[00:01] <tsimonq2> Alright, all of the Lubuntu *amd64* images are marked as ready. Working on i386 right now.
[00:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Alternate amd64 [Artful Alpha 1] has been marked as ready
[00:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libprelude [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [3.1.0-0.3] (no packageset)
[00:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [20170622-0ubuntu1~17.04.0]
[00:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-confluentinc-confluent-kafka-go [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.9.4-2]
[00:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kcptun [arm64] (artful-proposed) [20170525+ds-1]
[00:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kcptun [i386] (artful-proposed) [20170525+ds-1]
[00:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kcptun [s390x] (artful-proposed) [20170525+ds-1]
[00:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libprelude [arm64] (artful-proposed) [3.1.0-0.3]
[00:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libprelude [i386] (artful-proposed) [3.1.0-0.3]
[00:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libprelude [s390x] (artful-proposed) [3.1.0-0.3]
[00:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tmuxp [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.2.6-2]
[00:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kcptun [amd64] (artful-proposed) [20170525+ds-1]
[00:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kcptun [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [20170525+ds-1]
[00:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libprelude [armhf] (artful-proposed) [3.1.0-0.3]
[00:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted stressant [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.4.1]
[00:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kcptun [armhf] (artful-proposed) [20170525+ds-1]
[00:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libprelude [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [3.1.0-0.3]
[00:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libprelude [amd64] (artful-proposed) [3.1.0-0.3]
[00:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [amd64] (yakkety-proposed) [20170622-0ubuntu1~16.10.0]
[00:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [armhf] (yakkety-proposed) [20170622-0ubuntu1~16.10.0]
[00:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [powerpc] (yakkety-proposed) [20170622-0ubuntu1~16.10.0]
[00:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [s390x] (yakkety-proposed) [20170622-0ubuntu1~16.10.0]
[00:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [arm64] (yakkety-proposed) [20170622-0ubuntu1~16.10.0]
[00:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [ppc64el] (yakkety-proposed) [20170622-0ubuntu1~16.10.0]
[00:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [i386] (yakkety-proposed) [20170622-0ubuntu1~16.10.0]
[00:20] <stgraber> tsimonq2: have you heard from kubuntu?
[00:20] <tsimonq2> stgraber: Yep
[00:20] <tsimonq2> stgraber: Been chatting in #kubuntu-council (open channel fwiw)
[00:21] <tsimonq2> stgraber: Teaching valorie how to mark things as ready :P
[00:21] <tsimonq2> valorie: In fact, we should do this here.
[00:21] <tsimonq2> valorie: What are you clicking?
[00:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Artful Alpha 1] has been marked as ready
[00:22] <tsimonq2> Ok THERE you go :P
[00:22] <valorie> ha, now I can go to dinner in good conscience
[00:22] <tsimonq2> valorie: So no i386?
[00:22] <valorie> not now, with no tests
[00:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop i386 [Artful Alpha 1] has been marked as ready
[00:23] <valorie> if my users come through.....
[00:23] <tsimonq2> valorie: Ok, if we end up publishing before then, we can always publish i386 Kubuntu later :)
[00:23] <valorie> ok
[00:23] <tsimonq2> valorie: Enjoy your dinner :)
[00:23] <valorie> muy buen
[00:23] <tsimonq2> Just a couple more Lubuntu tests and we'll be golden, stgraber
[00:23] <stgraber> tsimonq2: ok
[00:23]  * tsimonq2 is doing them right now
[00:24] <valorie> my upgrade went like butter
[00:24] <tsimonq2> \o/
[00:24] <mparillo> There were no i386 kubuntu tests until a few hours ago, but I see marius-nestor has passed two (probably the two most important)
[00:24] <valorie> butter on a hot piece of fresh corn
[00:24] <valorie> ooooo, nice
[00:24] <valorie> ok, see you in a couple of hours
[00:25] <valorie> marius rocks!
[00:59] <mapreri> is there a random core-dev around who can do a no-change rebuild of src:audit against libprelude23 ?
[01:00] <mapreri> (otherwise tomorrow I'll seek out my usual victims :P)
[01:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [20170622-0ubuntu1~16.04.0]
[01:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [armhf] (xenial-proposed) [20170622-0ubuntu1~16.04.0]
[01:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [powerpc] (xenial-proposed) [20170622-0ubuntu1~16.04.0]
[01:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [s390x] (xenial-proposed) [20170622-0ubuntu1~16.04.0]
[01:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [arm64] (xenial-proposed) [20170622-0ubuntu1~16.04.0]
[01:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [20170622-0ubuntu1~16.04.0]
[01:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [i386] (xenial-proposed) [20170622-0ubuntu1~16.04.0]
[01:04] <slangasek> mapreri: random core-devs are in #ubuntu-devel; in here you're stuck with the stochastic ones
[01:04] <slangasek> (done)
[01:05] <mapreri> ahah :D  thanks
[01:47] <tsimonq2> One more test, stgraber :)
[01:47] <tsimonq2> So < 30 mins
[02:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Alternate i386 [Artful Alpha 1] has been marked as ready
[02:01] <tsimonq2> stgraber: Press buttons please? :)
[02:02] <tsimonq2> stgraber: (i.e. Alpha 1 is ready to be published)
[02:30] <stgraber> ok
[02:30] <tsimonq2> \oi/
[02:30] <tsimonq2> *\o/
[02:31] <tsimonq2> stgraber: I'm forgetting, how do I know when I can publish the announcement?
[02:31] <stgraber> tsimonq2: I'll tell you
[02:31] <tsimonq2> stgraber: Ok, cool :)
[02:34] <stgraber> oh fun, I get to fix ubuntu-archive-tools as it doesn't know about Lubuntu Next
[02:36] <tsimonq2> Oh, fun.
[02:37] <stgraber> ok, I think I got it
[02:38] <stgraber> lets try publishing
[02:38] <valorie> stgraber: evidently our i386 testers didn't step up, so we won't be publishing it
[02:38] <valorie> kubuntu I mean
[02:38] <stgraber> yep
[02:57] <tsimonq2> stgraber: How's everything looking?
[02:58] <stgraber> waiting for the source ISO to finish building
[02:59] <tsimonq2> Ok, cool.
[03:29] <stgraber> and we have a source iso
[03:30] <tsimonq2> \o/
[03:34] <tsimonq2> What now?
[03:34] <tsimonq2> Looks like the images might be published?
[03:34] <stgraber> trying to get the damn source image to publish
[03:34] <tsimonq2> Ah ok
[03:35] <stgraber> ok, after messing with the filesystem long enough, the publishing script is doing something
[03:36] <tsimonq2> \o/
[03:37] <tsimonq2> stgraber: Are the download pages supposed to say "Daily Build"?
[03:37] <stgraber> nope
[03:37] <stgraber> they won't once I'm done
[03:37] <tsimonq2> Ok cool
[03:38]  * tsimonq2 becomes quiet, enough poking :P
[03:44] <stgraber> content is good on nusakan, pushing to mirrors now
[03:45]  * tsimonq2 stands by
[03:52] <tsimonq2> stgraber: ...but the page still says "Daily Build," does it not?
[03:52] <stgraber> that's because it's not synced yet
[03:52] <stgraber> wait until I tell you it's done :)
[03:52] <tsimonq2> You're right :))
[03:58] <stgraber> tsimonq2: check now
[03:58] <tsimonq2> stgraber: Yep I see, all good
[04:00] <tsimonq2> stgraber: Are you verifying from my end or does that mean the mirrors are good? :P
[04:00] <stgraber> from what I can tell, they're all done syncing
[04:00] <tsimonq2> Ok cool :)
[04:00] <tsimonq2> Sending email
[04:00] <stgraber> I'm marking the alpha as released on the tracker, re-enabling cron and dropping the package freeze now
[04:01] <tsimonq2> \o/
[04:01] <tsimonq2> stgraber: Coulg I get my message to ubuntu-devel-announce approved?
[04:01] <tsimonq2> *could
[04:01] <stgraber> not by me :)
[04:01] <stgraber> slangasek maybe
[04:02] <stgraber> or infinity
[04:02] <tsimonq2> ok
[04:02] <slangasek> looking
[04:02] <slangasek> Subject:  The very first Christian weight loss product available for purchase
[04:02] <slangasek> ^^ that's you, right?
[04:02] <stgraber> :)
[04:03] <tsimonq2> lol
[04:03] <tsimonq2> no
[04:04] <stgraber> ok, all done on my side I think, if I forgot something, please yell :)
[04:04] <slangasek> freeze hint dropped?
[04:05] <stgraber> yup
[04:09] <valorie> onward and upward to Alpha 2!
[04:15] <tsimonq2> Thanks stgraber and slangasek, have a nice night and happy release :)
[04:23] <valorie> hmmm, are there torrents?
[04:23] <tsimonq2> valorie: Yes there are.
[04:23]  * valorie ain't finding them anywhere
[04:24] <valorie> zsync, metalink, etc.
[04:24] <valorie> but not torrents
[04:25] <tsimonq2> valorie: areyousureaboutthat http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/kubuntu/releases/artful/alpha-1/artful-desktop-amd64.iso.torrent
[04:29] <valorie> I guess I didn't reload the page
[04:29] <valorie> thanks my dear
[04:39] <valorie> strange, all the torrent links come through as "artful-desktop-amd64.iso.torrent" etc.
[04:40] <valorie> so I can only do kubuntu
[04:40] <valorie> seed, I mean
[05:15] <acheronuk> valorie: make sepetare kubuntu, ubuntu, xubuntu etc directories so you can save and seed each file that way?
[05:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: intel-microcode (yakkety-proposed/restricted) [3.20160714.1 => 3.20170511.1~ubuntu16.10.0] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[05:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (trusty-proposed/main) [3.13.0-124.173] (core, kernel)
[05:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-signed-hwe (xenial-proposed/main) [4.8.0-58.63~16.04.1 => 4.10.0-27.30~16.04.2] (kernel) (sync)
[05:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-signed-hwe [sync] (xenial-proposed) [4.10.0-27.30~16.04.2]
[05:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debian-installer (xenial-proposed/main) [20101020ubuntu451.10 => 20101020ubuntu451.11] (core)
[06:02] <ahoneybun> infinity: maybe you could look at this: https://code.launchpad.net/~aaronhoneycutt/ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu/artful/+merge/326115 ?
[06:02] <ahoneybun> didn't know cyphermox_ was out on vac till now so it didn't get into alpha1
[06:03] <ahoneybun> also there was a new ubiquity but there is not new release yet, I have a change for our (kubuntu) installer in there
[06:09] <valorie> he didn't get that SDDM bug fixed or that fix pushed, either
[06:09] <valorie> oh well, it's just OEM
[06:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (trusty-proposed) [3.13.0-124.173]
[07:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.10.0-27.30~16.04.2] (kernel)
[07:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.10.0-27.30~16.04.2]
[07:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debian-installer [source] (xenial-proposed) [20101020ubuntu451.11]
[08:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debian-installer (xenial-proposed/main) [20101020ubuntu451.11 => 20101020ubuntu451.12] (core)
[08:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debian-installer [source] (xenial-proposed) [20101020ubuntu451.12]
[09:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (yakkety-proposed/main) [4.8.0-59.64] (core, kernel)
[10:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (yakkety-proposed) [4.8.0-59.64]
[11:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: asn1crypto [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.22.0-1] (no packageset)
[11:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-lts-xenial [amd64] (trusty-proposed/main) [4.4.0-84.107~14.04.1] (kernel)
[11:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.4.0-84.107] (core, kernel)
[11:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-lts-xenial [amd64] (trusty-proposed) [4.4.0-84.107~14.04.1]
[11:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.4.0-84.107]
[13:09] <mapreri> is there a way to trick some SRU guy into processing the debootstrap SRUs? :)
[14:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected debootstrap [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.0.81ubuntu3.2]
[14:17] <apw> ^ duplicate upload in the queue ...
[14:20] <mapreri> mh
[14:21] <mapreri> fancy ^^
[14:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debootstrap [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.0.81ubuntu3.2]
[14:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debootstrap [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.0.81ubuntu2.3]
[14:30] <apw> mapreri, only back to xenial?
[14:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debootstrap [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.0.78+nmu1ubuntu1.4]
[14:31] <mapreri> apw: well, I went only that far as that's what I was interested it.  Surely adding one for trusty ain't hard if you feel like I should
[14:31] <apw> mapreri, it would be nice for everything to be in sync me thinks
[14:31] <alan_g> Is there someone around that can Ack ticket 2806 please?
[14:32] <mapreri> apw: can you sponsor the upload if I prepare it now?
[14:33] <apw> mapreri, sure
[14:33] <apw> alan_g, ack ticket ?
[14:33] <mapreri> trusty's debootstrap also misses stretch u.U
[14:33] <alan_g> apw: ack the packaging changes & publish
[14:40] <mapreri> apw: http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/debomatic/trusty/pool/debootstrap_1.0.59ubuntu0.8/debootstrap_1.0.59ubuntu0.8_sourceupload.changes - Also please approve the trusty nomination on the bug (LP #1698686).
[14:41] <mapreri> and I see the script added the 'verification-needed' tag, what should I do with that one?
[14:42] <apw> mapreri, rather than the *-<series>-* ones ?
[14:42] <mapreri> yeah
[14:42] <mapreri> I mean, do I have to turn that into verification-done too, ignore it, ??
[14:42] <apw> mapreri, good question ^^ bdmurray i think you know what the plan was with that
[14:43] <mapreri> besides, probably the verification-$series-$status tags should be "registered" in lp as well, so they are suggested, etc.
[14:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debootstrap (trusty-proposed/main) [1.0.59ubuntu0.7 => 1.0.59ubuntu0.8] (core)
[14:51] <jbicha> mapreri: I'll add those tags
[14:52] <mapreri> jbicha: ?
[14:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debootstrap [source] (trusty-proposed) [1.0.59ubuntu0.8]
[14:53] <apw> mapreri, ^ ok that is all of them in and building ... thank you
[14:54] <mapreri> yay, thanks :)
[15:00] <jbicha> mapreri: I updated the official bug tags
[15:00] <mapreri> ah, cool
[15:08] <mapreri> apw, bdmurray: typo in the automated message, there is a missing space:
[15:08] <mapreri> change the tag from verification-needed-xenial to verification-done-xenial.If it does not fix
[15:13] <bdmurray> mapreri, apw: The verification-needed tag is still added so there can be one tag to search for which will show all verification-needed bugs across all series.
[15:13] <apw> bdmurray, that makes sense, is that going to be programatically removed when all the *-needed-* are gone ?
[15:13] <bdmurray> This way the SRU verification team, if it becomes active, can find a pool of work.
[15:15] <bdmurray> apw: I guess that'd make sense.
[15:15] <apw> bdmurray, yeah it makes sense, and sense if we would scan for and kill them when not needed
[15:16] <bdmurray> apw: Can you add that missing space? I'd have to submit an MP etc...
[15:19] <bdmurray> apw: It's about line 355.
[15:20] <apw> bdmurray, yep
[15:22] <apw> bdmurray, fixed
[15:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: freeipmi (xenial-proposed/main) [1.4.11-1.1ubuntu3~0.16.04 => 1.4.11-1.1ubuntu4~0.16.04] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[15:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: freeipmi (zesty-proposed/main) [1.4.11-1.1ubuntu3 => 1.4.11-1.1ubuntu4~0.17.04] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[15:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: freeipmi (yakkety-proposed/main) [1.4.11-1.1ubuntu3~0.16.10 => 1.4.11-1.1ubuntu4~0.16.10] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[15:35] <alan_g> Is there someone around that can ack the packaging changes & publish ticket 2806 please?
[15:55] <apw> alan_g, can you confirm nothing is using all these packages you are dropping
[16:00] <apw> alan_g, also do you know you have lost an upload from slangasek, i assume it was a noop but you should check
[16:04] <slangasek> apw: my mir upload was a no-change rebuild
[16:04] <apw> slangasek, so i guess that is just changelog lossage ... alan_g so just the dropped packages
[16:05] <alan_g> apw: confirmed
[16:06] <slangasek> right, and I /think/ bileto is smart enough to not give you an error about dropping a no-change rebuild
[16:06] <slangasek> but will refuse to let you clobber the distro bits otherwise
[16:07] <didrocks> ci-train was able to do that, as bileto started from it, I think that feature sticked around
[16:09] <apw> alan_g, ok ... clicked
[16:09] <alan_g> thanks
[16:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted base-files [source] (zesty-proposed) [9.6ubuntu13.1]
[20:08] <bdmurray> slangasek: Can you review my apport SRU uploads for XYZ?
[20:28] <slangasek> bdmurray: yes
[20:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apport [source] (zesty-proposed) [2.20.4-0ubuntu4.4]
[20:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apport [source] (yakkety-proposed) [2.20.3-0ubuntu8.6]
[20:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apport [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.20.1-0ubuntu2.9]
[21:26] <bdmurray> apw: Did you push your change to launchpad?
[21:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted maas [source] (zesty-proposed) [2.2.0+bzr6054-0ubuntu2~17.04.1]