-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (xenial-proposed/main) [0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 => 0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~16.04.2] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server) | 03:08 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (yakkety-proposed/main) [0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~16.10.1 => 0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~16.10.2] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server) | 03:12 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (zesty-proposed/main) [0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~17.04.1 => 0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~17.04.2] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server) | 03:15 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~16.04.2] | 04:26 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (yakkety-proposed) [0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~16.10.2] | 04:38 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (zesty-proposed) [0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~17.04.2] | 04:39 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (zesty-proposed) [0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~17.04.2] | 04:46 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (yakkety-proposed) [0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~16.10.2] | 04:53 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~16.04.2] | 04:55 | |
acheronuk | slangasek: I tried a couple of times to get people to do some verification, without much luck so far. I'll ask again. | 05:09 |
---|---|---|
acheronuk | everyone seems more keen on trying the new and shiny Plasma 5.10! | 05:09 |
cpaelzer | apw: infinity: rbasak: ok I'll continue to testbuild via bileto then and might reference to it e.g. for dep8 test previews, but I'll submit "normally" then as I really do not want to cause you more work | 06:02 |
cpaelzer | infinity: thanks for bringing that up - I didn't realize that causes trouble further down the SRU chain | 06:02 |
LocutusOfBorg | please let openldap migrate, thanks (libreoffice:i386 testsuite sucks) | 07:08 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Artful Alpha 1] has been marked as ready | 08:17 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop i386 [Artful Alpha 1] has been marked as ready | 08:17 | |
LocutusOfBorg | why is the debian autosync so slow today? | 08:20 |
apw | big perhaps | 08:22 |
LocutusOfBorg | I don't see new imports being processed since ~24h or something like that | 08:22 |
LocutusOfBorg | lets wait a new dinstall | 08:22 |
LocutusOfBorg | and I can't upload stuff in my ppa :s | 08:23 |
LocutusOfBorg | e.g. moka-icon-theme, is almost two days old now | 08:26 |
cjwatson | LocutusOfBorg: my fault for breaking the importer config while trying to enable buster imports, by the looks of things; William landed a fix last night | 08:33 |
cjwatson | I'll roll that out today | 08:34 |
LocutusOfBorg | oh ok :) I tried to wait, but I didn't see mentions on irclogs, so I decided to write it here, thanks for caring/fixing | 08:35 |
cjwatson | I didn't mention it because I didn't know about the breakage until this morning :) | 08:36 |
LocutusOfBorg | I mean other people in general :) | 08:36 |
apw | LocutusOfBorg, is what the channel is for ... | 09:17 |
cpaelzer | infinity: thanks for thinkin with me thourhg potential regressiosn of bug 1593907 | 09:36 |
ubot5 | bug 1593907 in ntp (Ubuntu Zesty) "ntpdate startup routine prevents ntp service from launching up on Ubuntu 16.04 server on system boot; manually starting ntp service works: [FIX in DESCRIPTION], just need to apply it and release a new version" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1593907 | 09:36 |
cpaelzer | infinity: I updated the bug, but TL;DR I think what you brought up is not an issue | 09:36 |
cpaelzer | IMHO - ready to be "revisited" for sponsoring & SRU | 09:37 |
LocutusOfBorg | hello, where should I report builders kernels upgrade requests? :P | 10:05 |
LocutusOfBorg | I found the culprit for the libreoffice-i386 testsuite sadness, as well as the rustc ppc64el build failures and so on | 10:05 |
LocutusOfBorg | debian bug: #865303 | 10:06 |
ubot5 | Debian bug 865303 in src:linux "libreoffice: Libreoffice Java features crash with Linux 3.16.43-2+deb8u1" [Serious,Fixed] http://bugs.debian.org/865303 | 10:06 |
LocutusOfBorg | apw, maybe I can prod you, but this is not really about the Ubuntu kernel, but rather the buildds installed one | 10:06 |
* apw passes that info on ... | 10:18 | |
=== mparillo_ is now known as mparillo | ||
cjwatson | LocutusOfBorg: in what sense is the buildd-installed kernel not the Ubuntu kernel? | 10:20 |
cjwatson | LocutusOfBorg: (they're upgraded automatically and routinely from cloud images) | 10:20 |
cjwatson | arm64 is currently a special case IIRC but that doesn't seem to be what you're talking about | 10:20 |
LocutusOfBorg | yep, I found it, and my last retry has picked up the kernel in security pocket | 10:21 |
LocutusOfBorg | the latest one seems to be reverting somewhat the CVE patch | 10:21 |
LocutusOfBorg | not sure if the published kernel has an incomplete patch or what, debdiffs between ubuntu kernels is difficult | 10:22 |
sbeattie | LocutusOfBorg: it's converting from an early iteration of the fixes to the ones that were accepted upstream, which also should address the java issues that were seen. | 10:25 |
sbeattie | (well, earlier) | 10:25 |
apw | LocutusOfBorg, what sbeattie said ... | 10:25 |
LocutusOfBorg | sbeattie, I see that, but rustc is failing on ppc64el in the same way in debian, lets wait for their give-back | 10:32 |
cjwatson | LocutusOfBorg: next importer run should work | 11:26 |
LocutusOfBorg | thanks! | 11:29 |
LocutusOfBorg | Laney, for your happyness debian bug: #866389 | 12:12 |
ubot5 | Debian bug 866389 in release.debian.org "transition: perl 5.26" [Normal,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/866389 | 12:12 |
LocutusOfBorg | :) | 12:12 |
Laney | LocutusOfBorg: noooooooooope | 12:27 |
Laney | why would that make me happy anyway? | 12:27 |
apw | Laney, lets hope LocutusOfBorg has mastered sarcasm | 12:30 |
Laney | I hope that's what it is | 12:31 |
Laney | but I don't get why it's directed at me :P | 12:31 |
LocutusOfBorg | Laney, I remember your happyness for the 5.24 transition, was driven by you IIRC | 12:34 |
apw | Laney, i assume it will blow up the ADT queues, which will make you happy | 12:34 |
LocutusOfBorg | and yes, sarcasm is intended :) | 12:34 |
=== pietroalbini_ is now known as pietroalbini | ||
infinity | cpaelzer: Ahh, calling it with '-g' must be 'new' (for some value of new, I'm clearly old). Did you check that with large offsets, the initial start just slams the system into a more correct time, instead of attempt to adjtime it with a days-long drift? | 13:35 |
infinity | cpaelzer: If it does one hard settimeofday, then moves on to adjtime, I agree that ntpdate is entirely useless in that scenario. | 13:36 |
infinity | cpaelzer: (It used to be that you explicitly wanted a non-adjtime ntpdate call first, then ntpd to drift you to perfection). | 13:36 |
cpaelzer | infinity: the default is to slew time if under 128 ms but to step it if above that | 13:46 |
cpaelzer | the limit can be increased with -x (to drift higher amounts of delta), but the default should be 129 ms | 13:46 |
cpaelzer | so, TL;DR it should set it if the delta is huge | 13:47 |
cpaelzer | although to admit - I haven't tested it yet to verify how right the manpage is about that | 13:47 |
cpaelzer | infinity: I can do so and update the bug if you want | 13:47 |
infinity | cpaelzer: Would be nice to have peace of mind on that. | 13:48 |
cpaelzer | ok, will do so | 13:48 |
infinity | cpaelzer: Honestly, if ntpd's first run does the job of ntpdate, I almost feel like ntpd should provide/conflict ntpdate (and provide a /usr/bin/ntpdate that one-shots ntpd if it's not running, or something clever), for the few packages that depend on ntpdate for odd reasons. | 13:49 |
infinity | cpaelzer: But that's not worth doing in an SRU. Having ntpdate effectively inert is fine too. | 13:49 |
cpaelzer | yeah but it is a nice suggestion for the further deprecation and dropping of ntpdate | 13:51 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: base-files (zesty-proposed/main) [9.6ubuntu13 => 9.6ubuntu13.1] (core) | 14:26 | |
rbasak | kirkland: ^ need SRU information in the bug please | 14:32 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (xenial-proposed/universe) [20170523-0ubuntu1~16.04.0 => 20170622-0ubuntu1~16.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud) | 14:42 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (trusty-proposed/universe) [20170523-0ubuntu1~14.04.0 => 20170622-0ubuntu1~14.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud) | 14:43 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (zesty-proposed/universe) [20170523-0ubuntu1~17.04.0 => 20170622-0ubuntu1~17.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud) | 14:43 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (yakkety-proposed/universe) [20170523-0ubuntu1~16.10.0 => 20170622-0ubuntu1~16.10.0] (ubuntu-cloud) | 14:43 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gce-compute-image-packages [source] (yakkety-proposed) [20170609-0ubuntu1~16.10.0] | 14:47 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gce-compute-image-packages [source] (zesty-proposed) [20170609-0ubuntu1~17.04.0] | 14:47 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gce-compute-image-packages [source] (trusty-proposed) [20170609-0ubuntu1~14.04.0] | 14:48 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gce-compute-image-packages [source] (xenial-proposed) [20170609-0ubuntu1~16.04.0] | 14:48 | |
=== chiluk_ is now known as chiluk | ||
rbasak | kirkland: ^ what happens on first login? That'll still be delayed, right? So the bug is being reduced in scope, but not being fixed entirely? | 15:03 |
rbasak | If the first login is before the timer has run for the first time, that is, which seems likely. | 15:03 |
kirkland | rbasak: true | 15:04 |
kirkland | rbasak: that's an easy fix, though, just one more line to add | 15:04 |
kirkland | rbasak: would you like me to fix that? | 15:05 |
kirkland | I think it would be a good idea, yeah | 15:05 |
rbasak | kirkland: yes please. Probably better for the SRU process to do it fewer times :) | 15:05 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected base-files [source] (zesty-proposed) [9.6ubuntu13.1] | 15:07 | |
slashd | bdmurray, sil2100 good day, could you please have a look at 'autofs' package currently in -proposed and copy it out to -updates ? It has reached the minimum aging period, bug in green in pending sru page, verification-done-$RELEASE has been done with detailed explanation. | 15:19 |
sil2100 | slashd: I can take a look after the meeting | 15:20 |
slashd | sil2100, thanks | 15:20 |
kirkland | rbasak: okey doke... base-files_9.6ubuntu13.2_source.changes uploaded to zesty-proposed | 15:46 |
sil2100 | slashd: done! | 15:46 |
kirkland | rbasak: this ensures that the fix happens immediately (ie, not requiring a first run to establish the empty file) | 15:46 |
slashd | sil2100, thanks | 15:46 |
kirkland | rbasak: I've updated the SRU testing/documentation in the bug description, and the embedded patch | 15:46 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: base-files (zesty-proposed/main) [9.6ubuntu13 => 9.6ubuntu13.2] (core) | 15:46 | |
kirkland | rbasak: and I've reset the status to in-progress | 15:46 |
kirkland | rbasak: anythign else? | 15:47 |
rbasak | kirkland: otp, will look in a bit. FWIW, we didn't burn 9.6ubuntu13.1. Can we tidier and use that? No need to wait for a reject before uploading. | 15:49 |
kirkland | rbasak: yeah, you're right, those .numbers are expensive, we really don't want to run out! | 15:50 |
kirkland | rbasak: done | 15:51 |
kirkland | rbasak: uploaded base-files_9.6ubuntu13.1_source.changes | 15:51 |
rbasak | Thanks. I like things all ordered and tidy :-) | 15:51 |
* rbasak suspects this might be one reason he's in ~ubuntu-sru. | 15:52 | |
rbasak | kirkland: do you have an artful upload with that fix? I don't see it. | 15:52 |
kirkland | rbasak: yep | 15:52 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: base-files (zesty-proposed/main) [9.6ubuntu13 => 9.6ubuntu13.1] (core) | 15:52 | |
kirkland | rbasak: ah, hang on a sec | 15:54 |
kirkland | rbasak: okay, pushed to artful | 15:54 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected base-files [source] (zesty-proposed) [9.6ubuntu13.2] | 15:55 | |
cpaelzer | infinity: btw I got to complete the ntp tests, all worked on xenial the way it should, to the -g which is default really adresses your concern | 16:15 |
rbasak | kirkland: http://paste.ubuntu.com/24982581/ are lines 59 and 60 still needed? | 16:28 |
kirkland | rbasak: no, technically we don't | 17:11 |
infinity | cpaelzer: My brain couldn't parse that sentence until I finally realized 's/to the/so the/' but yay, +1 | 17:26 |
infinity | cpaelzer: You can either record that in the bug (might be nice for people doing archaeology) or I can just hide the comments with the concerns, but either way, that's all I need to go ahead with the SRU. | 17:27 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kcptun [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [20170525+ds-1] (no packageset) | 17:27 | |
infinity | cpaelzer: Thanks for humouring me on the matter. | 17:27 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kcptun [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [20170525+ds-1] (no packageset) | 17:27 | |
stgraber | tseliot: how's the alpha going? | 17:29 |
tseliot | stgraber: wrong person? | 17:30 |
stgraber | yup :) | 17:30 |
stgraber | tsimonq2: how's the alpha going? | 17:30 |
stgraber | there, that's better :) | 17:30 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-confluentinc-confluent-kafka-go [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.9.4-2] (no packageset) | 17:39 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: stressant [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.4.1] (no packageset) | 17:39 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kcptun [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [20170525+ds-1] (no packageset) | 17:40 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kcptun [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [20170525+ds-1] (no packageset) | 17:41 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tmuxp [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.2.6-2] (no packageset) | 17:42 | |
tsimonq2 | stgraber: Hey, sorry, I took a nap | 18:59 |
tsimonq2 | stgraber: Lubuntu and Kubuntu aren't done yet but Ubuntu Kylin is | 18:59 |
tsimonq2 | stgraber: Any testing help is appreciated. :) | 18:59 |
stgraber | tsimonq2: well, I'm off today, so not going to be around for much else than doing the final publishing :) | 19:01 |
stgraber | (one of those trying to stay away from computer day off, not terribly succesful so far :)) | 19:02 |
tsimonq2 | stgraber: Ok :) | 19:02 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kcptun [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [20170525+ds-1] (no packageset) | 19:55 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kcptun [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [20170525+ds-1] (no packageset) | 20:00 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apport (zesty-proposed/main) [2.20.4-0ubuntu4.3 => 2.20.4-0ubuntu4.4] (core) | 20:31 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apport (yakkety-proposed/main) [2.20.3-0ubuntu8.5 => 2.20.3-0ubuntu8.6] (core) | 20:34 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apport (xenial-proposed/main) [2.20.1-0ubuntu2.8 => 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.9] (core) | 20:36 | |
tsimonq2 | stgraber: How long do you anticipate being awake this evening? | 21:37 |
tsimonq2 | (3 more to go, I'm just marking the done one as ready) | 21:37 |
stgraber | I'll be around for another 6-7 hours I expect | 21:37 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Artful Alpha 1] has been marked as ready | 21:38 | |
tsimonq2 | stgraber: Ok, I thought you were in a European time zone? | 21:38 |
stgraber | nope, Canada, eastern | 21:39 |
tsimonq2 | Oh, cool. | 21:40 |
tsimonq2 | stgraber: I'm in Wisconsin, Central TZ fwiw | 21:40 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [source] (zesty-proposed) [0.8.1-3ubuntu0.1] | 22:09 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [source] (zesty-proposed) [20170622-0ubuntu1~17.04.0] | 22:45 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gce-compute-image-packages [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [20170622-0ubuntu1~17.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud) | 22:48 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gce-compute-image-packages [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed/universe) [20170622-0ubuntu1~17.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud) | 22:49 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gce-compute-image-packages [i386] (zesty-proposed/universe) [20170622-0ubuntu1~17.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud) | 22:49 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gce-compute-image-packages [s390x] (zesty-proposed/universe) [20170622-0ubuntu1~17.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud) | 22:49 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gce-compute-image-packages [armhf] (zesty-proposed/universe) [20170622-0ubuntu1~17.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud) | 22:52 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gce-compute-image-packages [arm64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [20170622-0ubuntu1~17.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud) | 22:55 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [source] (yakkety-proposed) [20170622-0ubuntu1~16.10.0] | 22:55 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [source] (xenial-proposed) [20170622-0ubuntu1~16.04.0] | 22:56 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gce-compute-image-packages [s390x] (xenial-proposed/universe) [20170622-0ubuntu1~16.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud) | 22:59 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gce-compute-image-packages [i386] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [20170622-0ubuntu1~16.10.0] (ubuntu-cloud) | 22:59 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gce-compute-image-packages [ppc64el] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [20170622-0ubuntu1~16.10.0] (ubuntu-cloud) | 22:59 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gce-compute-image-packages [amd64] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [20170622-0ubuntu1~16.10.0] (ubuntu-cloud) | 22:59 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gce-compute-image-packages [s390x] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [20170622-0ubuntu1~16.10.0] (ubuntu-cloud) | 22:59 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gce-compute-image-packages [powerpc] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [20170622-0ubuntu1~16.10.0] (ubuntu-cloud) | 22:59 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gce-compute-image-packages [amd64] (xenial-proposed/universe) [20170622-0ubuntu1~16.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud) | 23:00 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gce-compute-image-packages [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed/universe) [20170622-0ubuntu1~16.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud) | 23:00 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gce-compute-image-packages [i386] (xenial-proposed/universe) [20170622-0ubuntu1~16.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud) | 23:00 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gce-compute-image-packages [powerpc] (xenial-proposed/universe) [20170622-0ubuntu1~16.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud) | 23:00 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gce-compute-image-packages [armhf] (xenial-proposed/universe) [20170622-0ubuntu1~16.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud) | 23:02 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gce-compute-image-packages [armhf] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [20170622-0ubuntu1~16.10.0] (ubuntu-cloud) | 23:02 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gce-compute-image-packages [arm64] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [20170622-0ubuntu1~16.10.0] (ubuntu-cloud) | 23:04 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gce-compute-image-packages [arm64] (xenial-proposed/universe) [20170622-0ubuntu1~16.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud) | 23:05 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libprelude [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [3.1.0-0.3] (no packageset) | 23:48 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libprelude [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [3.1.0-0.3] (no packageset) | 23:48 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libprelude [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [3.1.0-0.3] (no packageset) | 23:50 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libprelude [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [3.1.0-0.3] (no packageset) | 23:50 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libprelude [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [3.1.0-0.3] (no packageset) | 23:55 | |
tsimonq2 | stgraber: Apologies for the delay. I'll mark Lubuntu as ready within the next 1-2 hours. | 23:56 |
stgraber | ok | 23:57 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!