/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2017/06/28/#ubuntu-release.txt

tsimonq2Can someone on the release team please get the ball rolling for Alpha 1? infinity slangasek stgraber00:53
tsimonq2i.e. put in archive blocks, spin up images on iso.qa.ubuntu.com00:56
tsimonq2The timing is tight as it is...00:56
slangasektsimonq2: I'm EOD now and not available to follow through on all of this, but I can at least create the milestone on iso.qa.u.c right quick01:04
tsimonq2slangasek: gracias01:12
stgrabertsimonq2: crap, got stuck in meetings... I started preparing the release block then got interrupted...01:45
stgraberwill sort it out after dinner01:45
tsimonq2stgraber: Ok, thanks :)01:48
tsimonq2stgraber: Just wanted to make sure you didn't forget :)01:48
tsimonq2(granted, I did ping you at 2 AM, so I exprected it to be a bit :P)01:49
tsimonq2*expected01:50
tsimonq2s/didn't forget/saw my message/ as well01:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Artful Alpha 1] (20170628) has been added02:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop i386 [Artful Alpha 1] (20170628) has been added02:27
tsimonq2I thought Xubuntu wasn't participating?02:30
stgraberI don't think it is02:45
stgraberI suspect slangasek setup the tracker but didn't change the series list02:45
stgraberok, done with the tracker I think02:47
stgrabercrontab updated, triggering an initial build02:49
stgraberrebuild requested, builds should show up soon02:50
stgrabergoing to figure out how to generate the right britney hint now02:50
stgraberfreeze in place02:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Alternate amd64 [Artful Alpha 1] (20170628) has been added02:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Alternate i386 [Artful Alpha 1] (20170628) has been added02:57
tsimonq2stgraber: \o/02:57
tsimonq2stgraber: What about the other flavors?03:28
stgraberthey're supposed to be building03:37
stgraberyeah, I see Launchpad building a bunch of stuff still03:38
tsimonq2Ok cool03:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Artful Alpha 1] (20170628) has been added03:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop i386 [Artful Alpha 1] (20170628) has been added03:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Artful Alpha 1] (20170628) has been added03:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop i386 [Artful Alpha 1] (20170628) has been added03:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Artful Alpha 1] (20170628) has been added03:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop i386 [Artful Alpha 1] (20170628) has been added03:58
tsimonq2stgraber: Can we get Lubuntu Next as well?05:24
acheronukconfusing artful hiding at bottom of page :/ http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker05:31
stgraberslangasek: so hmm, I seem to have broken britney with the freeze hint, just not sure how :)05:33
slangasekstgraber: orly. looking05:35
stgraberTraceback (most recent call last):05:36
stgraber  File "/home/ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/code/b2/britney.py", line 278, in __init__05:36
stgraber    self.read_hints(self.options.hintsdir)05:36
stgraber  File "/home/ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/code/b2/britney.py", line 1081, in read_hints05:36
stgraber    (x, package, hint2.version, hint2.user, hint2.days,05:36
stgraberAttributeError: 'Hint' object has no attribute 'days'05:36
stgraberthe freeze hint was generated using the usual command and doesn't look wrong to me (looked at a few past ones to compare)05:37
slangasekstgraber: because the freeze hint blocks linux, but apw already has a block for that, so britney bails on a message that's almost never used05:43
slangasekstgraber: I've dropped linux from the hint, the next run should go05:45
stgraberslangasek: thanks05:45
apwslangasek, now that is an esoteric bug ...05:52
slangasekapw: better or worse than "upstream tarball contains a patch not found in upstream git tag that breaks the library on armhf, but no one noticed because 'make check' is commented out without explanation in debian/rules"?05:53
tsimonq2stgraber: bump on Lubuntu Next? :)05:53
apwslangasek, heh that one should get some kind of prize ...05:53
stgrabertsimonq2: I added it and triggered a rebuild which is in progress now05:53
tsimonq2stgraber: Ok, thank you. :)05:54
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: curry-frontend [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.4.2-5ubuntu1] (no packageset)05:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: curry-frontend [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.4.2-5ubuntu1] (no packageset)05:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: curry-frontend [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.4.2-5ubuntu1] (no packageset)06:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: curry-frontend [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.4.2-5ubuntu1] (no packageset)06:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted curry-frontend [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.4.2-5ubuntu1]06:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted curry-frontend [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.4.2-5ubuntu1]06:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted curry-frontend [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.4.2-5ubuntu1]06:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted curry-frontend [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.4.2-5ubuntu1]06:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Next Desktop amd64 [Artful Alpha 1] (20170628.1) has been added06:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Next Desktop i386 [Artful Alpha 1] (20170628.1) has been added06:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: curry-frontend [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.4.2-5ubuntu1] (no packageset)06:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-bayespy [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.5.8-1] (no packageset)06:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-bayespy [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.5.8-1]06:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted curry-frontend [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.4.2-5ubuntu1]06:40
slangasekwell I've never seen that before. https://launchpadlibrarian.net/322236698/upload_12676800_log.txt06:41
slangasekINFO Upload was rejected:06:41
slangasekINFO faustworks_0.5~repack0-3_amd64.buildinfo: Unknown section 'programming'06:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [amd64] (artful-proposed) [20170622-0ubuntu1]06:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [armhf] (artful-proposed) [20170622-0ubuntu1]06:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [20170622-0ubuntu1]06:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [arm64] (artful-proposed) [20170622-0ubuntu1]06:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [s390x] (artful-proposed) [20170622-0ubuntu1]06:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [i386] (artful-proposed) [20170622-0ubuntu1]06:41
apwslangasek, i did not know we had a definative list ...06:42
tsimonq2*scratches head*06:42
tsimonq2slangasek: It was fine in Debian, no?06:42
slangasekI assume so06:42
* tsimonq2 wonders if there's an Ubuntu-specific list that differs from Debian's06:43
tsimonq2Because with Debian it's in the Policy Manual06:43
=== med_ is now known as Guest39045
cjwatsonslangasek,tsimonq2,apw: there's a Section table in Launchpad which we generally try to keep in sync with Debian08:34
cjwatsonbut AFAICS there isn't a "programming" section in Debian either?08:34
apwcjwatson, hrm, well thats all a bit of a mess08:38
cjwatsonI'm just double-checking Debian08:38
apwand syncing that is a "it should just happen in the background by magic" kind of thing its not something we need to be congniscent of08:39
cjwatsonNo, it's something we have to do explicitly08:39
cjwatsonVery rare though08:40
cjwatsonSo in this case it's just because faustworks has an incorrect Section in its debian/control08:45
cjwatsonMostly doesn't matter but we do minimal validation on the buildinfo, so ...08:45
cjwatson"programming" wouldn't be a sensible section to add - it would duplicate lots of other things08:46
cjwatsonI'll file a Debian bug on faustworks08:47
apwcjwatson, thank you for investigating that for us08:47
=== retoaded is now known as retoad
=== retoad is now known as leworks
=== leworks is now known as retoaded
cjwatsonhttps://bugs.debian.org/86620208:58
ubot5Debian bug 866202 in faustworks "faustworks: incorrect section in debian/control Source" [Normal,Open]08:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected intel-microcode [source] (xenial-proposed) [3.20170511.1~ubuntu16.04.0]09:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected intel-microcode [source] (yakkety-proposed) [3.20170511.1~ubuntu16.10.0]09:14
Ukikiehttps://deb.li/3utEj - master 7a24640 faustworks debian/control Switched section to 'devel'09:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (vivid-proposed/main) [3.19.0-88.96] (core, kernel)09:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-edge [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.10.0-26.30~16.04.1] (kernel)09:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (zesty-proposed/main) [4.10.0-26.30] (core, kernel)09:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted intel-microcode [source] (zesty-proposed) [3.20170511.1~ubuntu17.04.0]10:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (vivid-proposed) [3.19.0-88.96]10:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-edge [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.10.0-26.30~16.04.1]10:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [4.10.0-26.30]10:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: session-shortcuts (xenial-proposed/main) [1.2 => 1.2ubuntu0.16.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop)13:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: session-shortcuts (zesty-proposed/main) [1.2 => 1.2ubuntu0.17.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop)13:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: session-shortcuts (yakkety-proposed/main) [1.2 => 1.2ubuntu0.16.10.1] (ubuntu-desktop)13:22
cpaelzerinfinity: sorry for the late reply - I'm actually off today - sorry to make you a sad panda13:25
* cpaelzer has weird images in his head now13:26
cpaelzerIIRC in Seville it was encouraged to use bileto to push SRUs and such - I remember xnox saying he even prefers it13:26
cpaelzernow with robru gone things might be different (or they were different all the time just depending on person)13:26
cpaelzeranyway sorry my little panda - I can surely dput/debdiff as usual if that is preferred13:27
cpaelzerI'll ready your comments on the bug - once I'm back at work for real13:27
cpaelzerthanks already to look at it13:27
apwcpaelzer, heh xnox doesn't have to review them :)13:54
xnoxcpaelzer, the feedback from those was that the tooling is bad. E.g. sru-queue-pull for review does not follow syncs into the queue right, and launchpad doesn't generate diffs / downloadable artifacts from the queue the way it does for direct uploads.13:56
rbasak"git ubuntu queue sync" :-)13:57
rbasakI'm hoping to get it functional enough to superseded sru-* in the ned.13:57
rbasakend13:57
rbasakIt supports downloading from queue syncs because cpaelzer kept doing that to me :-)13:58
apwrbasak, yeah nice idea, but i don't want to have to change, i am a dinosaur :)14:09
Odd_BlokeHow often do the automated syncs from Debian in artful happen?14:34
apwiirc it is every 6 hours14:35
LocutusOfBorgOdd_Bloke, some times a day14:35
LocutusOfBorgmostly after debian dinstalls14:35
sil2100cpaelzer: reviewing bileto SRUs is actually quite easy if you just know how to use bileto14:35
cjwatsonEvery six hours, as apw says.14:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sssd (xenial-proposed/main) [1.13.4-1ubuntu1.5 => 1.13.4-1ubuntu1.6] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)15:08
slangasekbdmurray: I see LP: #1556653 flagged as a candidate for SRU removal, which you sponsored; do you want to nag someone to verify, or do the honors?16:22
ubot5Launchpad bug 1556653 in ktp-text-ui (Ubuntu Xenial) "ktp-text-ui crashed with SIGSEGV in ~SharedPtr()" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/155665316:23
bdmurrayslangasek: How about we just remove it16:55
slangasekbdmurray: doing16:56
slangasek"Steve Langasek does not have permission to unsubscribe SRU Verification."16:56
slangasekotherwise, done16:56
slangasekacheronuk: I see there is still a stack of kde 5.9.5 SRUs in zesty-proposed with to we19:08
slangasekacheronuk: with no verification (LP: #1687444); is someone going to follow through on those?19:08
ubot5Launchpad bug 1687444 in plasma-desktop (Ubuntu Zesty) "Zesty SRU tracking bug for KDE's Plasma 5.9.5" [Wishlist,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/168744419:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pptpd (xenial-proposed/main) [1.4.0-7ubuntu0.1 => 1.4.0-7ubuntu0.2] (ubuntu-server)20:52
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (xenial-proposed/main) [0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 => 0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~16.04.2] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)21:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (yakkety-proposed/main) [0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~16.10.1 => 0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~16.10.2] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)21:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (zesty-proposed/main) [0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~17.04.1 => 0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~17.04.2] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)21:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Next Desktop amd64 [Artful Alpha 1] has been marked as ready21:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Next Desktop i386 [Artful Alpha 1] has been marked as ready21:29

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!