[03:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (xenial-proposed/main) [0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 => 0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~16.04.2] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)
[03:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (yakkety-proposed/main) [0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~16.10.1 => 0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~16.10.2] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)
[03:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (zesty-proposed/main) [0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~17.04.1 => 0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~17.04.2] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)
[04:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~16.04.2]
[04:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (yakkety-proposed) [0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~16.10.2]
[04:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (zesty-proposed) [0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~17.04.2]
[04:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (zesty-proposed) [0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~17.04.2]
[04:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (yakkety-proposed) [0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~16.10.2]
[04:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.7.9-153-g16a7302f-0ubuntu1~16.04.2]
[05:09] <acheronuk> slangasek: I tried a couple of times to get people to do some verification, without much luck so far. I'll ask again.
[05:09] <acheronuk> everyone seems more keen on trying the new and shiny Plasma 5.10!
[06:02] <cpaelzer> apw: infinity: rbasak: ok I'll continue to testbuild via bileto then and might reference to it e.g. for dep8 test previews, but I'll submit "normally" then as I really do not want to cause you more work
[06:02] <cpaelzer> infinity: thanks for bringing that up - I didn't realize that causes trouble further down the SRU chain
[07:08] <LocutusOfBorg> please let openldap migrate, thanks (libreoffice:i386 testsuite sucks)
[08:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Artful Alpha 1] has been marked as ready
[08:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop i386 [Artful Alpha 1] has been marked as ready
[08:20] <LocutusOfBorg> why is the debian autosync so slow today?
[08:22] <apw> big perhaps
[08:22] <LocutusOfBorg> I don't see new imports being processed since ~24h or something like that
[08:22] <LocutusOfBorg> lets wait a new dinstall
[08:23] <LocutusOfBorg> and I can't upload stuff in my ppa :s
[08:26] <LocutusOfBorg> e.g. moka-icon-theme, is almost two days old now
[08:33] <cjwatson> LocutusOfBorg: my fault for breaking the importer config while trying to enable buster imports, by the looks of things; William landed a fix last night
[08:34] <cjwatson> I'll roll that out today
[08:35] <LocutusOfBorg> oh ok :) I tried to wait, but I didn't see mentions on irclogs, so I decided to write it here, thanks for caring/fixing
[08:36] <cjwatson> I didn't mention it because I didn't know about the breakage until this morning :)
[08:36] <LocutusOfBorg> I mean other people in general :)
[09:17] <apw> LocutusOfBorg, is what the channel is for ...
[09:36] <cpaelzer> infinity: thanks for thinkin with me thourhg potential regressiosn of bug 1593907
[09:36] <ubot5> bug 1593907 in ntp (Ubuntu Zesty) "ntpdate startup routine prevents ntp service from launching up on Ubuntu 16.04 server on system boot; manually starting ntp service works: [FIX in DESCRIPTION], just need to apply it and release a new version" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1593907
[09:36] <cpaelzer> infinity: I updated the bug, but TL;DR I think what you brought up is not an issue
[09:37] <cpaelzer> IMHO - ready to be "revisited" for sponsoring & SRU
[10:05] <LocutusOfBorg> hello, where should I report builders kernels upgrade requests? :P
[10:05] <LocutusOfBorg> I found the culprit for the libreoffice-i386 testsuite sadness, as well as the rustc ppc64el build failures and so on
[10:06] <LocutusOfBorg> debian bug: #865303
[10:06] <ubot5> Debian bug 865303 in src:linux "libreoffice: Libreoffice Java features crash with Linux 3.16.43-2+deb8u1" [Serious,Fixed] http://bugs.debian.org/865303
[10:06] <LocutusOfBorg> apw, maybe I can prod you, but this is not really about the Ubuntu kernel, but rather the buildds installed one
[10:18]  * apw passes that info on ...
=== mparillo_ is now known as mparillo
[10:20] <cjwatson> LocutusOfBorg: in what sense is the buildd-installed kernel not the Ubuntu kernel?
[10:20] <cjwatson> LocutusOfBorg: (they're upgraded automatically and routinely from cloud images)
[10:20] <cjwatson> arm64 is currently a special case IIRC but that doesn't seem to be what you're talking about
[10:21] <LocutusOfBorg> yep, I found it, and my last retry has picked up the kernel in security pocket
[10:21] <LocutusOfBorg> the latest one seems to be reverting somewhat the CVE patch
[10:22] <LocutusOfBorg> not sure if the published kernel has an incomplete patch or what, debdiffs between ubuntu kernels is difficult
[10:25] <sbeattie> LocutusOfBorg: it's converting from an early iteration of the fixes to the ones that were accepted upstream, which also should address the java issues that were seen.
[10:25] <sbeattie> (well, earlier)
[10:25] <apw> LocutusOfBorg, what sbeattie said ...
[10:32] <LocutusOfBorg> sbeattie, I see that, but rustc is failing on ppc64el in the same way in debian, lets wait for their give-back
[11:26] <cjwatson> LocutusOfBorg: next importer run should work
[11:29] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks!
[12:12] <LocutusOfBorg> Laney, for your happyness debian bug: #866389
[12:12] <ubot5> Debian bug 866389 in release.debian.org "transition: perl 5.26" [Normal,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/866389
[12:12] <LocutusOfBorg> :)
[12:27] <Laney> LocutusOfBorg: noooooooooope
[12:27] <Laney> why would that make me happy anyway?
[12:30] <apw> Laney, lets hope LocutusOfBorg has mastered sarcasm
[12:31] <Laney> I hope that's what it is
[12:31] <Laney> but I don't get why it's directed at me :P
[12:34] <LocutusOfBorg> Laney, I remember your happyness for the 5.24 transition, was driven by you IIRC
[12:34] <apw> Laney, i assume it will blow up the ADT queues, which will make you happy
[12:34] <LocutusOfBorg> and yes, sarcasm is intended :)
=== pietroalbini_ is now known as pietroalbini
[13:35] <infinity> cpaelzer: Ahh, calling it with '-g' must be 'new' (for some value of new, I'm clearly old).  Did you check that with large offsets, the initial start just slams the system into a more correct time, instead of attempt to adjtime it with a days-long drift?
[13:36] <infinity> cpaelzer: If it does one hard settimeofday, then moves on to adjtime, I agree that ntpdate is entirely useless in that scenario.
[13:36] <infinity> cpaelzer: (It used to be that you explicitly wanted a non-adjtime ntpdate call first, then ntpd to drift you to perfection).
[13:46] <cpaelzer> infinity: the default is to slew time if under 128 ms but to step it if above that
[13:46] <cpaelzer> the limit can be increased with -x (to drift higher amounts of delta), but the default should be 129 ms
[13:47] <cpaelzer> so, TL;DR it should set it if the delta is huge
[13:47] <cpaelzer> although to admit - I haven't tested it yet to verify how right the manpage is about that
[13:47] <cpaelzer> infinity: I can do so and update the bug if you want
[13:48] <infinity> cpaelzer: Would be nice to have peace of mind on that.
[13:48] <cpaelzer> ok, will do so
[13:49] <infinity> cpaelzer: Honestly, if ntpd's first run does the job of ntpdate, I almost feel like ntpd should provide/conflict ntpdate (and provide a /usr/bin/ntpdate that one-shots ntpd if it's not running, or something clever), for the few packages that depend on ntpdate for odd reasons.
[13:49] <infinity> cpaelzer: But that's not worth doing in an SRU.  Having ntpdate effectively inert is fine too.
[13:51] <cpaelzer> yeah but it is a nice suggestion for the further deprecation and dropping of ntpdate
[14:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: base-files (zesty-proposed/main) [9.6ubuntu13 => 9.6ubuntu13.1] (core)
[14:32] <rbasak> kirkland: ^ need SRU information in the bug please
[14:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (xenial-proposed/universe) [20170523-0ubuntu1~16.04.0 => 20170622-0ubuntu1~16.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud)
[14:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (trusty-proposed/universe) [20170523-0ubuntu1~14.04.0 => 20170622-0ubuntu1~14.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud)
[14:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (zesty-proposed/universe) [20170523-0ubuntu1~17.04.0 => 20170622-0ubuntu1~17.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud)
[14:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (yakkety-proposed/universe) [20170523-0ubuntu1~16.10.0 => 20170622-0ubuntu1~16.10.0] (ubuntu-cloud)
[14:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gce-compute-image-packages [source] (yakkety-proposed) [20170609-0ubuntu1~16.10.0]
[14:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gce-compute-image-packages [source] (zesty-proposed) [20170609-0ubuntu1~17.04.0]
[14:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gce-compute-image-packages [source] (trusty-proposed) [20170609-0ubuntu1~14.04.0]
[14:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gce-compute-image-packages [source] (xenial-proposed) [20170609-0ubuntu1~16.04.0]
=== chiluk_ is now known as chiluk
[15:03] <rbasak> kirkland: ^ what happens on first login? That'll still be delayed, right? So the bug is being reduced in scope, but not being fixed entirely?
[15:03] <rbasak> If the first login is before the timer has run for the first time, that is, which seems likely.
[15:04] <kirkland> rbasak: true
[15:04] <kirkland> rbasak: that's an easy fix, though, just one more line to add
[15:05] <kirkland> rbasak: would you like me to fix that?
[15:05] <kirkland> I think it would be a good idea, yeah
[15:05] <rbasak> kirkland: yes please. Probably better for the SRU process to do it fewer times :)
[15:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected base-files [source] (zesty-proposed) [9.6ubuntu13.1]
[15:19] <slashd> bdmurray, sil2100 good day, could you please have a look at 'autofs' package currently in -proposed and copy it out to -updates ? It has reached the minimum aging period, bug in green in pending sru page, verification-done-$RELEASE has been done with detailed explanation.
[15:20] <sil2100> slashd: I can take a look after the meeting
[15:20] <slashd> sil2100, thanks
[15:46] <kirkland> rbasak: okey doke...  base-files_9.6ubuntu13.2_source.changes uploaded to zesty-proposed
[15:46] <sil2100> slashd: done!
[15:46] <kirkland> rbasak: this ensures that the fix happens immediately (ie, not requiring a first run to establish the empty file)
[15:46] <slashd> sil2100, thanks
[15:46] <kirkland> rbasak: I've updated the SRU testing/documentation in the bug description, and the embedded patch
[15:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: base-files (zesty-proposed/main) [9.6ubuntu13 => 9.6ubuntu13.2] (core)
[15:46] <kirkland> rbasak: and I've reset the status to in-progress
[15:47] <kirkland> rbasak: anythign else?
[15:49] <rbasak> kirkland: otp, will look in a bit. FWIW, we didn't burn 9.6ubuntu13.1. Can we tidier and use that? No need to wait for a reject before uploading.
[15:50] <kirkland> rbasak: yeah, you're right, those .numbers are expensive, we really don't want to run out!
[15:51] <kirkland> rbasak: done
[15:51] <kirkland> rbasak: uploaded base-files_9.6ubuntu13.1_source.changes
[15:51] <rbasak> Thanks. I like things all ordered and tidy :-)
[15:52]  * rbasak suspects this might be one reason he's in ~ubuntu-sru.
[15:52] <rbasak> kirkland: do you have an artful upload with that fix? I don't see it.
[15:52] <kirkland> rbasak: yep
[15:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: base-files (zesty-proposed/main) [9.6ubuntu13 => 9.6ubuntu13.1] (core)
[15:54] <kirkland> rbasak: ah, hang on a sec
[15:54] <kirkland> rbasak: okay, pushed to artful
[15:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected base-files [source] (zesty-proposed) [9.6ubuntu13.2]
[16:15] <cpaelzer> infinity: btw I got to complete the ntp tests, all worked on xenial the way it should, to the -g which is default really adresses your concern
[16:28] <rbasak> kirkland: http://paste.ubuntu.com/24982581/ are lines 59 and 60 still needed?
[17:11] <kirkland> rbasak: no, technically we don't
[17:26] <infinity> cpaelzer: My brain couldn't parse that sentence until I finally realized 's/to the/so the/' but yay, +1
[17:27] <infinity> cpaelzer: You can either record that in the bug (might be nice for people doing archaeology) or I can just hide the comments with the concerns, but either way, that's all I need to go ahead with the SRU.
[17:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kcptun [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [20170525+ds-1] (no packageset)
[17:27] <infinity> cpaelzer: Thanks for humouring me on the matter.
[17:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kcptun [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [20170525+ds-1] (no packageset)
[17:29] <stgraber> tseliot: how's the alpha going?
[17:30] <tseliot> stgraber: wrong person?
[17:30] <stgraber> yup :)
[17:30] <stgraber> tsimonq2: how's the alpha going?
[17:30] <stgraber> there, that's better :)
[17:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-confluentinc-confluent-kafka-go [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.9.4-2] (no packageset)
[17:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: stressant [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.4.1] (no packageset)
[17:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kcptun [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [20170525+ds-1] (no packageset)
[17:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kcptun [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [20170525+ds-1] (no packageset)
[17:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tmuxp [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.2.6-2] (no packageset)
[18:59] <tsimonq2> stgraber: Hey, sorry, I took a nap
[18:59] <tsimonq2> stgraber: Lubuntu and Kubuntu aren't done yet but Ubuntu Kylin is
[18:59] <tsimonq2> stgraber: Any testing help is appreciated. :)
[19:01] <stgraber> tsimonq2: well, I'm off today, so not going to be around for much else than doing the final publishing :)
[19:02] <stgraber> (one of those trying to stay away from computer day off, not terribly succesful so far :))
[19:02] <tsimonq2> stgraber: Ok :)
[19:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kcptun [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [20170525+ds-1] (no packageset)
[20:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kcptun [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [20170525+ds-1] (no packageset)
[20:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apport (zesty-proposed/main) [2.20.4-0ubuntu4.3 => 2.20.4-0ubuntu4.4] (core)
[20:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apport (yakkety-proposed/main) [2.20.3-0ubuntu8.5 => 2.20.3-0ubuntu8.6] (core)
[20:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apport (xenial-proposed/main) [2.20.1-0ubuntu2.8 => 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.9] (core)
[21:37] <tsimonq2> stgraber: How long do you anticipate being awake this evening?
[21:37] <tsimonq2> (3 more to go, I'm just marking the done one as ready)
[21:37] <stgraber> I'll be around for another 6-7 hours I expect
[21:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Artful Alpha 1] has been marked as ready
[21:38] <tsimonq2> stgraber: Ok, I thought you were in a European time zone?
[21:39] <stgraber> nope, Canada, eastern
[21:40] <tsimonq2> Oh, cool.
[21:40] <tsimonq2> stgraber: I'm in Wisconsin, Central TZ fwiw
[22:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [source] (zesty-proposed) [0.8.1-3ubuntu0.1]
[22:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [source] (zesty-proposed) [20170622-0ubuntu1~17.04.0]
[22:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gce-compute-image-packages [amd64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [20170622-0ubuntu1~17.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud)
[22:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gce-compute-image-packages [ppc64el] (zesty-proposed/universe) [20170622-0ubuntu1~17.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud)
[22:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gce-compute-image-packages [i386] (zesty-proposed/universe) [20170622-0ubuntu1~17.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud)
[22:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gce-compute-image-packages [s390x] (zesty-proposed/universe) [20170622-0ubuntu1~17.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud)
[22:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gce-compute-image-packages [armhf] (zesty-proposed/universe) [20170622-0ubuntu1~17.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud)
[22:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gce-compute-image-packages [arm64] (zesty-proposed/universe) [20170622-0ubuntu1~17.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud)
[22:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [source] (yakkety-proposed) [20170622-0ubuntu1~16.10.0]
[22:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [source] (xenial-proposed) [20170622-0ubuntu1~16.04.0]
[22:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gce-compute-image-packages [s390x] (xenial-proposed/universe) [20170622-0ubuntu1~16.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud)
[22:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gce-compute-image-packages [i386] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [20170622-0ubuntu1~16.10.0] (ubuntu-cloud)
[22:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gce-compute-image-packages [ppc64el] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [20170622-0ubuntu1~16.10.0] (ubuntu-cloud)
[22:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gce-compute-image-packages [amd64] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [20170622-0ubuntu1~16.10.0] (ubuntu-cloud)
[22:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gce-compute-image-packages [s390x] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [20170622-0ubuntu1~16.10.0] (ubuntu-cloud)
[22:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gce-compute-image-packages [powerpc] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [20170622-0ubuntu1~16.10.0] (ubuntu-cloud)
[23:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gce-compute-image-packages [amd64] (xenial-proposed/universe) [20170622-0ubuntu1~16.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud)
[23:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gce-compute-image-packages [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed/universe) [20170622-0ubuntu1~16.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud)
[23:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gce-compute-image-packages [i386] (xenial-proposed/universe) [20170622-0ubuntu1~16.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud)
[23:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gce-compute-image-packages [powerpc] (xenial-proposed/universe) [20170622-0ubuntu1~16.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud)
[23:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gce-compute-image-packages [armhf] (xenial-proposed/universe) [20170622-0ubuntu1~16.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud)
[23:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gce-compute-image-packages [armhf] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [20170622-0ubuntu1~16.10.0] (ubuntu-cloud)
[23:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gce-compute-image-packages [arm64] (yakkety-proposed/universe) [20170622-0ubuntu1~16.10.0] (ubuntu-cloud)
[23:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gce-compute-image-packages [arm64] (xenial-proposed/universe) [20170622-0ubuntu1~16.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud)
[23:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libprelude [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [3.1.0-0.3] (no packageset)
[23:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libprelude [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [3.1.0-0.3] (no packageset)
[23:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libprelude [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [3.1.0-0.3] (no packageset)
[23:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libprelude [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [3.1.0-0.3] (no packageset)
[23:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libprelude [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [3.1.0-0.3] (no packageset)
[23:56] <tsimonq2> stgraber: Apologies for the delay. I'll mark Lubuntu as ready within the next 1-2 hours.
[23:57] <stgraber> ok