[02:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: appstream-glib (zesty-proposed/main) [0.6.9-1 => 0.6.9-1ubuntu1] (desktop-core)
[02:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: appstream-glib (xenial-proposed/main) [0.5.13-1ubuntu4 => 0.5.13-1ubuntu5] (desktop-core)
[02:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-software (xenial-proposed/main) [3.20.1+git20170524.0.ea2fe2b0-0ubuntu0.16.04.1 => 3.20.5-0ubuntu0.16.04.2] (ubuntu-desktop)
[05:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-alsa-core [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.5.0.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-attoparsec-iso8601 [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.0.0.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-alsa-core [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.5.0.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-store-core [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.4.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-attoparsec-iso8601 [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.0.0.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-store-core [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.4.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-aproba [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.0.4-2] (no packageset)
[05:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-has-unicode [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.0.1-2] (no packageset)
[05:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-alsa-core [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.5.0.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-attoparsec-iso8601 [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.0.0.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mockldap [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.2.8-1] (no packageset)
[05:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-alsa-core [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.5.0.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-attoparsec-iso8601 [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.0.0.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-gauge [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.7.4-1] (no packageset)
[05:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-store-core [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.4.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-store-core [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.4.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-alsa-core [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.5.0.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-attoparsec-iso8601 [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.0.0.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-alsa-core [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.5.0.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-attoparsec-iso8601 [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.0.0.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-store-core [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.4.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-store-core [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.4.1-1] (no packageset)
[06:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-alsa-core [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.5.0.1-1]
[06:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-alsa-core [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.5.0.1-1]
[06:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-attoparsec-iso8601 [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.0.0.0-1]
[06:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-attoparsec-iso8601 [armhf] (artful-proposed) [1.0.0.0-1]
[06:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-store-core [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.4.1-1]
[06:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-store-core [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.4.1-1]
[06:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mockldap [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.2.8-1]
[06:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-gauge [amd64] (artful-proposed) [2.7.4-1]
[06:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-alsa-core [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.5.0.1-1]
[06:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-attoparsec-iso8601 [arm64] (artful-proposed) [1.0.0.0-1]
[06:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-store-core [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.4.1-1]
[06:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-aproba [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.0.4-2]
[06:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-alsa-core [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.5.0.1-1]
[06:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-store-core [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.4.1-1]
[06:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-attoparsec-iso8601 [i386] (artful-proposed) [1.0.0.0-1]
[06:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-alsa-core [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.5.0.1-1]
[06:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-attoparsec-iso8601 [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [1.0.0.0-1]
[06:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-store-core [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.4.1-1]
[06:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-has-unicode [amd64] (artful-proposed) [2.0.1-2]
[06:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-alsa-core [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.5.0.1-1]
[06:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-store-core [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.4.1-1]
[06:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-attoparsec-iso8601 [s390x] (artful-proposed) [1.0.0.0-1]
[06:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ntp (xenial-proposed/main) [1:4.2.8p4+dfsg-3ubuntu5.5 => 1:4.2.8p4+dfsg-3ubuntu5.6] (ubuntu-server)
[06:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ntp (yakkety-proposed/main) [1:4.2.8p8+dfsg-1ubuntu2.1 => 1:4.2.8p8+dfsg-1ubuntu2.2] (ubuntu-server)
[06:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ntp (zesty-proposed/main) [1:4.2.8p9+dfsg-2ubuntu1.1 => 1:4.2.8p9+dfsg-2ubuntu1.2] (ubuntu-server)
[06:37] <tsimonq2> Morning release team! I got an email that the Lubuntu Xenial Daily build is FTBFS, and it seems to be because of a dependency problem with the HWE stack.
[06:37] <tsimonq2> Is this something I need to be concerned about, or will it resolve itself?
[06:38] <tsimonq2> Here's the exact dep problem if anyone is interested: http://paste.ubuntu.com/25037516/
[07:06] <apw> tsimonq2, reporting it is good, likely it is teathing issue as i believe those are being wriggled in at the moment
[07:08] <tsimonq2> apw: Reporting as I have just done, or should I file a bug somewhere?
[07:15] <apw> tsimonq2, i think that is good enough
[07:16] <tsimonq2> apw: Ok
[07:17] <apw> infinity, tjaalton ^
[07:17] <tsimonq2> apw: Ah ok, I didn't know who the HWE people were.
[07:20] <tjaalton> ?
[07:27] <tjaalton> tsimonq2: what's the problem?
[07:28] <tsimonq2> tjaalton: https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2017/07/07/%23ubuntu-release.html#t06:37 :)
[07:29] <tjaalton> freenode cut me off
[07:29] <tsimonq2> Ah ok
[07:30] <tjaalton> tsimonq2: don't depend on -intel
[07:30] <tsimonq2> tjaalton: Oh? Why not?
[07:31] <tjaalton> because it's not compatible with hwe xserver
[07:31] <tsimonq2> tjaalton: Lubuntu images don't follow recommends, and afair that was needed to fix some graphics issues on some Intel graphics cards.
[07:31] <tsimonq2> Ok... so how do I still get this functionality?
[07:31] <tjaalton> dunno why you didn't have issues with .2
[07:32] <tsimonq2> These issues are just popping up with yesterday's builds.
[07:32] <tjaalton> |xxvi-hwe-16.04
[07:32] <tsimonq2> ?
[07:32] <tjaalton> if you insist on using intel
[07:32] <tjaalton> you need to fix the dep
[07:33] <tsimonq2> Ok. Thanks for your time.
[07:34] <apw> tjaalton, thanks :)
[07:36] <tjaalton> nw, i'm glad these got in :)
[07:37] <tjaalton> tsimonq2: though, if you had no issues with .2 maybe some builds were just missing
[07:37] <tsimonq2> tjaalton: Oh?
[07:37] <tjaalton> so wait until the next run?
[07:38] <tsimonq2> tjaalton: Sure
[07:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: django-auth-ldap [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.2.12+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[08:02] <jibel> desktop images failed to build again this morning. Could someone have a look?
[08:02] <jibel> infinity, ^
[08:04] <tsimonq2> jibel: Would it happen to be because of the same dep error I described above?
[08:04] <tsimonq2> jibel: i.e. http://paste.ubuntu.com/25037516/
[08:04] <tsimonq2> s/error/problem/ is better wording. :)
[08:11] <jibel> tsimonq2, I don't think so. The squashfs builds successfully but the ISO fails
[08:27] <tsimonq2> jibel: Ah ok.
[08:28] <tsimonq2> jibel: Just thought I'd ask. :)
[08:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: deja-dup [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/main) [34.4-0ubuntu3] (ubuntu-desktop)
[08:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: deja-dup [s390x] (artful-proposed/main) [34.4-0ubuntu3] (ubuntu-desktop)
[08:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: deja-dup [amd64] (artful-proposed/main) [34.4-0ubuntu3] (ubuntu-desktop)
[08:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: deja-dup [i386] (artful-proposed/main) [34.4-0ubuntu3] (ubuntu-desktop)
[09:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: deja-dup [armhf] (artful-proposed/main) [34.4-0ubuntu3] (ubuntu-desktop)
[09:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: deja-dup [arm64] (artful-proposed/main) [34.4-0ubuntu3] (ubuntu-desktop)
[09:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deja-dup [amd64] (artful-proposed) [34.4-0ubuntu3]
[09:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deja-dup [armhf] (artful-proposed) [34.4-0ubuntu3]
[09:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deja-dup [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [34.4-0ubuntu3]
[09:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deja-dup [arm64] (artful-proposed) [34.4-0ubuntu3]
[09:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deja-dup [s390x] (artful-proposed) [34.4-0ubuntu3]
[09:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deja-dup [i386] (artful-proposed) [34.4-0ubuntu3]
[09:46] <infinity> jibel: For artful?
[09:47] <jibel> infinity, yes artfl
[09:47] <jibel> +u
[09:47] <infinity> Oh, hrm.  Neat.
[09:48] <infinity> And by "neat", I mean "WTF".
[09:48] <jibel> that's a way to say it
[09:49] <infinity> jibel: How long has it been failing?  I've been head down in xenial crap all week.
[09:49] <jibel> infinity, yesterday
[09:49] <jibel> infinity, 20170706 is the first build that failed
[09:49] <infinity> I wonder if I can blame the new apt somehow.
[09:53] <infinity> Oh.
[09:53] <infinity> Or we could blame someone overexhuberantly demoting isolinux to universe.
[09:53] <infinity> WE KINDA USE THAT A LITTLE BIT.
[09:53] <tsimonq2> apw, tjaalton: Yeppp, a simple ISO rebuild fixed it.
[09:53] <apw> infinity, that sounds a little unexpected!
[09:53] <tsimonq2> infinity: WAIT WHAT...
[09:53] <tjaalton> tsimonq2: cool
[09:54] <infinity> apw: Looks like it was never explicitly seeded, so something probably stopped accidentally pulling it in.
[09:54] <infinity> I'll just seed it.
[09:54] <apw> heh a good plan indeed
[09:58] <jibel> infinity, blame didrocks I suppose
[09:58] <jibel> infinity, he's cleaning the desktop seed to remove unity
[09:59] <infinity> jibel: It was never seeded.  I think it was just accidentally in main due to being an rdep of $something.
[09:59] <infinity> And it isn't anymore.
[09:59] <apw> infinity, i think that have been syslinux-themes-ubuntu
[10:00] <apw> -> syslinux-themes-ubuntu-xenial -> isolinux
[10:00] <infinity> Oh, do we not do that anymore?
[10:00] <apw> seems not as of 5th, which is about right timing wise
[10:00] <infinity> Yeah.
[10:00] <infinity> I meant "do we not use those themes anymore".
[10:01] <infinity> I kinda thought that's what was responsible for making the ISO boot screen (for BIOS) pretty.
[10:01] <infinity> Oh, no, that's gfxboot-theme-ubuntu
[10:01] <infinity> Confusing.
[10:01] <ogra_> yeah, but everyone dooes that ...
[10:01] <ogra_> ugliness sticks out nowadays :)
[10:02] <infinity> jibel: Alright, isolinux seeded and re-promoted.  Should resolve itself, but I'll probably test a bit later to be sure.
[10:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected fwupdate [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.5-2ubuntu5]
[10:07] <infinity> This is where I wish overrides had an audit trail, though.
[10:07] <infinity> I don't blame didrocks for not knowing that unseeding themes would drop isolinux out of main, but I totally blame the AA who blindly followed component-mismatches without questioning "hey, do we use that thing?"
[10:08] <tsimonq2> infinity: But isn't he an AA?
[10:09] <infinity> tsimonq2: Your failure was xenial-specific, and had to do with the xserver and drivers being mismatched.  Should have been fixed 10 hours ago or so.
[10:09] <infinity> tsimonq2: Sure, but that doesn't mean he's the one who demoted the package.
[10:09] <tsimonq2> infinity: Yep, fixed by a rebuild.
[10:09] <tsimonq2> infinity: Fair.
[10:09] <tsimonq2> infinity: Just thought I'd point it out. :)
[10:09] <infinity> Hence "I wish there was auditing".
[10:10] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: Oh good, you're around again.  Mind if I yell at you?
[10:10] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: "The testuite fails with a SIGILL, I guess I should disable it and let a miscompiled package migrate" is not the correct train of thought. :P
[10:10] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: proposed-migration isn't a video game, it was very much doing its job there.
[10:22] <LocutusOfBorg> infinity, yell at me whenever you want :)
[10:22] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: Consider yourself yelled at.
[10:23] <LocutusOfBorg> I'll read soon(TM)
[10:23] <LocutusOfBorg> :)
[10:23] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: But seriously, please don't treat migration as a game where the object is to get stuff through at any cost.  Bugs being caught is WHY it's there.
[10:23] <LocutusOfBorg> oh, can I give you some background?
[10:23] <LocutusOfBorg> :)
[10:23] <LocutusOfBorg> at the time I disabled that, after talking with bremner, the reasons were multiple for disabling it:
[10:24] <LocutusOfBorg> it didn't fail locally, bremner told that gdb on arm* is usually broken a lot, and also in debian that testsuite is disabled on many architectures
[10:24] <LocutusOfBorg> at that time we had a newer gdb in Ubuntu, so we were confident about a gdb regression, and we agreed on looking at it after stretch
[10:24] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: Didn't fail locally in what environment?
[10:25] <LocutusOfBorg> armhf* probably was on some qemu stuff, so the testsuite was not reliable too much
[10:25] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: armhf is not built on qemu, it's built on real hardware, in both Debian and Ubuntu.
[10:25] <LocutusOfBorg> sorry infinity I can't recall exactly what I did, but I remember talking here with Colin and Matthias IIRC
[10:25] <LocutusOfBorg> infinity, I think back in those days it was, or maybe it was only for ppas, the way I had to do testing
[10:26] <LocutusOfBorg> now it should be real hw everywhere I presume
[10:26] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: "Those days"?  You disabled the testsuite yesterday...
[10:26] <LocutusOfBorg> nah
[10:26] <LocutusOfBorg> everytime I try a force-sync and disable it again after talking with bremner
[10:27] <infinity> Ahh.  Is it always a SIGILL?
[10:27] <LocutusOfBorg> that sigkill has been discovered only yesterday, look at publish log
[10:27] <cjwatson> Just for the record I didn't say "sure, go ahead and disable the testsuite", so don't invoke my name for this
[10:27] <LocutusOfBorg> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/notmuch/+publishinghistory
[10:27] <LocutusOfBorg> cjwatson, I didn't say that :) you helped me understanding why ppas and official builders were different
[10:28] <cjwatson> Right, but you kind of implied it.
[10:28] <LocutusOfBorg> sorry, this wasn't in my intentions
[10:28] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: Okay, "it's been broken like this forever" is more reasonable.  That's not at all how I read backscroll.
[10:29] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: I saw "I investigated this and found a SIGILL, and decided to let it through anyway".
[10:29] <cjwatson> It is true that at one point there were terrible bad times when we were running armhf PPA builds in qemu and lots of things exploded.  Not been that way for a couple of years.
[10:29] <cjwatson> Well, at least a year.  I lose track of dates.
[10:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ceph [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/main) [12.1.0-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[10:35] <LocutusOfBorg> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/notmuch/0.22.1-3ubuntu2
[10:35] <LocutusOfBorg> this was when I disabled it, so am I partly forgiven? :P
[10:36] <LocutusOfBorg> it was when emacs has been promoted to main, and notmuch too
[10:36] <LocutusOfBorg> anyway, I want to fix that bug if there is one, how can I do it?
[10:36] <LocutusOfBorg> I don't have real hw
[10:39] <LocutusOfBorg> and if this is a bug in gcc/glibc, I really don't know where to start
[10:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ceph [i386] (artful-proposed/main) [12.1.0-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[10:45] <cjwatson> By the date of that upload, all the old armhf PPA qemu nonsense had been dead for at least six months.
[10:46] <cjwatson> So let's discard that as even possibly relevant.
[10:47] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: Figuring out what the illegal instruction is would be helpful.
[10:48] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: It won't have anything to do with glibc.
[10:48] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: It *could* have something to do with gcc.
[10:48] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: But more likely, it's the code itself making bad assumptions.
[10:49] <LocutusOfBorg> if you read #debian-devel I told bremner mostly the same things (he is upstream)
[10:49] <LocutusOfBorg> and the answer was "I don't care about possible code bugs that debian didn't spot"
[10:50] <LocutusOfBorg> I told about possible difference in optimization levels
[10:50] <LocutusOfBorg> I even tried to pick gdb from debian, but my armhf qemu sucks
[10:50] <LocutusOfBorg> really, this wasn't a "lets disable and live happy"
[10:50] <LocutusOfBorg> I spent days in trying to figure it out
[10:51] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: Right, you're slightly more off the hook for yesterday's upload given the "it's been broken forever" thing.
[10:51] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: Like I said, it appeared from backscroll that it was a regression, not "same bug, different day".
[10:53] <infinity> SIGILL in Ubuntu and not Debian is curious, though.  I *think* Debian still builds on real armv7 hardware, and ours being armv8 is teeeechnically missing one instruction.  But it's one instruction no one should be using.
[10:53] <infinity> (And it's an instruction that was optional in v7, it's just that everyone opted into including it for backward compat with v... 5?)
[10:54] <LocutusOfBorg> if you read devel, we tried on different porterboxes too
[10:54] <LocutusOfBorg> e.g. abel
[10:55] <LocutusOfBorg> and yeah, abel is v7
[10:55] <infinity> Yeah, it's an ArmadaXP.
[10:56] <LocutusOfBorg> I work sometimes with i.MX6 hw, but it is yocto based, so I don't have an easy way to port the same toolchain
[10:56] <infinity> Well, also v7.
[10:56] <LocutusOfBorg> ough
[10:56] <LocutusOfBorg> right
[11:00] <LocutusOfBorg> so, do you have any advice for me? or can you help in some way?
[11:01] <infinity> I have neither advice nor time right now.  But I'm also less grumpy knowing that this has been known for ages, and isn't a regression.
[11:02] <LocutusOfBorg> ages? this is a regression since yakkety, so not really ages :)
[11:10] <cjwatson> LocutusOfBorg: it sounds like the next step is figuring out which instruction is involved; you can get that out of siginfo_t in a signal handler (though there might be easier ways)
[11:10] <LocutusOfBorg> but how can I trigger this in a ppa build?
[11:10] <cjwatson> LocutusOfBorg: if you get something like that that dumps out relevant information, you could experiment via a PPA
[11:10] <LocutusOfBorg> mmm let me google around :D
[11:11] <cjwatson> patch the relevant binary to install a signal handler?  or if you think it might show up in system logs then you just need a || handler in shell somewhere
[11:12] <LocutusOfBorg> the testsuite runs in a shell script, so I might intercept it there
[11:12] <LocutusOfBorg> let me try, awesome
[11:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ceph [s390x] (artful-proposed/main) [12.1.0-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[11:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fifechan [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.1.4-2] (no packageset)
[11:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fifechan [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.1.4-2] (no packageset)
[11:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fifechan [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.1.4-2] (no packageset)
[11:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fifechan [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.1.4-2] (no packageset)
[11:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fifechan [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.1.4-2] (no packageset)
[11:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fifechan [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.1.4-2] (no packageset)
[11:31] <didrocks> infinity: yeah, sorry for unseeding. I didn't demote it though (as I was unsure about the -ubuntu one). I also noticed somebody demoted a lot of binary packages only movement, where I was analyzing the non source + all binaries movements. Makes it harder to keep the list of things to work on known (I hope that the current binary-only demotion will be kept that way) :/
[11:36] <infinity> jibel: Fresh builds worked, FYI.
[11:37] <didrocks> thanks infinity
[11:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: django-auth-ldap [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.2.13+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[11:39] <jibel> infinity, thanks
[11:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted django-auth-ldap [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.2.12+dfsg-1]
[11:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fifechan [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.1.4-2]
[11:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fifechan [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.1.4-2]
[11:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fifechan [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.1.4-2]
[11:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fifechan [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.1.4-2]
[11:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fifechan [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.1.4-2]
[11:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fifechan [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.1.4-2]
[12:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ceph [amd64] (artful-proposed/main) [12.1.0-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[12:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ceph [armhf] (artful-proposed/main) [12.1.0-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[14:30] <slangasek> infinity: any recent changes to the debian-cd repo that might explain this build failure for artful server on amd64+i386?
[14:30] <slangasek> infinity: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/25039610/
[14:37] <jibel> slangasek, infinity fixed this this morning. isolinux was not seeded and missing.
[14:37] <jibel> there was the same error for desktop
[14:45] <slangasek> ok
[14:46] <slangasek> I'll just respin then and see
[15:26] <slangasek> powersj: http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-server/daily/20170707.1/artful-server-amd64.OVERSIZED
[15:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ceph [arm64] (artful-proposed/main) [12.1.0-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[15:27] <powersj> ouch on the 5th it was right at 700mb
[15:28] <slangasek> well, the good news is that it's built
[15:28] <slangasek> the bad news is that it's 30MB larger? :)
[15:28] <powersj> haha yep
[15:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ceph [amd64] (artful-proposed) [12.1.0-0ubuntu1]
[15:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ceph [armhf] (artful-proposed) [12.1.0-0ubuntu1]
[15:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ceph [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [12.1.0-0ubuntu1]
[15:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted django-auth-ldap [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.2.13+dfsg-1]
[15:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ceph [arm64] (artful-proposed) [12.1.0-0ubuntu1]
[15:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ceph [s390x] (artful-proposed) [12.1.0-0ubuntu1]
[15:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ceph [i386] (artful-proposed) [12.1.0-0ubuntu1]
[15:36] <slangasek> what fresh craziness is this from pkg-perl-autopkgtest? Not installing the package, then failing the test because the package isn't installed? :P http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/libc/libcompress-raw-bzip2-perl/artful/amd64
[15:41] <powersj> slangasek: http://paste.ubuntu.com/25039944/ looks like bunch of new packages were pulled onto the ISO
[15:41] <slangasek> well that's interesting
[15:42] <powersj> adwaita-icon-theme -- that's useful for server ;)
[15:47] <slangasek> I'm not seeing why any of that is pulled in
[15:51] <jbicha> server-ship depends on kerneloops-daemon, kerneloops provides kerneloops-daemon, kerneloops recommends kerneloops-applet
[15:53] <jbicha> I suggest dropping that recommends then
[15:54] <slangasek> heh, quite
[15:54] <slangasek> was kerneloops newly seeded?
[15:56] <jbicha> no, but the kerneloops packging was changed: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kerneloops/0.12+git20140509-6ubuntu1
[16:03] <slangasek> jbicha: well, kerneloops was also in powersj's 'added' list, not 'updated'
[16:17] <jbicha> yes because of the provides
[16:21] <slangasek> ok, so the Provides: kerneloops-daemon was previously missing
[16:21] <slangasek> and kerneloops-daemon was a separate package name through zesty
[16:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-image (yakkety-proposed/universe) [1.0+16.10ubuntu1.1 => 1.1+16.10ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[16:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-image (zesty-proposed/universe) [1.0+17.04ubuntu1.1 => 1.1+17.04ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[16:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-image (xenial-proposed/universe) [1.0+16.04ubuntu1 => 1.1+16.04ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[18:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvirt (zesty-proposed/main) [2.5.0-3ubuntu5.2 => 2.5.0-3ubuntu5.3] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[18:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvirt (xenial-proposed/main) [1.3.1-1ubuntu10.10 => 1.3.1-1ubuntu10.11] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[22:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted maas [source] (yakkety-proposed) [2.2.0+bzr6054-0ubuntu2~16.10.1]
[22:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted maas [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.2.0+bzr6054-0ubuntu2~16.04.1]
[23:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: klaus [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.2.1-3] (no packageset)
[23:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-googleauth [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.5.1-2] (no packageset)