[00:53] <tsimonq2> Can someone on the release team please get the ball rolling for Alpha 1? infinity slangasek stgraber
[00:56] <tsimonq2> i.e. put in archive blocks, spin up images on iso.qa.ubuntu.com
[00:56] <tsimonq2> The timing is tight as it is...
[01:04] <slangasek> tsimonq2: I'm EOD now and not available to follow through on all of this, but I can at least create the milestone on iso.qa.u.c right quick
[01:12] <tsimonq2> slangasek: gracias
[01:45] <stgraber> tsimonq2: crap, got stuck in meetings... I started preparing the release block then got interrupted...
[01:45] <stgraber> will sort it out after dinner
[01:48] <tsimonq2> stgraber: Ok, thanks :)
[01:48] <tsimonq2> stgraber: Just wanted to make sure you didn't forget :)
[01:49] <tsimonq2> (granted, I did ping you at 2 AM, so I exprected it to be a bit :P)
[01:50] <tsimonq2> *expected
[01:50] <tsimonq2> s/didn't forget/saw my message/ as well
[02:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Artful Alpha 1] (20170628) has been added
[02:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop i386 [Artful Alpha 1] (20170628) has been added
[02:30] <tsimonq2> I thought Xubuntu wasn't participating?
[02:45] <stgraber> I don't think it is
[02:45] <stgraber> I suspect slangasek setup the tracker but didn't change the series list
[02:47] <stgraber> ok, done with the tracker I think
[02:49] <stgraber> crontab updated, triggering an initial build
[02:50] <stgraber> rebuild requested, builds should show up soon
[02:50] <stgraber> going to figure out how to generate the right britney hint now
[02:54] <stgraber> freeze in place
[02:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Alternate amd64 [Artful Alpha 1] (20170628) has been added
[02:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Alternate i386 [Artful Alpha 1] (20170628) has been added
[02:57] <tsimonq2> stgraber: \o/
[03:28] <tsimonq2> stgraber: What about the other flavors?
[03:37] <stgraber> they're supposed to be building
[03:38] <stgraber> yeah, I see Launchpad building a bunch of stuff still
[03:39] <tsimonq2> Ok cool
[03:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Artful Alpha 1] (20170628) has been added
[03:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop i386 [Artful Alpha 1] (20170628) has been added
[03:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Artful Alpha 1] (20170628) has been added
[03:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop i386 [Artful Alpha 1] (20170628) has been added
[03:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Artful Alpha 1] (20170628) has been added
[03:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop i386 [Artful Alpha 1] (20170628) has been added
[05:24] <tsimonq2> stgraber: Can we get Lubuntu Next as well?
[05:31] <acheronuk> confusing artful hiding at bottom of page :/ http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker
[05:33] <stgraber> slangasek: so hmm, I seem to have broken britney with the freeze hint, just not sure how :)
[05:35] <slangasek> stgraber: orly. looking
[05:36] <stgraber> Traceback (most recent call last):
[05:36] <stgraber>   File "/home/ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/code/b2/britney.py", line 278, in __init__
[05:36] <stgraber>     self.read_hints(self.options.hintsdir)
[05:36] <stgraber>   File "/home/ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/code/b2/britney.py", line 1081, in read_hints
[05:36] <stgraber>     (x, package, hint2.version, hint2.user, hint2.days,
[05:36] <stgraber> AttributeError: 'Hint' object has no attribute 'days'
[05:37] <stgraber> the freeze hint was generated using the usual command and doesn't look wrong to me (looked at a few past ones to compare)
[05:43] <slangasek> stgraber: because the freeze hint blocks linux, but apw already has a block for that, so britney bails on a message that's almost never used
[05:45] <slangasek> stgraber: I've dropped linux from the hint, the next run should go
[05:45] <stgraber> slangasek: thanks
[05:52] <apw> slangasek, now that is an esoteric bug ...
[05:53] <slangasek> apw: better or worse than "upstream tarball contains a patch not found in upstream git tag that breaks the library on armhf, but no one noticed because 'make check' is commented out without explanation in debian/rules"?
[05:53] <tsimonq2> stgraber: bump on Lubuntu Next? :)
[05:53] <apw> slangasek, heh that one should get some kind of prize ...
[05:53] <stgraber> tsimonq2: I added it and triggered a rebuild which is in progress now
[05:54] <tsimonq2> stgraber: Ok, thank you. :)
[05:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: curry-frontend [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.4.2-5ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[05:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: curry-frontend [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.4.2-5ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[06:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: curry-frontend [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.4.2-5ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[06:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: curry-frontend [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.4.2-5ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[06:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted curry-frontend [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.4.2-5ubuntu1]
[06:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted curry-frontend [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.4.2-5ubuntu1]
[06:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted curry-frontend [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.4.2-5ubuntu1]
[06:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted curry-frontend [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.4.2-5ubuntu1]
[06:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Next Desktop amd64 [Artful Alpha 1] (20170628.1) has been added
[06:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Next Desktop i386 [Artful Alpha 1] (20170628.1) has been added
[06:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: curry-frontend [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.4.2-5ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[06:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-bayespy [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.5.8-1] (no packageset)
[06:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-bayespy [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.5.8-1]
[06:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted curry-frontend [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.4.2-5ubuntu1]
[06:41] <slangasek> well I've never seen that before. https://launchpadlibrarian.net/322236698/upload_12676800_log.txt
[06:41] <slangasek> INFO Upload was rejected:
[06:41] <slangasek> INFO 	faustworks_0.5~repack0-3_amd64.buildinfo: Unknown section 'programming'
[06:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [amd64] (artful-proposed) [20170622-0ubuntu1]
[06:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [armhf] (artful-proposed) [20170622-0ubuntu1]
[06:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [20170622-0ubuntu1]
[06:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [arm64] (artful-proposed) [20170622-0ubuntu1]
[06:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [s390x] (artful-proposed) [20170622-0ubuntu1]
[06:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [i386] (artful-proposed) [20170622-0ubuntu1]
[06:42] <apw> slangasek, i did not know we had a definative list ...
[06:42] <tsimonq2> *scratches head*
[06:42] <tsimonq2> slangasek: It was fine in Debian, no?
[06:42] <slangasek> I assume so
[06:43]  * tsimonq2 wonders if there's an Ubuntu-specific list that differs from Debian's
[06:43] <tsimonq2> Because with Debian it's in the Policy Manual
[08:34] <cjwatson> slangasek,tsimonq2,apw: there's a Section table in Launchpad which we generally try to keep in sync with Debian
[08:34] <cjwatson> but AFAICS there isn't a "programming" section in Debian either?
[08:38] <apw> cjwatson, hrm, well thats all a bit of a mess
[08:38] <cjwatson> I'm just double-checking Debian
[08:39] <apw> and syncing that is a "it should just happen in the background by magic" kind of thing its not something we need to be congniscent of
[08:39] <cjwatson> No, it's something we have to do explicitly
[08:40] <cjwatson> Very rare though
[08:45] <cjwatson> So in this case it's just because faustworks has an incorrect Section in its debian/control
[08:45] <cjwatson> Mostly doesn't matter but we do minimal validation on the buildinfo, so ...
[08:46] <cjwatson> "programming" wouldn't be a sensible section to add - it would duplicate lots of other things
[08:47] <cjwatson> I'll file a Debian bug on faustworks
[08:47] <apw> cjwatson, thank you for investigating that for us
[08:58] <cjwatson> https://bugs.debian.org/866202
[09:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected intel-microcode [source] (xenial-proposed) [3.20170511.1~ubuntu16.04.0]
[09:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected intel-microcode [source] (yakkety-proposed) [3.20170511.1~ubuntu16.10.0]
[09:39] <Ukikie> https://deb.li/3utEj - master 7a24640 faustworks debian/control Switched section to 'devel'
[09:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (vivid-proposed/main) [3.19.0-88.96] (core, kernel)
[09:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-edge [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.10.0-26.30~16.04.1] (kernel)
[09:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (zesty-proposed/main) [4.10.0-26.30] (core, kernel)
[10:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted intel-microcode [source] (zesty-proposed) [3.20170511.1~ubuntu17.04.0]
[10:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (vivid-proposed) [3.19.0-88.96]
[10:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-edge [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.10.0-26.30~16.04.1]
[10:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [4.10.0-26.30]
[13:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: session-shortcuts (xenial-proposed/main) [1.2 => 1.2ubuntu0.16.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[13:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: session-shortcuts (zesty-proposed/main) [1.2 => 1.2ubuntu0.17.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[13:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: session-shortcuts (yakkety-proposed/main) [1.2 => 1.2ubuntu0.16.10.1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[13:25] <cpaelzer> infinity: sorry for the late reply - I'm actually off today - sorry to make you a sad panda
[13:26]  * cpaelzer has weird images in his head now
[13:26] <cpaelzer> IIRC in Seville it was encouraged to use bileto to push SRUs and such - I remember xnox saying he even prefers it
[13:26] <cpaelzer> now with robru gone things might be different (or they were different all the time just depending on person)
[13:27] <cpaelzer> anyway sorry my little panda - I can surely dput/debdiff as usual if that is preferred
[13:27] <cpaelzer> I'll ready your comments on the bug - once I'm back at work for real
[13:27] <cpaelzer> thanks already to look at it
[13:54] <apw> cpaelzer, heh xnox doesn't have to review them :)
[13:56] <xnox> cpaelzer, the feedback from those was that the tooling is bad. E.g. sru-queue-pull for review does not follow syncs into the queue right, and launchpad doesn't generate diffs / downloadable artifacts from the queue the way it does for direct uploads.
[13:57] <rbasak> "git ubuntu queue sync" :-)
[13:57] <rbasak> I'm hoping to get it functional enough to superseded sru-* in the ned.
[13:57] <rbasak> end
[13:58] <rbasak> It supports downloading from queue syncs because cpaelzer kept doing that to me :-)
[14:09] <apw> rbasak, yeah nice idea, but i don't want to have to change, i am a dinosaur :)
[14:34] <Odd_Bloke> How often do the automated syncs from Debian in artful happen?
[14:35] <apw> iirc it is every 6 hours
[14:35] <LocutusOfBorg> Odd_Bloke, some times a day
[14:35] <LocutusOfBorg> mostly after debian dinstalls
[14:35] <sil2100> cpaelzer: reviewing bileto SRUs is actually quite easy if you just know how to use bileto
[14:37] <cjwatson> Every six hours, as apw says.
[15:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sssd (xenial-proposed/main) [1.13.4-1ubuntu1.5 => 1.13.4-1ubuntu1.6] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[16:22] <slangasek> bdmurray: I see LP: #1556653 flagged as a candidate for SRU removal, which you sponsored; do you want to nag someone to verify, or do the honors?
[16:55] <bdmurray> slangasek: How about we just remove it
[16:56] <slangasek> bdmurray: doing
[16:56] <slangasek> "Steve Langasek does not have permission to unsubscribe SRU Verification."
[16:56] <slangasek> otherwise, done
[19:08] <slangasek> acheronuk: I see there is still a stack of kde 5.9.5 SRUs in zesty-proposed with to we
[19:08] <slangasek> acheronuk: with no verification (LP: #1687444); is someone going to follow through on those?
[20:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pptpd (xenial-proposed/main) [1.4.0-7ubuntu0.1 => 1.4.0-7ubuntu0.2] (ubuntu-server)
[21:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (xenial-proposed/main) [0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 => 0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~16.04.2] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)
[21:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (yakkety-proposed/main) [0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~16.10.1 => 0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~16.10.2] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)
[21:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (zesty-proposed/main) [0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~17.04.1 => 0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~17.04.2] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)
[21:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Next Desktop amd64 [Artful Alpha 1] has been marked as ready
[21:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Next Desktop i386 [Artful Alpha 1] has been marked as ready