[06:58] <symbolzhao> help,how can i install irc-server on ubuntu16.04
[07:41] <lordievader> Good morning
[08:58] <cpaelzer> rbasak: are you around so you could kick a import of ntp so that it picks up 1:4.2.8p10+dfsg-4 ?
[08:59] <gheorghe_> drab: what are you using kickstart/preseed for?
[08:59] <gheorghe_> i mean, there are lots of other options out there
[09:33] <cpaelzer> rbasak: I filed a bug about various broken history in ntp bug 1699079
[09:33] <cpaelzer> rbasak: if anything of that comes up on the re-import you might add that there
[09:33] <cpaelzer> rbasak: e.g. if the push would cause conflicts
[10:18] <c4f> o/
[10:22] <c4f> I've got a problem with AJAX requests [401] on Ubuntu apache2, everything is on Symfony and jquery ajax request + JWT auth and bearer. This is really odd, because everything works as charm on Windows xampp, but on Linux not. Someone something? I suppose its problem with rights or apache config. Idk really what is it and moreover backend guy too. Everything with auth is ok, url ok, i've jwt token which
[10:22] <c4f> is need to make request by ajax. Help guys :)
[10:26] <c4f> Its look like a problem with auth, but everything looks OK. GET requests works good.
[10:39] <gheorghe_> c4f: do you get any errors in /var/log/apache/error.log? i hope i got the file name right
[10:40] <c4f> gheorghe_: hmm.. I think not, but Ill check again, wait please ;)
[10:41] <gheorghe_> c4f: you can follow the error file with "tail -f" and retry the token request, to see if any error appears
[10:42] <gheorghe_> c4f: the fille location is /var/log/apache2/error.log
[10:43] <c4f> gheorghe_: yeeaa, ok, i got it :) w8 ive got to turn on appache server and etc.
[10:44] <c4f> gheorghe_: and.. nothing.. 401, to confirm that, symfony toolbar shows info about that. P.S Sorry for my english, I know its suck :)
[10:46] <c4f> gheorghe_: Log is clear, not any warrning, errors, fails and etc.
[10:46] <c4f> gheorghe_: https://pastebin.com/m5H6jCsi with tail -f
[10:47] <c4f> gheorghe_: making requests, a lot of requests
[10:53] <gheorghe_> you placed symphony in /var/www/html?
[10:53] <gheorghe_> if you did, did you also change the user that owns the files?
[10:58] <c4f> gheorghe_: ofc i have in /var/www/html
[10:59] <c4f> gheorghe_: I use commands from ubuntu apache page to recursive changing owner and group for this files
[11:00] <c4f> gheorghe_: but hmm.. on the first symfony throw me up some notices [errors] about unwriteable cache folder, but i change it. Can you give me some confirmed commands for that?
[11:03] <gheorghe_> if you are using ubuntu-server? if yes, the user should be www-data
[11:04] <gheorghe_> try with chown -r www-data:www-data /path/to/cache/folder
[11:05] <gheorghe_> also check if the owner has write rights
[11:05] <c4f> hmm cache wroks well, everything works well, but request put, post, delete not.
[11:06] <gheorghe_> is delete not blocked by symphony acl?
[11:06] <c4f> I changed rights and owner for cache immediately as symfony threw me up this error
[11:06] <c4f> gheorghe_: No. :) It isnt.
[11:07] <c4f> gheorghe_: Every requests works well on Windows XAMPP, immediately after installing the project [if all is clean]
[11:08] <c4f> gheorghe_: Im confused.
[11:09] <c4f> gheorghe_: ive got an idea. I check not on localhost but on 127.0.0.1 I know is equivalent but maybe, who knows.
[11:13] <c4f> gheorghe_: tail -f on access.log file show notices about 402 error - payment required?! [what?! We don't use that now], but I think it isnt important. Now I start symfony server, maybe with that will work
[11:20] <c4f> gheorghe_: Ouu ;( On symfony server, took me notice about rights for /var/session/etc..
[11:21] <c4f> gheorghe_: Could you give commands to change rights to /var/www/html
[11:21] <c4f> ?
[11:23] <c4f> gheorghe_: oo f*ck im angry about that. I think i need to makes rights from the begin on main html folder and inner. Help me please :D
[11:36] <c4f> gheorghe_: Hurraay! It works :D I remove /var/sessions and cache folder, made rights from begin with ubuntu page and i open symfony server aaaanddd its works! :D
[11:36] <c4f> gheorghe_: but know idk what helped :)
[11:43] <c4f> gheorghe_: yeaa, that was symfony server. And works well :)
[11:51] <c4f> gheorghe_: Thank you so much for you time and involve in solving my problem:)
[11:52] <c4f> gheorghe_: Ive got it go :) 2pm end of job time ;)
[11:52] <c4f> gheorghe_: thanks again and bye! :D
[11:53] <RoyK^_> keep in mind that if www-data has write access to its own files, as in scripts, php etc, things can get rather nasty if a security bug appears
[11:54] <gheorghe_> c4f: to change rights for /var/www/html, use chown
[11:54] <gheorghe_> c4f: sorry for being afk, i had something to do
[11:58] <RoyK^_> (s)he left
[12:04] <ahasenack> rbasak: hi, good morning/afternoon, I have a question
[12:04] <ahasenack> about https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sssd/+bug/1689387
[12:05] <rbasak> ahasenack: o/
[12:05] <ahasenack> rbasak: \o
[12:05] <cpaelzer> also reading that bug :-)
[12:06] <ahasenack> rbasak: I think that guy put the apparmor profile in enforcing mode. That's not how we ship it in X as far as I can tell
[12:06] <ahasenack> if that's the case, it's still a bug, but then I don't think it's "high"
[12:07] <rbasak> ahasenack: agreed, though we should still prioritise it as an active contributor
[12:07] <rbasak> (so still server-next IMHO)
[12:07] <ahasenack> no doubt about that
[12:08] <ahasenack> I found other missing configs in that profile once I enabled it in enforcing mode
[12:09] <ahasenack> I'm grabbing sssd bugs now
[12:09] <cpaelzer> It also is high because it essentially would be a update-regression of 1566508
[12:09] <cpaelzer> one that would have set it to enforce and had it working would fail after this bug update as I ready the case
[12:09] <ahasenack> one thing to check is if it switched between enforcing and complaining in this update
[12:10] <cpaelzer> it did not
[12:10] <ahasenack> ok
[12:13] <ahasenack> cpaelzer: about opevpn, I'm thinking
[12:13] <ahasenack> cpaelzer: not all bug fixes lead to an sru
[12:13] <ahasenack> cpaelzer: so I'm inclined to track the sru as separate work
[12:14] <ahasenack> even though it's the same bug number
[12:14] <ahasenack> but I'm not sure
[12:14] <gheorghe_> RoyK^_ i like talking alone ^^
[12:14] <ahasenack> I dislike cards going "backwards"
[12:19] <cpaelzer> ahasenack: yeah I'm totally fine with that
[12:19] <ahasenack> ok, let's experiment
[12:19] <cpaelzer> ahasenack: I handle most that would go back + span more than a week with multiple cards
[12:19] <cpaelzer> ahasenack: yet give the card in done a matching title
[12:19] <cpaelzer> ahasenack: like "artful"
[12:19] <ahasenack> right
[12:19] <cpaelzer> ahasenack: and the new one a "SRU"
[12:19] <ahasenack> move the label too
[12:19] <cpaelzer> ahasenack: that way tracking and reports do not seem too silly
[12:19] <cpaelzer> ack
[12:20] <cpaelzer> rbasak: could you accept the trusty task of 1593907 for me?
[12:21] <cpaelzer> it seems my upload permissions do only cover bug tasks >=xenial for some packages
[12:22] <cpaelzer> Oh I see in this case ubuntu-server-dev upload permissions got only added >= xenial
[12:22] <cpaelzer> that is why I can't ack the trusty task
[12:22] <cpaelzer> that will also stop me from the upload then, good to check that in advance
[12:35] <rbasak> cpaelzer: done.
[12:35] <cpaelzer> thanks rbasak, if you or nacc later find some time to check and sponsor the trusty upload that would be nice
[12:36] <cpaelzer> as outlined before the teams upload permission only is >=xenial
[12:36] <cpaelzer> nacc in case you are, that is bug 1593907
[12:50] <ahasenack> cpaelzer: new samba dep8 tests running, yay
[12:50] <ahasenack> cpaelzer: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/artful/update_excuses.html search for 2:4.5.8+dfsg-2ubuntu2
[12:55] <cpaelzer> ahasenack: yeah I see them, also the skip due to lacking machine level isolation on s390 worke
[12:56] <ahasenack> cpaelzer: what do we have in s390, just lxd?
[12:56] <cpaelzer> ahasenack: my usual search on -excuses is "packagename (" that way you always find the actual upload and no other reverese deps
[12:56] <cpaelzer> ahasenack: yeah only containers, on armhf as well IIRC
[12:56] <ahasenack> I started like that, but there are still some tests on 2ubuntu1, the previous upload
[12:56] <ahasenack> cpaelzer: ok, then we only lose one test, the cifs one
[12:56] <cpaelzer> ahasenack: s390 scalingstack is on the way to become reality, but that it is for quite a while
[12:57] <cpaelzer> ahasenack: exactly that is what I wanted to check
[12:57] <cpaelzer> looking good
[12:57] <ahasenack> nice
[13:15] <ahasenack> rbasak: could you import openvpn-auth-ldap please?
[13:17] <rbasak> ack
[13:18] <ahasenack> thx
[13:18] <rbasak> Running. It'll take a while I think.
[13:19] <ahasenack> ok
[13:19] <ahasenack> is the import "atomic"?
[13:19] <ahasenack> i.e., once I can git ubuntu clone it, it's done? Or will I get bits and pieces?
[13:22] <cpaelzer> ahasenack: you can clone now and git fetch later
[13:22] <cpaelzer> to get the latest bits
[13:23] <cpaelzer> ahasenack: so if you have something that you can prep now and rebase to the new import alter you are good
[13:23] <cpaelzer> ahasenack: or is that not yet importet at all?
[13:23] <ahasenack> it didn't exist at all
[13:24] <cpaelzer> ahasenack: you can set up a loop that clones and once it worked once wait a bit and then fetch
[13:25] <cpaelzer> ahasenack: not sure if the push the importer does will lock you in an atomic way
[13:25] <cpaelzer> but poll until some clone is there + fetch should be good
[13:31] <ahasenack> rbasak: can you accept my nominations in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvpn-auth-ldap/+bug/1602813 please?
[13:33] <rbasak> ahasenack: done. Also, if you hadn't noticed, the import finished.
[13:33] <ahasenack> great²
[13:33] <ahasenack> just in time :)
[13:34] <ahasenack> 1,2M	openvpn-auth-ldap/
[13:34] <ahasenack> there weren't many releases
[14:49] <drab> gheorghe_: just using preseed, no kickstart, that's why I was asking. to install all my servers and desktops, what else could be done with it?
[14:49] <drab> all the basic provisioning of baremetal and kvm is done with preseed, then ansible to finish it off
[14:57] <gheorghe_> drab: AFAIK, MAAS can do a good job at that
[15:35] <EmilienM> jamespage, coreycb : when do you plan to update openstack packages to m2 in pike?
[16:04] <jamespage> EmilienM: m2 is in -proposed; needs testing so probably this week I should think
[16:04] <EmilienM> k
[16:05] <EmilienM> jamespage: don't you have a staging system where you move stuffs only when passing jobs, etc?
[16:05] <EmilienM> in RDO, we promote if jobs pass the tests, to make ci/cd
[16:05] <jamespage> EmilienM: yes thats where it is atm
[16:06] <jamespage> not promoted yet as its not passing testing :-)
[16:06] <EmilienM> ok
[16:07] <jamespage> some new packaged had to go through the ubuntu archive review process - that completed am this morning, everything should now be built and testing
[18:48] <DammitJim> how do you find out why a server is saying: *** System restart required ***
[18:49] <Poster> kernel update most likely
[18:50] <teward> DammitJim: USUALLY it's a kernel update.  Try this command including the semicolon and the second command: echo "Packages causing reboot:"; cat /var/run/reboot-required.pkgs
[18:50] <DammitJim> I see in /var/run/reboot-required.pkgs that it has: libc6, libssl1.0.0 and dbus
[18:50] <teward> usually for libssl it makes you reboot
[18:50] <teward> well sometimes*
[18:50] <DammitJim> but I just ran dist-upgrade and autoremove like 4 hours ago
[18:50] <DammitJim> and rebooted the system
[18:51] <DammitJim> I thought I had disabled all automatic updates
[18:51] <DammitJim> so, I'm a little lost as to what happened
[18:51] <DammitJim> especially because I'm about to roll out up to date patches on 100 servers
[18:51] <DammitJim> and I was assuming that a reboot at the end was going to do it
[18:51] <DammitJim> but apparently not :(
[18:52] <Poster> not 100% sure but those updates could have landed between your dist-upgrade and now
[18:52] <DammitJim> tru
[18:52] <DammitJim> but I didn't run updates after the reboot
[18:53] <Poster> you may consider a local mirror if you need updates to be frozen at a certain time
[18:53] <Poster> which if you have 100 systems might be a good idea anyway
[18:53] <Poster> just stop syncing it when it's where you want it to be
[18:53] <DammitJim> yeah, that's a plan for a project we have
[18:53] <DammitJim> Poster, that's what is driving me nuts
[18:54] <DammitJim> I don't have anything set up where automatic updates happen
[18:54] <DammitJim> my 50unattended-upgrades is basically empty
[18:54] <DammitJim> with the exception of the line: Unattended-Upgrade::Remove-Unused-Dependencies "true";
[18:54] <Poster> not real sure what to suggest on that one, I've kept mine enabled in just about all cases
[18:54] <DammitJim> Poster, we defined that to be a policy at our office
[18:55] <DammitJim> no automatic updates
[18:55] <DammitJim> besides, the /boot partition gets full pretty fast
[18:55] <Poster> yeah I get it
[18:55] <DammitJim> but then, it only has like 100M allocated to our servers
[18:55] <Poster> my / usually fills up with kernel modules
[18:55] <nacc> DammitJim: why do you even have a /boot partition?
[18:55] <teward> nacc: because they wanted one heh
[18:55] <nacc> DammitJim: and that small is a bad choice anyways, that barely holds two kernels and initrds
[18:56] <nacc> DammitJim: so won't let autoremove do its job
[18:56] <DammitJim> honestly, I don't know why it's that small
[18:56] <DammitJim> actually, it's 236M
[18:56] <DammitJim> just looked it up
[18:57] <DammitJim> I just let Ubuntu set that automatically from what I remember when I set up the partitions
[18:57] <nacc> DammitJim: ah ok that's fine
[18:57] <nacc> DammitJim: 100M would almost always be an issue
[18:58] <DammitJim> Yeah, I could see that...
[20:08] <miceiken> Hi
[20:09] <miceiken> I changed mobo, how can I "reset" ethernet device?
[20:11] <teward> miceiken: erm, what do you mean "reset"?
[20:11] <miceiken> Well, I no longer have internet access, which I guess is because as network card is in the new mobo, I assume it needs to be installed somehow
[20:12] <teward> miceiken: 16.04?
[20:12] <miceiken> 17.04
[20:12] <teward> close enough, predictive interface naming is in play
[20:12] <teward> miceiken: do you have physical access to the machine?
[20:12] <miceiken> yes
[20:12] <teward> ifconfig -a
[20:12] <teward> get the name of your ethernet card from it
[20:12] <teward> then adjust /etc/network/interfaces accordingly
[20:13] <teward> to update the name of the adapter to autoconfigure and set up
[20:13] <teward> alternatively use network manager and nmcli, but i prefer the old-school /etc/network/interfaces solution except for wifi things
[20:13] <teward> (servers included)
[20:14] <miceiken> thanks, now it works techmagus
[20:14] <miceiken> teward*
[20:15] <miceiken> quick follow up, if you dont mind. can I ask the machine to lease a certain ip?
[20:15] <miceiken> dhcp router
[20:15] <miceiken> or would you do that in the router directly?
[20:16] <teward> miceiken: depends.  Usually I reserve the IP in the DHCP server (router, etc.) for that MAC address, *and* set it as a static IP on the machine i'm configuring.
[20:16] <teward> that way there's nothing that can just 'get' the address.
[20:16] <teward> Though, in my case, *most* of my network segments are small enough I can just static IP everything
[20:16] <teward> or they're containers on a specific host system and have 1:1 NAT'd IPs.
[20:18] <teward> so the host node just is static IP'd for all the IPs, and reserved in DHCP as well.
[20:18] <teward> or, outside the DHCP range, that is.
[20:18] <teward> it really depends on your environment or setup.
[20:19] <miceiken> thanks, ill just configure it in the router
[20:36] <teward> miceiken: sounds good, enjoy :)
[21:32] <Epx998> Ubuntu OS sees my 6TB raid drive has 600GB - sweet
[21:33] <dpb1> Epx998: not the best.
[21:33] <Epx998> dpb1: yeah it's to be expected though.
[21:34] <Epx998> interesting i am not seeing megaraid loaded
[22:01] <Epx998> hmm keeps coming up as 600gb
[23:41] <Guest65463> hello, I am unable to install any packages, I tried install openssh-server and got the following:
[23:41] <Guest65463> Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
[23:42] <Guest65463> even after running
[23:42] <Guest65463> sudo apt-get autoclean $$ apt-get clear cache
[23:42] <Guest65463> running update and upgrade did nothing to solve the problem, and nothing was upgraded, no error mesages
[23:43] <tarpman> Guest65463: please pastebin the entire output and consider also using -o Debug::pkgProblemResolver=yes for more info
[23:44] <Guest65463> how do I use the -o?
[23:45] <Guest65463> https://thepasteb.in/p/j2hlN95AjG9hP
[23:45] <tarpman> apt-get -o Debug::pkgProblemResolver=yes install openssh-server
[23:48] <Guest65463> https://thepasteb.in/p/j2hlN95AjG9hP
[23:48] <Guest65463> tarpman: ^^
[23:49] <Guest65463> WTF
[23:49] <Guest65463> that is not it
[23:49] <tarpman> :)
[23:49] <Guest65463> http://paste.ubuntu.com/24912520/
[23:50] <oerheks> try full-upgrade too, i think there are packages held back
[23:50] <Guest65463> well, not my apt I was just able to install hexchat via apt install hexchat
[23:51] <Guest65463> https://thepasteb.in/p/98hR713PKMqfk
[23:51] <Guest65463> nada
[23:52] <Guest65463> I'm attempting to set up vnc through ssh
[23:53] <tarpman> not quite understanding what I'm reading here. it's an amd64 system, but you have openssh-client:i386 installed? am I reading that correctly?
[23:53] <tarpman> what do you have installed right now as far as libc6 and openssh packages?
[23:54] <Guest65463> This *was  a clean install of server with vmware and virtuabox and unity added
[23:55] <Guest65463> how do I tell which libc
[23:55] <tarpman> dpkg-query -W libc6 openssh-client
[23:55] <tarpman> also: unity? on a server?
[23:56] <Guest65463> libc6:amd64 2.23-0ubuntu7
[23:56] <Guest65463> openssh-client 1:7.2p2-4ubuntu2.1
[23:56] <Guest65463> tarpman, yeah, cause it's not really a "server" I'm using it to run a number of VM's reallyh
[23:56] <Guest65463> Suppose I should have done gnome
[23:56] <Guest65463> or lxfce
[23:57] <tarpman> I am not skilled enough at reading pkgProblemResolver output unfortunately
[23:57] <Guest65463> shall I try removing openssh-client?
[23:57] <tarpman> might be worth a try. as long as it doesn't take important things with it
[23:58] <tarpman> annoying that dpkg-query didn't say which arch is installed of that
[23:58] <tarpman> could ask it explicitly: dpkg-query openssh-client:i386
[23:58] <Guest65463> removed tried to do full-upgrade, nothing installed
[23:59] <Guest65463> tarpman: now install openssh-server just fine ;-/
[23:59] <tarpman> so I guess I was right