[00:06] <nacc> ahasenack: and it would be good to put the conclusion on the wiki page
[00:14] <slangasek> Laney: "You submitted an invalid request: freedombox-setup/0.10 is not published in artful" seems an unexpected result for http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=artful&arch=armhf&package=freedombox-setup&trigger=freedombox-setup/0.10
[00:14] <slangasek> Laney: any insight?
[00:17] <nacc> slangasek: hrm, why does update_excuses say freedombox-setup/unknown?
[00:17] <jbicha> we've had problems with unknown armhf autopkgtests since Friday
[00:17] <nacc> jbicha: ah ok, i wasn't aware, sorry
[00:18] <jbicha> retrying works most of the time
[00:18] <nacc> slangasek: fwiw, i don't believe that retrigger will end up succeeding (I don't see why it's invalid) because mod-gnutls hasn't built on non-amd64 for some time
[00:19] <jbicha> it's ok, I don't think there's anything tracking the armhf problem yet
[00:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (artful-proposed/main) [2.02~beta3-4ubuntu6 => 2.02~beta3-4ubuntu6] (core)
[02:46] <slangasek> nacc: ah, is mod-gnutls the source of the problem?  thanks, that was non-obvious why things were showing uninstallable.  Still, I don't think that explains freedombox-setup showing as "not published"
[02:48] <slangasek> nacc, jbicha: fwiw the "/unknown" is the result of Laney's fix to make early-aborted autopkgtests show up in the index instead of disappearing into the void, so is not necessarily a sign of armhf runners having regressed (these are the tests that previously would have shown up indefinitely as 'In progress')
[04:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mythtv (yakkety-proposed/multiverse) [2:0.28.0+fixes.20160413.15cf421-0ubuntu2 => 2:0.28.0+fixes.20160413.15cf421-0ubuntu2.16.10.1] (mythbuntu)
[05:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mythtv [source] (yakkety-proposed) [2:0.28.0+fixes.20160413.15cf421-0ubuntu2.16.10.2]
[05:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mythtv [source] (yakkety-proposed) [2:0.28.0+fixes.20160413.15cf421-0ubuntu2.16.10.1]
[05:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libinput [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [1.6.3-1ubuntu1~16.04.1]
[05:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libinput [armhf] (xenial-proposed) [1.6.3-1ubuntu1~16.04.1]
[05:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libinput [powerpc] (xenial-proposed) [1.6.3-1ubuntu1~16.04.1]
[05:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libinput [s390x] (xenial-proposed) [1.6.3-1ubuntu1~16.04.1]
[05:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libinput [arm64] (xenial-proposed) [1.6.3-1ubuntu1~16.04.1]
[05:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libinput [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [1.6.3-1ubuntu1~16.04.1]
[05:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libinput [i386] (xenial-proposed) [1.6.3-1ubuntu1~16.04.1]
[06:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xfonts-utils [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:7.7+3ubuntu0.16.04.2]
[07:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xorg-server-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [2:1.19.3-1ubuntu1~16.04.1]
[12:36] <slashd> good day sil2100, do you have some cycle to approve the upload of 'ksh' in Trusty ? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/trusty/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=ksh
[12:38] <slashd> sil2100, I'm re-sending my message, since I just notice you quit/join
[12:38] <slashd> good day sil2100, do you have some cycle to approve the upload of 'ksh' in Trusty ? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/trusty/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=ksh
[12:45] <sil2100> slashd: hey! I can try looking into that after lunch if that's ok :)
[12:48] <ogra_> sil2100, when you decided to pick the gross hack for ubuntu-image that classic snaps are, you already gave up on the elegance bit ;) (just read your PR commit) ... I woulldnt care about elegance anymore ;)
[12:48] <slashd> sil2100, sure thank you
[12:49] <jibel> Hi, there is no desktop image today. Can someone have a look? There is a livefs but the ISO failed to build
[12:49] <sil2100> ogra_: yeah, but this involves ugly things happening in the part-install of snapcraft.yaml ;p Like, moving lib files around
[12:49] <sil2100> jibel: let me take a look
[12:49] <jibel> sil2100, thanks
[12:49] <ogra_> sil2100, as long as you dont copy them over system libs outside of the snap (which classic can actuallly do as well)
[13:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-cinderclient (xenial-proposed/main) [1:1.6.0-2 => 1:1.6.0-2ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[13:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: s390-tools (xenial-proposed/main) [1.34.0-0ubuntu8.2 => 1.34.0-0ubuntu8.4] (no packageset)
[13:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: s390-tools (zesty-proposed/main) [1.37.0-0ubuntu3 => 1.37.0-0ubuntu3.1] (core)
[13:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: s390-tools (yakkety-proposed/main) [1.36.1-0ubuntu2 => 1.36.1-0ubuntu2.2] (no packageset)
[14:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: walinuxagent (trusty-proposed/main) [2.2.12-0ubuntu1~14.04.1 => 2.2.14-0ubuntu1~14.04.1] (ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)
[14:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: walinuxagent (xenial-proposed/main) [2.2.12-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 => 2.2.14-0ubuntu1~16.04.1] (ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)
[14:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: walinuxagent (zesty-proposed/main) [2.2.12-0ubuntu1~17.04.1 => 2.2.14-0ubuntu1~17.04.1] (ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)
[14:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: walinuxagent (yakkety-proposed/main) [2.2.12-0ubuntu1~16.10.1 => 2.2.14-0ubuntu1~16.10.1] (ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)
[14:38] <jbicha> slangasek: oh, that makes sense for the armhf autopkgtests, it is a nice improvement to have the retry buttons at least :)
[14:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-control-center [amd64] (artful-proposed/main) [1:3.24.2-0ubuntu3] (edubuntu, ubuntugnome)
[14:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected gnome-control-center [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1:3.24.2-0ubuntu3]
[14:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-control-center [amd64] (artful-proposed/main) [1:3.24.2-0ubuntu4] (edubuntu, ubuntugnome)
[14:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ksh [source] (trusty-proposed) [93u+20120801-1ubuntu0.14.04.1]
[14:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-control-center [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1:3.24.2-0ubuntu4]
[14:58] <slangasek> infinity: these xenial image build failure emails that look like a partially-broken x stack, is that known and in progress in -proposed right now?
[14:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: borgbackup (xenial-proposed/universe) [1.0.7-0ubuntu1.16.04.1 => 1.0.10-2~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[15:01] <infinity> slangasek: Yep, drivers will go in this morning and should fix it.
[15:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tpm-tools [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.3.9.1-0.2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[15:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tpm-tools [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.3.9.1-0.2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[15:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tpm-tools [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.3.9.1-0.2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[15:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tpm-tools [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.3.9.1-0.2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[15:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tpm-tools [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.3.9.1-0.2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[15:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ksh [source] (yakkety-proposed) [93u+20120801-2ubuntu0.16.10.1]
[15:06] <ahasenack> hi, can someone please accept my xenial nomination for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sssd/+bug/1664566 ? Thanks
[15:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ksh [source] (xenial-proposed) [93u+20120801-2ubuntu0.16.04.1]
[15:15] <rbasak> chiluk: regarding intel-microcode, did you see the discussion in ubuntu-release@ and in the bug? I see the same issues. It's not a minimal cherry-pick.
[15:16] <chiluk> rbasak: looking
[15:18] <chiluk> rbasak you are going to have to be more specific I have seen all the discussion...
[15:19] <rbasak> chiluk: for example, why is debhelper compat being bumped?
[15:20] <chiluk> it is but we have sufficient version in xenial so I considered it a non-issue
[15:21] <nacc> ahasenack: done
[15:21] <ahasenack> thx
[15:24] <rbasak> chiluk: I don't think you understood my point in the thread then? These are unnecessary packaging changes.
[15:24] <chiluk> rbasak: the functionality change of depending on the newer version when the underlying isn't changing should be a non-issue
[15:24] <rbasak> chiluk: no, the compat level changed. That's different from just depending on a newer version. That's specifically *asking* for different behaviour.
[15:25] <chiluk> rbasak: they might be unnecessary packaging changes, but in my opinion on a blanket pull-back like this, I think it's more appropriate to stay close to the new version than to start ripping out stuff because it's "new"
[15:26] <rbasak> chiluk: we had this discussion already on the thread. Three members of the SRU team, the only ones who opined, have asked for either a minimal cherry-pick of only the blob update and nothing else, or a full documented exception for ongoing backports. I'd expect the latter to include a comprehensive testing plan. In this case that'd require different CPU types, etc, IMHO.
[15:26] <chiluk> rbasak... If you want Henrique is commenting in the public bug we could ask him
[15:27] <rbasak> chiluk: why is a minimal blob update so difficult?
[15:27] <rbasak> chiluk: see Trusty for an example of it being done in the past.
[15:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected intel-microcode [source] (xenial-proposed) [3.20170511.1~ubuntu16.04.0]
[15:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ksh [source] (zesty-proposed) [93u+20120801-2ubuntu1]
[15:29] <chiluk> rbasak I don't remember seeing that consensus was reached.
[15:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected intel-microcode [source] (yakkety-proposed) [3.20170511.1~ubuntu16.10.0]
[15:29] <chiluk> but if we must I'll pull back just the blobs...
[15:29] <rbasak> chiluk: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/intel-microcode/+bug/1700373/comments/27
[15:34] <chiluk> yeah I missed the ML thread... all my subscriptions got dropped when I lost my canonical.com email address.
[15:42] <LocutusOfBorg> cjwatson, sorry, is armhf real hardware or qemu stuff?
[15:42] <LocutusOfBorg> because I'm tracing down notmuch failures and I see in my qemu ptrace is giving unsupported syscall
[15:51] <chiluk> thanks rbasak for alerting me to that thread... There's a lot of background discussion that I was missing.. I'll investigate more thoroughly later today...*(meetings).
[15:52] <slangasek> LocutusOfBorg: it is real hardware
[15:52] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks
[15:53] <LocutusOfBorg> nice, so I can't debug on my machine notmuch failures because I use qemu
[15:53] <LocutusOfBorg> and there is no porterbox in Ubuntu
[15:53] <LocutusOfBorg> and for some reasons gdb+Ubuntu+notmuch sucks
[15:53] <LocutusOfBorg> "sucks much"
[15:56] <rbasak> "I should also mention that we will be following Debian's lead and not updating this for Trusty." -- who is "we" there, please?
[15:56] <rbasak> chiluk: ^
[15:57] <rbasak> Is that an Ubuntu Foundations team discussion? Or if not, which team?
[15:57] <rbasak> s/discussion/decision/
[16:00] <slangasek> LocutusOfBorg: what is the failure?
[16:01] <slangasek> I don't see any notmuch waiting to migrate
[16:07] <LocutusOfBorg> slangasek, I had to disable testsuite on armhf
[16:08] <LocutusOfBorg> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/notmuch/0.24.2-2
[16:14] <LocutusOfBorg> slangasek, illegal instruction
[16:14] <LocutusOfBorg> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/327045619/buildlog_ubuntu-artful-armhf.notmuch_0.24.2-2ubuntu7_BUILDING.txt.gz
[16:14] <LocutusOfBorg> in my ppa there is the debug in the instruction
[16:15] <LocutusOfBorg> https://launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/+archive/ubuntu/locutusofborg-ppa/+files/notmuch_0.24.2-2ubuntu7.dsc
[16:15] <LocutusOfBorg> something smells like a glibc issue?
[16:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted skiboot [source] (yakkety-proposed) [5.3.3-1ubuntu0.1]
[16:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted skiboot [source] (xenial-proposed) [5.1.13-0ubuntu3]
[17:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gmime [amd64] (artful-proposed/main) [3.0.1-2] (core)
[17:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gmime [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/main) [3.0.1-2] (core)
[17:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gmime [s390x] (artful-proposed/main) [3.0.1-2] (core)
[17:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gmime [armhf] (artful-proposed/main) [3.0.1-2] (core)
[17:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libratbag [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.9-1] (no packageset)
[17:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gmime [arm64] (artful-proposed/main) [3.0.1-2] (core)
[17:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libratbag [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.9-1] (no packageset)
[17:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gmime [i386] (artful-proposed/main) [3.0.1-2] (core)
[17:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libratbag [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.9-1] (no packageset)
[17:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libratbag [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.9-1] (no packageset)
[17:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-daiquiri [amd64] (artful-proposed/none) [1.0.1-1] (no packageset)
[17:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-coverage-test-runner [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.13.1-1] (no packageset)
[17:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-bitcoinlib [amd64] (artful-proposed/none) [0.7.0-1] (no packageset)
[17:24] <infinity> doko: Hrm, LocutusOfBorg just disabled the notmuch testsuite on armhf due to it throwing SIGILL.  That sounds fishy.
[17:24] <infinity> doko: (Well, disabling the testsuite because it's doing its job is very fishy, but I mean the SIGILL could perhaps relate to new toolchain)
[17:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qbs [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.8.1+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qbs [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.8.1+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gmime [amd64] (artful-proposed) [3.0.1-2]
[17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gmime [armhf] (artful-proposed) [3.0.1-2]
[17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gmime [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [3.0.1-2]
[17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libratbag [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.9-1]
[17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libratbag [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.9-1]
[17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-bitcoinlib [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.7.0-1]
[17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-daiquiri [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.0.1-1]
[17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qbs [s390x] (artful-proposed) [1.8.1+dfsg-1]
[17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gmime [arm64] (artful-proposed) [3.0.1-2]
[17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gmime [s390x] (artful-proposed) [3.0.1-2]
[17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libratbag [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.9-1]
[17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qbs [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [1.8.1+dfsg-1]
[17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gmime [i386] (artful-proposed) [3.0.1-2]
[17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-coverage-test-runner [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.13.1-1]
[17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libratbag [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.9-1]
[17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dolfin [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [2016.2.0-4] (no packageset)
[17:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dolfin [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [2016.2.0-4] (no packageset)
[17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qbs [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.8.1+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qbs [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.8.1+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[17:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dolfin [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [2016.2.0-4] (no packageset)
[17:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dolfin [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [2016.2.0-4] (no packageset)
[17:51] <doko> infinity: we currently only have new binutils
[17:52] <infinity> doko: Yes.  Which could very well be responsible for generating bad instructions.
[17:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tpm-tools [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.3.9.1-0.2ubuntu1]
[17:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tpm-tools [i386] (artful-proposed) [1.3.9.1-0.2ubuntu1]
[17:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tpm-tools [s390x] (artful-proposed) [1.3.9.1-0.2ubuntu1]
[17:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tpm-tools [arm64] (artful-proposed) [1.3.9.1-0.2ubuntu1]
[17:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tpm-tools [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [1.3.9.1-0.2ubuntu1]
[18:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dolfin [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [2016.2.0-4] (no packageset)
[18:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dolfin [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [2016.2.0-4] (no packageset)
[18:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dolfin [amd64] (artful-proposed) [2016.2.0-4]
[18:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dolfin [armhf] (artful-proposed) [2016.2.0-4]
[18:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dolfin [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [2016.2.0-4]
[18:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dolfin [arm64] (artful-proposed) [2016.2.0-4]
[18:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dolfin [s390x] (artful-proposed) [2016.2.0-4]
[18:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dolfin [i386] (artful-proposed) [2016.2.0-4]
[18:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qbs [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.8.1+dfsg-1]
[18:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qbs [i386] (artful-proposed) [1.8.1+dfsg-1]
[19:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [amd64] (artful-proposed) [2.02~beta3-4ubuntu6]
[19:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [arm64] (artful-proposed) [2.02~beta3-4ubuntu6]
[21:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xf86-input-mtrack-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.3.1-1build2~16.04.1]
[21:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-input-void-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.4.1-1build3~16.04.1]
[21:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-nouveau-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.0.14-0ubuntu1~16.04.1]
[21:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-trident-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.3.8-1build1~16.04.1]
[21:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-vmware-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:13.2.1-1build1~16.04.1]
[21:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xf86-input-wacom-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:0.34.0-0ubuntu2~16.04.1]
[21:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-qxl-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.1.5-2build1~16.04.1]
[21:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-dummy-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:0.3.8-1build1~16.04.1]
[21:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-vesa-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.3.4-1build3~16.04.1]
[21:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-input-evdev-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.10.5-1ubuntu1~16.04.1]
[21:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-amdgpu-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1~16.04.1]
[21:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-fbdev-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:0.4.4-1build6~16.04.1]
[21:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-input-synaptics-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.9.0-1ubuntu1~16.04.1]
[21:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-intel-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [2:2.99.917+git20170309-0ubuntu1~16.04.1]
[21:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-ati-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:7.9.0-0ubuntu1~16.04.1]
[21:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-siliconmotion-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.7.9-2ubuntu1~16.04.1]
[21:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-tdfx-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.4.7-1build1~16.04.1]
[21:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-sisusb-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:0.9.7-1build1~16.04.1]
[22:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-mach64-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [6.9.5-1build3~16.04.1]
[22:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-openchrome-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:0.5.0-3build1~16.04.1]
[22:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-savage-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.3.9-1ubuntu1~16.04.1]
[22:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-neomagic-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.2.9-1build3~16.04.1]
[22:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-r128-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [6.10.2-1build1~16.04.1]
[22:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-input-joystick-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.6.3-1build1~16.04.1]
[22:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-geode-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.11.19-2~16.04.1]
[22:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-input-libinput-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.25.0-0ubuntu1~16.04.1]
[22:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xorg-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:7.7+16ubuntu3~16.04.1]
[22:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qtbase-opensource-src (zesty-proposed/main) [5.7.1+dfsg-2ubuntu4~1 => 5.7.1+dfsg-2ubuntu4~1.17.04.1] (kubuntu, qt5, ubuntu-desktop)