| === maclin1 is now known as maclin | ||
| tsimonq2 | Could a MOTU please take a look at bug 1703307 and upload the package to zesty-proposed to start the SRU process? | 04:08 |
|---|---|---|
| ubottu | bug 1703307 in lxterminal (Ubuntu Zesty) "[SRU] Unable to rename tabs" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1703307 | 04:08 |
| tsimonq2 | Could someone also nominate bug 1690416 for Xenial and Trusty please? | 04:25 |
| ubottu | bug 1690416 in lxterminal (Ubuntu Artful) "[CVE] socket can be blocked by another user" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1690416 | 04:25 |
| infinity | juliank: Can you gimme a poke when you're around? | 06:03 |
| infinity | juliank: Also, is it an intentional change that repositories without Release files are now considered invalid? That's a pretty major behaviour change. | 06:04 |
| juliank | infinity: As the news said, apt-get now also requires explictly setting allow-insecure-repositories | 06:08 |
| juliank | Then they work just fine | 06:08 |
| juliank | (with warnings) | 06:09 |
| infinity | juliank: Ahh. Yeah, looks like [trusted=yes] works (I think suggesting people set the apt.conf option is irresponsible, as that allows ALL sources to be insecure, not just the one I know I trust) | 06:10 |
| juliank | All other apt frontends already worked that way for some time, it's just the switch now being toggled around for apt-get to | 06:10 |
| juliank | s/to/too/ | 06:10 |
| infinity | juliank: To be fair, applying that policy to file:/ and copy:/ URIs (which is where I just had to add a trusted=yes to fix d-i) seems a bit busted. | 06:15 |
| infinity | juliank: I mean, sure, someone could hack my local filesystem and all, but I feel like I have bigger problems if I can't trust a local repo. | 06:15 |
| juliank | Well, maybe you use some partial mirroring tool, or it's on an NFS share, or whatever | 06:15 |
| infinity | Yeah, I suppose. | 06:16 |
| juliank | infinity: (re poke) Is there something else you wanted to discuss, or just that? I'm a bit slow right now, as I basically just woke up (brain is about to get carbs any minute now) :) | 06:32 |
| * juliank woke up figuring out if he actually wanted to get up or not, and then saw the messages and decided to actually get up. | 06:34 | |
| infinity | juliank: That was it. Just being grumpy because you made me do work. ;) | 06:48 |
| juliank | Ah, OK; the 'also' made me think it might be two separate things :) | 06:49 |
| juliank | infinity: You are not the first one, we also broke siduction's ISO building, or whatever | 06:50 |
| LocutusOfBorg | hello Adri2000 seems that _rene_ wants to team upload libfilezilla (see #debian-release channel) | 07:45 |
| Adri2000 | LocutusOfBorg: thanks for the notice, that's ok if he has an upload ready, I don't have much time to do it myself now :/ | 07:47 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I will do it, and upgrade to the latest release | 07:47 |
| Adri2000 | thanks | 07:49 |
| ricotz | hello, are there plans to pick up boost 1.64 for artful? | 08:06 |
| LocutusOfBorg | ricotz, maybe you need to talk with xnox :) | 08:56 |
| xnox | ricotz, is there a need for 1.64? | 08:57 |
| xnox | i'd rather not go ahead of debian. | 08:57 |
| xnox | 62 is currently default, with 63 available | 08:57 |
| ricotz | xnox, not yet, I guess, currently libreoffice internally defaults to 1.63, but with 1.64 already available seems better to push for that | 08:58 |
| ricotz | so avoiding to do two transitions | 08:59 |
| ricotz | of course debian should update to 1.64 too | 08:59 |
| ricotz | xnox, I guess you are the right person to ask for a MIR of libboost-locale-dev | 08:59 |
| xnox | ricotz, it doesn't need an mir. | 09:00 |
| xnox | ricotz, you should simply poke archive admin to promote that binary if something needs it. E.g. ask infinity. | 09:00 |
| ricotz | ah, than just an component switch of those binaries | 09:00 |
| xnox | yes, boost itself is in main. | 09:00 |
| xnox | unfortunately. | 09:00 |
| ricotz | I see, libreoffice 5.4.0 will require it | 09:00 |
| xnox | so when that is uploaded, it will be highlighted in components missmatches, and then we promote things. | 09:01 |
| ricotz | I see | 09:01 |
| xnox | boost binaries move between main-universe a lot, depending on what we end up shipping in the distro. | 09:01 |
| xnox | ricotz, also if libboost-locale-dev is headers only, it needs not any promotion. can't remember if locale-dev is or isn't header/template only. | 09:02 |
| xnox | however things should be declaring built-using, but whatever. | 09:02 |
| ricotz | it has a library too | 09:02 |
| xnox | ack, so it will be a normal promotion of that library package to main. | 09:03 |
| xnox | debian might go with with 1.65 transition and just skip 1.64 to be honest. | 09:03 |
| seb128 | cyphermox_, xnox, slangasek, hey, any news about the nplan/n-m issue? | 09:03 |
| ricotz | xnox, ok, I guess this mean artful will stay with 1.62 | 09:03 |
| bdrung_work | Trevinho, regarding the mouse click event: i am currently testing the system with a different mouse. no issues so far. | 09:16 |
| === gurmble is now known as grumble | ||
| xnox | Laney, is transition tracker ok? e.g. from http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/html/ocaml.html ocaml-melt and ocamlviz are not installable on amd64, but they seem like they are to me. | 09:47 |
| xnox | or maybe i am missing something. | 09:47 |
| LocutusOfBorg | xnox, they are both green here | 09:48 |
| LocutusOfBorg | cache? | 09:48 |
| xnox | LocutusOfBorg, ah, that! thanks | 09:49 |
| xnox | problem between the keyboard and chair | 09:49 |
| xnox | symptoms to be fixed with coffee | 09:49 |
| Laney | ._. | 09:49 |
| LocutusOfBorg | xnox, I'm doing a photo shot of my current t-shirt | 09:50 |
| LocutusOfBorg | http://imgur.com/e8GUJer | 09:56 |
| LocutusOfBorg | xnox, ^^ :) | 09:56 |
| Zta77 | Hi. I'm having trouble building a package from source, perhaps someone could help, please? I'm doing the build inside a docker container so my system isn't soiled with all sorts of weird dependencies. Here's a self-contained Dockerfile: https://pastebin.com/wutSLrWq And this is how to test it, ie. make it build (and fail): docker build -t aseprite . Not that this builds fine when invoken the plain cmake/make commands (also specified in Dockerfile) | 10:28 |
| Zta77 | 2 minutes and I'll post the error message =) .. | 10:30 |
| Zta77 | https://pastebin.com/zatpVKhN | 10:38 |
| cjwatson | Zta77: You should really regard the packaging as (at least mostly) source code, rather than something you generate with dh_make; dh_make is usually at best only useful as a guideline. | 10:46 |
| cjwatson | Zta77: Anyway, I think the actual error is above what you cut off in that paste. | 10:46 |
| Zta77 | I'm rebuilding now; I'll paste a complete error code if possible. Perhaps there's more info further up in the scroll buffer. | 10:49 |
| Zta77 | I basically want to git clone some source and build a .deb that I can install later. I will start from scratch when I want to build an updated version (i.e. start a new docker container). | 10:50 |
| Zta77 | cjwatson: There's more here: https://pastebin.com/VBicjBHa | 10:52 |
| cjwatson | Zta77: Looks like missing Build-Depends: pkg-config | 10:53 |
| cjwatson | Possibly others | 10:53 |
| Zta77 | Thanks, I'll try adding them and rebuild. | 10:54 |
| cjwatson | (Also slightly odd that you're installing sbuild in your container but not actually using it, so with what you have at the moment you'd also need to specify additional build-dependencies in the Dockerfile) | 10:54 |
| cjwatson | Oh, and that error about -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=None looks suspicious | 10:54 |
| cjwatson | Hm, no, that's debhelper's default | 10:54 |
| cjwatson | You might need to add -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release or something like that | 10:55 |
| cjwatson | Which would go in override_dh_auto_configure | 10:55 |
| Zta77 | (I think sbuild is a left over from another experiment where I was building locally on my own machine) | 10:56 |
| Zta77 | Right. What was the first Build-Depends you mentioned? I lost my history.. | 10:56 |
| cjwatson | pkg-config | 10:56 |
| cjwatson | That's not the actual fatal error in this case (the fatal error appears to be about CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE), but I expect you'll run into it later anyway | 10:57 |
| Zta77 | Isn't it weird that the build succeeds if run with plain cmake/make but fails when invoked though dpkg-buildpackage ? | 11:07 |
| cjwatson | Zta77: Not particularly, because debhelper (used via debian/rules) supplies a bunch of cmake defaults | 11:08 |
| cjwatson | Zta77: One of those is -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=None, which apparently the embedded libarchive doesn't like | 11:09 |
| cjwatson | Zta77: See /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Debhelper/Buildsystem/cmake.pm | 11:09 |
| cjwatson | Zta77: Like I say you can override that by adding parameters after "dh_auto_configure --" | 11:10 |
| cjwatson | (I think -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=RelWithDebInfo is actually a better override) | 11:13 |
| cjwatson | See https://bugs.debian.org/701233 for the history here | 11:13 |
| ubottu | Debian bug 701233 in debhelper "debhelper: Add -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=RelWithDebInfo to standard set of cmake flags" [Important,Fixed] | 11:13 |
| Zta77 | Now I'm getting somewhere! It's building. | 11:18 |
| Zta77 | Using RelWithDebInfo | 11:19 |
| Zta77 | cjwatson: So the build actually completes .. and then it fails =) Any idea what could be going on here? https://pastebin.com/Ngs7FABP | 11:53 |
| cjwatson | Zta77: Packages shouldn't install stuff into /usr/local | 11:54 |
| cjwatson | Zta77: You should be using /usr as the prefix | 11:55 |
| cjwatson | Zta77: If you reeeeeeeeeeally don't want to comply with that, you should (a) reconsider (b) if you still don't want to, override dh_usrlocal to do nothing | 11:56 |
| Zta77 | Oh, I was just about to ask if this could be related to my custom prefix | 11:56 |
| Zta77 | how do I override dh_usrlocal ? | 11:57 |
| Zta77 | I'd like to be able to install my package side-by-side with the official package. | 11:58 |
| cjwatson | I don't really want to teach you the details because I think you are on a mistaken route | 11:58 |
| cjwatson | But if you really want to you can read "man dh" (which gives general advice on how to override debhelper commands) | 11:58 |
| cjwatson | There's a "Here is a way to prevent dh from running several commands that you don't want it to run" section | 11:59 |
| cjwatson | It's worth learning how overrides work anyway: it's easy and regular | 11:59 |
| Zta77 | This whole project is a mistaken route. | 11:59 |
| cjwatson | :) | 12:00 |
| Zta77 | But I'm learning docker, learning a but about .deb, learning how to populate a repository, and getting the latest build of aseprite. So it's not all bad. | 12:03 |
| coreycb | apw: hello, if you have some cycles, could you review a few openstack SRU uploads for me? In the queue I have libvirt for zesty/xenial, and python-cinderclient/python-openstackclient for xenial. | 13:37 |
| apw | coreycb, are these two identicle in the zesty queue ? | 13:45 |
| apw | coreycb, and the same question for xenial | 13:46 |
| coreycb | apw: for libvirt there should be 2 uploads for zesty and 2 for xenial, of which the older ones can be rejected | 13:47 |
| apw | coreycb, there is already a libvirt in zesty-proposed | 13:51 |
| apw | are we replacing that ? | 13:51 |
| cpaelzer | coreycb: is that the update to have both rules? | 13:58 |
| coreycb | cpaelzer: yes | 13:59 |
| cpaelzer | coreycb: did you change the changelog - since I prefeched that into my merge and want history to be correct | 13:59 |
| coreycb | apw: checking | 13:59 |
| coreycb | cpaelzer: here's the zesty upload - http://launchpadlibrarian.net/327345846/libvirt_2.5.0-3ubuntu5.2_2.5.0-3ubuntu5.3.diff.gz | 13:59 |
| cpaelzer | ok thats the odl message - I'm good then | 14:00 |
| coreycb | cpaelzer: you probably want to release 5.2 rather than having the 5.3 version replace it, right? | 14:01 |
| coreycb | cpaelzer: in zesty-proposed | 14:01 |
| cpaelzer | coreycb: yeah 5.2 is in proposed quite a while now | 14:01 |
| cpaelzer | I'd prefer to not restart its amturing cycle | 14:01 |
| coreycb | apw: it looks like 5.2 is verified, perhaps we can release that to updates and accept 5.3 into proposed? | 14:03 |
| coreycb | cpaelzer: ^ | 14:03 |
| apw | coreycb, ok its not marked verified according to the reports, i think they may have used the wrong tag form | 14:04 |
| cpaelzer | verification-zesty-done since 22. June | 14:04 |
| cpaelzer | there was the global change by sil2100 - maybe affected by that in some way | 14:05 |
| cpaelzer | apw: ^^ | 14:05 |
| apw | i think the form is verification-done-zesty ... | 14:05 |
| sil2100 | Yeah, it's verification-done-zesty as apw says ;) | 14:05 |
| cpaelzer | well I added the wrong way before you added it :-) | 14:06 |
| apw | cpaelzer, if you could flip that (too dangerous to overlap with you) | 14:06 |
| apw | then we can indeed release this one | 14:06 |
| coreycb | apw: cpaelzer: thanks | 14:07 |
| cpaelzer | apw: I corrected the tag | 14:07 |
| apw | cpaelzer, coreycb, ok that one released | 14:11 |
| cpaelzer | thanks apw | 14:11 |
| coreycb | apw: thanks | 14:11 |
| apw | i'll come back to the new one once the world notices | 14:11 |
| willcooke | mbiebl_, hi. I copied (more or less) your patch for disabling bluetooth audio in gdm for Ubuntu, I wondering if it's likely to land in Debian soon, or did you decide that the a11y impact was too great? | 14:45 |
| willcooke | rdiff in question: https://paste.debian.net/975780/ | 14:45 |
| === JanC is now known as Guest50617 | ||
| === JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
| seb128 | cyphermox_, slangasek, xnox, hey again, sorry to nag but is annoying working on unblock that n-m update? | 15:57 |
| cyphermox_ | yes, annoying is working on unblocking that | 15:57 |
| cyphermox_ | fwiw, I told jbicha two weeks ago that it was a NM regression | 15:58 |
| cyphermox_ | I think I can work around it in nplan, working on that right now | 15:58 |
| dmj_s76 | Given the recent discovery of skylake/kabylake hyperthreading problems, could we get the latest intel-microcode backported to xenial? That should fix the issue on a sizeable percentage of systems. | 16:40 |
| nacc | dmj_s76: LP: #1700373 | 16:40 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1700373 in intel-microcode (Ubuntu Yakkety) "intel-microcode is out of date, version 20170511 fixes errata on 6th and 7th generation platforms" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1700373 | 16:40 |
| dmj_s76 | nacc: Thanks | 16:48 |
| nacc | dmj_s76: yw | 16:48 |
| bdrung_work | Trevinho, after one day use, i can say that the unwanted click events were caused by broken hardware | 17:59 |
| === zyga_ is now known as zyga | ||
| juliank | Seems like seviper's smtp does not speak TLS? gmail shows annoying red crossed-out locks for ubuntu-devel mails :( | 19:55 |
| === santa is now known as Guest89941 | ||
| === Guest89941 is now known as santa_ | ||
| Trevinho | bdrung_work: sad to hear for you, but also good for us :-D | 21:39 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!