[05:16] <lubot> <julienlavergne> Tested fluxbox some days ago, I was not really impressed, openbox behave better
[05:17] <lubot> <julienlavergne> Also softsomething announce vlc on lxqt version, I didn't see any argument for switching over smplayer on the blueprint
[05:50] <lubot> <tsimonq2> @julienlavergne, I contacted Marius and told him that, but while he didn't change the headline, he changed the wording a bit in the article. If you read the article, it says that it is a possibility but not certain :)
[05:51] <lubot> <tsimonq2> Because we haven't decided on it yet.
[05:51] <lubot> <julienlavergne> On Twitter, they only read the headline ...
[05:52] <lubot> <tsimonq2> Yeah, can't change that :/
[05:53] <lubot> <julienlavergne> So, don't retweet it, sound like official now
[05:56] <lubot> <tsimonq2> But the thing is, the article is good, the headline is just a bit off. I can unretweet it if you want, it just seems a bit trivial at this point.
[05:59] <lubot> <julienlavergne> If the article is good, just tweet it with a link, explaining the title is wrong
[06:00] <lubot> <tsimonq2> OK wfm
[06:04] <lubot> <tsimonq2> @julienlavergne Done, nice catch
[06:10] <lubot> <julienlavergne> Thanks, sorry I'm a bit picky with PR :-)
[06:10] <lubot> <tsimonq2> I get it :)
[06:11] <lubot> <tsimonq2> @julienlavergne If you'd like to see the progress I'm making with mitya57 to get Qt 5.9 landed in Artful, here's the PPA: https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/2819/
[06:12] <lubot> <tsimonq2> Just a couple more rebuilds and it should be installable on a Lubuntu LXQt session
[06:19] <lubot> <julienlavergne> Cool, Qt releases are usually not painful for LXQt, so I'm not really  worried
[06:37] <lubot> <tsimonq2> @julienlavergne, Well the pain point is going to be getting the Unity 8 packages removed first. They depend on a lot of Qt private headers so they take *months* to fix for a new Qt version :/
[07:29] <acheronuk> I noticed bug #1695928 the other day. Looks not fun!
[07:29] <ubot93> Bug 1695928 in gnome-control-center-signon (Ubuntu) "Please remove obsolete UOA packages" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1695928
[07:30] <acheronuk> unity8 and some qt stuff dragged in there
[08:06] <lubot> <tsimonq2> Yeah
[08:06] <lubot> <tsimonq2> It's a bit of a nightmare
[08:26] <lubot> <VikingRedwolf> @julienlavergne, And it's not very maintained either
[08:26] <lubot> <VikingRedwolf> Morning!
[08:36] <lubot> <tsimonq2> @VikingRedwolf, Good morning ALBERTO! :D
[08:36] <lubot> <tsimonq2> How are you?
[08:36] <lubot> <VikingRedwolf> Awake. Kinda.
[08:37] <lubot> <VikingRedwolf> What the hell are you doing awake so late?!
[08:37] <lubot> <tsimonq2> You mean "early"? ;)
[08:38] <lubot> <VikingRedwolf> ☺️
[16:38] <redwolf> TIBERIO!
[16:40] <lubot> <tsimonq2> @redwolf, ALBERTO!
[16:41] <redwolf> O.O
[16:41] <redwolf> what ISO are you testing, Tiberio?
[16:42] <lubot> <tsimonq2> The one found on cdimage.ubuntu.com .__.
[16:42] <lubot> <VikingRedwolf> yup, the standard one
[16:42] <lubot> <VikingRedwolf> meta-package? maybe lubuntu-qt-desktop?
[16:43] <lubot> <tsimonq2> No, we have a Lubuntu Next image in its own directory...
[16:43] <lubot> <VikingRedwolf> I did it the complicated way
[16:43] <lubot> <VikingRedwolf> ._____.
[16:44] <lubot> <tsimonq2> (Document) http://vps.tsimonq2.net:9090//file_406.mp4
[16:45] <lubot> <VikingRedwolf> (Document) http://vps.tsimonq2.net:9090//file_407.mp4
[18:58] <lynorian> wow a ton of my lubuntu next bugs have been fixed already and are no longer problems
[19:35] <lubot> <VikingRedwolf> @julienlavergne there's a surprise for you in GitHub ;)
[21:04] <lubot> <julienlavergne> @VikingRedwolf, Thanks :-)
[21:11] <lubot> <VikingRedwolf> have you seen it?
[21:11] <lubot> <VikingRedwolf> check out the colour levels
[21:13] <lubot> <julienlavergne> I can't login right now, I'll check this tomorow
[21:14] <lubot> <VikingRedwolf> okies
[21:14] <lubot> <VikingRedwolf> I can send you a .tar.gz if you prefer