/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2017/06/24/#ubuntu-release.txt

-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-os-browserify [amd64] (artful-proposed/none) [0.2.1-2] (no packageset)05:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected shim-signed [source] (trusty-proposed) [1.27~14.04.1]05:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected shim-signed [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.30~16.04.1]05:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected shim-signed [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.30~17.04.1]05:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected shim-signed [source] (trusty-proposed) [1.30~14.04.1]05:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected shim-signed [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.30~16.10.1]05:25
slangasekLocutusOfBorg: hi, so is this you blindly retrying the armhf haskell builds?07:48
LocutusOfBorgslangasek, no, I did retry some builds in the 19-20-21 tonight07:52
LocutusOfBorgand the side effect was that I retried also them07:52
LocutusOfBorgsorry if you got a lot of emails07:52
slangasekLocutusOfBorg: hmm, ok.  well, somebody (or multiple somebodies) are leaning on the retry button ;)07:53
LocutusOfBorgit was some automatic tool :)07:53
LocutusOfBorgnot me, not anymore07:53
LocutusOfBorgsince I woke up07:53
acheronukslangasek: did a rebuild of KDE zanshin which depends on KDE PIM https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zanshin ; so that needs the same removal of binaries due to non building architectures now I think07:53
slangasekLocutusOfBorg: I fixed haskell-cryptonite this evening, and have scheduled rebuilds of the rest of the stack above it07:53
LocutusOfBorgI see07:53
LocutusOfBorg:)07:53
LocutusOfBorgI'm fixing right now *yesod*07:53
slangasekacheronuk: already removed07:53
LocutusOfBorgoops, I mean *prelude*07:53
acheronukslangasek: :) thank you07:53
LocutusOfBorgthe main showstoppers now are ada and xmlhtml07:56
mapreriI also noticed somebody retrying a failed build of opencv/s390x at least 4 times in not even 2 hours yesterday night.  when the issue was an installability problem fixed later (and then I successfully retried the build).07:57
maprerii.e. that guy didn't care of watching the build log…07:57
LocutusOfBorgprelude should be ready for upload07:57
LocutusOfBorgmapreri, why can't they be 4 different people?07:57
mapreriLocutusOfBorg: what are you doing with prelude?07:57
LocutusOfBorghaskell-prelude07:58
maprerithey can, but I don't think they are.  call it a hunch :)07:58
LocutusOfBorgmapreri, I retried it once, but only one single time07:58
mapreriah, ok, carry on with haskell *shrugs*07:58
LocutusOfBorgbecause I also retried git and something else, then I looked at vtk6 and everything was in place07:59
LocutusOfBorgso, I stopped caring about opencv07:59
LocutusOfBorgit was probably python, right?07:59
maprerino, it was opempio08:00
mapreriopenmpi*08:00
LocutusOfBorgoh yeah yes08:00
LocutusOfBorgI remember now08:00
LocutusOfBorgyeah the nice transition08:00
maprerifixed with -608:00
LocutusOfBorgwhat could possibly go wrong08:00
mapreriit wasn't a transition, was it?08:00
LocutusOfBorgyou will know when reverse-dependencies will start breaking08:02
mapreri:(08:02
LocutusOfBorgopenmpi can be sooo funny08:02
acheronukmapreri: I retried just once. Then looked at the build log and realised :/08:02
acheronukdunno who did the other 308:02
maprerithat's already 2 people08:03
mapreridon't tell me LocutusOfBorg was right08:03
slangasek:D08:03
slangasekit wasn't me08:03
LocutusOfBorgmapreri :)08:23
LocutusOfBorgprelude* is in dep-wait and building08:24
LocutusOfBorgslangasek, what is next step? remove that bunch of armhf stuff? I looked a lot, and I don't really know how to solve08:24
LocutusOfBorgagda and xmlhtml08:24
slangasekcould be08:26
slangasekxmlhtml also failed on i386, so it may be a 32-bit problem?  Did this fail in Debian?08:26
maprericould you please remind me how often ubuntu's britney runs?08:26
LocutusOfBorgxmlhtml I opened an issue upstream08:27
LocutusOfBorgconfirm, I think this is a general 32 bit issue08:27
slangasekmapreri: it runs 5 minutes after the previous one finishes08:27
LocutusOfBorgI can't know debian because slowlyness of builders08:27
maprerithat's Very Often™08:27
LocutusOfBorgno, i386 has failed08:27
LocutusOfBorgarmhf is slow, but meh08:28
LocutusOfBorgalso kfreebsd-i386 is sad, I think I reported that upstream08:28
LocutusOfBorglets see how bad I was tonight at fixing/reporting stuff08:28
LocutusOfBorghttps://github.com/snapframework/xmlhtml/issues/3008:28
LocutusOfBorgthe funny thing IIRC this is a new test, so it has been probably broken since forever :)08:28
LocutusOfBorgsomething is telling me "ehi disable testsuite", but I won't listen to it08:29
LocutusOfBorghgettext testsuite depends on cabal-install sigh08:32
LocutusOfBorgso, probably it needs to go away or be silented08:32
=== sakrecoe1 is now known as sakrecoer
acheronukE: [Sat Jun 24 18:00:50 2017] - https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-artful/artful/armhf/c/carton/20170623_115845_812ba@/result.tar is damaged, ignoring: "filename 'testpkg-version' not found"18:43
acheronukquite a few errors like that in the full migration output logs18:43
acheronukwhich seems to be associated with tests thate are "running" forever in excuses, but not in the running tests @ http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/running18:45
slangasekacheronuk: where are you looking that you see that error?19:12
acheronukslangasek: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/log/artful/2017-06-24/18:47:36.log19:14
acheronukraw logs which I sometimes look at if I'm impatient19:14
acheronuksearch down for alien-hunter a few times, and that will come eventually19:15
acheronukwhich seems associated with the forever "running" test reported here: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#libcommons-cli-java19:15
slangasekacheronuk: thanks, I'll dig a bit and see what I can find19:17
acheronukI noticed the same think on some KDE tests this morning, but worked around those with the 'retry' script with '--state RUNNING' and some very specific picking of the output urls19:17
acheronukand re-running those seemed to break them out of that situation19:18
acheronukok. thanks19:18
slangasekacheronuk: btw is something supposed to be providing the 'kdepim' binary package going forward? I see that this, plus the stale ktnef binaries on arm64/ppc64el/s390x, are the only bits still in artful right now19:19
slangasekso maybe that source package is ready for removal?19:19
slangasek(which would clean up NBS)19:19
acheronukslangasek: AFAIK, yes. They can go. kdepim meta package was not really appropriate to be included anything produced from the kdepim split. I guess if ever decided we need to bring back a meta, it would made somewhere else19:24
acheronukslangasek: seen the bug for the removal, and that it's done. thank you19:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-raaz [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.1.1-2] (no packageset)22:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-raaz [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.1.1-2] (no packageset)22:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-raaz [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.1.1-2] (no packageset)22:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-raaz [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.1.1-2] (no packageset)22:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-raaz [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.1.1-2] (no packageset)22:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-raaz [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.1.1-2] (no packageset)22:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-raaz [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.1.1-2]22:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-raaz [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.1.1-2]22:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-raaz [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.1.1-2]22:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-os-browserify [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.2.1-2]22:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-raaz [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.1.1-2]22:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-raaz [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.1.1-2]22:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-raaz [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.1.1-2]22:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hackage-security [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.5.2.2-7ubuntu1] (no packageset)22:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hackage-security [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.5.2.2-7ubuntu1] (no packageset)22:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hackage-security [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.5.2.2-7ubuntu1] (no packageset)22:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hackage-security [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.5.2.2-7ubuntu1] (no packageset)22:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hackage-security [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.5.2.2-7ubuntu1] (no packageset)22:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hackage-security [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.5.2.2-7ubuntu1] (no packageset)22:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libaqbanking [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [5.7.6beta-2] (no packageset)23:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libaqbanking [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [5.7.6beta-2] (no packageset)23:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libaqbanking [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [5.7.6beta-2] (no packageset)23:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libaqbanking [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [5.7.6beta-2] (no packageset)23:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libaqbanking [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [5.7.6beta-2] (no packageset)23:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libaqbanking [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [5.7.6beta-2] (no packageset)23:23

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!