mwhudson | does anyone see what happened here? https://launchpadlibrarian.net/325167198/buildlog_ubuntu-artful-s390x.vim_2%3A8.0.0197-4ubuntu3_BUILDING.txt.gz | 00:45 |
---|---|---|
sarnold | no idea. but I got a giggle out of this "Test BufferLength and BufferAssSlice" | 00:51 |
tsimonq2 | hah | 00:58 |
=== maclin1 is now known as maclin | ||
slangasek | so who's blindly retrying haskell package builds to punish me? :) | 03:53 |
sarnold | ugh | 03:55 |
sarnold | I don't know what you did to deserve thjat but that's a mean thing to do to someone | 03:56 |
slangasek | sarnold: what I did was upload no-change rebuilds for the transition, now someone's retrying them without looking at the build logs ;) | 03:56 |
tsimonq2 | slangasek: I've been getting emails on artful-changes. | 04:00 |
tsimonq2 | slangasek: he-who-is-never-on-irc :P | 04:00 |
rbasak | slangasek: ah. So you think it's appropriate to be there, just not in the minimal seed? I must have got you confused with someone else saying it was deprecated and should be removed altogether. | 08:06 |
=== girish946 is now known as Guest32166 | ||
sil2100 | Hey! Anyone here could force ignore octave-io's failing armhf test? Checking the logs it's been failing for longer and from the logs (and one re-run) I see that random tests seem to be failing, not the same ones everytime | 09:19 |
sil2100 | http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#octave-io | 09:19 |
ginggs | sil2100: i cannot even see where it was ever successful, but britney seems to think it was | 10:24 |
ginggs | sil2100: i don't know if it matters, but #ubuntu-release is usually the channel for that | 10:26 |
sil2100 | ginggs: thanks! | 10:30 |
flexiondotorg | Any MOTUs or core devs here who could take a look at LP: #1699333 and LP: #1699334 please? | 12:59 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1699333 in Ubuntu "[needs-packaging] vala-panel" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1699333 | 12:59 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1699334 in Ubuntu "[needs-packaging] vala-panel-appmenu" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1699334 | 12:59 |
flexiondotorg | I'd like to include there in Ubuntu MATE 17.10 Alpha 1. Ubuntu Budgie are interested in the packages too. | 13:00 |
seb128 | flexiondotorg, how come you are not MOTU yet? ;-) | 13:00 |
flexiondotorg | Long term I'll ask the DMB to add them to my packageset so I can maintain them. | 13:00 |
flexiondotorg | seb128 I know right. | 13:00 |
flexiondotorg | On the long list of "stuff I should do". | 13:01 |
seb128 | flexiondotorg, replying to your direct question, I can try to have a look on monday but today is just too busy with things I've to do already | 13:01 |
flexiondotorg | seb128 Thanks. | 13:02 |
flexiondotorg | If anyone is able to improve on seb128's kind offer, I'd appreciate it :-) | 13:02 |
jbicha | flexiondotorg: apply to be a Debian Maintainer too :) | 13:02 |
flexiondotorg | jbicha In progress :-) | 13:02 |
slangasek | rbasak: I think I may have said at one point that it was deprecated, but I may have been wrong ;) | 14:23 |
rbasak | slangasek: no problem. I think we're all clear on it now. Well, to be clear, ethtool is staying seeded, but not in minimal since it doesn't need to be in minima. | 14:26 |
rbasak | l | 14:26 |
mapreri | somebody know what's wrong with https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opencv/3.1.0+dfsg1-1~exp1ubuntu1/+build/12795080 ? | 14:39 |
mapreri | sbuild-build-depends-opencv-dummy : Depends: libvtk6-dev but it is not going to be installed | 14:39 |
mapreri | not really geared to test installation issues of !x86 in ubuntu (and I don't use dose, etc) | 14:40 |
oSoMoN | awe_, hey, I see that you did some extensive testing on bug #1585863 a while back, would you be able to test Aron's packages in https://launchpad.net/~happyaron/+archive/ubuntu/nm-oem/+packages to confirm the fix on xenial by any chance? | 14:58 |
ubottu | bug 1585863 in OEM Priority Project xenial "WiFi malfunction after suspend & resume stress - sudo wpa_cli scan required to fix it." [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1585863 | 14:58 |
awe_ | oSoMoN, I can take a look, but from my recollection, the bug was considered fixed when a new version of network-manager was SRU'd | 15:13 |
awe_ | so Aaron's patches weren't required | 15:13 |
awe_ | see comment https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/1585863/comments/94 | 15:14 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1585863 in OEM Priority Project xenial "WiFi malfunction after suspend & resume stress - sudo wpa_cli scan required to fix it." [Critical,Triaged] | 15:14 |
awe_ | four dollars re-opened the bug based on two comments with zero details | 15:15 |
oSoMoN | awe_, yeah, after reading all the comments in the bug it wasn't clear to me either that the patches were required | 15:25 |
oSoMoN | if 1.2.6-0ubuntu0.16.04.1 that's in xenial already fixes the issue, then perfect | 15:25 |
oSoMoN | FourDollars: I know it's EOW for you, but when you get a chance would you mind commenting on bug #1585863 to clarify the situation? | 15:30 |
ubottu | bug 1585863 in OEM Priority Project xenial "WiFi malfunction after suspend & resume stress - sudo wpa_cli scan required to fix it." [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1585863 | 15:30 |
oSoMoN | thanks! | 15:30 |
awe_ | oSoMoN, I added an additional comment to the bug | 15:32 |
awe_ | which provides a method for checking whether the bug has been hit or not | 15:32 |
awe_ | the problem is that sometimes when coming out of S3 | 15:32 |
awe_ | NM failed to initiate WiFi scanning | 15:33 |
awe_ | and if it doesn't scan | 15:33 |
awe_ | it can't detect APs | 15:33 |
awe_ | which means it's re-connect to APs | 15:33 |
oSoMoN | awe_, thanks, that’s very helpful! Hopefully 1.2.6 did fix the issue, and no more work will be needed on that one | 15:33 |
oSoMoN | let’s see if F_ourDollars can clarify the situation | 15:34 |
awe_ | willcooke might also be interested to hear that this has been re-opened | 15:39 |
* willcooke reads | 15:39 | |
awe_ | (maybe "interested" isn't the right word) | 15:39 |
awe_ | ;)- | 15:39 |
willcooke | hqa | 15:40 |
willcooke | ha | 15:40 |
willcooke | Yeah, so I /think/ it is fixed. But I was confused by that bug as well | 15:40 |
willcooke | Pretty sure we'd be hearing a lot more about it if it was still broken. But good to be sure | 15:41 |
FourDollars | oSoMoN: Aron's patch is still needed. Please check the bug comments again. | 15:41 |
oSoMoN | FourDollars, thanks mate, I’ll work on the SRU then | 15:42 |
awe_ | based on what evidence? | 15:42 |
FourDollars | oSoMoN: Thx a lot. | 15:42 |
awe_ | willcooke, can we bring jbicha into the conversation? | 15:43 |
willcooke | awe_, I don't think he'll know about this one, he's only done the merge from Debian (n-m 1.8) | 15:43 |
awe_ | the bug doesn't even say *which* patch is required | 15:44 |
willcooke | yeah, I think this might be a red herring | 15:44 |
oSoMoN | I gotta take off for today, I’d appreciate if relevant bits of the conversation could be saved to the bug report | 15:44 |
willcooke | oSoMoN, sure thing | 15:44 |
oSoMoN | thanks! | 15:44 |
awe_ | I think my comments says it all | 15:44 |
awe_ | we need proof something is broken before we decide a patch is needed | 15:45 |
mapreri | somebody can guess what's wrong with https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opencv/3.1.0+dfsg1-1~exp1ubuntu1/+build/12795080 ? ← slangasek ? (given you seemed so interested ^^) | 15:59 |
slangasek | mapreri: you might be able to decipher it using chdist to see why it might be uninstallable on that arch | 16:05 |
mapreri | ok, it's due to https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=865465 | 16:13 |
ubottu | Debian bug 865465 in src:openmpi "openmpi FTBFS on s390x: undefined reference to opal_atomic_*" [Serious,Fixed] | 16:14 |
nacc | mapreri: http://paste.ubuntu.com/24933694/ | 16:14 |
nacc | mapreri: it's uninstallable with artful-proposed on s390x | 16:14 |
mapreri | yeah, got to it | 16:14 |
mapreri | eventually | 16:14 |
mapreri | pity, but should be fixed by the next autosync, theoretically | 16:14 |
slangasek | mdeslaur: have you seen LP: #1700079 ? I am unconvinced from the description that it's a regression vs. a race-condition in the systemd unit | 16:38 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1700079 in openvpn (Ubuntu) "openvpn broken after unattended security upgrade" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1700079 | 16:38 |
rbasak | slangasek: that's from adac and/or frickler in #ubuntu-server earlier today. Two people reported the same thing, so I asked for a bug report. | 17:25 |
sarnold | slangasek: btw mdeslaur is out for the weekend | 17:57 |
slangasek | sarnold: ok. would someone else from security look at this, should I assign the bug to him so he sees it on his return? | 18:29 |
sarnold | slangasek: probably best to assign it to him, none of us spotted anything in postinsts or unit files or elsewhere. :/ I'm not even sure if this is expected or not. Is it? | 18:30 |
slangasek | sarnold: it is not expected that restarting the server on upgrade fails? | 18:31 |
sarnold | slangasek: hrm. I read too quickly I thought that was the hanging clients that everyone experienced.. hrm. | 18:32 |
sbeattie | slangasek: the curious thing is it only happening with unattended upgrades, both reporters in #ubuntu-server last night were unable to reproduce it outside of that. Though it could just be unattended upgrades making it easier to lose whatever race is happening. | 18:40 |
slangasek | sbeattie: how many times did they try outside of unattended-upgrades? sample size of 4 isn't much to draw conclusions from | 18:41 |
sbeattie | slangasek: unknown | 18:43 |
LocutusOfBorg | hello apw, how do you feel about suricata sync/merge? | 19:06 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!