[00:06] ahasenack: and it would be good to put the conclusion on the wiki page [00:14] Laney: "You submitted an invalid request: freedombox-setup/0.10 is not published in artful" seems an unexpected result for http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=artful&arch=armhf&package=freedombox-setup&trigger=freedombox-setup/0.10 [00:14] Laney: any insight? [00:17] slangasek: hrm, why does update_excuses say freedombox-setup/unknown? [00:17] we've had problems with unknown armhf autopkgtests since Friday [00:17] jbicha: ah ok, i wasn't aware, sorry [00:18] retrying works most of the time [00:18] slangasek: fwiw, i don't believe that retrigger will end up succeeding (I don't see why it's invalid) because mod-gnutls hasn't built on non-amd64 for some time [00:19] it's ok, I don't think there's anything tracking the armhf problem yet [00:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (artful-proposed/main) [2.02~beta3-4ubuntu6 => 2.02~beta3-4ubuntu6] (core) [02:46] nacc: ah, is mod-gnutls the source of the problem? thanks, that was non-obvious why things were showing uninstallable. Still, I don't think that explains freedombox-setup showing as "not published" [02:48] nacc, jbicha: fwiw the "/unknown" is the result of Laney's fix to make early-aborted autopkgtests show up in the index instead of disappearing into the void, so is not necessarily a sign of armhf runners having regressed (these are the tests that previously would have shown up indefinitely as 'In progress') [04:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mythtv (yakkety-proposed/multiverse) [2:0.28.0+fixes.20160413.15cf421-0ubuntu2 => 2:0.28.0+fixes.20160413.15cf421-0ubuntu2.16.10.1] (mythbuntu) [05:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mythtv [source] (yakkety-proposed) [2:0.28.0+fixes.20160413.15cf421-0ubuntu2.16.10.2] [05:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mythtv [source] (yakkety-proposed) [2:0.28.0+fixes.20160413.15cf421-0ubuntu2.16.10.1] [05:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libinput [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [1.6.3-1ubuntu1~16.04.1] [05:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libinput [armhf] (xenial-proposed) [1.6.3-1ubuntu1~16.04.1] [05:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libinput [powerpc] (xenial-proposed) [1.6.3-1ubuntu1~16.04.1] [05:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libinput [s390x] (xenial-proposed) [1.6.3-1ubuntu1~16.04.1] [05:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libinput [arm64] (xenial-proposed) [1.6.3-1ubuntu1~16.04.1] [05:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libinput [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [1.6.3-1ubuntu1~16.04.1] [05:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libinput [i386] (xenial-proposed) [1.6.3-1ubuntu1~16.04.1] === stokachu_ is now known as stokachu [06:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xfonts-utils [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:7.7+3ubuntu0.16.04.2] [07:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xorg-server-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [2:1.19.3-1ubuntu1~16.04.1] === maclin1 is now known as maclin === doko_ is now known as doko === NCommander is now known as mcasadevall === mcasadevall is now known as NCommander [12:36] good day sil2100, do you have some cycle to approve the upload of 'ksh' in Trusty ? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/trusty/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=ksh [12:38] sil2100, I'm re-sending my message, since I just notice you quit/join [12:38] good day sil2100, do you have some cycle to approve the upload of 'ksh' in Trusty ? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/trusty/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=ksh [12:45] slashd: hey! I can try looking into that after lunch if that's ok :) [12:48] sil2100, when you decided to pick the gross hack for ubuntu-image that classic snaps are, you already gave up on the elegance bit ;) (just read your PR commit) ... I woulldnt care about elegance anymore ;) [12:48] sil2100, sure thank you [12:49] Hi, there is no desktop image today. Can someone have a look? There is a livefs but the ISO failed to build [12:49] ogra_: yeah, but this involves ugly things happening in the part-install of snapcraft.yaml ;p Like, moving lib files around [12:49] jibel: let me take a look [12:49] sil2100, thanks [12:49] sil2100, as long as you dont copy them over system libs outside of the snap (which classic can actuallly do as well) [13:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-cinderclient (xenial-proposed/main) [1:1.6.0-2 => 1:1.6.0-2ubuntu1] (openstack, ubuntu-server) [13:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: s390-tools (xenial-proposed/main) [1.34.0-0ubuntu8.2 => 1.34.0-0ubuntu8.4] (no packageset) [13:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: s390-tools (zesty-proposed/main) [1.37.0-0ubuntu3 => 1.37.0-0ubuntu3.1] (core) [13:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: s390-tools (yakkety-proposed/main) [1.36.1-0ubuntu2 => 1.36.1-0ubuntu2.2] (no packageset) [14:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: walinuxagent (trusty-proposed/main) [2.2.12-0ubuntu1~14.04.1 => 2.2.14-0ubuntu1~14.04.1] (ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server) [14:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: walinuxagent (xenial-proposed/main) [2.2.12-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 => 2.2.14-0ubuntu1~16.04.1] (ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server) [14:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: walinuxagent (zesty-proposed/main) [2.2.12-0ubuntu1~17.04.1 => 2.2.14-0ubuntu1~17.04.1] (ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server) [14:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: walinuxagent (yakkety-proposed/main) [2.2.12-0ubuntu1~16.10.1 => 2.2.14-0ubuntu1~16.10.1] (ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server) [14:38] slangasek: oh, that makes sense for the armhf autopkgtests, it is a nice improvement to have the retry buttons at least :) [14:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-control-center [amd64] (artful-proposed/main) [1:3.24.2-0ubuntu3] (edubuntu, ubuntugnome) [14:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected gnome-control-center [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1:3.24.2-0ubuntu3] [14:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-control-center [amd64] (artful-proposed/main) [1:3.24.2-0ubuntu4] (edubuntu, ubuntugnome) [14:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ksh [source] (trusty-proposed) [93u+20120801-1ubuntu0.14.04.1] [14:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-control-center [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1:3.24.2-0ubuntu4] [14:58] infinity: these xenial image build failure emails that look like a partially-broken x stack, is that known and in progress in -proposed right now? [14:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: borgbackup (xenial-proposed/universe) [1.0.7-0ubuntu1.16.04.1 => 1.0.10-2~16.04.1] (no packageset) [15:01] slangasek: Yep, drivers will go in this morning and should fix it. [15:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tpm-tools [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.3.9.1-0.2ubuntu1] (no packageset) [15:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tpm-tools [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.3.9.1-0.2ubuntu1] (no packageset) [15:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tpm-tools [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.3.9.1-0.2ubuntu1] (no packageset) [15:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tpm-tools [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.3.9.1-0.2ubuntu1] (no packageset) [15:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tpm-tools [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.3.9.1-0.2ubuntu1] (no packageset) [15:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ksh [source] (yakkety-proposed) [93u+20120801-2ubuntu0.16.10.1] [15:06] hi, can someone please accept my xenial nomination for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sssd/+bug/1664566 ? Thanks [15:06] Ubuntu bug 1664566 in sssd (Ubuntu) "sssd_krb5_locator_plugin.so is not loaded (installed at wrong path)" [Undecided,Fix released] [15:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ksh [source] (xenial-proposed) [93u+20120801-2ubuntu0.16.04.1] [15:15] chiluk: regarding intel-microcode, did you see the discussion in ubuntu-release@ and in the bug? I see the same issues. It's not a minimal cherry-pick. [15:16] rbasak: looking [15:18] rbasak you are going to have to be more specific I have seen all the discussion... [15:19] chiluk: for example, why is debhelper compat being bumped? [15:20] it is but we have sufficient version in xenial so I considered it a non-issue [15:21] ahasenack: done [15:21] thx [15:24] chiluk: I don't think you understood my point in the thread then? These are unnecessary packaging changes. [15:24] rbasak: the functionality change of depending on the newer version when the underlying isn't changing should be a non-issue [15:24] chiluk: no, the compat level changed. That's different from just depending on a newer version. That's specifically *asking* for different behaviour. [15:25] rbasak: they might be unnecessary packaging changes, but in my opinion on a blanket pull-back like this, I think it's more appropriate to stay close to the new version than to start ripping out stuff because it's "new" [15:26] chiluk: we had this discussion already on the thread. Three members of the SRU team, the only ones who opined, have asked for either a minimal cherry-pick of only the blob update and nothing else, or a full documented exception for ongoing backports. I'd expect the latter to include a comprehensive testing plan. In this case that'd require different CPU types, etc, IMHO. [15:26] rbasak... If you want Henrique is commenting in the public bug we could ask him [15:27] chiluk: why is a minimal blob update so difficult? [15:27] chiluk: see Trusty for an example of it being done in the past. [15:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected intel-microcode [source] (xenial-proposed) [3.20170511.1~ubuntu16.04.0] [15:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ksh [source] (zesty-proposed) [93u+20120801-2ubuntu1] [15:29] rbasak I don't remember seeing that consensus was reached. [15:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected intel-microcode [source] (yakkety-proposed) [3.20170511.1~ubuntu16.10.0] [15:29] but if we must I'll pull back just the blobs... [15:29] chiluk: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/intel-microcode/+bug/1700373/comments/27 [15:29] Ubuntu bug 1700373 in intel-microcode (Ubuntu Yakkety) "intel-microcode is out of date, version 20170511 fixes errata on 6th and 7th generation platforms" [Undecided,Confirmed] [15:34] yeah I missed the ML thread... all my subscriptions got dropped when I lost my canonical.com email address. [15:42] cjwatson, sorry, is armhf real hardware or qemu stuff? [15:42] because I'm tracing down notmuch failures and I see in my qemu ptrace is giving unsupported syscall [15:51] thanks rbasak for alerting me to that thread... There's a lot of background discussion that I was missing.. I'll investigate more thoroughly later today...*(meetings). [15:52] LocutusOfBorg: it is real hardware [15:52] thanks [15:53] nice, so I can't debug on my machine notmuch failures because I use qemu [15:53] and there is no porterbox in Ubuntu [15:53] and for some reasons gdb+Ubuntu+notmuch sucks [15:53] "sucks much" [15:56] "I should also mention that we will be following Debian's lead and not updating this for Trusty." -- who is "we" there, please? [15:56] chiluk: ^ [15:57] Is that an Ubuntu Foundations team discussion? Or if not, which team? [15:57] s/discussion/decision/ === NCommander is now known as mcasadevall [16:00] LocutusOfBorg: what is the failure? [16:01] I don't see any notmuch waiting to migrate [16:07] slangasek, I had to disable testsuite on armhf [16:08] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/notmuch/0.24.2-2 [16:14] slangasek, illegal instruction [16:14] https://launchpadlibrarian.net/327045619/buildlog_ubuntu-artful-armhf.notmuch_0.24.2-2ubuntu7_BUILDING.txt.gz [16:14] in my ppa there is the debug in the instruction [16:15] https://launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/+archive/ubuntu/locutusofborg-ppa/+files/notmuch_0.24.2-2ubuntu7.dsc [16:15] something smells like a glibc issue? [16:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted skiboot [source] (yakkety-proposed) [5.3.3-1ubuntu0.1] [16:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted skiboot [source] (xenial-proposed) [5.1.13-0ubuntu3] [17:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gmime [amd64] (artful-proposed/main) [3.0.1-2] (core) [17:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gmime [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/main) [3.0.1-2] (core) [17:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gmime [s390x] (artful-proposed/main) [3.0.1-2] (core) [17:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gmime [armhf] (artful-proposed/main) [3.0.1-2] (core) [17:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libratbag [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.9-1] (no packageset) [17:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gmime [arm64] (artful-proposed/main) [3.0.1-2] (core) [17:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libratbag [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.9-1] (no packageset) [17:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gmime [i386] (artful-proposed/main) [3.0.1-2] (core) [17:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libratbag [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.9-1] (no packageset) [17:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libratbag [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.9-1] (no packageset) [17:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-daiquiri [amd64] (artful-proposed/none) [1.0.1-1] (no packageset) [17:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-coverage-test-runner [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.13.1-1] (no packageset) [17:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-bitcoinlib [amd64] (artful-proposed/none) [0.7.0-1] (no packageset) [17:24] doko: Hrm, LocutusOfBorg just disabled the notmuch testsuite on armhf due to it throwing SIGILL. That sounds fishy. [17:24] doko: (Well, disabling the testsuite because it's doing its job is very fishy, but I mean the SIGILL could perhaps relate to new toolchain) [17:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qbs [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.8.1+dfsg-1] (no packageset) [17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qbs [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.8.1+dfsg-1] (no packageset) [17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gmime [amd64] (artful-proposed) [3.0.1-2] [17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gmime [armhf] (artful-proposed) [3.0.1-2] [17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gmime [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [3.0.1-2] [17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libratbag [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.9-1] [17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libratbag [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.9-1] [17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-bitcoinlib [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.7.0-1] [17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-daiquiri [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.0.1-1] [17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qbs [s390x] (artful-proposed) [1.8.1+dfsg-1] [17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gmime [arm64] (artful-proposed) [3.0.1-2] [17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gmime [s390x] (artful-proposed) [3.0.1-2] [17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libratbag [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.9-1] [17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qbs [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [1.8.1+dfsg-1] [17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gmime [i386] (artful-proposed) [3.0.1-2] [17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-coverage-test-runner [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.13.1-1] [17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libratbag [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.9-1] [17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dolfin [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [2016.2.0-4] (no packageset) [17:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dolfin [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [2016.2.0-4] (no packageset) [17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qbs [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.8.1+dfsg-1] (no packageset) [17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qbs [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.8.1+dfsg-1] (no packageset) [17:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dolfin [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [2016.2.0-4] (no packageset) [17:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dolfin [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [2016.2.0-4] (no packageset) [17:51] infinity: we currently only have new binutils [17:52] doko: Yes. Which could very well be responsible for generating bad instructions. [17:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tpm-tools [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.3.9.1-0.2ubuntu1] [17:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tpm-tools [i386] (artful-proposed) [1.3.9.1-0.2ubuntu1] [17:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tpm-tools [s390x] (artful-proposed) [1.3.9.1-0.2ubuntu1] [17:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tpm-tools [arm64] (artful-proposed) [1.3.9.1-0.2ubuntu1] [17:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tpm-tools [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [1.3.9.1-0.2ubuntu1] [18:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dolfin [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [2016.2.0-4] (no packageset) [18:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dolfin [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [2016.2.0-4] (no packageset) [18:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dolfin [amd64] (artful-proposed) [2016.2.0-4] [18:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dolfin [armhf] (artful-proposed) [2016.2.0-4] [18:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dolfin [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [2016.2.0-4] [18:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dolfin [arm64] (artful-proposed) [2016.2.0-4] [18:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dolfin [s390x] (artful-proposed) [2016.2.0-4] [18:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dolfin [i386] (artful-proposed) [2016.2.0-4] [18:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qbs [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.8.1+dfsg-1] [18:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qbs [i386] (artful-proposed) [1.8.1+dfsg-1] === NCommander is now known as mcasadevall === NCommander is now known as mcasadevall [19:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [amd64] (artful-proposed) [2.02~beta3-4ubuntu6] [19:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [arm64] (artful-proposed) [2.02~beta3-4ubuntu6] [21:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xf86-input-mtrack-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.3.1-1build2~16.04.1] [21:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-input-void-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.4.1-1build3~16.04.1] [21:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-nouveau-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.0.14-0ubuntu1~16.04.1] [21:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-trident-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.3.8-1build1~16.04.1] [21:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-vmware-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:13.2.1-1build1~16.04.1] [21:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xf86-input-wacom-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:0.34.0-0ubuntu2~16.04.1] [21:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-qxl-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.1.5-2build1~16.04.1] [21:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-dummy-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:0.3.8-1build1~16.04.1] [21:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-vesa-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.3.4-1build3~16.04.1] [21:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-input-evdev-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.10.5-1ubuntu1~16.04.1] [21:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-amdgpu-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1~16.04.1] [21:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-fbdev-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:0.4.4-1build6~16.04.1] [21:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-input-synaptics-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.9.0-1ubuntu1~16.04.1] [21:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-intel-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [2:2.99.917+git20170309-0ubuntu1~16.04.1] [21:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-ati-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:7.9.0-0ubuntu1~16.04.1] [21:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-siliconmotion-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.7.9-2ubuntu1~16.04.1] [21:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-tdfx-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.4.7-1build1~16.04.1] [21:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-sisusb-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:0.9.7-1build1~16.04.1] [22:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-mach64-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [6.9.5-1build3~16.04.1] [22:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-openchrome-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:0.5.0-3build1~16.04.1] [22:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-savage-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.3.9-1ubuntu1~16.04.1] [22:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-neomagic-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.2.9-1build3~16.04.1] [22:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-r128-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [6.10.2-1build1~16.04.1] [22:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-input-joystick-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.6.3-1build1~16.04.1] [22:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-geode-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.11.19-2~16.04.1] [22:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-input-libinput-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.25.0-0ubuntu1~16.04.1] [22:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xorg-hwe-16.04 [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:7.7+16ubuntu3~16.04.1] [22:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qtbase-opensource-src (zesty-proposed/main) [5.7.1+dfsg-2ubuntu4~1 => 5.7.1+dfsg-2ubuntu4~1.17.04.1] (kubuntu, qt5, ubuntu-desktop)