/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2017/07/07/#ubuntu-release.txt

-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: appstream-glib (zesty-proposed/main) [0.6.9-1 => 0.6.9-1ubuntu1] (desktop-core)02:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: appstream-glib (xenial-proposed/main) [0.5.13-1ubuntu4 => 0.5.13-1ubuntu5] (desktop-core)02:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-software (xenial-proposed/main) [3.20.1+git20170524.0.ea2fe2b0-0ubuntu0.16.04.1 => 3.20.5-0ubuntu0.16.04.2] (ubuntu-desktop)02:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-alsa-core [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.5.0.1-1] (no packageset)05:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-attoparsec-iso8601 [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.0.0.0-1] (no packageset)05:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-alsa-core [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.5.0.1-1] (no packageset)05:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-store-core [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.4.1-1] (no packageset)05:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-attoparsec-iso8601 [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.0.0.0-1] (no packageset)05:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-store-core [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.4.1-1] (no packageset)05:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-aproba [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.0.4-2] (no packageset)05:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-has-unicode [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.0.1-2] (no packageset)05:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-alsa-core [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.5.0.1-1] (no packageset)05:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-attoparsec-iso8601 [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.0.0.0-1] (no packageset)05:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mockldap [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.2.8-1] (no packageset)05:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-alsa-core [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.5.0.1-1] (no packageset)05:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-attoparsec-iso8601 [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.0.0.0-1] (no packageset)05:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-gauge [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.7.4-1] (no packageset)05:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-store-core [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.4.1-1] (no packageset)05:22
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-store-core [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.4.1-1] (no packageset)05:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-alsa-core [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.5.0.1-1] (no packageset)05:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-attoparsec-iso8601 [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.0.0.0-1] (no packageset)05:25
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-alsa-core [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.5.0.1-1] (no packageset)05:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-attoparsec-iso8601 [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.0.0.0-1] (no packageset)05:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-store-core [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.4.1-1] (no packageset)05:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-store-core [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.4.1-1] (no packageset)05:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-alsa-core [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.5.0.1-1]06:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-alsa-core [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.5.0.1-1]06:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-attoparsec-iso8601 [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.0.0.0-1]06:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-attoparsec-iso8601 [armhf] (artful-proposed) [1.0.0.0-1]06:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-store-core [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.4.1-1]06:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-store-core [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.4.1-1]06:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mockldap [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.2.8-1]06:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-gauge [amd64] (artful-proposed) [2.7.4-1]06:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-alsa-core [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.5.0.1-1]06:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-attoparsec-iso8601 [arm64] (artful-proposed) [1.0.0.0-1]06:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-store-core [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.4.1-1]06:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-aproba [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.0.4-2]06:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-alsa-core [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.5.0.1-1]06:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-store-core [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.4.1-1]06:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-attoparsec-iso8601 [i386] (artful-proposed) [1.0.0.0-1]06:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-alsa-core [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.5.0.1-1]06:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-attoparsec-iso8601 [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [1.0.0.0-1]06:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-store-core [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.4.1-1]06:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-has-unicode [amd64] (artful-proposed) [2.0.1-2]06:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-alsa-core [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.5.0.1-1]06:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-store-core [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.4.1-1]06:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-attoparsec-iso8601 [s390x] (artful-proposed) [1.0.0.0-1]06:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ntp (xenial-proposed/main) [1:4.2.8p4+dfsg-3ubuntu5.5 => 1:4.2.8p4+dfsg-3ubuntu5.6] (ubuntu-server)06:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ntp (yakkety-proposed/main) [1:4.2.8p8+dfsg-1ubuntu2.1 => 1:4.2.8p8+dfsg-1ubuntu2.2] (ubuntu-server)06:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ntp (zesty-proposed/main) [1:4.2.8p9+dfsg-2ubuntu1.1 => 1:4.2.8p9+dfsg-2ubuntu1.2] (ubuntu-server)06:21
tsimonq2Morning release team! I got an email that the Lubuntu Xenial Daily build is FTBFS, and it seems to be because of a dependency problem with the HWE stack.06:37
tsimonq2Is this something I need to be concerned about, or will it resolve itself?06:37
tsimonq2Here's the exact dep problem if anyone is interested: http://paste.ubuntu.com/25037516/06:38
=== maclin1 is now known as maclin
apwtsimonq2, reporting it is good, likely it is teathing issue as i believe those are being wriggled in at the moment07:06
tsimonq2apw: Reporting as I have just done, or should I file a bug somewhere?07:08
apwtsimonq2, i think that is good enough07:15
=== s8321414_ is now known as s8321414
tsimonq2apw: Ok07:16
apwinfinity, tjaalton ^07:17
tsimonq2apw: Ah ok, I didn't know who the HWE people were.07:17
tjaalton?07:20
=== klebers_ is now known as klebers
tjaaltontsimonq2: what's the problem?07:27
tsimonq2tjaalton: https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2017/07/07/%23ubuntu-release.html#t06:37 :)07:28
tjaaltonfreenode cut me off07:29
tsimonq2Ah ok07:29
tjaaltontsimonq2: don't depend on -intel07:30
tsimonq2tjaalton: Oh? Why not?07:30
tjaaltonbecause it's not compatible with hwe xserver07:31
tsimonq2tjaalton: Lubuntu images don't follow recommends, and afair that was needed to fix some graphics issues on some Intel graphics cards.07:31
tsimonq2Ok... so how do I still get this functionality?07:31
tjaaltondunno why you didn't have issues with .207:31
tsimonq2These issues are just popping up with yesterday's builds.07:32
tjaalton|xxvi-hwe-16.0407:32
tsimonq2?07:32
tjaaltonif you insist on using intel07:32
tjaaltonyou need to fix the dep07:32
tsimonq2Ok. Thanks for your time.07:33
apwtjaalton, thanks :)07:34
tjaaltonnw, i'm glad these got in :)07:36
tjaaltontsimonq2: though, if you had no issues with .2 maybe some builds were just missing07:37
tsimonq2tjaalton: Oh?07:37
tjaaltonso wait until the next run?07:37
tsimonq2tjaalton: Sure07:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: django-auth-ldap [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.2.12+dfsg-1] (no packageset)07:43
jibeldesktop images failed to build again this morning. Could someone have a look?08:02
jibelinfinity, ^08:02
tsimonq2jibel: Would it happen to be because of the same dep error I described above?08:04
tsimonq2jibel: i.e. http://paste.ubuntu.com/25037516/08:04
tsimonq2s/error/problem/ is better wording. :)08:04
jibeltsimonq2, I don't think so. The squashfs builds successfully but the ISO fails08:11
tsimonq2jibel: Ah ok.08:27
tsimonq2jibel: Just thought I'd ask. :)08:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: deja-dup [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/main) [34.4-0ubuntu3] (ubuntu-desktop)08:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: deja-dup [s390x] (artful-proposed/main) [34.4-0ubuntu3] (ubuntu-desktop)08:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: deja-dup [amd64] (artful-proposed/main) [34.4-0ubuntu3] (ubuntu-desktop)08:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: deja-dup [i386] (artful-proposed/main) [34.4-0ubuntu3] (ubuntu-desktop)08:59
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: deja-dup [armhf] (artful-proposed/main) [34.4-0ubuntu3] (ubuntu-desktop)09:04
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: deja-dup [arm64] (artful-proposed/main) [34.4-0ubuntu3] (ubuntu-desktop)09:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deja-dup [amd64] (artful-proposed) [34.4-0ubuntu3]09:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deja-dup [armhf] (artful-proposed) [34.4-0ubuntu3]09:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deja-dup [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [34.4-0ubuntu3]09:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deja-dup [arm64] (artful-proposed) [34.4-0ubuntu3]09:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deja-dup [s390x] (artful-proposed) [34.4-0ubuntu3]09:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deja-dup [i386] (artful-proposed) [34.4-0ubuntu3]09:10
infinityjibel: For artful?09:46
jibelinfinity, yes artfl09:47
jibel+u09:47
infinityOh, hrm.  Neat.09:47
infinityAnd by "neat", I mean "WTF".09:48
jibelthat's a way to say it09:48
infinityjibel: How long has it been failing?  I've been head down in xenial crap all week.09:49
jibelinfinity, yesterday09:49
jibelinfinity, 20170706 is the first build that failed09:49
infinityI wonder if I can blame the new apt somehow.09:49
infinityOh.09:53
infinityOr we could blame someone overexhuberantly demoting isolinux to universe.09:53
infinityWE KINDA USE THAT A LITTLE BIT.09:53
tsimonq2apw, tjaalton: Yeppp, a simple ISO rebuild fixed it.09:53
apwinfinity, that sounds a little unexpected!09:53
tsimonq2infinity: WAIT WHAT...09:53
tjaaltontsimonq2: cool09:53
infinityapw: Looks like it was never explicitly seeded, so something probably stopped accidentally pulling it in.09:54
infinityI'll just seed it.09:54
apwheh a good plan indeed09:54
jibelinfinity, blame didrocks I suppose09:58
jibelinfinity, he's cleaning the desktop seed to remove unity09:58
infinityjibel: It was never seeded.  I think it was just accidentally in main due to being an rdep of $something.09:59
infinityAnd it isn't anymore.09:59
apwinfinity, i think that have been syslinux-themes-ubuntu09:59
apw-> syslinux-themes-ubuntu-xenial -> isolinux10:00
infinityOh, do we not do that anymore?10:00
apwseems not as of 5th, which is about right timing wise10:00
infinityYeah.10:00
infinityI meant "do we not use those themes anymore".10:00
infinityI kinda thought that's what was responsible for making the ISO boot screen (for BIOS) pretty.10:01
infinityOh, no, that's gfxboot-theme-ubuntu10:01
infinityConfusing.10:01
ogra_yeah, but everyone dooes that ...10:01
ogra_ugliness sticks out nowadays :)10:01
infinityjibel: Alright, isolinux seeded and re-promoted.  Should resolve itself, but I'll probably test a bit later to be sure.10:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected fwupdate [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.5-2ubuntu5]10:02
infinityThis is where I wish overrides had an audit trail, though.10:07
infinityI don't blame didrocks for not knowing that unseeding themes would drop isolinux out of main, but I totally blame the AA who blindly followed component-mismatches without questioning "hey, do we use that thing?"10:07
tsimonq2infinity: But isn't he an AA?10:08
infinitytsimonq2: Your failure was xenial-specific, and had to do with the xserver and drivers being mismatched.  Should have been fixed 10 hours ago or so.10:09
infinitytsimonq2: Sure, but that doesn't mean he's the one who demoted the package.10:09
tsimonq2infinity: Yep, fixed by a rebuild.10:09
tsimonq2infinity: Fair.10:09
tsimonq2infinity: Just thought I'd point it out. :)10:09
infinityHence "I wish there was auditing".10:09
infinityLocutusOfBorg: Oh good, you're around again.  Mind if I yell at you?10:10
infinityLocutusOfBorg: "The testuite fails with a SIGILL, I guess I should disable it and let a miscompiled package migrate" is not the correct train of thought. :P10:10
infinityLocutusOfBorg: proposed-migration isn't a video game, it was very much doing its job there.10:10
LocutusOfBorginfinity, yell at me whenever you want :)10:22
infinityLocutusOfBorg: Consider yourself yelled at.10:22
LocutusOfBorgI'll read soon(TM)10:23
LocutusOfBorg:)10:23
infinityLocutusOfBorg: But seriously, please don't treat migration as a game where the object is to get stuff through at any cost.  Bugs being caught is WHY it's there.10:23
LocutusOfBorgoh, can I give you some background?10:23
LocutusOfBorg:)10:23
LocutusOfBorgat the time I disabled that, after talking with bremner, the reasons were multiple for disabling it:10:23
LocutusOfBorgit didn't fail locally, bremner told that gdb on arm* is usually broken a lot, and also in debian that testsuite is disabled on many architectures10:24
LocutusOfBorgat that time we had a newer gdb in Ubuntu, so we were confident about a gdb regression, and we agreed on looking at it after stretch10:24
infinityLocutusOfBorg: Didn't fail locally in what environment?10:24
LocutusOfBorgarmhf* probably was on some qemu stuff, so the testsuite was not reliable too much10:25
infinityLocutusOfBorg: armhf is not built on qemu, it's built on real hardware, in both Debian and Ubuntu.10:25
LocutusOfBorgsorry infinity I can't recall exactly what I did, but I remember talking here with Colin and Matthias IIRC10:25
LocutusOfBorginfinity, I think back in those days it was, or maybe it was only for ppas, the way I had to do testing10:25
LocutusOfBorgnow it should be real hw everywhere I presume10:26
infinityLocutusOfBorg: "Those days"?  You disabled the testsuite yesterday...10:26
LocutusOfBorgnah10:26
LocutusOfBorgeverytime I try a force-sync and disable it again after talking with bremner10:26
infinityAhh.  Is it always a SIGILL?10:27
LocutusOfBorgthat sigkill has been discovered only yesterday, look at publish log10:27
cjwatsonJust for the record I didn't say "sure, go ahead and disable the testsuite", so don't invoke my name for this10:27
LocutusOfBorghttps://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/notmuch/+publishinghistory10:27
LocutusOfBorgcjwatson, I didn't say that :) you helped me understanding why ppas and official builders were different10:27
cjwatsonRight, but you kind of implied it.10:28
LocutusOfBorgsorry, this wasn't in my intentions10:28
infinityLocutusOfBorg: Okay, "it's been broken like this forever" is more reasonable.  That's not at all how I read backscroll.10:28
infinityLocutusOfBorg: I saw "I investigated this and found a SIGILL, and decided to let it through anyway".10:29
cjwatsonIt is true that at one point there were terrible bad times when we were running armhf PPA builds in qemu and lots of things exploded.  Not been that way for a couple of years.10:29
cjwatsonWell, at least a year.  I lose track of dates.10:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ceph [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/main) [12.1.0-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)10:31
LocutusOfBorghttps://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/notmuch/0.22.1-3ubuntu210:35
LocutusOfBorgthis was when I disabled it, so am I partly forgiven? :P10:35
LocutusOfBorgit was when emacs has been promoted to main, and notmuch too10:36
LocutusOfBorganyway, I want to fix that bug if there is one, how can I do it?10:36
LocutusOfBorgI don't have real hw10:36
LocutusOfBorgand if this is a bug in gcc/glibc, I really don't know where to start10:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ceph [i386] (artful-proposed/main) [12.1.0-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)10:44
cjwatsonBy the date of that upload, all the old armhf PPA qemu nonsense had been dead for at least six months.10:45
cjwatsonSo let's discard that as even possibly relevant.10:46
infinityLocutusOfBorg: Figuring out what the illegal instruction is would be helpful.10:47
infinityLocutusOfBorg: It won't have anything to do with glibc.10:48
infinityLocutusOfBorg: It *could* have something to do with gcc.10:48
infinityLocutusOfBorg: But more likely, it's the code itself making bad assumptions.10:48
LocutusOfBorgif you read #debian-devel I told bremner mostly the same things (he is upstream)10:49
LocutusOfBorgand the answer was "I don't care about possible code bugs that debian didn't spot"10:49
LocutusOfBorgI told about possible difference in optimization levels10:50
LocutusOfBorgI even tried to pick gdb from debian, but my armhf qemu sucks10:50
LocutusOfBorgreally, this wasn't a "lets disable and live happy"10:50
LocutusOfBorgI spent days in trying to figure it out10:50
infinityLocutusOfBorg: Right, you're slightly more off the hook for yesterday's upload given the "it's been broken forever" thing.10:51
infinityLocutusOfBorg: Like I said, it appeared from backscroll that it was a regression, not "same bug, different day".10:51
infinitySIGILL in Ubuntu and not Debian is curious, though.  I *think* Debian still builds on real armv7 hardware, and ours being armv8 is teeeechnically missing one instruction.  But it's one instruction no one should be using.10:53
infinity(And it's an instruction that was optional in v7, it's just that everyone opted into including it for backward compat with v... 5?)10:53
LocutusOfBorgif you read devel, we tried on different porterboxes too10:54
LocutusOfBorge.g. abel10:54
LocutusOfBorgand yeah, abel is v710:55
infinityYeah, it's an ArmadaXP.10:55
LocutusOfBorgI work sometimes with i.MX6 hw, but it is yocto based, so I don't have an easy way to port the same toolchain10:56
infinityWell, also v7.10:56
LocutusOfBorgough10:56
LocutusOfBorgright10:56
LocutusOfBorgso, do you have any advice for me? or can you help in some way?11:00
infinityI have neither advice nor time right now.  But I'm also less grumpy knowing that this has been known for ages, and isn't a regression.11:01
LocutusOfBorgages? this is a regression since yakkety, so not really ages :)11:02
cjwatsonLocutusOfBorg: it sounds like the next step is figuring out which instruction is involved; you can get that out of siginfo_t in a signal handler (though there might be easier ways)11:10
LocutusOfBorgbut how can I trigger this in a ppa build?11:10
cjwatsonLocutusOfBorg: if you get something like that that dumps out relevant information, you could experiment via a PPA11:10
LocutusOfBorgmmm let me google around :D11:10
cjwatsonpatch the relevant binary to install a signal handler?  or if you think it might show up in system logs then you just need a || handler in shell somewhere11:11
LocutusOfBorgthe testsuite runs in a shell script, so I might intercept it there11:12
LocutusOfBorglet me try, awesome11:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ceph [s390x] (artful-proposed/main) [12.1.0-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)11:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fifechan [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.1.4-2] (no packageset)11:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fifechan [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.1.4-2] (no packageset)11:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fifechan [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.1.4-2] (no packageset)11:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fifechan [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.1.4-2] (no packageset)11:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fifechan [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.1.4-2] (no packageset)11:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fifechan [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.1.4-2] (no packageset)11:16
didrocksinfinity: yeah, sorry for unseeding. I didn't demote it though (as I was unsure about the -ubuntu one). I also noticed somebody demoted a lot of binary packages only movement, where I was analyzing the non source + all binaries movements. Makes it harder to keep the list of things to work on known (I hope that the current binary-only demotion will be kept that way) :/11:31
infinityjibel: Fresh builds worked, FYI.11:36
didrocksthanks infinity11:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: django-auth-ldap [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.2.13+dfsg-1] (no packageset)11:38
jibelinfinity, thanks11:39
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted django-auth-ldap [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.2.12+dfsg-1]11:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fifechan [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.1.4-2]11:40
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fifechan [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.1.4-2]11:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fifechan [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.1.4-2]11:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fifechan [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.1.4-2]11:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fifechan [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.1.4-2]11:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fifechan [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.1.4-2]11:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ceph [amd64] (artful-proposed/main) [12.1.0-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)12:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ceph [armhf] (artful-proposed/main) [12.1.0-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)12:55
slangasekinfinity: any recent changes to the debian-cd repo that might explain this build failure for artful server on amd64+i386?14:30
slangasekinfinity: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/25039610/14:30
jibelslangasek, infinity fixed this this morning. isolinux was not seeded and missing.14:37
jibelthere was the same error for desktop14:37
slangasekok14:45
slangasekI'll just respin then and see14:46
slangasekpowersj: http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-server/daily/20170707.1/artful-server-amd64.OVERSIZED15:26
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ceph [arm64] (artful-proposed/main) [12.1.0-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)15:26
powersjouch on the 5th it was right at 700mb15:27
slangasekwell, the good news is that it's built15:28
slangasekthe bad news is that it's 30MB larger? :)15:28
powersjhaha yep15:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ceph [amd64] (artful-proposed) [12.1.0-0ubuntu1]15:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ceph [armhf] (artful-proposed) [12.1.0-0ubuntu1]15:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ceph [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [12.1.0-0ubuntu1]15:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted django-auth-ldap [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.2.13+dfsg-1]15:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ceph [arm64] (artful-proposed) [12.1.0-0ubuntu1]15:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ceph [s390x] (artful-proposed) [12.1.0-0ubuntu1]15:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ceph [i386] (artful-proposed) [12.1.0-0ubuntu1]15:28
slangasekwhat fresh craziness is this from pkg-perl-autopkgtest? Not installing the package, then failing the test because the package isn't installed? :P http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/libc/libcompress-raw-bzip2-perl/artful/amd6415:36
powersjslangasek: http://paste.ubuntu.com/25039944/ looks like bunch of new packages were pulled onto the ISO15:41
slangasekwell that's interesting15:41
powersjadwaita-icon-theme -- that's useful for server ;)15:42
slangasekI'm not seeing why any of that is pulled in15:47
jbichaserver-ship depends on kerneloops-daemon, kerneloops provides kerneloops-daemon, kerneloops recommends kerneloops-applet15:51
jbichaI suggest dropping that recommends then15:53
slangasekheh, quite15:54
slangasekwas kerneloops newly seeded?15:54
jbichano, but the kerneloops packging was changed: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kerneloops/0.12+git20140509-6ubuntu115:56
slangasekjbicha: well, kerneloops was also in powersj's 'added' list, not 'updated'16:03
jbichayes because of the provides16:17
slangasekok, so the Provides: kerneloops-daemon was previously missing16:21
slangasekand kerneloops-daemon was a separate package name through zesty16:21
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-image (yakkety-proposed/universe) [1.0+16.10ubuntu1.1 => 1.1+16.10ubuntu1] (no packageset)16:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-image (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.0+17.04ubuntu1.1 => 1.1+17.04ubuntu1] (no packageset)16:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-image (xenial-proposed/universe) [1.0+16.04ubuntu1 => 1.1+16.04ubuntu1] (no packageset)16:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvirt (zesty-proposed/main) [2.5.0-3ubuntu5.2 => 2.5.0-3ubuntu5.3] (ubuntu-server, virt)18:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvirt (xenial-proposed/main) [1.3.1-1ubuntu10.10 => 1.3.1-1ubuntu10.11] (ubuntu-server, virt)18:38
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted maas [source] (yakkety-proposed) [2.2.0+bzr6054-0ubuntu2~16.10.1]22:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted maas [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.2.0+bzr6054-0ubuntu2~16.04.1]22:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: klaus [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.2.1-3] (no packageset)23:12
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-googleauth [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.5.1-2] (no packageset)23:14

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!