/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2017/06/23/#ubuntu-devel.txt

mwhudsondoes anyone see what happened here? https://launchpadlibrarian.net/325167198/buildlog_ubuntu-artful-s390x.vim_2%3A8.0.0197-4ubuntu3_BUILDING.txt.gz00:45
sarnoldno idea. but I got a giggle out of this "Test BufferLength and BufferAssSlice"00:51
tsimonq2hah00:58
=== maclin1 is now known as maclin
slangasekso who's blindly retrying haskell package builds to punish me? :)03:53
sarnoldugh03:55
sarnoldI don't know what you did to deserve thjat but that's a mean thing to do to someone03:56
slangaseksarnold: what I did was upload no-change rebuilds for the transition, now someone's retrying them without looking at the build logs ;)03:56
tsimonq2slangasek: I've been getting emails on artful-changes.04:00
tsimonq2slangasek: he-who-is-never-on-irc :P04:00
rbasakslangasek: ah. So you think it's appropriate to be there, just not in the minimal seed? I must have got you confused with someone else saying it was deprecated and should be removed altogether.08:06
=== girish946 is now known as Guest32166
sil2100Hey! Anyone here could force ignore octave-io's failing armhf test? Checking the logs it's been failing for longer and from the logs (and one re-run) I see that random tests seem to be failing, not the same ones everytime09:19
sil2100http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#octave-io09:19
ginggssil2100: i cannot even see where it was ever successful, but britney seems to think it was10:24
ginggssil2100: i don't know if it matters, but #ubuntu-release is usually the channel for that10:26
sil2100ginggs: thanks!10:30
flexiondotorgAny MOTUs or core devs here who could take a look at LP: #1699333 and LP: #1699334 please?12:59
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1699333 in Ubuntu "[needs-packaging] vala-panel" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/169933312:59
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1699334 in Ubuntu "[needs-packaging] vala-panel-appmenu" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/169933412:59
flexiondotorgI'd like to include there in Ubuntu MATE 17.10 Alpha 1. Ubuntu Budgie are interested in the packages too.13:00
seb128flexiondotorg, how come you are not MOTU yet? ;-)13:00
flexiondotorgLong term I'll ask the DMB to add them to my packageset so I can maintain them.13:00
flexiondotorgseb128 I know right.13:00
flexiondotorgOn the long list of "stuff I should do".13:01
seb128flexiondotorg, replying to your direct question, I can try to have a look on monday but today is just too busy with things I've to do already13:01
flexiondotorgseb128 Thanks.13:02
flexiondotorgIf anyone is able to improve on seb128's kind offer, I'd appreciate it :-)13:02
jbichaflexiondotorg: apply to be a Debian Maintainer too :)13:02
flexiondotorgjbicha In progress :-)13:02
slangasekrbasak: I think I may have said at one point that it was deprecated, but I may have been wrong ;)14:23
rbasakslangasek: no problem. I think we're all clear on it now. Well, to be clear, ethtool is staying seeded, but not in minimal since it doesn't need to be in minima.14:26
rbasakl14:26
maprerisomebody know what's wrong with https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opencv/3.1.0+dfsg1-1~exp1ubuntu1/+build/12795080 ?14:39
mapreri sbuild-build-depends-opencv-dummy : Depends: libvtk6-dev but it is not going to be installed14:39
maprerinot really geared to test installation issues of !x86 in ubuntu (and I don't use dose, etc)14:40
oSoMoNawe_, hey, I see that you did some extensive testing on bug #1585863 a while back, would you be able to test Aron's packages in https://launchpad.net/~happyaron/+archive/ubuntu/nm-oem/+packages to confirm the fix on xenial by any chance?14:58
ubottubug 1585863 in OEM Priority Project xenial "WiFi malfunction after suspend & resume stress - sudo wpa_cli scan required to fix it." [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/158586314:58
awe_oSoMoN, I can take a look, but from my recollection, the bug was considered fixed when a new version of network-manager was SRU'd15:13
awe_so Aaron's patches weren't required15:13
awe_see comment https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/1585863/comments/9415:14
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1585863 in OEM Priority Project xenial "WiFi malfunction after suspend & resume stress - sudo wpa_cli scan required to fix it." [Critical,Triaged]15:14
awe_four dollars re-opened the bug based on two comments with zero details15:15
oSoMoNawe_, yeah, after reading all the comments in the bug it wasn't clear to me either that the patches were required15:25
oSoMoNif 1.2.6-0ubuntu0.16.04.1 that's in xenial already fixes the issue, then perfect15:25
oSoMoNFourDollars: I know it's EOW for you, but when you get a chance would you mind commenting on bug #1585863 to clarify the situation?15:30
ubottubug 1585863 in OEM Priority Project xenial "WiFi malfunction after suspend & resume stress - sudo wpa_cli scan required to fix it." [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/158586315:30
oSoMoNthanks!15:30
awe_oSoMoN, I added an additional comment to the bug15:32
awe_which provides a method for checking whether the bug has been hit or not15:32
awe_the problem is that sometimes when coming out of S315:32
awe_NM failed to initiate  WiFi scanning15:33
awe_and if it doesn't scan15:33
awe_it can't detect APs15:33
awe_which means it's re-connect to APs15:33
oSoMoNawe_, thanks, that’s very helpful! Hopefully 1.2.6 did fix the issue, and no more work will be needed on that one15:33
oSoMoNlet’s see if F_ourDollars can clarify the situation15:34
awe_willcooke might also be interested to hear that this has been re-opened15:39
* willcooke reads15:39
awe_(maybe "interested" isn't the right word)15:39
awe_;)-15:39
willcookehqa15:40
willcookeha15:40
willcookeYeah, so I /think/ it is fixed.  But I was confused by that bug as well15:40
willcookePretty sure we'd be hearing a lot more about it if it was still broken.  But good to be sure15:41
FourDollarsoSoMoN: Aron's patch is still needed. Please check the bug comments again.15:41
oSoMoNFourDollars, thanks mate, I’ll work on the SRU then15:42
awe_based on what evidence?15:42
FourDollarsoSoMoN: Thx a lot.15:42
awe_willcooke, can we bring jbicha into the conversation?15:43
willcookeawe_, I don't think he'll know about this one, he's only done the merge from Debian (n-m 1.8)15:43
awe_the bug doesn't even say *which* patch is required15:44
willcookeyeah, I think this might be a red herring15:44
oSoMoNI gotta take off for today, I’d appreciate if relevant bits of the conversation could be saved to the bug report15:44
willcookeoSoMoN, sure thing15:44
oSoMoNthanks!15:44
awe_I think my comments says it all15:44
awe_we need proof something is broken before we decide a patch is needed15:45
maprerisomebody can guess what's wrong with https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opencv/3.1.0+dfsg1-1~exp1ubuntu1/+build/12795080 ?    ← slangasek ?  (given you seemed so interested ^^)15:59
slangasekmapreri: you might be able to decipher it using chdist to see why it might be uninstallable on that arch16:05
mapreriok, it's due to https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=86546516:13
ubottuDebian bug 865465 in src:openmpi "openmpi FTBFS on s390x: undefined reference to opal_atomic_*" [Serious,Fixed]16:14
naccmapreri: http://paste.ubuntu.com/24933694/16:14
naccmapreri: it's uninstallable with artful-proposed on s390x16:14
mapreriyeah, got to it16:14
maprerieventually16:14
mapreripity, but should be fixed by the next autosync, theoretically16:14
slangasekmdeslaur: have you seen LP: #1700079 ? I am unconvinced from the description that it's a regression vs. a race-condition in the systemd unit16:38
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1700079 in openvpn (Ubuntu) "openvpn broken after unattended security upgrade" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/170007916:38
rbasakslangasek: that's from adac and/or frickler in #ubuntu-server earlier today. Two people reported the same thing, so I asked for a bug report.17:25
sarnoldslangasek: btw mdeslaur is out for the weekend17:57
slangaseksarnold: ok.  would someone else from security look at this, should I assign the bug to him so he sees it on his return?18:29
sarnoldslangasek: probably best to assign it to him, none of us spotted anything in postinsts or unit files or elsewhere. :/ I'm not even sure if this is expected or not. Is it?18:30
slangaseksarnold: it is not expected that restarting the server on upgrade fails?18:31
sarnoldslangasek: hrm. I read too quickly I thought that was the hanging clients that everyone experienced.. hrm.18:32
sbeattieslangasek: the curious thing is it only happening with unattended upgrades, both reporters in #ubuntu-server last night were unable to reproduce it outside of that. Though it could just be unattended upgrades making it easier to lose whatever race is happening.18:40
slangaseksbeattie: how many times did they try outside of unattended-upgrades?  sample size of 4 isn't much to draw conclusions from18:41
sbeattieslangasek: unknown18:43
LocutusOfBorghello apw, how do you feel about suricata sync/merge?19:06

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!