and I have a couple more in the pipe line that are cert blockers for QDF2400 that I will submit shortly 
[15:42] <smb> manjo, I know exactly which ones you are asking about. And both were in a sense risky as they pull in very recent changes which also touch the generic or x86 parts of iommu. And I had not yet time to look back there
[15:42] <manjo> smb, sure.. just putting it in your ear .. so that it does not fall thro the cracks
[15:44] <manjo> smb, and I agree the 2nd one has more risks than the 1st one.. I have done testing and posted test results to the bug reports in comments
[15:47] <smb> manjo, ack, we will give it some consideration. As said, I just don't want to make any promises for things we cannot guarantee
[15:47] <manjo> smb, ok I get that.. thanks for looking into those