[00:09] <xnox> Logan, we are discussing it right now. There is a list of questions we have and how we gonna do it.
[00:10] <Unit193> That might be surprising since openssh, bind9, and apache2 don't support it as-is.
[00:11] <xnox> there are dependencies and security considerations
[00:11] <xnox> also ruby2.4
[00:13] <Unit193> Right, didn't mention that one.  Ruby 2.5 supports, but I'm presuming that's why do ko was asking #debian-ruby.
[00:13] <Unit193> (Err, fixed in 2.4, they're skipping directly to .5)
[00:15] <xnox> yes
[07:33] <Unit193> mapreri: Danke.
[11:48] <mdeslaur> Unit193: do you want me to upload your irssi merge to artful?
[13:43] <Laney> Odd_Bloke: hey, is there any chance of arm64/artful cloud images (in SS bos01)?
[14:44] <elopio> stgraber: hey, the failure on the snapcraft autopkgtest that's blocking your lxd SRU was a problem with the launchpad proxy
[14:45] <elopio> a re-run should help.
[15:10] <stgraber> elopio: ok, cool, thanks
[15:17] <abeato> infinity, hey. there has been no response yet for the patch submitted to debian for lp: #1692494 , which should be the curse of action? Should I ping anybody about this?
[15:20] <mdeslaur> Unit193: I uploaded your irssi merge, hope you don't mind
[15:49] <mwhudson> nacc: let's go with "no"
[15:50] <mwhudson> nacc: wait what?
[15:50] <mwhudson> nacc: distribute fleet as a snap kthxbye ?
[16:04] <Odd_Bloke> Laney: We're building them; I think you'd have to bug IS to get them synced in.
[16:07] <nacc> mwhudson: yeah, that might be a fine response :)
[16:36] <mapreri> Unit193: anytime (for syncs I react right after I see the mails, don't really have time to go hunt more complex sponsorships these days, but if you need please poke me)
[17:00] <elopio> tjaalton: hello. Can you help us putting snapcraft 2.31 in xenial, yakkety and zesty -proposed?
[17:04] <elopio> slangasek: Sergio is asking why click was not dput-ed. Are we missing something there?
[17:04] <slangasek> elopio: we are sprinting this week so hitting time constraints.  I will try to make time today
[17:05] <elopio> slangasek: ok, it would be nice if we can spend
[17:05] <elopio> the weekend testing.
[17:05] <elopio> but I understand. Please ping me if I can help with something.
[17:09] <Skuggen> elopio: Does it have snapcraft-specific users!? :P
[17:10] <elopio> Skuggen: sorry, I don't understand.
[17:11] <Skuggen> We are a bit blocked from making "proper" MySQL snaps because we can't change file ownership and drop process privileges
[17:12] <elopio> Skuggen: yes, I know :( That's still on discussion in the forum.
[17:15] <elopio> Skuggen: https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/snappy-and-users-and-groups/331
[17:40] <Skuggen> elopio: Right, primarily #1619888
[18:49] <mwhudson> nacc: did you look at celery yet?
[18:49] <nacc> mwhudson: i'm working on it now, but about to travel home
[18:50] <mwhudson> nacc: cool
[18:50] <mwhudson> nacc: where are you guys?
[18:50] <nacc> mwhudson: it needs several updated deps too (billiar, sphinx-celery)
[18:50] <nacc> *billiard
[18:50] <mwhudson> nacc: hooray
[18:50] <nacc> mwhudson: so i'm having to iterate a bit :)
[18:50] <mwhudson> nacc: want help? (i'm travelling today to though so....)
[18:50] <mwhudson> *too
[18:52] <nacc> mwhudson: i'm happy to churn on this for a bit -- if i don't make much progress on monday, i'll ping you -- if that's ok by you schedule wise?
[18:52] <mwhudson> nacc: sure
[19:12] <hallyn> huh, chan is locked down now?
[19:13] <hallyn> bug 1697043 - is there a known bug in debconf right now?
[20:27] <Unit193> mdeslaur: No that's quite alright, thanks very much!
[20:35] <Unit193> mapreri: And thanks, will do.  What do you feel about ruby?
[22:05] <tdaitx> pitti, regarding adding the pid to apport reports, I forgot to ask if the way I proposed is good enough... I wonder if it would be better to do that from somewhere else? for example, add_proc_info seems to set it from other means (os.getpid) but I'm not sure we need to cover those other code paths