-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-integer-logarithms [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-1] (no packageset) | 00:00 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-quickcheck-text [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.1.2.1-1] (no packageset) | 00:00 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-quickcheck-text [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.1.2.1-1] (no packageset) | 00:01 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-integer-logarithms [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-1] (no packageset) | 00:02 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-th-abstraction [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.2.3.0-1] (no packageset) | 00:03 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-th-abstraction [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.2.3.0-1] (no packageset) | 00:03 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-uri-bytestring [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.2.3.3-1] (no packageset) | 00:06 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-uri-bytestring [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.2.3.3-1] (no packageset) | 00:06 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gdal [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.2.1+dfsg-1] (no packageset) | 00:30 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (trusty-proposed/main) [1.19~14.04.1 => 1.32~14.04.1] (core) | 00:35 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (xenial-proposed/main) [1.28~16.04.1 => 1.32~16.04.1] (core) | 00:36 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (yakkety-proposed/main) [1.28~16.10.1 => 1.32~16.10.1] (core) | 00:38 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (zesty-proposed/main) [1.28 => 1.32~17.04.1] (core) | 00:41 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-software (xenial-proposed/main) [3.20.1+git20170524.0.ea2fe2b0-0ubuntu0.16.04.1 => 3.20.5-0ubuntu0.16.04.4] (ubuntu-desktop) | 03:28 | |
=== s8321414_ is now known as s8321414 | ||
=== maclin1 is now known as maclin | ||
=== s8321414_ is now known as s8321414 | ||
LocutusOfBorg | hello, can we have some haskell processing from binNEW queue? | 07:40 |
---|---|---|
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (trusty-proposed/main) [3.13.0-125.174] (core, kernel) | 07:42 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (trusty-proposed) [3.13.0-125.174] | 07:43 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gdal [amd64] (artful-proposed) [2.2.1+dfsg-1] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-alsa-mixer [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.2.0.3-1] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-alsa-mixer [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.2.0.3-1] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-floatinghex [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.4-1] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-floatinghex [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.4-1] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hashable-time [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.2.0.1-1] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hashable-time [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.2.0.1-1] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-integer-logarithms [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.0.1-1] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-integer-logarithms [armhf] (artful-proposed) [1.0.1-1] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-integer-logarithms [s390x] (artful-proposed) [1.0.1-1] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-alsa-mixer [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.2.0.3-1] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-floatinghex [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.4-1] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hashable-time [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.2.0.1-1] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hashable-time [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.2.0.1-1] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-integer-logarithms [i386] (artful-proposed) [1.0.1-1] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-quickcheck-text [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.1.2.1-1] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-quickcheck-text [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.1.2.1-1] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-th-abstraction [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.2.3.0-1] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-th-abstraction [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.2.3.0-1] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-th-abstraction [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.2.3.0-1] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-alsa-mixer [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.2.0.3-1] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hashable-time [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.2.0.1-1] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-quickcheck-text [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.1.2.1-1] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-quickcheck-text [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.1.2.1-1] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-th-abstraction [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.2.3.0-1] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-uri-bytestring [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.2.3.3-1] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-uri-bytestring [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.2.3.3-1] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-uri-bytestring [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.2.3.3-1] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qtvirtualkeyboard-opensource-src [arm64] (artful-proposed) [5.7.1+dfsg-1] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qtvirtualkeyboard-opensource-src [i386] (artful-proposed) [5.7.1+dfsg-1] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-floatinghex [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.4-1] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-quickcheck-text [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.1.2.1-1] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-uri-bytestring [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.2.3.3-1] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-uri-bytestring [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.2.3.3-1] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qtvirtualkeyboard-opensource-src [armhf] (artful-proposed) [5.7.1+dfsg-1] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-integer-logarithms [arm64] (artful-proposed) [1.0.1-1] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-uri-bytestring [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.2.3.3-1] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cppunit [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.14.0-2] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cppunit [armhf] (artful-proposed) [1.14.0-2] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cppunit [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [1.14.0-2] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-alsa-mixer [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.2.0.3-1] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-cryptohash-sha1 [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.11.100.1-1] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-cryptohash-sha1 [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.11.100.1-1] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-cryptohash-sha1 [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.11.100.1-1] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-floatinghex [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.4-1] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-th-abstraction [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.2.3.0-1] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cppunit [arm64] (artful-proposed) [1.14.0-2] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cppunit [s390x] (artful-proposed) [1.14.0-2] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-cryptohash-sha1 [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.11.100.1-1] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-cryptohash-sha1 [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.11.100.1-1] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hashable-time [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.2.0.1-1] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-quickcheck-text [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.1.2.1-1] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qtvirtualkeyboard-opensource-src [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [5.7.1+dfsg-1] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qtvirtualkeyboard-opensource-src [amd64] (artful-proposed) [5.7.1+dfsg-1] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-alsa-mixer [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.2.0.3-1] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-floatinghex [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.4-1] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-th-abstraction [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.2.3.0-1] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cppunit [i386] (artful-proposed) [1.14.0-2] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-integer-logarithms [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [1.0.1-1] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-cryptohash-sha1 [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.11.100.1-1] | 07:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qtvirtualkeyboard-opensource-src [s390x] (artful-proposed) [5.7.1+dfsg-1] | 07:45 | |
LocutusOfBorg | thanks | 08:21 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-cryptohash-md5 [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.11.100.1-1] (no packageset) | 08:28 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-cryptohash-md5 [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.11.100.1-1] (no packageset) | 08:28 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-cryptohash-md5 [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.11.100.1-1] (no packageset) | 08:28 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-cryptohash-md5 [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.11.100.1-1] (no packageset) | 08:29 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-cryptohash-md5 [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.11.100.1-1] (no packageset) | 08:30 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-cryptohash-md5 [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.11.100.1-1] (no packageset) | 08:34 | |
LocutusOfBorg | apw, pleeeeeeeeease ^^ | 08:34 |
cjwatson | we do these without prodding normally | 08:35 |
cjwatson | done | 08:35 |
LocutusOfBorg | I remember you having some semi-automatic script for doing them, I need this one for haskell-tls, that blocks a bunch of rebuilds, thanks! | 08:36 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-cryptohash-md5 [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.11.100.1-1] | 08:36 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-cryptohash-md5 [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.11.100.1-1] | 08:36 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-cryptohash-md5 [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.11.100.1-1] | 08:36 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-cryptohash-md5 [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.11.100.1-1] | 08:36 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-cryptohash-md5 [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.11.100.1-1] | 08:36 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-cryptohash-md5 [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.11.100.1-1] | 08:36 | |
LocutusOfBorg | I would like to make it transition before Clint uploads new stuff in Debian :) | 08:38 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-cryptohash-sha256 [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.11.100.1-1] (no packageset) | 09:01 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hosc [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.15-1] (no packageset) | 09:01 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-libmpd [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.9.0.6-1] (no packageset) | 09:03 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hosc [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.15-1] (no packageset) | 09:04 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-libmpd [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.9.0.6-1] (no packageset) | 09:05 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-cryptohash-sha256 [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.11.100.1-1] (no packageset) | 09:06 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-cryptohash-sha256 [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.11.100.1-1] (no packageset) | 09:11 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hosc [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.15-1] (no packageset) | 09:11 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-libmpd [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.9.0.6-1] (no packageset) | 09:12 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-libmpd [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.9.0.6-1] (no packageset) | 09:12 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-cryptohash-sha256 [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.11.100.1-1] (no packageset) | 09:13 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hosc [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.15-1] (no packageset) | 09:13 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-cryptohash-sha256 [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.11.100.1-1] (no packageset) | 09:21 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-cryptohash-sha256 [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.11.100.1-1] (no packageset) | 09:23 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-cryptohash-sha256 [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.11.100.1-1] | 09:25 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-cryptohash-sha256 [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.11.100.1-1] | 09:25 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-cryptohash-sha256 [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.11.100.1-1] | 09:25 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-cryptohash-sha256 [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.11.100.1-1] | 09:25 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-cryptohash-sha256 [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.11.100.1-1] | 09:25 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-cryptohash-sha256 [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.11.100.1-1] | 09:25 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hosc [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.15-1] (no packageset) | 09:26 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hosc [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.15-1] (no packageset) | 09:27 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hosc [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.15-1] | 09:31 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hosc [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.15-1] | 09:31 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hosc [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.15-1] | 09:32 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hosc [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.15-1] | 09:32 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hosc [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.15-1] | 09:32 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hosc [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.15-1] | 09:32 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-libmpd [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.9.0.6-1] (no packageset) | 09:34 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-libmpd [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.9.0.6-1] (no packageset) | 09:43 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-libmpd [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.9.0.6-1] | 09:43 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-libmpd [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.9.0.6-1] | 09:43 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-libmpd [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.9.0.6-1] | 09:43 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-libmpd [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.9.0.6-1] | 09:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-libmpd [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.9.0.6-1] | 09:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-libmpd [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.9.0.6-1] | 09:44 | |
apw | xnox, are you aware of your copious adt failures in xenial for your systemd sru ? | 10:16 |
xnox | apw, i am expecting some, i haven't started verfiying the bugs or the adt failures on xenial yet. | 10:17 |
xnox | apw, i do know it fails with funky custom kernels. | 10:18 |
xnox | and i have a plat to fix it (basically don't test things, which require modules that the funky kernel do not ship) | 10:18 |
xnox | apw, e.g. http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/systemd/xenial/amd64 | 10:18 |
apw | xnox, i would be interested in what systemd wants to be using which those kernels are not supplying, as that sounds wrong to me | 10:20 |
xnox | apw, scsi_debug kernel module or some such | 10:21 |
apw | xnox, that sounds like something we might really want on those kernels for testing purposes | 10:21 |
apw | xnox, have we had a bug on that ? | 10:21 |
apw | (i feel we did for -azure or something and turned it back on) | 10:21 |
xnox | there was a bug, which got waved away, because i thought it needs to be a dynamic module to constantly unload and reload with different parameters | 10:24 |
xnox | i can open a new one. | 10:24 |
xnox | with details. | 10:24 |
apw | xnox, that might be true, that it has to be builtin for some reason which would stop that working | 10:32 |
apw | xnox, best to get it documented so i don't ask you again :) | 10:32 |
infinity | apw: I don't think we ever brought it to your team formally, but I kinda figured bloating the "slim" kernel packages with debug modules wasn't a thing we'd want. | 10:36 |
infinity | (Unless said modules are an effective QA tool for the kernel itself) | 10:36 |
apw | if they are just modules, and it is that one module, and it lets us have some testing ... | 10:36 |
infinity | apw: Well yes, just modules, but the cloud kernels are concerned both with vmlinux size/speed and with overall package/image size, I thought? | 10:36 |
infinity | (Otherwise, they'd have allmodconfig) | 10:37 |
apw | infinity, they are, but we are also concerned about QA'ing them... so it is a trade off we should be conciously making for these cases and documenting | 10:38 |
infinity | apw: Either way, it's poor form for the systemd tests to explode if the module isn't there, so doing a "modinfo && modprobe || exit 0" is still appropriate, IMO. | 10:38 |
apw | infinity, that too, but "you don't want to do that" | 10:38 |
infinity | I don't? | 10:38 |
apw | (standard response from upstream about why it doesn't do that already) | 10:39 |
apw | (just saving some time in reporting it) | 10:39 |
infinity | Oh, ISWYM. :P | 10:39 |
xnox | apw, we actually do that sort of thing in ./debian/tests/ and filter upstream tests to run already. | 10:40 |
xnox | there is enough bullshit tests as it is =) | 10:40 |
infinity | The only argument against would be if you believe the systemd tests should be responsible for testing of mod_scsi_debug is installed correctly, which I'd argue isn't their job. | 10:40 |
apw | indeed | 10:40 |
infinity | s/testing of/testing if/ | 10:40 |
ginggs | hi, facter and freedombox-setup autopkgtests on armhf need to be retried against bind9/1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-10.1ubuntu7 but autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi doesn't seem to like bind9's version in a trigger | 11:17 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxterminal (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.3.0-1ubuntu0.1 => 0.3.0-1ubuntu0.2] (no packageset) | 11:18 | |
apw | ginggs, in the sense it says it is an error ? | 11:23 |
apw | have you URL escaped the version enough? | 11:24 |
Laney | ginggs: I fixed it https://git.launchpad.net/autopkgtest-cloud/commit/?id=46e645dda67925ab11ce0f6a818c8d1defa1c92b | 11:32 |
Laney | and retried facter - you can test with the other one | 11:32 |
ginggs | Laney: fixed, thanks! freedombox-setup test request submitted | 11:39 |
ginggs | ah, it was the P in 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-10.1ubuntu6 it didn't like | 11:40 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libseccomp (trusty-proposed/main) [2.2.3-2ubuntu1~ubuntu14.04.1 => 2.1.1-1ubuntu1~trusty4] (core) | 11:42 | |
Laney | PpPpP | 11:46 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libseccomp [source] (trusty-proposed) [2.1.1-1ubuntu1~trusty4] | 12:25 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ntp [sync] (zesty-proposed) [1:4.2.8p9+dfsg-2ubuntu1.1] | 12:28 | |
apw | ^ shadowed by a security update and already replaced in the queue | 12:28 |
xnox | Laney, i am confused about britney now. | 12:56 |
xnox | trying: systemd libmicrohttpd greenbone-security-assistant kodi ola janus yubikey-server-c openzwave-controlpanel psensor bfgminer libjson-rpc-cpp nageru gnunet opensips | 12:56 |
xnox | skipped: systemd libmicrohttpd greenbone-security-assistant kodi ola janus yubikey-server-c openzwave-controlpanel psensor bfgminer libjson-rpc-cpp nageru gnunet opensips (27, 25, 7) | 12:56 |
xnox | got: 2+0: a-1:a-0:a-0:i-0:p-0:s-1 | 12:56 |
xnox | * s390x: pcp-webapi | 12:56 |
xnox | - splitting the component into single items and retrying them | 12:56 |
xnox | however, it all installs fine. | 12:56 |
xnox | i've tried now in the sbuild chroot and install _all_ packages from that set works, including the pcp-webapi | 12:56 |
LocutusOfBorg | on s390x^ | 12:58 |
LocutusOfBorg | maybe it is uninstallable on that arch only | 12:59 |
LocutusOfBorg | or maybe pcp is blocked by perl (not considered), so it can't migrate :) | 13:00 |
LocutusOfBorg | xnox, ^^ this one | 13:00 |
xnox | right, not considered. | 13:00 |
LocutusOfBorg | sorry for that :( I feel guilty | 13:01 |
LocutusOfBorg | s/feel/am | 13:01 |
xnox | well, i guess i can build pcp against old perl to make it migrate the lighttpd transition | 13:01 |
LocutusOfBorg | and no-change rebuild after it migrates? | 13:02 |
LocutusOfBorg | seems sane enough :) | 13:02 |
xnox | yes. | 13:02 |
Laney | xnox: pcp-webapi : Depends: libmicrohttpd10 (>= 0.9.35) but it is not installable | 13:42 |
Laney | it's because of perl | 13:42 |
xnox | ack. | 13:44 |
Laney | why do you think that rebuilding will work? | 13:44 |
LocutusOfBorg | rebuilding libmicrohttpd with a forced perl from -release should work | 13:48 |
LocutusOfBorg | and then no-change rebuild again | 13:49 |
* LocutusOfBorg didn't look closely | 13:49 | |
Laney | I don't understand why it would | 13:49 |
Laney | but maybe I'm missing something | 13:50 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libvirt [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.3.1-1ubuntu10.11] | 13:50 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libvirt [source] (zesty-proposed) [2.5.0-3ubuntu5.3] | 13:50 | |
apw | ^ replaced in the queue by a later upload ... | 13:50 |
LocutusOfBorg | because it would be unentangled from perl? | 13:51 |
LocutusOfBorg | not even sure if that word exists | 13:51 |
cjwatson | "disentangled" normally | 14:01 |
LocutusOfBorg | thanks, seems better indeed | 14:04 |
Laney | LocutusOfBorg: I think that all excuses that show up in Depends have to be valid regardless of any versioning, but maybe I'm wrong. | 14:12 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted walinuxagent [source] (zesty-proposed) [2.2.14-0ubuntu1~17.04.1] | 14:58 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted walinuxagent [source] (yakkety-proposed) [2.2.14-0ubuntu1~16.10.1] | 15:00 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted walinuxagent [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.2.14-0ubuntu1~16.04.1] | 15:02 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted walinuxagent [source] (trusty-proposed) [2.2.14-0ubuntu1~14.04.1] | 15:03 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (trusty-proposed/partner) [1:20170616.1-0ubuntu0.14.04.1 => 1:20170711.1-0ubuntu0.14.04.1] (no packageset) | 15:13 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (yakkety-proposed/partner) [1:20170616.1-0ubuntu0.16.10.1 => 1:20170711.1-0ubuntu0.16.10.1] (no packageset) | 15:13 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (xenial-proposed/partner) [1:20170616.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1 => 1:20170711.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1] (no packageset) | 15:13 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (zesty-proposed/partner) [1:20170616.1-0ubuntu0.17.04.1 => 1:20170711.1-0ubuntu0.17.04.1] (no packageset) | 15:14 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-image [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.1+17.04ubuntu1] | 15:32 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-image [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.1+16.10ubuntu1] | 15:33 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (trusty-proposed) [1:20170711.1-0ubuntu0.14.04.1] | 15:37 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:20170711.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1] | 15:38 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1:20170711.1-0ubuntu0.16.10.1] | 15:38 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (zesty-proposed) [1:20170711.1-0ubuntu0.17.04.1] | 15:39 | |
slangasek | bdmurray: I notice the SRU tooling in ubuntu-archive-tools now has some inconsistent defaulting of series (xenial vs. yakkety vs. zesty). Do you agree that these should all default now to zesty? | 16:48 |
slangasek | (queuediff; sru-remove; sru-review; kernel-sru-review) | 16:48 |
slangasek | and gee it would be nice if we could use distro-data for this | 16:49 |
apw | slangasek, perhaps they should just not default at all | 16:49 |
bdmurray | slangasek: yes, defaulting to zesty makes sense | 16:49 |
bdmurray | apw: but it saves you typing with sru-review at least! | 16:49 |
infinity | Traditionally, they all defaulted to the latest stable, but I'm sort of with apw that defaults don't make sense. | 16:50 |
infinity | The series arguments should probably just be mandatory. | 16:50 |
apw | half the time not so much | 16:50 |
slangasek | well if you don't think the default should exist, that means there's no chance you'll care if I change it ;) | 16:51 |
bdmurray | I guess being deliberate could avoid errors | 16:51 |
slangasek | I tend not to use the default | 16:51 |
infinity | slangasek: I don't mind if you fix the current state to match the tradition of defaulting to the latest stable. | 16:51 |
infinity | That doesn't change my statement that maybe we should nix the defaults entirely and make the argument mandatory. :P | 16:51 |
infinity | Given we process SRUs for several series, and except for immediately after a release, the volume to "latest stable" isn't statistically high enough to warrant a default. | 16:52 |
slangasek | sru-release deals with this by making it a positional argument, and I hate that inconsistency ;) | 16:52 |
infinity | I prefer the positional argument, probably just because less typing. | 16:53 |
bdmurray | infinity, slangasek: While you are "here" I noticed and fixed https://ubu.one/upgY2Z to not say to use the "-d" switch when upgrading from Y to Z. | 16:53 |
infinity | But yes, consistency there would be nice too. | 16:53 |
infinity | bdmurray: Oh, thanks! | 16:53 |
infinity | bdmurray: Did older ones have that bug too? | 16:53 |
apw | slangasek, i have seriously considered adding -s to sru-release _too_ | 16:53 |
slangasek | apw: as have I | 16:53 |
apw | and likely will yet | 16:54 |
infinity | I don't mind if they're all -s or all positional, but consistency would be nice. I prefer positional, but meh. | 16:54 |
slangasek | it follows logically that if we're not going to have a default that it should be positional | 16:54 |
infinity | Probably because copy-proposed-kernel and sru-release are both positional, and I used both those tools a lot more than the others. | 16:54 |
slangasek | but I'm not sold on this | 16:54 |
bdmurray | infinity: looks like they do I wonder if there is a template somewhere | 16:54 |
infinity | bdmurray: They're just copied forward AFAIK. | 16:55 |
slangasek | infinity: you should stop using copy-proposed-kernel and use kernel-sru-review instead, I've landed all of sil2100's changes to support your use case :) | 16:55 |
infinity | bdmurray: So the bug could go back years. | 16:55 |
slangasek | infinity: btw did you catch my comment the other day about glibc being newer in zesty-security than in artful? | 16:55 |
infinity | slangasek: I caught it when I came to last night, yeah. | 16:55 |
slangasek | k. should we just do a binary copy-forward? | 16:56 |
infinity | slangasek: I couple copy the zesty-updates version directly to artful-release if it's a concern. New builds of glibc in artful are currently blocked on https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21725 | 16:56 |
ubot5 | sourceware.org bug 21725 in binutils "[2.29 Regression] binutils fails to build glibc-2.24 on aarch64-linux-gnu and arm-linux-gnueabihf" [Normal,New] | 16:56 |
* slangasek nods | 16:56 | |
infinity | I couple copy? WTF, fingers? | 16:57 |
infinity | I could copy. | 16:57 |
flocculant | fingers are overrated | 16:58 |
infinity | Mine have this nasty habit of, a few chars into a word, going "OMG, C-O-U, I KNOW A WORD THAT STARTS WITH THOSE LETTERS!!" and finishing an entirely different word. | 16:58 |
nacc | courgette? | 16:59 |
infinity | I'd suggest my fingers were programmed by Apple, but I've yet to call someone a ducking idiot on IRC, so it's probably not that. | 16:59 |
nacc | heh | 17:00 |
sil2100 | slangasek: thanks for merging those in! | 17:02 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-image [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.1+16.04ubuntu1] | 17:09 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libqtpas [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.6~beta-3] (no packageset) | 17:23 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libqtpas [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.6~beta-3] (no packageset) | 17:31 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libqtpas [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.6~beta-3] (no packageset) | 17:31 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libqtpas [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.6~beta-3] (no packageset) | 17:33 | |
infinity | slangasek: Yo, you removed grafana but not its rdeps. | 17:40 |
slangasek | wut | 17:40 |
infinity | http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/artful_uninst.txt | 17:40 |
slangasek | I mean, I know I removed grafana | 17:41 |
slangasek | but I don't do that without looking at the output of process-removals | 17:41 |
infinity | slangasek: Curious. reverse-depends shows zabbix for me (well, when called with -r zesty, since it won't work on artful anymoe) | 17:43 |
infinity | slangasek: Anyhow, can probably just demote-to-proposed, since it can't possibly migrate back until a working grafana appears. | 17:44 |
slangasek | infinity: yeah, it could simply be a matter of me having misread while clicking through a dozen-plus prompts | 17:44 |
slangasek | agreed re: demote-to-proposed; are you doing or shall I? | 17:44 |
infinity | slangasek: I'll do it now. | 17:45 |
infinity | slangasek: And done. | 17:45 |
infinity | I wonder what a zabbix is. | 17:46 |
slangasek | a cross between a zebra, a rabbit, and a unix | 17:47 |
infinity | And now I want a zebra-striped rabbit. | 17:47 |
infinity | That explodes in 2038. | 17:47 |
slangasek | and is full of daemons | 17:48 |
infinity | slangasek: I still can't decide if that debian-project mail was sincere or a super-clever parody. | 17:49 |
slangasek | hah | 17:49 |
ahoneybun | infinity: who do I talk to about ubiquity merges? | 18:08 |
infinity | ahoneybun: Generally cyphermox. | 18:10 |
=== santa is now known as Guest89941 | ||
=== Guest89941 is now known as santa_ | ||
mwhudson | can an AA look at why src:astroid is in main and maybe demote it? | 21:16 |
jbicha | mwhudson: I believe it's in main because of https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu-seeds/ubuntu.artful/view/head:/development#L51 | 21:19 |
mwhudson | jbicha: ah yeah, that explains why but not why, if that makes sense :) | 21:20 |
jbicha | one of its rdepends is pylint which dropped to universe when we no longer required build-depends to be in main just before xenial's release | 21:20 |
mwhudson | yeah i think it's probably leftover from that | 21:21 |
jbicha | merge proposal welcome :) | 21:25 |
chiluk | rbasak, slangasek, I'm going to rebackport intel-microcode once again and base it on the 20170707 revision, as that includes kabylake and skylake-x ..... previously it wasn't clear if they were fixed in 20170511, now we know for certain.. I'll try to package up the changes tonight. | 21:26 |
chiluk | I plan on doing x, y, and z.. | 21:26 |
chiluk | rbasak / slangasek, should I open a new bug? I'm not sure what to do since z is already marked resolved | 21:27 |
rbasak | chiluk: in what way is Z not resolved? | 21:30 |
rbasak | Am I missing some context here? | 21:30 |
chiluk | rbasak intel just released a new microcode version on 7/7 | 21:58 |
chiluk | rbasak it autosynced to A, but Z is still on 20170511.. | 21:58 |
chiluk | the 20170511 doesn't include the fix for kabylake or skylake-x apparently | 21:59 |
chiluk | I haven't been able to find a good page showing their changelog. | 21:59 |
chiluk | best thing I have descibing changes is upstream debian. | 22:04 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (trusty-proposed/universe) [20170622-0ubuntu1~14.04.0 => 20170622-0ubuntu1~14.04.1] (ubuntu-cloud) | 22:24 | |
LocutusOfBorg | god, strip-nondeterminism is making everything fail to build | 22:27 |
LocutusOfBorg | I'm doing a fake sync of 0.037 to avoid 0.036 being picked up by lp | 22:28 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [source] (trusty-proposed) [20170622-0ubuntu1~14.04.1] | 22:28 | |
LocutusOfBorg | hopefullly I did it in time | 22:28 |
LocutusOfBorg | :( | 22:28 |
LocutusOfBorg | (and correctly) | 22:29 |
LocutusOfBorg | https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=filezilla&suite=unstable | 22:29 |
LocutusOfBorg | dh_strip_nondeterminism: debian/filezilla-common/usr/share/filezilla/resources/leds.png: Can't locate object method "new" via package "File::Temp" (perhaps you forgot to load "File::Temp"?) at /usr/share/perl5/File/StripNondeterminism/handlers/png.pm line 55. | 22:29 |
LocutusOfBorg | https://bugs.debian.org/868077 | 22:29 |
ubot5 | Debian bug 868077 in dh-strip-nondeterminism "/usr/bin/dh_strip_nondeterminism: fails on Winff with: Can't locate object method "new" via package "File::Temp"" [Grave,Fixed] | 22:29 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected shim-signed [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.32~17.04.1] | 23:26 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (zesty-proposed/main) [1.28 => 1.32~17.04.1] (core) | 23:26 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected shim-signed [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.32~16.10.1] | 23:28 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected shim-signed [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.32~16.04.1] | 23:29 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (yakkety-proposed/main) [1.28~16.10.1 => 1.32~16.10.1] (core) | 23:29 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected shim-signed [source] (trusty-proposed) [1.32~14.04.1] | 23:30 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (xenial-proposed/main) [1.28~16.04.1 => 1.32~16.04.1] (core) | 23:30 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (trusty-proposed/main) [1.19~14.04.1 => 1.32~14.04.1] (core) | 23:31 | |
slangasek | xnox: do you know why ocaml appears to be terrible on arm64? | 23:34 |
xnox | slangasek, i believe upstream is not ready for pie-by-default toolchain and the asm they emit is not PIC/PIE compatible for arm64 and s390x. https://lists.debian.org/debian-ocaml-maint/2017/07/msg00044.html | 23:37 |
slangasek | xnox: so this is all broken in Debian also? | 23:38 |
xnox | slangasek, i do not have any further assement, and I worry that to unwind coq and the rest, on arm64 and s390x i will need to revert ocaml from PIE to non-PIE and means rebuilding everything. I guess in a silo this time around. | 23:38 |
slangasek | Did Debian do binary removals for the release? Or do they have a pile of silently FTBFS packages on arm64+s390x? | 23:38 |
slangasek | also, s390x was PIE-by-default from inception in Ubuntu | 23:38 |
xnox | right, but 4.04 brings s390x native port, instead of byte-compiled port. | 23:39 |
slangasek | ok | 23:39 |
xnox | so this is the first native s390x. | 23:39 |
xnox | slangasek, for FTBFS I am requesting these demotions to -proposed https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/polygen/+bug/1702913 | 23:40 |
ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1702913 in polygen (Ubuntu) "ocaml 4.04 transition; FTBFS demote to proposed" [Low,Triaged] | 23:40 |
xnox | 7 packages, | 23:40 |
infinity | xnox: See debian/patches/pie-on-amd64.diff | 23:40 |
xnox | but coq chain should be fixed / fixable, and dinto ppx chain of packages. | 23:40 |
infinity | xnox: Could it be as simple as adding more arches to that (or just not making it conditional in our case)? | 23:40 |
slangasek | ok well I won't be demoting to -proposed, I'll be removing from release | 23:41 |
xnox | infinity, i saw that, and also the armhf pie patches. I've tried that in my nonvirt ppa, but I think i am missbuilding stuff on downgrade from pie to pic - cause i'm getting relocation errors in src:ocaml builds in my nonvirt ppa | 23:41 |
xnox | slangasek, quite. | 23:41 |
slangasek | xnox: also, if the packages in -proposed won't build without sourceful fixes, I'll be removing those too | 23:41 |
xnox | infinity, but i may have confused myself, therefore need to try harder / more methodical. | 23:41 |
xnox | slangasek, but then the fixes will not migrate from debian =( | 23:42 |
slangasek | xnox: they won't get autosynced back, they'll get vorlonsynced | 23:42 |
infinity | xnox: Ahh, yes, the arm PIC patch looks relevant too indeed. | 23:42 |
xnox | slangasek, but i guess it is easy enough to scan for packages that are in testing; but not in devel-proposed. | 23:42 |
xnox | infinity, sure, but the arm port in ocaml, has different codepaths / different asm emitted for pic=true vs false; | 23:43 |
slangasek | xnox: the autosync script when run interactively gives you the option to re-sync newer versions of removed packages | 23:43 |
xnox | infinity, no such thing for arm64 port though =( | 23:43 |
slangasek | I just haven't automated that | 23:43 |
xnox | slangasek, oooooh =) | 23:43 |
infinity | xnox: s390, amd64, and arm have: | 23:44 |
infinity | asmcomp/amd64/arch.ml: [ "-fPIC", Arg.Set Clflags.pic_code, | 23:44 |
infinity | asmcomp/amd64/arch.ml: "-fno-PIC", Arg.Clear Clflags.pic_code, | 23:44 |
slangasek | cappuccino is a genuine demote-to-proposed, though | 23:44 |
infinity | xnox: I would expect adding something similar to arm64 would be trivial. | 23:44 |
xnox | infinity, hm, that smells on the money | 23:44 |
xnox | slangasek, also i am dubious about its usefulness - it is a dummy CPU spinner | 23:45 |
xnox | intended to make ones machine look busy, whilst one is getting cappuccino from fresh pot | 23:45 |
infinity | xnox: I use cappuccino to replace my broken Ctrl key. | 23:46 |
slangasek | I completely misread that and thought you said from /a/ fresh pot | 23:46 |
slangasek | and I was like, that's not how you cappuccino | 23:46 |
infinity | slangasek: Yes, obtaining cappuccino from fresh marijuana makes a lot more sense. | 23:47 |
slangasek | infinity: it does if you were paying attention in Portland | 23:47 |
xnox | infinity, yeah oregon decriminsalised small scale possesion of pretty much everything. | 23:48 |
infinity | Is it non-sequitor Tuesday? | 23:48 |
xnox | Including heroin, cocaine, meth | 23:49 |
xnox | infinity, Wednesday here | 23:49 |
infinity | Oh, well, that makes sense then. If it's Wednesday, decriminalising possession obviously means cappuccino is derived from weed. | 23:50 |
infinity | I think. | 23:50 |
infinity | I need to lie down. My head hurts. | 23:50 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: marionnet (artful-proposed/primary) [0.90.6+bzr457-1build1] | 23:51 | |
* xnox ponders if queuebot is announcing vorlonsync in funny ways | 23:51 | |
infinity | It always announces New. | 23:52 |
slangasek | xnox: that was me removing it and then noticing marionnet didn't actually need source changes, just fixed build-dep | 23:52 |
slangasek | (and forgetting the --auto-approve) | 23:52 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted marionnet [sync] (artful-proposed) [0.90.6+bzr457-1build1] | 23:53 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!