| xnox | Logan, we are discussing it right now. There is a list of questions we have and how we gonna do it. | 00:09 |
|---|---|---|
| Unit193 | That might be surprising since openssh, bind9, and apache2 don't support it as-is. | 00:10 |
| xnox | there are dependencies and security considerations | 00:11 |
| xnox | also ruby2.4 | 00:11 |
| Unit193 | Right, didn't mention that one. Ruby 2.5 supports, but I'm presuming that's why do ko was asking #debian-ruby. | 00:13 |
| Unit193 | (Err, fixed in 2.4, they're skipping directly to .5) | 00:13 |
| xnox | yes | 00:15 |
| === JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
| Unit193 | mapreri: Danke. | 07:33 |
| === koza|away is now known as koza | ||
| === CRogers_________ is now known as cRogers | ||
| === cRogers is now known as CRogers | ||
| === ogra is now known as ogra_ | ||
| mdeslaur | Unit193: do you want me to upload your irssi merge to artful? | 11:48 |
| Laney | Odd_Bloke: hey, is there any chance of arm64/artful cloud images (in SS bos01)? | 13:43 |
| elopio | stgraber: hey, the failure on the snapcraft autopkgtest that's blocking your lxd SRU was a problem with the launchpad proxy | 14:44 |
| elopio | a re-run should help. | 14:45 |
| === koza is now known as koza|away | ||
| stgraber | elopio: ok, cool, thanks | 15:10 |
| abeato | infinity, hey. there has been no response yet for the patch submitted to debian for lp: #1692494 , which should be the curse of action? Should I ping anybody about this? | 15:17 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1692494 in klibc (Ubuntu) "klibc does not support reboot arguments" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1692494 | 15:17 |
| mdeslaur | Unit193: I uploaded your irssi merge, hope you don't mind | 15:20 |
| mwhudson | nacc: let's go with "no" | 15:49 |
| mwhudson | nacc: wait what? | 15:50 |
| mwhudson | nacc: distribute fleet as a snap kthxbye ? | 15:50 |
| Odd_Bloke | Laney: We're building them; I think you'd have to bug IS to get them synced in. | 16:04 |
| nacc | mwhudson: yeah, that might be a fine response :) | 16:07 |
| mapreri | Unit193: anytime (for syncs I react right after I see the mails, don't really have time to go hunt more complex sponsorships these days, but if you need please poke me) | 16:36 |
| elopio | tjaalton: hello. Can you help us putting snapcraft 2.31 in xenial, yakkety and zesty -proposed? | 17:00 |
| elopio | slangasek: Sergio is asking why click was not dput-ed. Are we missing something there? | 17:04 |
| slangasek | elopio: we are sprinting this week so hitting time constraints. I will try to make time today | 17:04 |
| elopio | slangasek: ok, it would be nice if we can spend | 17:05 |
| elopio | the weekend testing. | 17:05 |
| elopio | but I understand. Please ping me if I can help with something. | 17:05 |
| Skuggen | elopio: Does it have snapcraft-specific users!? :P | 17:09 |
| elopio | Skuggen: sorry, I don't understand. | 17:10 |
| Skuggen | We are a bit blocked from making "proper" MySQL snaps because we can't change file ownership and drop process privileges | 17:11 |
| elopio | Skuggen: yes, I know :( That's still on discussion in the forum. | 17:12 |
| elopio | Skuggen: https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/snappy-and-users-and-groups/331 | 17:15 |
| === zyga_ is now known as zyga-fedora | ||
| Skuggen | elopio: Right, primarily #1619888 | 17:40 |
| mwhudson | nacc: did you look at celery yet? | 18:49 |
| nacc | mwhudson: i'm working on it now, but about to travel home | 18:49 |
| mwhudson | nacc: cool | 18:50 |
| mwhudson | nacc: where are you guys? | 18:50 |
| nacc | mwhudson: it needs several updated deps too (billiar, sphinx-celery) | 18:50 |
| nacc | *billiard | 18:50 |
| mwhudson | nacc: hooray | 18:50 |
| nacc | mwhudson: so i'm having to iterate a bit :) | 18:50 |
| mwhudson | nacc: want help? (i'm travelling today to though so....) | 18:50 |
| mwhudson | *too | 18:50 |
| nacc | mwhudson: i'm happy to churn on this for a bit -- if i don't make much progress on monday, i'll ping you -- if that's ok by you schedule wise? | 18:52 |
| mwhudson | nacc: sure | 18:52 |
| hallyn | huh, chan is locked down now? | 19:12 |
| hallyn | bug 1697043 - is there a known bug in debconf right now? | 19:13 |
| ubottu | bug 1697043 in lxcfs (Ubuntu) "package libpam-cgfs 2.0.7-0ubuntu1~16.10.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 128" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1697043 | 19:13 |
| Unit193 | mdeslaur: No that's quite alright, thanks very much! | 20:27 |
| Unit193 | mapreri: And thanks, will do. What do you feel about ruby? | 20:35 |
| tdaitx | pitti, regarding adding the pid to apport reports, I forgot to ask if the way I proposed is good enough... I wonder if it would be better to do that from somewhere else? for example, add_proc_info seems to set it from other means (os.getpid) but I'm not sure we need to cover those other code paths | 22:05 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!