[00:51] ah interesting. DO is doing an object storage product === frickler_ is now known as frickler [08:37] powersj: https://github.com/jenkinsci/pipeline-model-definition-plugin/wiki/Syntax-Reference [08:37] just found that [08:37] the pipeline reference for the declarative syntax === sambetts|afk is now known as sambetts === rangerpbzzzz is now known as rangerpb [14:22] could anyone comment on a workaround for this? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1686338 [14:22] we're using cloud-init on our VPS platform and we don't want cloud-init to configure networkign (we have our own tool for that which cloud-init provides the data to) so network_data.json contains "{}" - would this be sufficient to run into the above bug? [14:22] Ubuntu bug 1686338 in cloud-init (Ubuntu) "cloud-init fails if no network config is set" [Undecided,New] [14:23] bob_cheesey: I'll respond on the bug [14:23] dpb1: thanks! [14:23] bob_cheesey: a patch is certainly welcom [14:23] e [14:28] dpb1: I can attempt that, however I'm not sure my Python skill are sufficient to achieve this. I'll await your response first! [14:29] bob_cheesey: my first comment was just a general how to submit the issue, now to look at the issue [14:31] ok, understood. thanks again [14:37] bob_cheesey: what cloud is this, btw? [14:39] dpb1: it's not, it's custom images which run on our own Xen platform [14:42] bob_cheesey: if you want to disable networking in the image, you can write out /etc/cloud/cloud.cfg.d/05-disable-network.cfg with "network: {config: disabled}" http://cloudinit.readthedocs.io/en/latest/topics/network-config.html [14:44] that said, if it's custom, still interested in what files in the datasource you're using are indicating that network configuration is available (I suspect this is either ConfigDrive or NoCloud); likely some files are being included but empty; I'd like to confirm which ones; the DataSource should handle this so cloud-init can generate a fallback network config if it's not really present [14:45] rharper: thanks, I wasn't aware of that (I'm picking up where someone left off after developing this so I'm learning as I go). Would I need to ensure that network_data.json is completely empty or will the solution you mentioned ensure that the network_data file is ignored? [14:46] if you disable networking entirely, then nothing will attempt to consume the network_data.json file [14:46] rharper: we're using ConfigDrive [14:46] on the other hand, it seems odd to include the network_data.json file if it's empty [14:46] rharper: agreed; I'm not sure why that decision was arrived at [14:46] further though, we should check if it's returning an empty config and propagate that back [14:47] if you could just mention in the bz that it's COnfigDrive, and show the contents of the network_data.json file included,; we can reproduce with that and get a fix; I do think in your case you'll likely want to just disable networking (but we'll fix the bug as well) [14:48] rharper: certainly, i'll do that now [14:48] thanks! [14:49] sure; thanks for the bug === sambetts is now known as sambetts|afk [18:36] powersj, did we have some c-i failures for cloud-init ? [18:36] smoser: there was a LXD xenial hash mismatch that recked havoc on testing last night. [18:37] that was resolved, so things will clean up tonight [18:37] There have not been any commits I believe, so I didn't expect any changes in test restults. [18:42] right. ok. i saw chad say something above in my logs about a change to 'bash' invocation [19:46] yeah that was bbsw barking up the wrong tree :/ [19:47] I just saw bash in the traceback and assumed incorrectly [20:24] blackboxsw_away, go back to away. :) [20:24] later. === rangerpb is now known as rangerpbzzzz [22:50] hi blackboxsw_away [22:50] :) [22:57] dpb1: rharper: I know both of you are buried.. but FYI take a look at last comment on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1686514 [22:57] Ubuntu bug 1686514 in cloud-init (Ubuntu Zesty) "Azure: cloud-init does not handle reformatting GPT partition ephemeral disks" [Medium,Fix committed] [23:14] powersj: ok [23:21] powersj: it appears that sdb1 is getting claimed by the system; possible due to /etc/fstab having an entry from the previous boot [23:21] that prevents the mkfs command from running [23:22] seems odd that the other two distros didn't see this [23:36] newer systemd [23:36] I suspect [23:36] powersj: ^ [23:36] we found systemd fstab/mount unit to be 'racier' [23:37] ah [23:38] so , not your fault but possibly indicating that we need to try harder to get that out of the way (or root cause it) [23:38] and it's beer thirty for sure