| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| pietroalbini | hi! is there a way to get authenticated read-only access with the launchpad api? | 13:48 |
|---|---|---|
| pietroalbini | I'm building a script for the italian loco to automatically generate the email aliases configuration file, but not all the addresses are available publicly | 13:49 |
| pietroalbini | and I'm not comfortable sticking my personal credentials in a script :) | 13:50 |
| cjwatson | pietroalbini: when you authorise an oauth token you can give it read-only access | 14:19 |
| cjwatson | pietroalbini: still has to be your personal credentials to some extent though, just a somewhat limited version of those. we don't have very good limited cred support yet | 14:20 |
| pietroalbini | cjwatson, thanks! I'll see if it's more convenient to generate a token or create a dummy launchpad account just for this | 14:21 |
| pietroalbini | cjwatson, is there a way to generate a personal access token from the launchpad UI as other services allows? | 14:22 |
| cjwatson | pietroalbini: no, you need to either get launchpadlib to do it or use the mechanism documented in https://help.launchpad.net/API/SigningRequests | 14:23 |
| pietroalbini | cjwatson, thanks, I'll read that page :) | 14:24 |
| acheronuk | LP having issues? ppa uploads and acceptance emails have been very slow to appear | 17:51 |
| emoraes25 | Greetings dear friends! Please, I need help uploading my package to PPA. | 17:59 |
| emoraes25 | I did a packing only that my tarball contained a mistake that I made during the packaging. I needed to update it with the correct upstream tarball, but I would not like to generate a new version number. | 18:01 |
| emoraes25 | How can I do it? | 18:03 |
| acheronuk | you can't upload a new tarball with different contents of the same version as already existed in the ppa | 18:03 |
| acheronuk | either bump the version, or make a new ppa | 18:04 |
| emoraes25 | The problem is that I am packaging the same version for Debian, and from what I understand, Ubuntu takes to its repositories the new packages of the Debian repositories. I do not like this version of PPA appears as newer than the version that is in Debian. Would there be a way for me to version in Ubuntu so that it looks like the package version was less than the version that will arrive in Debian? | 18:10 |
| acheronuk | make a new ppa. then you can put whatever version you like in it | 18:11 |
| emoraes25 | For example. The upstream version is 9.0. My package in Debian is 9.0-1. How could I make my PPA not 9.0-2, for example? | 18:11 |
| emoraes25 | Can I delete the current ppa and create a new one with the same name as the previous one? | 18:12 |
| acheronuk | the -1 or -2 is a debian revision, not a source version | 18:13 |
| emoraes25 | I know, but the source version did not change, I accidentally edited a source package file when I went to package. | 18:14 |
| cjwatson | you can entirely delete and recreate the archive if you don't need anything old in it, yes | 18:14 |
| cjwatson | you should probably look at versioning styles that use the ~ syntax though (see Debian policy) | 18:15 |
| emoraes25 | Truth! I actually saw something about it, but I did not quite understand how it works. I will take a look. Thank you! | 18:16 |
| emoraes25 | Thank you all! | 18:18 |
| acheronuk | emoraes25: at the moment you'll be luck to get any ppa builds uploaded. seems to be borked | 18:19 |
| cjwatson | OK that's not actually super-helpful to tell people unless you know the problem | 18:19 |
| cjwatson | acheronuk: Things seem to be running OK at the moment. If you have a problem then you need to give specifics (archive/package names) | 18:20 |
| acheronuk | cjwatson: sorry. | 18:21 |
| acheronuk | cjwatson: ppa:rikmills/staging3 Uploading kalarm_17.04.2-0ubuntu1~ubuntu17.10~ppa10.dsc: done. | 18:22 |
| cjwatson | 2017-06-08 17:58:14 DEBUG Rejected: | 18:23 |
| cjwatson | 2017-06-08 17:58:14 DEBUG Unable to find kalarm_17.04.2.orig.tar.xz in upload or distribution. | 18:23 |
| cjwatson | the system sent you a rejection email | 18:23 |
| acheronuk | no email here! | 18:23 |
| cjwatson | (seven minutes after you initially asked, admittedly) | 18:23 |
| acheronuk | though as said, emails have been off the last day or so. had a few come nearly 24hrs after the package upload! | 18:24 |
| cjwatson | I think that must be a problem somewhere in the email delivery pipeline, rather than in LP. Received headers are a good tool for investigating this kind of thing | 18:25 |
| acheronuk | grr. I see the issue in that. gbp-ppa is assuming already uploaded source when it is not | 18:25 |
| cjwatson | ah, not in fact seven minutes after you initially asked; I think your initial question was in fact about a slightly different version, since I see an earlier rejection of 4:17.04.1-0ubuntu1~ubuntu17.10~ppa10, eight minutes before you asked here | 18:26 |
| acheronuk | cjwatson: thanks. next time I get a very latest one I'll check. at them moment I don't recall the excact previous ones to check | 18:27 |
| acheronuk | yes, I did another upload to correct my version | 18:28 |
| cjwatson | right, I just wanted to make sure that there really was no unexplained delay here. | 18:28 |
| acheronuk | and a rejection email comes through \o/ | 18:28 |
| acheronuk | that's fine. it's just when packages appear to disappear into nothingness that it gets a tad annoying. | 18:29 |
| acheronuk | thanks :) | 18:29 |
| acheronuk | BTW, the rejection email I got was for the 2nd one. still not got the 1st | 18:33 |
| acheronuk | something somewhere is not behaving well, LP or elsewhere | 18:33 |
| cjwatson | please check Received headers; they will show the timestamps when the mail was received by various hosts along the way, of which there can easily be quite a lot | 18:34 |
| cjwatson | I cannot see that information. Only you can. | 18:34 |
| cjwatson | a random recent email sent to me by LP got to the first non-Canonical email host in the chain within ten seconds of being sent, so I don't think there's a general enormous queue or anything | 18:35 |
| acheronuk | my headers appear to show that mail did not get received by google from canonical server for about 30 mins | 18:46 |
| acheronuk | though my reading of the headers could be suspect :P | 18:47 |
| === JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
| === santa is now known as Guest22192 | ||
| === cpaelzer_ is now known as cpaelzer | ||
| === lan3y is now known as Laney | ||
| gsilvapt | Could someone tell me where I can find information on how to do a proper merge request in launchpad using git? | 23:54 |
| wxl | gsilvapt: the merge request process is all handled within the LP UI | 23:55 |
| wxl | i.e. you would commit/push to git, then load up the appropriate branch in the UI, at which point it will present things | 23:56 |
| clivejo | wxl: where do you push to? | 23:56 |
| clivejo | I guess you add a remote? | 23:56 |
| wxl | yep | 23:56 |
| gsilvapt | yes, but in terms of branches and all that. I cloned the source code and then where should I push the changes? Should I create a branch under my user? | 23:56 |
| clivejo | the repo is https://code.launchpad.net/~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/+git/ksnakeduel | 23:56 |
| clivejo | kubuntu_unstable branch | 23:56 |
| wxl | ah yes | 23:56 |
| wxl | push to a branch under your use | 23:57 |
| gsilvapt | Okay. Makes sense. Do I need specific names to create a branch under my user or not at all? | 23:57 |
| gsilvapt | Of course, non-sense not included here | 23:57 |
| wgrant | gsilvapt: ssh://USERNAME@git.launchpad.net/~USERNAME/kubuntu-packaging/+git/ksnakeduel probably makes sense. | 23:58 |
| clivejo | do you add a remote as git+ssh://git.launchpad.net/~gsilvapt/kubuntu-packaging/+git/ksnakeduel ? | 23:58 |
| wxl | ssh+git:// | 23:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!