| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sundials [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.5.0-4] (no packageset) | 05:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sundials [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.5.0-4] (no packageset) | 05:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sundials [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [2.5.0-4] | 05:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sundials [s390x] (artful-proposed) [2.5.0-4] | 05:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sundials [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.5.0-4] (no packageset) | 05:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sundials [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.5.0-4] (no packageset) | 05:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sundials [arm64] (artful-proposed) [2.5.0-4] | 05:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sundials [armhf] (artful-proposed) [2.5.0-4] | 05:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mutter [source] (zesty-proposed) [3.24.2-0ubuntu0.1] | 06:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected apt [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.3.7] | 06:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mythtv [source] (yakkety-proposed) [2:0.28.0+fixes.20160413.15cf421-0ubuntu2.16.10.1] | 06:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected apt [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.3.8] | 06:54 | |
| apw | ^ 3 duplicate in the queue | 06:58 |
|---|---|---|
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sudo [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.8.19p1-1ubuntu1.2] | 07:05 | |
| apw | tjaalton, it looks like your sudo fix for LP: #1686803 got lost in yakkety with the upload of a security update. | 07:21 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1686803 in sudo (Ubuntu Yakkety) "sudo returns exit code 0 if child is killed with SIGTERM" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1686803 | 07:21 |
| tjaalton | apw: bah, noone cares at this point :) | 07:22 |
| tjaalton | I think | 07:22 |
| apw | tjaalton, bah that should be: bug #1607666 | 07:22 |
| ubot5 | bug 1607666 in sudo (Ubuntu Yakkety) "sudo fails with host netgroup returned from freeipa" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1607666 | 07:22 |
| tjaalton | looks like it wouldn't get verified anyway | 07:23 |
| * apw idly wonders how long yakkety has before EOL | 07:23 | |
| apw | tjaalton, well it did in xenial and zesty i assume, and is released in those i think | 07:24 |
| apw | so we are left i in a bit of a muddle | 07:24 |
| flocculant | morning - -running artful with kernel from -proposed, seem to have an issue with alsa and that kernel, can't report issue with ubuntu-bug (proposed I assume) not sure of best way to proceed (reported at least to alsa) | 07:24 |
| flocculant | apw: Ubuntu 16.10 will reach end of life on Wednesday, July 20, 2017 | 07:24 |
| tjaalton | apw: I think it's fine to wontfix it, the guy says they don't deploy yakkety so can't test it | 07:24 |
| tjaalton | zesty got the new upstream version | 07:25 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sudo [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.8.16-0ubuntu3.3] | 07:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sudo [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.8.16-0ubuntu1.5] | 07:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted telegram-desktop [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.0.29-1ubuntu1.17.04.1] | 07:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted postfix [source] (zesty-proposed) [3.1.4-4ubuntu1] | 07:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted postfix [source] (yakkety-proposed) [3.1.0-5ubuntu1] | 07:46 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (yakkety-proposed/main) [231-9ubuntu5 => 231-9ubuntu6] (core) | 11:06 | |
| sil2100 | jamespage: hey! | 11:27 |
| jamespage | sil2100: hello | 11:27 |
| sil2100 | jamespage: I'm looking at releasing some of the packages that we have in -proposed - was looking at the ones frome LP: #1696139 | 11:28 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1696139 in neutron-fwaas (Ubuntu Zesty) "[SRU] ocata stable releases" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1696139 | 11:28 |
| sil2100 | jamespage: my question here is - do we need for all of them to be released at once? | 11:28 |
| jamespage | sil2100: ideally yes as we tested proposed, rather than individual parts | 11:29 |
| sil2100 | jamespage: ok, in that case would you be able to test/get someone to test the two bugs that are still not verified? LP: #1649616 and LP: #1675088 | 11:32 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1649616 in keystone (Ubuntu) "Keystone Token Flush job does not complete in HA deployed environment" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1649616 | 11:32 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1675088 in horizon (Ubuntu Zesty) "Restrict permissions on Openstack installation" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1675088 | 11:32 |
| sil2100 | jamespage: once those are marked as verified I'll be able to flush the whole stack from -proposed at once | 11:32 |
| sil2100 | Thanks! | 11:32 |
| sil2100 | (those two bugs were included in the uploads of heat and keystone along with the 'new upstream release' bug) | 11:33 |
| jamespage | sil2100: that matches my expectations! | 11:37 |
| sil2100 | jamespage: could you give me a ping once those two bugs are green? | 11:52 |
| jamespage | sil2100: can do | 12:08 |
| LocutusOfBorg | autopkgtest for apt/unknown: armhf: Regression ♻ | 12:17 |
| LocutusOfBorg | WTF? armhf, you so sad | 12:17 |
| apw | LocutusOfBorg, retry it, i am starting to think we have a sad runner in the pool | 12:18 |
| apw | have not had a chance to investigate it yet | 12:18 |
| LocutusOfBorg | apw, I already retried them, I'm having a look about how it goes | 12:18 |
| apw | i had a lot of those over the weekend i think it was, and retried them and most came out ok | 12:19 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [source] (trusty-proposed) [20170622-0ubuntu1~14.04.0] | 12:19 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | wonderful, I'll keep retry/check then | 12:20 |
| LocutusOfBorg | not a good timing to upload perl :( | 12:20 |
| LocutusOfBorg | queues were empty | 12:21 |
| LocutusOfBorg | apw, can we have libreoffice/i386 forced bad? I don't like that "ignore/retry" continuous kick | 12:22 |
| LocutusOfBorg | testsuite sucks, and wasting power cycles for that is just useless | 12:22 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gce-compute-image-packages [amd64] (trusty-proposed/universe) [20170622-0ubuntu1~14.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud) | 12:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gce-compute-image-packages [ppc64el] (trusty-proposed/universe) [20170622-0ubuntu1~14.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud) | 12:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gce-compute-image-packages [i386] (trusty-proposed/universe) [20170622-0ubuntu1~14.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud) | 12:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gce-compute-image-packages [arm64] (trusty-proposed/universe) [20170622-0ubuntu1~14.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud) | 12:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gce-compute-image-packages [powerpc] (trusty-proposed/universe) [20170622-0ubuntu1~14.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud) | 12:23 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | doko, hello, do you want me to upload ghc building with bfd on arm64? | 12:24 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gce-compute-image-packages [armhf] (trusty-proposed/universe) [20170622-0ubuntu1~14.04.0] (ubuntu-cloud) | 12:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [amd64] (trusty-proposed) [20170622-0ubuntu1~14.04.0] | 12:33 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [armhf] (trusty-proposed) [20170622-0ubuntu1~14.04.0] | 12:33 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [powerpc] (trusty-proposed) [20170622-0ubuntu1~14.04.0] | 12:33 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [arm64] (trusty-proposed) [20170622-0ubuntu1~14.04.0] | 12:33 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [ppc64el] (trusty-proposed) [20170622-0ubuntu1~14.04.0] | 12:33 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [i386] (trusty-proposed) [20170622-0ubuntu1~14.04.0] | 12:33 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: smartshine (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.36-0ubuntu2 => 0.36-0ubuntu2.17.04.1] (no packageset) | 13:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: smartshine (xenial-proposed/universe) [0.36-0ubuntu2 => 0.36-0ubuntu2.16.04.1] (no packageset) | 13:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: smartshine (trusty-proposed/universe) [0.36-0ubuntu2 => 0.36-0ubuntu2.14.04.1] (no packageset) | 13:12 | |
| sil2100 | Hello! Looking at the zesty NEW queue, I see someone approved the new gce-compute-image-packages binary for amd64 but not for all the other arches - does anyone know why it's like that? | 13:28 |
| sil2100 | The xenial and yakkety binaries got accepted for all arches, same for trusty | 13:28 |
| LocutusOfBorg | apw, please make doxygen and freetype migrate? hinting libreoffice/i386 should be enough | 13:45 |
| LocutusOfBorg | gstreamer, pango, cairo | 13:45 |
| LocutusOfBorg | all of them waiting for that libreoffice | 13:45 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted freeipa [source] (zesty-proposed) [4.4.3-3ubuntu2.1] | 14:09 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libepoxy [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.3.1-1ubuntu1.17.04.2] | 14:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libepoxy [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.3.1-1ubuntu0.16.04.2] | 14:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xorg-server-hwe-16.04 (xenial-proposed/main) [2:1.18.4-1ubuntu6.1~16.04.1 => 2:1.19.3-1ubuntu1~16.04.1] (no packageset) | 14:41 | |
| Saviq | hi team, we got an email about mir/miral being stuck in artful-proposed for a few days now, are we in Alpha1 freeze or so? | 14:44 |
| apw | Saviq, nope | 14:45 |
| Saviq | any idea why those don't migrate then http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/artful/update_excuses.html#mir ? | 14:45 |
| jbicha | Saviq: thanks for asking, you need to rebuild unity-system-compositor | 14:46 |
| jbicha | after that page, there's https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/artful/update_output.txt | 14:46 |
| jbicha | which is a bit hard to read | 14:46 |
| Saviq | yeah, I can't parse that, sorry :D | 14:46 |
| cjwatson | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ProposedMigration has some advice on learning how to do so | 14:46 |
| apw | Saviq, from the huge list of things which are broken by those promoting, i assume they are creating an ABI break and you have not rebuilt everything that uses those ? | 14:47 |
| cjwatson | also, if the problem is that we're in a freeze, then update_excuses will say so explicitly | 14:47 |
| apw | http://paste.ubuntu.com/25018646/ | 14:47 |
| apw | Saviq, ^ those are the relevant bits | 14:47 |
| Saviq | yup, thanks | 14:47 |
| jbicha | Saviq: I recommend rebuilding unity-system-compositor, that might be all you need | 14:48 |
| Saviq | jbicha, yeah I'm not sure that should happen, we'll look into it, thanks | 14:50 |
| jbicha | Saviq: libmirserver43 was bumped to 44 so everything that depends on 43 needs to be rebuilt | 14:52 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted hw-detect [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.117ubuntu2.2] | 14:53 | |
| apw | Saviq, what jbicha said ... unity-system-compositor is linked against libmirserver43 so is broken if that mir migrates | 14:54 |
| jbicha | qtmir and qtmir-gles too | 14:54 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted hw-detect [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.117ubuntu3.1] | 14:54 | |
| Saviq | yeah, I'm not sure why those weren't part of that upload, we'll take care of that, thanks | 14:55 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected apt [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.2.23] | 14:55 | |
| Trevinho | Hey, can someone from the SRU team promote https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-control-center/15.04.0+16.04.20170214-0ubuntu1 ? | 15:14 |
| Trevinho | As it's blocking the upcoming SRU | 15:14 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sssd [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.13.4-1ubuntu1.6] | 15:27 | |
| slashd | vtapia ^ | 15:28 |
| slashd | sil2100, doing SRU today related work today ? | 15:45 |
| slashd | doing SRU related work today lol | 15:45 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxcfs (xenial-proposed/main) [2.0.7-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 => 2.0.7-0ubuntu1~16.04.2] (edubuntu, ubuntu-server) | 15:45 | |
| sil2100 | slashd: yes, a bit, I didn't have time yesterday + the US guys are off | 15:47 |
| sil2100 | But I'm finishing in a bit | 15:48 |
| slashd | sil2100, ok I'll ping the vanguard tomorrow then | 15:48 |
| sil2100 | slashd: what's up? You need some action on something? | 15:48 |
| slashd | sil2100, was wondering if you could move multipath-tools from trusty-proposed to trusty-updates, if everything look good to you. I checked and everything lgtm | 15:50 |
| sil2100 | I was looking at that today, need to remind myself what were my thoughts about that one | 15:50 |
| slashd | Note that pending SRU still shows LP: 1687004 has not verified, but it is, it simply that we did it a couples minutes ago and it didn't refresh the page yet. | 15:50 |
| sil2100 | One moment | 15:50 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1687004 in multipath-tools (Ubuntu Trusty) "multipath crash generating core dump" [Medium,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1687004 | 15:50 |
| sil2100 | Ah | 15:50 |
| slashd | sil2100, sure | 15:50 |
| sil2100 | Ok, yeah, probably wasn't verified back then | 15:51 |
| slashd | sil2100, yeah that was probably it, there is no clear way to reproduce it, as mentioned it is base on dump analysis | 15:51 |
| slashd | but knowing Rafael he did a lot of testing using valgrind, etc .... | 15:52 |
| slashd | sil2100, they are both mark as green now in pending SRU | 15:53 |
| sil2100 | Will take care of that one in a minute | 15:54 |
| slashd | sil2100, much appreciated | 15:54 |
| slashd | sil2100, and sorry for the changelog lp thing, I have took a note for next time. | 15:54 |
| slashd | re: sssd ^ | 15:54 |
| sil2100 | slashd: no worries, I didn't expect it to cause any issues with the tooling, but I guess it should be good now | 15:57 |
| slashd | sil2100, ack | 15:57 |
| sil2100 | slashd: multipath-tools released o/ | 16:00 |
| slashd | sil2100, thanks for this last minute request | 16:01 |
| slashd | tinoco, ^^ | 16:01 |
| sil2100 | np! | 16:02 |
| tinoco | tau =) | 16:05 |
| tinoco | tku =) | 16:05 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.4.0-85.108] (core, kernel) | 17:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxcfs (yakkety-proposed/main) [2.0.7-0ubuntu1~16.10.1 => 2.0.7-0ubuntu1~16.10.2] (edubuntu, ubuntu-server) | 18:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxcfs (zesty-proposed/main) [2.0.7-0ubuntu1~17.04.1 => 2.0.7-0ubuntu1~17.04.2] (edubuntu, ubuntu-server) | 18:31 | |
| slashd | Hi, Does someone with upload rights in devel release who has some cycle to sponsor a debdiff https://launchpadlibrarian.net/326769765/artful-ksh_93u+20120801-3.2.debdiff ? Once in Artful, I can sponsor the SRU myself. | 18:51 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.4.0-85.108] | 18:52 | |
| mitya57 | slashd, the correct version number would be 93u+20120801-3.1ubuntu1 | 18:56 |
| mitya57 | Otherwise, will upload to artful now. | 18:56 |
| slashd | mitya57, much appreciated, you'll do the correction or want me to re-generate a new debdiff ? | 18:58 |
| mitya57 | I will do. | 18:58 |
| slashd | mitya57, thanks much | 18:58 |
| mitya57 | slashd, uploaded. | 19:00 |
| slashd | mitya57, thanks you very much | 19:00 |
| slashd | mitya57, you were right about the version, I think I misread when I saw, it I was under the impression it was ubuntu3.1, thanks for catching this | 19:01 |
| slashd | need some glasses | 19:01 |
| slangasek | xnox: do you know why udev is failing to configure on armhf for autopkgtests? (e.g. http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/l/lazarus/artful/armhf) | 20:16 |
| infinity | slangasek: Going to assume it's less to do with armhf and more to do with lxd. | 20:35 |
| slangasek | infinity: s390x didn't show the problem, and this is certainly a regression in the behavior | 20:50 |
| infinity | slangasek: s390x is lxc, not lxd, just to be confusing. | 20:50 |
| slangasek | ah right | 20:50 |
| slangasek | well anyway. still a behavior regression :) | 20:50 |
| infinity | Not saying it's not a problem, just guessing it's not arch-specific. | 20:50 |
| slangasek | and nagios3 autopkgtest is failing cross-arch because Error: The new file apt.cfg does not exist! | 20:56 |
| xnox | slangasek, hahahahah elipsised logs are useful - Jul 04 12:23:38 autopkgtest-lxd-qemhph systemd[1]: systemd-udevd.service: Fai…ed | 22:12 |
| xnox | slangasek, also why is that calling invoke-rc.d on ubuntu?! initscript udev?! | 22:13 |
| xnox | wtf. | 22:13 |
| xnox | what is this?! 2004? | 22:13 |
| xnox | slangasek, there is also an upgrade bug where open-vm-tools tries to call udevadm trigger or settle and that is not allowed whilst udev is upgrading. that is from trusty->xenial do-release-upgrade of EC2 instance. | 22:14 |
| xnox | slangasek, do we do cloud lts-lts upgrade testing in all the clouds? | 22:14 |
| slangasek | xnox: invoke-rc.d is the policy interface and always has been | 22:24 |
| slangasek | lts-lts upgrade testing in "all the clouds" - I'm sure not | 22:24 |
| xnox | sorry for rebooting my irc bouncer. | 22:25 |
| === enick_370 is now known as RAOF | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!