[00:35] <gQuigs> ty
[02:36] <mz_> which package include "bzr import-package" command?
[06:41] <cjwatson> mz_: Do you possibly mean "bzr import-dsc", which is in bzr-builddeb?
[06:50] <mz_> cjwaston: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DistributedDevelopment/Specification , describe that "The bulk of the import code already exists in the bzr builddeb plugin". But the package "bzr-builddeb" not include the comand of bzr import-package
[06:52] <cjwatson> mz_: Well, that project is abandoned, so I can't help if it doesn't quite follow the spec.
[06:53] <cjwatson> Maybe that bit of the design was never implemented, or implemented in a slightly different shape.  I don't remember.
[06:53] <cjwatson> But that is a software design document, not user documentation for something existing.
[06:57] <mz_> the Phase1 , packages can't be imported to lauchpad?
[07:01] <cjwatson> The import was run for a while, but has now been abandoned.  There are too many problems with it and bzr is not sufficiently maintained to fix them.
[07:01] <cjwatson> The Ubuntu server team is working on a replacement process using git.
[07:02] <cjwatson> Unless you happen to have a spare multi-person bzr maintenance team lying around, I would not advise trying to revive the bzr import project.
[07:12] <mz_> But how to importing Ubuntu packages in to Bazaar?  Is there any specification for that?
[07:18] <cjwatson> I've said everything I can say.
[07:21] <cjwatson> The abandoned project is in lp:udd (which come to think of it does seem to have something called import-package).
[07:21] <cjwatson> But if you try to use it you will be entirely on your own.  Expect fatal bugs and no support.
[07:26] <mz_> Ok, I understand, thanks for your help.
[17:46] <sil2100> Hey! A quick question: is this still a thing? LP: #254901 - just checking if anyone knows instantly ;)
[17:46] <mup> Bug #254901: appending tags to bug.tags is not supported properly on lp_save() <oem-services> <launchpadlib :Triaged> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/254901>
[17:55] <sil2100> Ok, I see it's still the case, nvm ;)
[19:30] <xnox> wgrant, i want to be able for a private bug in a private project, to have a second status with a remote bug tracker.
[19:30] <xnox> as far as i can tell, that's not possible.
[19:31] <xnox> is it at all possible to create private remote bug trackers and add "affects remote bug tracker" on private bugs in private projects?
[22:49] <wgrant> xnox: No, a private project can't have bugs that affect other projects.
[22:50] <wgrant> xnox: The owner of the other project would then have a bug in their project that they couldn't see because it would reveal the existence of the private project.