[00:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: webcamoid [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [8.0.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[05:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-core [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.3.1-2] (no packageset)
[05:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-core [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.3.1-2] (no packageset)
[05:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-core [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.3.1-2] (no packageset)
[05:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-kaptan [amd64] (artful-proposed/none) [0.5.8-3] (no packageset)
[05:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-core [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.3.1-2] (no packageset)
[05:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-core [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.3.1-2] (no packageset)
[05:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-core [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.3.1-2] (no packageset)
[09:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (yakkety-proposed/main) [4.8.0-57.62] (core, kernel)
[09:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.8.0-57.62~16.04.1] (kernel)
[09:10] <jamespage> if there is a sru person around, I have uploads for neutron and keystone in xenial-proposed I'd like to regression test alongside the rest of the mitaka point releases already accepted - those are for specific bug fixes
[09:11] <jamespage> and similar in yakkety in that I have a number of point releases in the unappproved queue - I'd like to clear testing this week if possible please :)
[09:14] <sil2100> jamespage: hey, I *might* have a look at those once I'm done with my kernel round, so in ~1 hour
[09:14] <jamespage> sil2100: thankyou :-)
[09:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (yakkety-proposed) [4.8.0-57.62]
[09:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.8.0-57.62~16.04.1]
[10:13] <sil2100> jamespage: I checked neutron xenial, looks fine-ish - I don't like the version number though but I'll just re-upload and then approve
[10:13] <sil2100> So don't worry about that one, there will be a reject followed by an approval
[10:14] <jamespage> sil2100: ok I'll make a not to re-import your updated version to the git repo then
[10:14] <jamespage> note rather
[10:15] <sil2100> jamespage: it's just that it doesn't make sense to do a 2:8.4.0-0ubuntu2.1 since there's no version conflict possible, we should just go to ubuntu3 as is
[10:16] <sil2100> But those are nitpicks, which is why I'll fix that ;)
[10:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected neutron [source] (xenial-proposed) [2:8.4.0-0ubuntu2.1]
[10:18] <apw> doesn't that help maintain consistency though ?
[10:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron (xenial-proposed/main) [2:8.4.0-0ubuntu2 => 2:8.4.0-0ubuntu3] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[10:20] <sil2100> apw: well, it's not consistent anyway since we already have one update in xenial that bumped from ubuntu1 to ubuntu2, so to stay consistent we need to bump to ubuntu3, not suddenly decide on switching to the .1 notation ;)
[10:20] <sil2100> IMO
[10:21] <sil2100> Which is what I'm doing nwo
[10:21] <apw> sil2100, ok
[10:25] <sil2100> apw: ah, while we're at it, do you want to tackle keystone? I already started looking at it but I see you handled the zesty version already, so maybe you'd like the rest too?
[10:29] <apw> sil2100, i can.  it would not be instand
[10:29] <apw> t
[10:30] <xnox> Laney, can src:systemd be peppered over to migrate in artful? =)
[10:30] <xnox> or is it too much to say that i don't care about armhf.
[10:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron [source] (xenial-proposed) [2:8.4.0-0ubuntu3]
[10:49] <sil2100> apw: ok then, I'll leave that one for you then
[10:49] <sil2100> apw: thanks! I'll proceed with neutron and others in yakkety
[10:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron [source] (yakkety-proposed) [2:9.4.0-0ubuntu1]
[11:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (trusty-proposed/main) [3.13.0-122.171] (core, kernel)
[11:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libpodofo [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.9.5-5] (edubuntu)
[11:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libpodofo [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.9.5-5] (edubuntu)
[11:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted horizon [source] (yakkety-proposed) [3:10.0.4-0ubuntu1]
[11:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libpodofo [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.9.5-5] (edubuntu)
[11:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libpodofo [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.9.5-5] (edubuntu)
[11:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nova [source] (yakkety-proposed) [2:14.0.7-0ubuntu1]
[11:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted swift [source] (yakkety-proposed) [2.10.2-0ubuntu1]
[11:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libpodofo [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.9.5-5] (edubuntu)
[11:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libpodofo [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.9.5-5] (edubuntu)
[11:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-core [amd64] (artful-proposed) [2.3.1-2]
[11:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-core [armhf] (artful-proposed) [2.3.1-2]
[11:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-core [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [2.3.1-2]
[11:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgetdata [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.10.0-3]
[11:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgetdata [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.10.0-3]
[11:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgetdata [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.10.0-3]
[11:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libpodofo [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.9.5-5]
[11:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libpodofo [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.9.5-5]
[11:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libpodofo [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.9.5-5]
[11:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-kaptan [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.5.8-3]
[11:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-core [arm64] (artful-proposed) [2.3.1-2]
[11:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-core [s390x] (artful-proposed) [2.3.1-2]
[11:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgetdata [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.10.0-3]
[11:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libpodofo [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.9.5-5]
[11:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libpodofo [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.9.5-5]
[11:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted webcamoid [arm64] (artful-proposed) [8.0.0+dfsg-2]
[11:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted webcamoid [i386] (artful-proposed) [8.0.0+dfsg-2]
[11:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted webcamoid [s390x] (artful-proposed) [8.0.0+dfsg-2]
[11:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-core [i386] (artful-proposed) [2.3.1-2]
[11:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgetdata [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.10.0-3]
[11:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted webcamoid [amd64] (artful-proposed) [8.0.0+dfsg-2]
[11:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted webcamoid [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [8.0.0+dfsg-2]
[11:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgetdata [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.10.0-3]
[11:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted webcamoid [armhf] (artful-proposed) [8.0.0+dfsg-2]
[11:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libpodofo [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.9.5-5]
[11:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (trusty-proposed) [3.13.0-122.171]
[12:23] <ypwong> sil2100, it's bug 1684034 again, about fwupdate. We avoided doing a full upgrade and just picked 4 commits this time.
[12:23] <ubot5`> bug 1684034 in fwupdate-signed (Ubuntu Yakkety) "Some Dell and Lenovo systems do not work after BIOS Capsule Update" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1684034
[12:24] <ypwong> sil2100, could you give it a look?
[12:47] <rbasak> sil2100, bdmurray: during SRUs today? I had a couple I'd mostly looked at so was just going to finish those two off - less and cloud-init.
[12:47] <rbasak> (releasing less, and accepting cloud-init from Trusty unapproved)
[12:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (trusty-proposed) [0.7.5-0ubuntu1.22]
[13:13] <slashd> bdmurray, sil2100:  Good day, could you please have a look at these uploads waiting for approval : #1) - autofs for X/Y (LP: #1686679) -- #2) - multipath-tools for Trusty : (LP: #1695789) & (LP: #1687004). Thanks.
[13:13] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1686679 in autofs5 (Ubuntu Yakkety) "[SRU] Ubuntu16.04 : autofs is extremely long with large number of direct maps" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1686679
[13:13] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1695789 in multipath-tools (Ubuntu Trusty) "multipath random crashes on use-after-free" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1695789
[13:13] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1687004 in multipath-tools (Ubuntu Trusty) "multipath crash generating core dump" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1687004
[13:14] <slashd> tinoco^
[13:19] <sil2100> slashd: hey! Just got back from lunch, can take a look in a moment
[13:21] <sil2100> rbasak: hey, I'm doing some SRU work today yes
[13:21] <sil2100> ypwong: I can try having a look at that in some moments, thanks!
[13:27] <rbasak> sil2100: hello! I'm done with SRU work for today - I handled just those two I mentioned.
[13:27] <sil2100> rbasak: ok, thanks o/
[13:30] <xnox> ypwong, the bug title sounds bad
[13:34] <slashd> sil2100, thanks
[13:42] <xnox> slangasek, please remove linux 4.11.0-8.13 from artful-proposed due to failing adt tests.
[13:42] <xnox> slangasek, my understanding is that adt tests should be run against linux kernel ppa built before copying into artful-proposed (aka silo style)
[13:47] <apw> xnox, indeed the normally are, and tests change because that is the nature of tests
[13:47] <apw> xnox, so they can trivially pass get copied out and stop passing
[13:54] <xnox> (after more talk on -kernel)
[13:54] <xnox> Laney, slangasek: why are src:systemd triggered tests of src:linux are running against proposed version of src:linux?
[13:55] <xnox> using proposed src:linux is almost never the right answer.
[13:56] <Laney> https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/autopkgtest-cloud/tree/worker/worker#n350
[13:56] <Laney> it's always worked like that
[13:57] <xnox> Laney, sorry does that code means always use src:linux from release, instead of proposed?
[13:57] <xnox> Laney, then why my systemd tests are currently using linux 4.11 instead of 4.10?
[13:58] <xnox> (4.11 is in proposed, and 4.10 is what is in release)
[13:58] <xnox> or does that on the contrary says always use src:linux from proposed?
[13:58] <Laney> the opposite of what you said
[13:59] <xnox> o_O
[13:59] <xnox> i've said both things =)
[13:59] <Laney> the behaviour you are observing is the one that the code says should happen
[13:59] <xnox> where does src:linux always come from?
[13:59] <xnox> *sigh*
[14:00] <Laney> linux is not subject to the pinning
[14:00] <xnox> apw, ^^^^^
[14:00] <xnox> src:linux and src:linux-meta is so special that broken src:linux in proposed affects everybody, always, unlike all the other packages.
[14:00] <xnox> slangasek, ^
[14:01] <apw> hmmm, that is unexpected i think
[14:02] <xnox> ideally we would fix src:linux pinning and test against release linux; or remove src:linux from -proposed if its tests are broken.
[14:02] <xnox> fix ADT pinning of src:linux src:linux-meta src:linux-hwe-meta
[14:02] <xnox> that is.
[14:02] <Laney> you'll have to ask pitti what the precise problem was
[14:03] <xnox> apw, or e.g. change the process to copy from PPA into silo; wait for adt results of src:linux -> adt test of src:linux, and copy from silo to devel-proposed, iff the adt test for src:linux of the new src:linux passed.
[14:03] <xnox> (not _all_ the triggered tests, but just src:linux trigger linux)
[14:03] <xnox> apw, does that make sense for the linux package release process?
[14:04] <apw> xnox, making the process have yet another copy step is not going to make anyone happy
[14:04] <apw> we are running tests against it before it moves in the normal case
[14:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted autofs [source] (yakkety-proposed) [5.1.1-1ubuntu4]
[14:05] <xnox> apw, ok, where are the results visible? e.g. did 4.11-8.13, 4.11.0-7.12, 4.11.0-6.11, 4.11.0-5.10 ever pass on amd64?
[14:05] <xnox> because all of those kernels never passed adt on amd64 in the archive yet.
[14:06] <xnox> (linux, passing itself tests, with various triggers, with probably some packages coming from -proposed)
[14:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted autofs [source] (xenial-proposed) [5.1.1-1ubuntu3.1]
[14:07] <Laney> it's been forced up to now
[14:08]  * apw has to step away
[14:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-seq [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[14:08] <apw> it seems we have an apparmor issue which has been triggering the test, a failure in the tests to keep up with the kernel, hmmm
[14:09] <xnox> FAIL: test_061_guard_page (__main__.KernelSecurityTest) is the one that seems to be failing from the ubuntu-regression-suite
[14:09] <xnox> in adt, in artful-proposed, and said test case should have run in ADT prior to copy to artful-proposed, no?
[14:09] <apw> xnox, right this a new issue with the CRD fixes
[14:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-seq [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[14:10] <xnox> right that's on the recentish kernels. the older I go, it has different errors from a different part of the suite.
[14:10] <apw> xnox, although it is annoying, this is so normal, like we've been hinting systemd failures for literally months where the kernel is cross affected
[14:10] <xnox> on armhf/s390x -> yes, and i have fixed those.
[14:11] <xnox> or do you mean on amd64 as well?
[14:11] <apw> doesn't matter what arch it is
[14:11]  * apw really has to step out now
[14:11] <xnox> apw, http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/linux/artful/amd64 vs http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/systemd/artful/amd64
[14:13] <sforshee> xnox: there are failures in apparmor test cases that the security team has known about for a while now which are responsible for the past failures
[14:17] <sforshee> xnox: I should note that those apparmor failures don't represent any serious problem, just that the tests haven't been updated for a change in kernel behavior
[14:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-seq [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[14:19] <xnox> sforshee, sure. and that is fine. my concern is that src:linux->linux adt test is run; known to be broken; yet the package is thrown over the wall anyway, which then flags up many false regressions across many core packages; requiring manual intervention on each depdant package to migrate.
[14:19] <xnox> and i'm being told that adt test of src:linux against new src:linux is run before upload.
[14:22] <sforshee> xnox: normally they are, I rushed this one because it was a cve fix then it turned out upstream had flubbed it. The tests wouldn't have passed anyway though, and we can't wait indefinitely for others to fix broken tests.
[14:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-seq [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[14:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-seq [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[14:36] <xnox> sforshee, ok, but the end result is that src:linux 4.11 is not in release pocket; but clogging up many package migrations in devel-proposed; and nobody running artful has the CVE fix, and thus is still vulnerable.
[14:36] <xnox> (not that it matters, cause we do not guarantee security support in devel series)
[14:37] <xnox> sforshee, but e.g. what was the rationale for pushing these packages to devel-proposed, what did you hope to achieve? that people running devel-proposed are secured?
[14:39] <sforshee> xnox: I had a 4.11 in -proposed last week that I hoped to get promoted. When the cve came up I thought it better to wait and let 4.10 with the fix get copied forward then try to push out a 4.11 with the fix.
[14:40] <sforshee> xnox: that other stack guard test failing isn't as bad as it looks, the guard page is still there but there's a difference in behavior.
[14:40] <sforshee> or guard region rather, more than a single page now
[14:42] <sforshee> xnox: in hindsight is was a bad idea to rush it though, and there wasn't a real reason other than trying to get 4.11 into -release
[14:42] <xnox> right. a series of unfortunate events.
[14:43] <xnox> .... our test-suite was expoiting the guard page cve all this time?! O_o =)
[14:43] <xnox> good test suite
[14:43]  * xnox giggles
[14:54] <slashd> sil2100, no rush, just wanted to know if you will have time today for my 2 requests :  #2) - multipath-tools for Trusty : (LP: #1695789) & (LP: #1687004)
[14:54] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1695789 in multipath-tools (Ubuntu Trusty) "multipath random crashes on use-after-free" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1695789
[14:54] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1687004 in multipath-tools (Ubuntu Trusty) "multipath crash generating core dump" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1687004
[14:54] <sil2100> slashd: I'll try! Need to finish up something else first + weekly meeting
[14:55] <sil2100> If not Brian might during his shift later today or I'll pick it up first thing in the morning
[14:55] <slashd> sil2100, bdmurray ok thanks
[14:56] <sil2100> High chance is I'll just be able to make it today
[14:56] <xnox> slangasek, please release systemd (src:linux is broken, and known, impossible to run src:linux release tests as src:linux is pinned to always run from proposed)
[14:56] <xnox> it's otherwise green
[14:56] <slashd> tinoco, ^^^
[15:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-seq [amd64] (artful-proposed) [2.3.1-1]
[15:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-seq [armhf] (artful-proposed) [2.3.1-1]
[15:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-seq [s390x] (artful-proposed) [2.3.1-1]
[15:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-seq [arm64] (artful-proposed) [2.3.1-1]
[15:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-seq [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [2.3.1-1]
[16:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-popgen [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[16:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-raa [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[16:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-raa [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[16:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-seq-omics [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[16:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-popgen [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[16:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-seq-omics [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[16:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-raa [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[16:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-popgen [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[16:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-raa [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[16:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-seq-omics [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[16:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-popgen [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[16:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-raa [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[16:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-seq-omics [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[16:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-popgen [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[16:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-seq-omics [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[16:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-popgen [amd64] (artful-proposed) [2.3.1-1]
[16:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-popgen [armhf] (artful-proposed) [2.3.1-1]
[16:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-popgen [s390x] (artful-proposed) [2.3.1-1]
[16:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-raa [arm64] (artful-proposed) [2.3.1-1]
[16:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-raa [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [2.3.1-1]
[16:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-seq-omics [amd64] (artful-proposed) [2.3.1-1]
[16:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-seq-omics [armhf] (artful-proposed) [2.3.1-1]
[16:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-popgen [arm64] (artful-proposed) [2.3.1-1]
[16:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-raa [amd64] (artful-proposed) [2.3.1-1]
[16:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-raa [s390x] (artful-proposed) [2.3.1-1]
[16:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-popgen [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [2.3.1-1]
[16:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-seq-omics [arm64] (artful-proposed) [2.3.1-1]
[16:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-raa [armhf] (artful-proposed) [2.3.1-1]
[16:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-seq-omics [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [2.3.1-1]
[16:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-seq-omics [s390x] (artful-proposed) [2.3.1-1]
[16:30] <sil2100> slashd: I guess from the bug description that there's no reliable way of reproducing LP: #1687004 for testing purposes?
[16:30] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1687004 in multipath-tools (Ubuntu Trusty) "multipath crash generating core dump" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1687004
[16:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-phyl [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[16:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted multipath-tools [source] (trusty-proposed) [0.4.9-3ubuntu7.16]
[16:37] <slashd> tinoco, ^ see sil2100 comment
[16:37] <tinoco> sil2100: unfortunately not. single crash dump.
[16:37] <tinoco> sil2100: approach (fix) from upstream changes from heap to stack.
[16:37] <tinoco> i thought it was safe enough to consider this as a fix for the crash (customer verified)
[16:38] <tinoco> among several servers, statistically we could consider this fixed (as no crash files were created)
[16:43] <slashd> sil2100, tinoco thanks guys
[16:43] <tinoco> tku both!
[16:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-phyl [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[17:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-phyl [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[17:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-phyl [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.3.1-2] (no packageset)
[18:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-phyl [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.3.1-2] (no packageset)
[18:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-phyl [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.3.1-2] (no packageset)
[18:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-phyl [amd64] (artful-proposed) [2.3.1-1]
[18:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-phyl [s390x] (artful-proposed) [2.3.1-1]
[18:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-phyl [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [2.3.1-2]
[18:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-phyl [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [2.3.1-1]
[18:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-phyl [s390x] (artful-proposed) [2.3.1-2]
[18:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-phyl [amd64] (artful-proposed) [2.3.1-2]
[19:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kexec-tools (zesty-proposed/main) [1:2.0.14-1ubuntu3 => 1:2.0.14-1ubuntu3.1] (core)
[20:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: php-defaults (xenial-proposed/main) [35ubuntu6 => 35ubuntu6.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-server)
[22:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-phyl-omics [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.3.1-2] (no packageset)
[22:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-phyl-omics [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.3.1-2] (no packageset)
[22:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libbpp-phyl-omics [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.3.1-2] (no packageset)
[22:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: bppsuite [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.3.1-1] (no packageset)
[23:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-libtmux [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.6.3-4] (no packageset)
[23:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dj-static [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.0.6-2] (no packageset)
[23:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-decouple [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [3.0-2] (no packageset)
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted vulkan [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.0.42.0+dfsg1-1ubuntu1~16.04.1]
[23:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libdrm [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.4.76-1~ubuntu16.04.1]
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libwacom [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.22-1~ubuntu16.04.1]
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libdrm [armhf] (xenial-proposed/main) [2.4.76-1~ubuntu16.04.1] (core, xorg)
[23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xfonts-utils [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:7.7+3ubuntu0.16.04.1]
[23:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libwacom [s390x] (xenial-proposed/main) [0.22-1~ubuntu16.04.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[23:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libwacom [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed/main) [0.22-1~ubuntu16.04.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libwacom [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [0.22-1~ubuntu16.04.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libwacom [armhf] (xenial-proposed/main) [0.22-1~ubuntu16.04.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libwacom [powerpc] (xenial-proposed/main) [0.22-1~ubuntu16.04.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libwacom [arm64] (xenial-proposed/main) [0.22-1~ubuntu16.04.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libwacom [i386] (xenial-proposed/main) [0.22-1~ubuntu16.04.1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[23:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libclc [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.2.0+git20170213-1~16.04.1]
[23:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libwacom [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [0.22-1~ubuntu16.04.1]
[23:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libwacom [armhf] (xenial-proposed) [0.22-1~ubuntu16.04.1]
[23:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libwacom [powerpc] (xenial-proposed) [0.22-1~ubuntu16.04.1]
[23:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libwacom [s390x] (xenial-proposed) [0.22-1~ubuntu16.04.1]
[23:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libwacom [arm64] (xenial-proposed) [0.22-1~ubuntu16.04.1]
[23:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libwacom [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [0.22-1~ubuntu16.04.1]
[23:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libwacom [i386] (xenial-proposed) [0.22-1~ubuntu16.04.1]
[23:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libdrm [armhf] (xenial-proposed) [2.4.76-1~ubuntu16.04.1]
[23:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted bppsuite [amd64] (artful-proposed) [2.3.1-1]
[23:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-phyl-omics [amd64] (artful-proposed) [2.3.1-2]
[23:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-phyl-omics [s390x] (artful-proposed) [2.3.1-2]
[23:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-libtmux [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.6.3-4]
[23:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dj-static [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.0.6-2]
[23:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-decouple [amd64] (artful-proposed) [3.0-2]
[23:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libbpp-phyl-omics [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [2.3.1-2]