/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2017/06/28/#cloud-init.txt

dpb1powersj: https://jenkins.ubuntu.com/server/job/cloud-init-ci/20/consoleText too many values to unpack?18:25
powersjhmm a merge on ubuntu/xenial18:30
powersjlet me see what the state of the integration tests is there18:30
smoserpowersj, yeah, was justa about to ask about that18:33
smoserif i cherry picked your integration fixes18:33
smoserwould that do it ?18:34
powersjYes it would. It is due to the new test framework handling error exceptions from pylxd which is missing from the old version18:35
smoserok. i'm going to attempt to pull those along18:46
smoserpowersj, bah19:09
smoserso i got those commits. and didn't fix.19:09
smoserso i'm going to drop them again and ignore the failure.19:09
smoser:-(19:09
powersjok19:09
powersjsame failure though?19:09
smoseri grabbed the commits, but they're not in the tree19:09
smoseryeah19:09
smoserhttps://jenkins.ubuntu.com/server/job/cloud-init-ci/21/console19:10
smoserthey're not in the tree, they're in quilt patches in debian/patches19:10
powersjah19:10
smoserso you'd have to 'quilt push' in order to run the intergration tests with them there.19:10
powersjhmm should I keep the integration tests as a part of CI then?19:12
smoseryes19:15
smoserand msot of the time this would work.19:15
powersjok as long as you are fine with those odd ball cases :)19:17
=== Guest28796 is now known as mgagne
smoserpowersj, i wonder...19:35
smoseri dont have a suffiecntly old lxd anywhere19:35
powersj?19:35
smosercould you easily run integration tests on the xenial deb in https://launchpad.net/~smoser/+archive/ubuntu/cloud-init-dev/+files/cloud-init_0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~16.04.2~ppa3_all.deb19:35
powersjwe could; clone master to get latest tests, and pass --deb option to integration tests to put that deb into the images.19:39
powersjthis however, assumes we don't run into a mismatch of tests and features/functionality19:39
dpb1getting the tests executed will be step 119:44
dpb1instead of failure to launch19:44
smoserpowersj, yeah. i was just asking if you could do it locally19:46
powersjsmoser: running...19:48
smoseri think it will run19:48
powersjoh it is19:49
powersjcollecting output for tests now19:49
powersjtests passed20:03
powersjhttps://paste.ubuntu.com/24975100/20:37
powersjhmm CI doesn't seem to be triggering at the moment now...20:50
dpb1powersj: attach those results to the MP?20:53
powersjdpb1: done20:56
dpb1thx20:57
powersjok CI is back, sorry about that folks21:00
smoser[ubuntu/xenial-proposed] cloud-init 0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~16.04.2 (Waiting for approval)21:27
smoser[ubuntu/yakkety-proposed] cloud-init 0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~16.10.2 (Waiting for approval)21:27
dpb1woop dee doo21:27
smoser[ubuntu/zesty-proposed] cloud-init 0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~17.04.2 (Waiting for approval)21:27
smosernight night21:31
dpb1smoser: cya21:31
dpb1rharper: this should be fix released? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1693939 (for cloud-init project)21:56
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1693939 in cloud-init (Ubuntu Zesty) "Switch Azure detection to use chassis_asset_tag" [Medium,Confirmed]21:56
rharperdpb1: hrm21:56
* rharper checks in zesty daily21:57
dpb1well21:57
rharperdpb1: no, I don't think so21:57
dpb1I mean, the cloud-init project bug21:57
dpb1er21:57
dpb1task21:57
rharper0.7.9-113 is in zesty, so ideally we'd SRU to Zesty21:57
dpb1not the source package task21:57
dpb1ok21:57
dpb1that confuses me21:58
dpb1why21:58
dpb1?21:58
rharperwe don't  strictly have to update zesty21:58
rharperbut it's not nice to have 16.04 up to date but the current release have issues21:58
dpb1why is zesty involved in the cloud-init project task though21:58
dpb1there is a separate source package task on there21:59
rharperwell, we upload to each of the current release (devel + any currently supported releases)21:59
rharperpossibly as cloud-init has a branch per release to handle the packaging ?21:59
rharperI don't know for sure21:59
dpb1ok21:59
dpb1the release process stuff is a bit hazy to me21:59
rharperI'm not too keen on the lp bits, but I do know that we have a branch per release for packaging changes22:00
dpb1in our source tree (outside of the ubuntu distro)22:00
rharperyes22:00
rharpergit22:00
dpb1k22:00
dpb1that makes sense22:00
dpb1I'll ask scott when I next think of it.22:01
rharperok22:01

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!