| mup | PR snapd#3416 closed: tests: fix for test interfaces-openvswitch <Created by sergiocazzolato> <Closed by sergiocazzolato> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/3416> | 01:54 |
|---|---|---|
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| === JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| mup | PR snapd#3468 opened: debian: add missing Type=notify in 14.04 packaging <Created by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/3468> | 07:02 |
| mup | PR snapd#3458 closed: tests: check that locale-control is not present on core <Created by fgimenez> <Merged by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/3458> | 07:09 |
| === koza|away is now known as koza | ||
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| mup | PR snapd#3454 closed: spread: add fedora snap bin dir to global PATH <Created by morphis> <Merged by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/3454> | 07:24 |
| morphis | mvo: thanks! | 07:25 |
| mup | PR snapd#3452 closed: tests/main: check for confinement in a few more interface tests <Created by morphis> <Merged by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/3452> | 07:25 |
| mup | PR snapd#3451 closed: tests/main: use dir abstraction in a few more test cases <Created by morphis> <Merged by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/3451> | 07:26 |
| zyga | good morning | 07:27 |
| mup | PR snapd#3443 closed: Unity7 interface grows gtk2/3 settings and user's specific ini <Created by didrocks> <Merged by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/3443> | 07:28 |
| mvo | fgimenez: if you de-conflict 3391 I am happy to merge it | 07:30 |
| mvo | morphis: my pleasure, thanks for working on this! | 07:30 |
| fgimenez | mvo: sure thx! on it | 07:31 |
| morphis | mvo: np, more to come :-) | 07:31 |
| mup | PR snapd#3405 closed: tests: fix for upgrade test when it is repeated <Created by sergiocazzolato> <Merged by zyga> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/3405> | 07:31 |
| mvo | morphis: 3222 has a conflict and test failures (probably unrelated) - could you merge master and de-conflict, hopefully this can go in then :) | 07:31 |
| mvo | fgimenez: no rush :) | 07:31 |
| morphis | mvo: yeah will start working on these PRs in a bit | 07:34 |
| mvo | morphis: ta | 07:37 |
| fgimenez | mvo: snapd#3391 is ready thx :) btw when you have some time (not urgent) it would be great to create these test snaps under the shared account in prod: https://code.launchpad.net/~snappy-dev/+snap/test-snapd-system-observe-consumer https://code.launchpad.net/~snappy-dev/+snap/test-snapd-autopilot-consumer https://code.launchpad.net/~snappy-dev/+snap/test-snapd-upower-observe-provider | 07:39 |
| mup | PR snapd#3391: tests: reboot after upgrading to snapd on the -proposed pocket <Created by fgimenez> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/3391> | 07:39 |
| pachulo | I'm working on a MuseScore snap: https://github.com/pachulo/musescore-snap and trying to get the MuseScore devs to make it "official": any tips on doing it? | 08:54 |
| ogra | pachulo, dont they have some "how to contribute" doc on their website ? i'd try to follow it (make a PR on github etc) | 09:00 |
| pachulo | I've already did something like this: https://github.com/musescore/MuseScore/pull/3204 | 09:02 |
| mup | PR musescore/MuseScore#3204: Add snap package <Created by pachulo> <https://github.com/musescore/MuseScore/pull/3204> | 09:02 |
| ogra | well, then wait for answer :) | 09:03 |
| pachulo | should I recommend them to use https://build.snapcraft.io/ to create the snaps? | 09:07 |
| pachulo | ogra: | 09:07 |
| ogra | well, thats up to them but yes, show them the possible ways of making use of your code :) | 09:08 |
| pachulo | does it makes sense to have different snapcraft.yaml for the different channels all in the master branch of the project? | 09:14 |
| zyga | pachulo: I would kepe them in separate branches, not sure what the actual difference between those is though | 09:15 |
| * Chipaca ~> coffee | 09:16 | |
| mup | PR snapd#3465 closed: hooks: re-org of some hooks types <Created by stolowski> <Closed by stolowski> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/3465> | 09:26 |
| morphis | Pharaoh_Atem: `zypper si -d` doesn't help for local srpm's, it only works with packages listed in the archive | 09:45 |
| abeato | ogra, hi, do you know how can I force generation of core file on program crash, in UC16? | 09:51 |
| ogra | abeato, you should be able to do the same stuff apport does i think | 09:52 |
| ogra | (iirc it pokes around in sysfs to make file dumps happen) | 09:52 |
| abeato | ogra, ok, will check, thanks | 09:52 |
| abeato | mvo, is 2.27 already in candidate? or latest changes (including androidboot) are only in edge? | 10:00 |
| mvo | abeato: only in edge, we have no pushed 2.26 out, some small issue in specific revert cases still | 10:04 |
| abeato | mvo, got it, thanks | 10:05 |
| pedronis | mvo: fgimenez: hi, have we found out more about those revert problems? is still related to profiles or something else? | 10:23 |
| fgimenez | hi pedronis, the core-revert test now shows the problem with the changes at snapd#3466, this is syslog of the testbed after the failure http://paste.ubuntu.com/24815993/ looks like the problem is related to "hsearch_r failed for NETLINK_KOBJECT_UEVENT: No such process" after the revert | 10:26 |
| mup | PR snapd#3466: tests: extend core-revert test to cover bluez issues <Created by fgimenez> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/3466> | 10:26 |
| pedronis | ok, profiles, thanks | 10:26 |
| pachulo | is it possible to upload a snap for different archs in the webui of the store? | 10:50 |
| daker | pachulo: i think yes, the store will automatically detect the arch | 10:53 |
| pachulo | but if I want to upload the snap for x86 & for amd64? | 10:54 |
| ogra | then the store simply generates a revision per arch ... it check the meta/snap.yaml inside your snap | 10:58 |
| pachulo | ah, ok, different revisions per arch | 11:00 |
| pachulo | that makes sense | 11:00 |
| pachulo | and how do you make the snap availabe in the stable channel? In the webui I can only pusblish to "beta" and/or "edge" | 11:01 |
| ogra | id your snap confinement: strict and grade: stable ? | 11:04 |
| ogra | s/id/is/ | 11:05 |
| ogra | only stable snaps with strict confinement can go into stable | 11:05 |
| pachulo | ok | 11:06 |
| pachulo | thanks for the info ogra ! | 11:07 |
| ogra | np :) | 11:07 |
| niemeyer | Mornings | 11:20 |
| mup | PR snapd#3469 opened: many: add "release.BuildStamp" to identify the current build <Created by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/3469> | 11:24 |
| Chipaca | oops, i done goofed | 11:36 |
| * Chipaca fixes | 11:36 | |
| fgimenez | mvo: ogra we are still getting errors with the new kernel snaps published to beta due to missing /dev/ram* https://travis-ci.org/snapcore/spread-cron/builds/241982348 should we change the tests to stop using them? the related bug recently expired bug #1677622 | 12:02 |
| mup | Bug #1677622: missing ramdisks in latest amd64 kernel snap <kernel-da-key> <linux (Ubuntu):Expired> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1677622> | 12:02 |
| ogra | fgimenez, well, that seems to be a userspace tool issue if i read ppisati's comment correctly | 12:06 |
| ogra | you could just run mknod before mkfs | 12:07 |
| fgimenez | thanks ogra, i'll try that with beta's kernel | 12:09 |
| ogra | fgimenez, i also think it might be realted to https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/3010 | 12:10 |
| mup | PR snapd#3010: snap: skip /dev/ram from auto-import assertions to make it less noisy <Created by mvo5> <Merged by pedronis> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/3010> | 12:10 |
| ogra | (i suspect the mount attemmpt makes the kernel actually create the device (just y theory though)) | 12:11 |
| ogra | s/y/a/ | 12:11 |
| fgimenez | ogra: not sure, we noticed the problem before snapd#3010 was proposed, the first errors are from 2017-03-15 https://travis-ci.org/snapcore/spread-cron/builds/211518618#L668 | 12:14 |
| mup | PR snapd#3010: snap: skip /dev/ram from auto-import assertions to make it less noisy <Created by mvo5> <Merged by pedronis> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/3010> | 12:14 |
| ogra | hmm, k | 12:14 |
| ogra | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/2.23.1 landed on 2017-03-14 | 12:18 |
| ogra | quite some changes in there | 12:18 |
| ogra | and https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/4.4.0-67.88 went into beta on the 15th | 12:19 |
| ogra | also not a small changeset | 12:19 |
| mup | PR snapd#3470 opened: interfaces/builtin: sync connected slot and permanent slot snippet <Created by morphis> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/3470> | 12:59 |
| mup | PR snapd#3471 opened: snap: make `snap run` look at the system-key for security profiles <Created by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/3471> | 13:30 |
| fgimenez | mvo: i didn't receive yet the test snaps emails, should i have them already? | 13:54 |
| mvo | fgimenez: you should, let me double check | 13:56 |
| fgimenez | mvo: thx! | 13:56 |
| mvo | fgimenez: probably primary email vs not primary sso email again, sorry for that | 13:57 |
| fgimenez | mvo: np :) already received, thank you! | 13:58 |
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| jdstrand | noise][: hey, fyi, https://dashboard.snapcraft.io/dev/snaps/7807/rev/1/ says 'manifest not available' | 14:03 |
| noise][ | jdstrand: you are getting an err on the page? | 14:04 |
| jdstrand | noise][: https://dashboard.snapcraft.io/dev/snaps/7809/ too | 14:05 |
| jdstrand | noise][: sorry, if I go to Overview, then review capabilities | 14:05 |
| jdstrand | Manifest (snap.yaml) | 14:05 |
| jdstrand | manifest not available | 14:05 |
| noise][ | ah, i see | 14:05 |
| noise][ | weird - can you file a bug on https://bugs.launchpad.net/snapstore and i'll get someone to take a look ASAP | 14:06 |
| jdstrand | sure | 14:06 |
| jdstrand | noise][: https://bugs.launchpad.net/snapstore/+bug/1697459 | 14:09 |
| mup | Bug #1697459: Manifest (snap.yaml): manifest not available <Snap Store:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1697459> | 14:09 |
| * zyga lunch and small break | 14:10 | |
| zyga | re | 14:26 |
| morphis | zyga, mvo, Pharaoh_Atem: https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/3449 is ready for another review and merge :-) | 14:56 |
| mup | PR snapd#3449: tests/lib: generalize RPM build support <Created by morphis> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/3449> | 14:56 |
| Pharaoh_Atem | morphis: why are you not using `dnf builddep` or `zypper si`? | 14:58 |
| morphis | Pharaoh_Atem: as zypper si doesn't work | 15:06 |
| morphis | it works only for packages coming from the archive | 15:06 |
| morphis | and with that I couldn't find a good abstraction and left the comming thing in I had before | 15:06 |
| Pharaoh_Atem | you gave it the full path of the RPM, not just the rpm name? | 15:06 |
| morphis | correct | 15:06 |
| morphis | it complains about not being able to find that package | 15:07 |
| Pharaoh_Atem | wow, that's... dumb | 15:07 |
| morphis | giving it just a name works fine | 15:07 |
| morphis | if you find a better way on suse I am all ears but want to get this in as I have a lot more on my plate at the moment | 15:08 |
| Pharaoh_Atem | can you pull all the deps into an array, ignore the ones that are rpmlib() ones, and then just pass that as an arg to zypper install / dnf install? | 15:08 |
| Pharaoh_Atem | because the way you're doing it now is really slow | 15:09 |
| mvo | jdstrand: it looks like we need to revert http://paste.ubuntu.com/24841683/ this is using new symbols and things break on revert- this is 17389627 - it looks dangerous though. what is your opinion here? instead of reverting we could hold a stable release back until the seccomp-bpf branch is finished and lands. | 15:10 |
| mup | PR snapd#3463 closed: client, daemon: expose service commands (start, stop, etc) <Created by chipaca> <Closed by chipaca> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/3463> | 15:15 |
| morphis | Pharaoh_Atem: that is what I am doing right now | 15:17 |
| Pharaoh_Atem | ah, I see where you're passing the array | 15:17 |
| Pharaoh_Atem | I missed that | 15:18 |
| morphis | :-) | 15:18 |
| Pharaoh_Atem | then the only piece left is that spurious --nocheck on rpmbuild -bs | 15:19 |
| morphis | let me drop that | 15:20 |
| morphis | actually why doesn't rpm complain if it is there and not used? | 15:20 |
| morphis | Pharaoh_Atem: done | 15:21 |
| jdstrand | mvo: which stable would we hold back? | 15:26 |
| mvo | jdstrand: 2.25 is currently in candidate but never progressed to stable because when 2.24.1 -> 2.25 -> 2.24.1 reverts happen some snaps (like network-manager) fail to start because of seccomp symbols | 15:28 |
| mvo | jdstrand: and we found during testing that the above commit is also problematic | 15:29 |
| jdstrand | that whole PR has a bunch of new symbols | 15:29 |
| jdstrand | I've started looking at the bpf PR | 15:30 |
| jdstrand | I don't know what kind of timeframe you are looking for at this point | 15:30 |
| jdstrand | I'd be inclined to wait for the bpf at this point | 15:31 |
| jdstrand | mvo: ^ | 15:34 |
| mvo | jdstrand: ok, that is something to discuss I think, I can't make this decision alone, but I have the same feeling, it feels like whack-a-mole currently and the risk is that we break things. seccomp-bpf I can pick-up again and its pretty safe | 15:37 |
| mvo | jdstrand: but I definitely want your input if all things I do there are sound :) | 15:37 |
| jdstrand | mvo: I will be looking at the PR in depth | 15:38 |
| jdstrand | mvo: note I already commented on it regarding missing tests | 15:39 |
| mvo | jdstrand: tests about the >= etc syntax? those should be ported in a different way, let me look for the link | 15:39 |
| jdstrand | mvo: so all the reverts are making me uneasy because there is risk in getting the revert wrong and getting the unrevert wrong in the future | 15:40 |
| mvo | jdstrand: https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/3431/files#diff-be7cfe1e5aff69d70d80b1c2cabcaaccR148 is the testing, it uses a bpf.VM and gives it the same inputs as the kernel would give it. is your concern that you want sometimg more integration-ish? or am I missing someting in those tests that I overlooked? | 15:41 |
| mup | PR snapd#3431: interfaces: simplify snap-confine by just loading pre-generated bpf code <Created by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/3431> | 15:41 |
| jdstrand | mvo: the tests I commented on were cmd/snap-confine/tests. the will definitely need to be ported in a different way, but the PR doesn't show them | 15:41 |
| mvo | jdstrand: yeah, I agree, I don't feel good about those reverts either. | 15:41 |
| jdstrand | mvo: I suspect that the porting will be done in two ways: syntax checks in TestCompile and functional tests to spread | 15:43 |
| mvo | jdstrand: aha, I see, something more integration test-ish then, I make that a priority in my morning. it should be unit tested now but you are right, integration type tests in this style are missing | 15:43 |
| jdstrand | mvo: where the spread tests will consist of rewriting the seccomp filter | 15:44 |
| * mvo nods | 15:44 | |
| jdstrand | mvo: it's more than just integration though. there are a ton of syntax tests. eg test_restrictions_working_args_socket | 15:44 |
| jdstrand | they won't be hard to port or anything, just saying more is needed in TestCompile | 15:45 |
| jdstrand | in addition to integration/spread tests | 15:45 |
| mvo | jdstrand: thank you, indeed, I will work on it in my morning. it looks straightfoward to port to TestCompile fortunately | 15:47 |
| jdstrand | mvo: yes. there are relatively few things that need to go to spread otoh | 15:48 |
| jdstrand | mvo: thanks for taking care of that | 15:49 |
| mvo | jdstrand: yeah, thanks a lot for your feedback | 15:49 |
| jdstrand | np | 15:49 |
| jdstrand | more will be coming :) | 15:49 |
| mvo | jdstrand: thank you. I updated the forum thread on the 2.25 issue, feel free to jump in and add your opinion | 15:59 |
| jdstrand | ok | 16:00 |
| mup | Bug #1697492 opened: systemd fails to run /lib/systemd/system-sleep/wpasupplicant script when wpa-supplicant is installed <Snappy:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1697492> | 16:12 |
| ogra | abeato, urgh ... we have a wpa-supplicant snap ? | 16:13 |
| abeato | ogra, we do... was needed for some wowlan stuff in caracalla | 16:14 |
| ogra | abeato, i doubt that can work, given that we have a wpa-supplicant in the core snap too | 16:14 |
| ogra | unless you block that or make it unexecutable somehow | 16:15 |
| abeato | ogra, it does, mostly, see https://github.com/snapcore/core-build/blob/master/config/lib/systemd/system/wpa_supplicant.service.d/snap.conf , that is how the one in core is blocked | 16:16 |
| ogra | ah, i remember landing that, yeah | 16:16 |
| ogra | but that only blocks execution, you still have all the files and scripts in the rootfs | 16:17 |
| ogra | thats a really tricky bug | 16:17 |
| ogra | we cant just hack the default script | 16:17 |
| abeato | yeah, it is quite ugly thing | 16:17 |
| abeato | I agree... | 16:18 |
| abeato | I'm not sure how this could be solved, maybe the path should have been to add patches to wpa-s in xenial instead | 16:18 |
| ogra | well, if you think that coulld solve the need for a snap ... xenial is there, SRUs are always possible :) | 16:20 |
| abeato | sure... I'll think about that and leave the bug there open for the moment | 16:22 |
| ogra | abeato, hmm, i wonder what happens if you ship a /writable/system-data/lib/systemd/system-sleep/wpasupplicant in your gadget snap | 16:23 |
| ogra | (if that gets copied into place etc) | 16:23 |
| ogra | might be possible to override the default file from the gadget that way | 16:23 |
| abeato | ogra, good idea, will give that a try | 16:23 |
| ogra | i know we allow copying a bunch of things ... mot sure if /lib is included in that though ... (the ubuntu-image source might know :) ) | 16:24 |
| mup | PR snapd#3472 opened: interfaces, tests: add mising dbus abstraction to system-observe and extend spread test <Created by fgimenez> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/3472> | 16:33 |
| cachio_ | Chipaca, are you working in a store related change? is it something that could be addressed https://travis-ci.org/snapcore/snapd/builds/241920749#L2050 ? | 17:22 |
| mup | PR snapd#3473 opened: tests: fix create-key by generating entropy in case the current it is not enough <Created by sergiocazzolato> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/3473> | 17:29 |
| === cachio_ is now known as cachio_afk | ||
| niemeyer | mvo: Still here? | 18:13 |
| bdmurray | Is this an issue with the kubelet snap or snappy itself? https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/19272ebc18709d4407dba0438a536d56bb143069 | 18:25 |
| ogra | bdmurray, https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/test-failures-with-cannot-create-lock-directory-run-snapd-lock/390 | 18:26 |
| niemeyer | cachio_afk: Some feedback on 3437 | 18:26 |
| mup | PR snapd#3437 closed: tests: apt autoclean <Created by sergiocazzolato> <Closed by niemeyer> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/3437> | 18:26 |
| bdmurray | ogra: ah, thanks | 18:30 |
| ogra | ogra@bbb:~$ sudo classic | 18:33 |
| ogra | cannot open cookie file /var/lib/snapd/cookie/snap.classic | 18:33 |
| ogra | hmm, whats that ? that wasnt there yesterday, since todays core refresh i seem to get it everywherre | 18:34 |
| ogra | (i end up just fine in the classic shell after the message) | 18:34 |
| niemeyer | morphis: snapd#3222 is good to go assuming one trivial tweak mentioned there | 18:54 |
| mup | PR snapd#3222: many: fix test cases to work with different DistroLibExecDir <Created by morphis> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/3222> | 18:54 |
| mup | PR snapd#3461 closed: debian: add missing "make -C data/systemd clean" <Created by mvo5> <Merged by niemeyer> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/3461> | 18:58 |
| morphis | niemeyer: thanks, will fix that tomorrow! | 19:37 |
| niemeyer | morphis: Thank you! Glad to see that one in | 19:37 |
| morphis | niemeyer: lets see how friendly travis is tomorrow to me :-) | 19:42 |
| niemeyer | morphis: I've heard things have been improving much there | 19:43 |
| morphis | niemeyer: yeah they did :-) | 19:53 |
| === elfgoh_ is now known as elfgoh | ||
| === blr_ is now known as blr | ||
| === cachio_afk is now known as cachio | ||
| ssbash | hi everyone! | 21:38 |
| cachio | niemeyer, please when you have a minute could you take a look to the PR 3473? | 21:43 |
| niemeyer | cachio: Will do | 21:50 |
| cachio | tc | 21:50 |
| cachio | tx | 21:50 |
| ssbash | Does anyone know how to fix python path issues? I'm experiencing the same problems from this post https://askubuntu.com/questions/906199/how-to-setup-pythonpath-for-a-snap-package | 21:59 |
| ssbash | Basically my python package is in the site packages directory, but I am getting the error that my command cannot find my package | 22:00 |
| ssbash | cachio do you have any experience dealing with python path issues? | 22:44 |
| nacc | ssbash: so the wrapper script doesn't set PYTHONPATH at all (should be viewable from the shell session, i think) | 22:48 |
| ssbash | i checked the shell session, this is what it returns https://paste.ubuntu.com/24844778/ | 22:50 |
| cachio | ssbash, let me see | 22:51 |
| ssbash | here is the error message http://paste.ubuntu.com/24844781/ | 22:52 |
| ssbash | also here is the snapcraft.yaml http://paste.ubuntu.com/24844790/ | 22:53 |
| nacc | ssbash: so i think the issue is site-packages vs. dist-packages, but i'm not sure why | 22:54 |
| ssbash | env PYTHONPATH variable seems to be correct as I have specificed in the .yaml file. However my python script is still not picking up on the package. | 22:54 |
| ssbash | ok, how could I move the install location of my package to a dist-package? | 22:55 |
| nacc | ssbash: it's strange, i think the python plugin should be handling that for you | 22:55 |
| ssbash | It's automatically moved to site-packages, since I use setup.py to build | 22:55 |
| nacc | ssbash: i wonder if the python2.7 site.py needs to be udpated | 22:56 |
| cachio | ssbash, what do you have in the requirements.txt? | 22:56 |
| nacc | ssbash: again, not something you should have to do, either way | 22:56 |
| ssbash | I'm not sure what you mean by the python 2.7 site.py? I've specified the python plugin that this is a pyhton 3.5 project. Also here is my requirements.txt http://paste.ubuntu.com/24844809/ | 22:58 |
| cachio | ssbash, did you try creating a wrapper and setting up the pythonpath on there? | 23:02 |
| ssbash | like a virtualenv? I'm confused what you mean by wrapper | 23:03 |
| cachio | ssbash, I mean a bash script able to call the python module | 23:06 |
| cachio | ssbash, let me take a look to the lib to see why it is givving that error | 23:06 |
| nacc | or try to do that form the shell itself (spin up the interpreter from your snap shell) | 23:07 |
| nacc | ssbash: i just was thinking through how site-packages works normally | 23:07 |
| ssbash | cachio: this is the command wrapper that snapcraft created. #!/bin/sh export PATH="$SNAP/usr/sbin:$SNAP/usr/bin:$SNAP/sbin:$SNAP/bin:$PATH" export LD_LIBRARY_PATH="$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:$SNAP/lib:$SNAP/usr/lib:$SNAP/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu:$SNAP/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu" export LD_LIBRARY_PATH="$SNAP/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH" export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$SNAP_LIBRARY_PATH:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH exec "$SNAP/usr/bin/python3" "$SNAP/bin/wr | 23:10 |
| ssbash | whoops http://paste.ubuntu.com/24844868/ | 23:11 |
| ssbash | I dont see any mention of the python path in the wrapper | 23:11 |
| cachio | ssbash, no | 23:13 |
| cachio | ssbash, did you check the project was correctly downloaded¡? | 23:13 |
| cachio | ssbash, I am talking about wraticus | 23:14 |
| ssbash | oh, yes I've check that the entire package and sub packages have been downloaded in site-packages. | 23:14 |
| cachio | ssbash, what I have done with good results is to create a wrapper script where I setup all the veriables that I need and also I make the call the to command | 23:17 |
| cachio | let me check for an example | 23:17 |
| cachio | ssbash, there is some doc on https://snapcraft.io/docs/build-snaps/metadata | 23:19 |
| cachio | section Using wrappers | 23:19 |
| cachio | ssbash, does it work for you? | 23:20 |
| ssbash | I'm still a bit confused. how could I specific the python path in the wrapper without hard coding a path? | 23:21 |
| cachio | you can do, export PYTHONPATH=PYTHONPATH:blablabbla | 23:23 |
| ssbash | PYTHONPATH: $PYTHONPATH:$SNAP/lib/python3.5/site-packages would that be work?\ | 23:23 |
| cachio | and then exec "$SNAP/usr/bin/python3" "$SNAP/bin/wraticus.py" "$@" | 23:23 |
| ssbash | ok and then point the command to this new wrapper executable | 23:24 |
| cachio | yes | 23:24 |
| ssbash | ok ill give it a try | 23:24 |
| ssbash | cachio I added the wrapper command. python still isnt able to find wraticus. | 23:47 |
| cachio | ssbash, can you share the wrapper? | 23:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!