[00:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-integer-logarithms [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-1] (no packageset)
[00:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-quickcheck-text [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.1.2.1-1] (no packageset)
[00:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-quickcheck-text [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.1.2.1-1] (no packageset)
[00:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-integer-logarithms [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-1] (no packageset)
[00:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-th-abstraction [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.2.3.0-1] (no packageset)
[00:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-th-abstraction [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.2.3.0-1] (no packageset)
[00:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-uri-bytestring [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.2.3.3-1] (no packageset)
[00:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-uri-bytestring [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.2.3.3-1] (no packageset)
[00:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gdal [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.2.1+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[00:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (trusty-proposed/main) [1.19~14.04.1 => 1.32~14.04.1] (core)
[00:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (xenial-proposed/main) [1.28~16.04.1 => 1.32~16.04.1] (core)
[00:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (yakkety-proposed/main) [1.28~16.10.1 => 1.32~16.10.1] (core)
[00:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (zesty-proposed/main) [1.28 => 1.32~17.04.1] (core)
[03:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-software (xenial-proposed/main) [3.20.1+git20170524.0.ea2fe2b0-0ubuntu0.16.04.1 => 3.20.5-0ubuntu0.16.04.4] (ubuntu-desktop)
[07:40] <LocutusOfBorg> hello, can we have some haskell processing from binNEW queue?
[07:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (trusty-proposed/main) [3.13.0-125.174] (core, kernel)
[07:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (trusty-proposed) [3.13.0-125.174]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gdal [amd64] (artful-proposed) [2.2.1+dfsg-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-alsa-mixer [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.2.0.3-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-alsa-mixer [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.2.0.3-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-floatinghex [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.4-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-floatinghex [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.4-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hashable-time [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.2.0.1-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hashable-time [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.2.0.1-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-integer-logarithms [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.0.1-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-integer-logarithms [armhf] (artful-proposed) [1.0.1-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-integer-logarithms [s390x] (artful-proposed) [1.0.1-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-alsa-mixer [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.2.0.3-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-floatinghex [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.4-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hashable-time [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.2.0.1-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hashable-time [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.2.0.1-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-integer-logarithms [i386] (artful-proposed) [1.0.1-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-quickcheck-text [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.1.2.1-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-quickcheck-text [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.1.2.1-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-th-abstraction [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.2.3.0-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-th-abstraction [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.2.3.0-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-th-abstraction [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.2.3.0-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-alsa-mixer [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.2.0.3-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hashable-time [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.2.0.1-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-quickcheck-text [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.1.2.1-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-quickcheck-text [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.1.2.1-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-th-abstraction [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.2.3.0-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-uri-bytestring [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.2.3.3-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-uri-bytestring [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.2.3.3-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-uri-bytestring [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.2.3.3-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qtvirtualkeyboard-opensource-src [arm64] (artful-proposed) [5.7.1+dfsg-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qtvirtualkeyboard-opensource-src [i386] (artful-proposed) [5.7.1+dfsg-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-floatinghex [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.4-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-quickcheck-text [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.1.2.1-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-uri-bytestring [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.2.3.3-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-uri-bytestring [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.2.3.3-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qtvirtualkeyboard-opensource-src [armhf] (artful-proposed) [5.7.1+dfsg-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-integer-logarithms [arm64] (artful-proposed) [1.0.1-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-uri-bytestring [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.2.3.3-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cppunit [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.14.0-2]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cppunit [armhf] (artful-proposed) [1.14.0-2]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cppunit [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [1.14.0-2]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-alsa-mixer [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.2.0.3-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-cryptohash-sha1 [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.11.100.1-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-cryptohash-sha1 [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.11.100.1-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-cryptohash-sha1 [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.11.100.1-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-floatinghex [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.4-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-th-abstraction [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.2.3.0-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cppunit [arm64] (artful-proposed) [1.14.0-2]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cppunit [s390x] (artful-proposed) [1.14.0-2]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-cryptohash-sha1 [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.11.100.1-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-cryptohash-sha1 [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.11.100.1-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hashable-time [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.2.0.1-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-quickcheck-text [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.1.2.1-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qtvirtualkeyboard-opensource-src [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [5.7.1+dfsg-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qtvirtualkeyboard-opensource-src [amd64] (artful-proposed) [5.7.1+dfsg-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-alsa-mixer [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.2.0.3-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-floatinghex [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.4-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-th-abstraction [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.2.3.0-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cppunit [i386] (artful-proposed) [1.14.0-2]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-integer-logarithms [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [1.0.1-1]
[07:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-cryptohash-sha1 [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.11.100.1-1]
[07:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qtvirtualkeyboard-opensource-src [s390x] (artful-proposed) [5.7.1+dfsg-1]
[08:21] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks
[08:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-cryptohash-md5 [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.11.100.1-1] (no packageset)
[08:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-cryptohash-md5 [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.11.100.1-1] (no packageset)
[08:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-cryptohash-md5 [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.11.100.1-1] (no packageset)
[08:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-cryptohash-md5 [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.11.100.1-1] (no packageset)
[08:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-cryptohash-md5 [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.11.100.1-1] (no packageset)
[08:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-cryptohash-md5 [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.11.100.1-1] (no packageset)
[08:34] <LocutusOfBorg> apw, pleeeeeeeeease ^^
[08:35] <cjwatson> we do these without prodding normally
[08:35] <cjwatson> done
[08:36] <LocutusOfBorg> I remember you having some semi-automatic script for doing them, I need this one for haskell-tls, that blocks a bunch of rebuilds, thanks!
[08:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-cryptohash-md5 [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.11.100.1-1]
[08:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-cryptohash-md5 [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.11.100.1-1]
[08:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-cryptohash-md5 [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.11.100.1-1]
[08:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-cryptohash-md5 [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.11.100.1-1]
[08:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-cryptohash-md5 [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.11.100.1-1]
[08:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-cryptohash-md5 [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.11.100.1-1]
[08:38] <LocutusOfBorg> I would like to make it transition before Clint uploads new stuff in Debian :)
[09:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-cryptohash-sha256 [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.11.100.1-1] (no packageset)
[09:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hosc [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.15-1] (no packageset)
[09:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-libmpd [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.9.0.6-1] (no packageset)
[09:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hosc [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.15-1] (no packageset)
[09:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-libmpd [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.9.0.6-1] (no packageset)
[09:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-cryptohash-sha256 [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.11.100.1-1] (no packageset)
[09:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-cryptohash-sha256 [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.11.100.1-1] (no packageset)
[09:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hosc [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.15-1] (no packageset)
[09:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-libmpd [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.9.0.6-1] (no packageset)
[09:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-libmpd [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.9.0.6-1] (no packageset)
[09:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-cryptohash-sha256 [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.11.100.1-1] (no packageset)
[09:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hosc [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.15-1] (no packageset)
[09:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-cryptohash-sha256 [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.11.100.1-1] (no packageset)
[09:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-cryptohash-sha256 [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.11.100.1-1] (no packageset)
[09:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-cryptohash-sha256 [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.11.100.1-1]
[09:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-cryptohash-sha256 [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.11.100.1-1]
[09:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-cryptohash-sha256 [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.11.100.1-1]
[09:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-cryptohash-sha256 [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.11.100.1-1]
[09:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-cryptohash-sha256 [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.11.100.1-1]
[09:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-cryptohash-sha256 [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.11.100.1-1]
[09:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hosc [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.15-1] (no packageset)
[09:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hosc [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.15-1] (no packageset)
[09:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hosc [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.15-1]
[09:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hosc [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.15-1]
[09:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hosc [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.15-1]
[09:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hosc [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.15-1]
[09:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hosc [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.15-1]
[09:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hosc [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.15-1]
[09:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-libmpd [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.9.0.6-1] (no packageset)
[09:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-libmpd [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.9.0.6-1] (no packageset)
[09:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-libmpd [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.9.0.6-1]
[09:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-libmpd [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.9.0.6-1]
[09:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-libmpd [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.9.0.6-1]
[09:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-libmpd [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.9.0.6-1]
[09:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-libmpd [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.9.0.6-1]
[09:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-libmpd [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.9.0.6-1]
[10:16] <apw> xnox, are you aware of your copious adt failures in xenial for your systemd sru ?
[10:17] <xnox> apw, i am expecting some, i haven't started verfiying the bugs or the adt failures on xenial yet.
[10:18] <xnox> apw, i do know it fails with funky custom kernels.
[10:18] <xnox> and i have a plat to fix it (basically don't test things, which require modules that the funky kernel do not ship)
[10:18] <xnox> apw, e.g. http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/systemd/xenial/amd64
[10:20] <apw> xnox, i would be interested in what systemd wants to be using which those kernels are not supplying, as that sounds wrong to me
[10:21] <xnox> apw, scsi_debug kernel module or some such
[10:21] <apw> xnox, that sounds like something we might really want on those kernels for testing purposes
[10:21] <apw> xnox, have we had a bug on that ?
[10:21] <apw> (i feel we did for -azure or something and turned it back on)
[10:24] <xnox> there was a bug, which got waved away, because i thought it needs to be a dynamic module to constantly unload and reload with different parameters
[10:24] <xnox> i can open a new one.
[10:24] <xnox> with details.
[10:32] <apw> xnox, that might be true, that it has to be builtin for some reason which would stop that working
[10:32] <apw> xnox, best to get it documented so i don't ask you again :)
[10:36] <infinity> apw: I don't think we ever brought it to your team formally, but I kinda figured bloating the "slim" kernel packages with debug modules wasn't a thing we'd want.
[10:36] <infinity> (Unless said modules are an effective QA tool for the kernel itself)
[10:36] <apw> if they are just modules, and it is that one module, and it lets us have some testing ...
[10:36] <infinity> apw: Well yes, just modules, but the cloud kernels are concerned both with vmlinux size/speed and with overall package/image size, I thought?
[10:37] <infinity> (Otherwise, they'd have allmodconfig)
[10:38] <apw> infinity, they are, but we are also concerned about QA'ing them... so it is a trade off we should be conciously making for these cases and documenting
[10:38] <infinity> apw: Either way, it's poor form for the systemd tests to explode if the module isn't there, so doing a "modinfo && modprobe || exit 0" is still appropriate, IMO.
[10:38] <apw> infinity, that too, but "you don't want to do that"
[10:38] <infinity> I don't?
[10:39] <apw> (standard response from upstream about why it doesn't do that already)
[10:39] <apw> (just saving some time in reporting it)
[10:39] <infinity> Oh, ISWYM. :P
[10:40] <xnox> apw, we actually do that sort of thing in ./debian/tests/ and filter upstream tests to run already.
[10:40] <xnox> there is enough bullshit tests as it is =)
[10:40] <infinity> The only argument against would be if you believe the systemd tests should be responsible for testing of mod_scsi_debug is installed correctly, which I'd argue isn't their job.
[10:40] <apw> indeed
[10:40] <infinity> s/testing of/testing if/
[11:17] <ginggs> hi, facter and freedombox-setup autopkgtests on armhf need to be retried against bind9/1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-10.1ubuntu7 but autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi doesn't seem to like bind9's version in a trigger
[11:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxterminal (zesty-proposed/universe) [0.3.0-1ubuntu0.1 => 0.3.0-1ubuntu0.2] (no packageset)
[11:23] <apw> ginggs, in the sense it says it is an error ?
[11:24] <apw> have you URL escaped the version enough?
[11:32] <Laney> ginggs: I fixed it https://git.launchpad.net/autopkgtest-cloud/commit/?id=46e645dda67925ab11ce0f6a818c8d1defa1c92b
[11:32] <Laney> and retried facter - you can test with the other one
[11:39] <ginggs> Laney: fixed, thanks! freedombox-setup test request submitted
[11:40] <ginggs> ah, it was the P in 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-10.1ubuntu6 it didn't like
[11:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libseccomp (trusty-proposed/main) [2.2.3-2ubuntu1~ubuntu14.04.1 => 2.1.1-1ubuntu1~trusty4] (core)
[11:46] <Laney> PpPpP
[12:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libseccomp [source] (trusty-proposed) [2.1.1-1ubuntu1~trusty4]
[12:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ntp [sync] (zesty-proposed) [1:4.2.8p9+dfsg-2ubuntu1.1]
[12:28] <apw> ^ shadowed by a security update and already replaced in the queue
[12:56] <xnox> Laney, i am confused about britney now.
[12:56] <xnox> trying: systemd libmicrohttpd greenbone-security-assistant kodi ola janus yubikey-server-c openzwave-controlpanel psensor bfgminer libjson-rpc-cpp nageru gnunet opensips
[12:56] <xnox> skipped: systemd libmicrohttpd greenbone-security-assistant kodi ola janus yubikey-server-c openzwave-controlpanel psensor bfgminer libjson-rpc-cpp nageru gnunet opensips (27, 25, 7)
[12:56] <xnox>     got: 2+0: a-1:a-0:a-0:i-0:p-0:s-1
[12:56] <xnox>     * s390x: pcp-webapi
[12:56] <xnox>     - splitting the component into single items and retrying them
[12:56] <xnox> however, it all installs fine.
[12:56] <xnox> i've tried now in the sbuild chroot and install _all_ packages from that set works, including the pcp-webapi
[12:58] <LocutusOfBorg> on s390x^
[12:59] <LocutusOfBorg> maybe it is uninstallable on that arch only
[13:00] <LocutusOfBorg> or maybe pcp is blocked by perl (not considered), so it can't migrate :)
[13:00] <LocutusOfBorg> xnox, ^^ this one
[13:00] <xnox> right, not considered.
[13:01] <LocutusOfBorg> sorry for that :( I feel guilty
[13:01] <LocutusOfBorg> s/feel/am
[13:01] <xnox> well, i guess i can build pcp against old perl to make it migrate the lighttpd transition
[13:02] <LocutusOfBorg> and no-change rebuild after it migrates?
[13:02] <LocutusOfBorg> seems sane enough :)
[13:02] <xnox> yes.
[13:42] <Laney> xnox: pcp-webapi : Depends: libmicrohttpd10 (>= 0.9.35) but it is not installable
[13:42] <Laney> it's because of perl
[13:44] <xnox> ack.
[13:44] <Laney> why do you think that rebuilding will work?
[13:48] <LocutusOfBorg> rebuilding libmicrohttpd with a forced perl from -release should work
[13:49] <LocutusOfBorg> and then no-change rebuild again
[13:49]  * LocutusOfBorg didn't look closely
[13:49] <Laney> I don't understand why it would
[13:50] <Laney> but maybe I'm missing something
[13:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libvirt [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.3.1-1ubuntu10.11]
[13:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libvirt [source] (zesty-proposed) [2.5.0-3ubuntu5.3]
[13:50] <apw> ^ replaced in the queue by a later upload ...
[13:51] <LocutusOfBorg> because it would be unentangled from perl?
[13:51] <LocutusOfBorg> not even sure if that word exists
[14:01] <cjwatson> "disentangled" normally
[14:04] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks, seems better indeed
[14:12] <Laney> LocutusOfBorg: I think that all excuses that show up in Depends have to be valid regardless of any versioning, but maybe I'm wrong.
[14:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted walinuxagent [source] (zesty-proposed) [2.2.14-0ubuntu1~17.04.1]
[15:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted walinuxagent [source] (yakkety-proposed) [2.2.14-0ubuntu1~16.10.1]
[15:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted walinuxagent [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.2.14-0ubuntu1~16.04.1]
[15:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted walinuxagent [source] (trusty-proposed) [2.2.14-0ubuntu1~14.04.1]
[15:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (trusty-proposed/partner) [1:20170616.1-0ubuntu0.14.04.1 => 1:20170711.1-0ubuntu0.14.04.1] (no packageset)
[15:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (yakkety-proposed/partner) [1:20170616.1-0ubuntu0.16.10.1 => 1:20170711.1-0ubuntu0.16.10.1] (no packageset)
[15:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (xenial-proposed/partner) [1:20170616.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1 => 1:20170711.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1] (no packageset)
[15:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (zesty-proposed/partner) [1:20170616.1-0ubuntu0.17.04.1 => 1:20170711.1-0ubuntu0.17.04.1] (no packageset)
[15:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-image [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.1+17.04ubuntu1]
[15:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-image [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.1+16.10ubuntu1]
[15:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (trusty-proposed) [1:20170711.1-0ubuntu0.14.04.1]
[15:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:20170711.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1]
[15:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1:20170711.1-0ubuntu0.16.10.1]
[15:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (zesty-proposed) [1:20170711.1-0ubuntu0.17.04.1]
[16:48] <slangasek> bdmurray: I notice the SRU tooling in ubuntu-archive-tools now has some inconsistent defaulting of series (xenial vs. yakkety vs. zesty).  Do you agree that these should all default now to zesty?
[16:48] <slangasek> (queuediff; sru-remove; sru-review; kernel-sru-review)
[16:49] <slangasek> and gee it would be nice if we could use distro-data for this
[16:49] <apw> slangasek, perhaps they should just not default at all
[16:49] <bdmurray> slangasek: yes, defaulting to zesty makes sense
[16:49] <bdmurray> apw: but it saves you typing with sru-review at least!
[16:50] <infinity> Traditionally, they all defaulted to the latest stable, but I'm sort of with apw that defaults don't make sense.
[16:50] <infinity> The series arguments should probably just be mandatory.
[16:50] <apw> half the time not so much
[16:51] <slangasek> well if you don't think the default should exist, that means there's no chance you'll care if I change it ;)
[16:51] <bdmurray> I guess being deliberate could avoid errors
[16:51] <slangasek> I tend not to use the default
[16:51] <infinity> slangasek: I don't mind if you fix the current state to match the tradition of defaulting to the latest stable.
[16:51] <infinity> That doesn't change my statement that maybe we should nix the defaults entirely and make the argument mandatory. :P
[16:52] <infinity> Given we process SRUs for several series, and except for immediately after a release, the volume to "latest stable" isn't statistically high enough to warrant a default.
[16:52] <slangasek> sru-release deals with this by making it a positional argument, and I hate that inconsistency ;)
[16:53] <infinity> I prefer the positional argument, probably just because less typing.
[16:53] <bdmurray> infinity, slangasek: While you are "here" I noticed and fixed https://ubu.one/upgY2Z to not say to use the "-d" switch when upgrading from Y to Z.
[16:53] <infinity> But yes, consistency there would be nice too.
[16:53] <infinity> bdmurray: Oh, thanks!
[16:53] <infinity> bdmurray: Did older ones have that bug too?
[16:53] <apw> slangasek, i have seriously considered adding -s to sru-release _too_
[16:53] <slangasek> apw: as have I
[16:54] <apw> and likely will yet
[16:54] <infinity> I don't mind if they're all -s or all positional, but consistency would be nice.  I prefer positional, but meh.
[16:54] <slangasek> it follows logically that if we're not going to have a default that it should be positional
[16:54] <infinity> Probably because copy-proposed-kernel and sru-release are both positional, and I used both those tools a lot more than the others.
[16:54] <slangasek> but I'm not sold on this
[16:54] <bdmurray> infinity: looks like they do I wonder if there is a template somewhere
[16:55] <infinity> bdmurray: They're just copied forward AFAIK.
[16:55] <slangasek> infinity: you should stop using copy-proposed-kernel and use kernel-sru-review instead, I've landed all of sil2100's changes to support your use case :)
[16:55] <infinity> bdmurray: So the bug could go back years.
[16:55] <slangasek> infinity: btw did you catch my comment the other day about glibc being newer in zesty-security than in artful?
[16:55] <infinity> slangasek: I caught it when I came to last night, yeah.
[16:56] <slangasek> k. should we just do a binary copy-forward?
[16:56] <infinity> slangasek: I couple copy the zesty-updates version directly to artful-release if it's a concern.  New builds of glibc in artful are currently blocked on https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21725
[16:56]  * slangasek nods
[16:57] <infinity> I couple copy?  WTF, fingers?
[16:57] <infinity> I could copy.
[16:58] <flocculant> fingers are overrated
[16:58] <infinity> Mine have this nasty habit of, a few chars into a word, going "OMG, C-O-U, I KNOW A WORD THAT STARTS WITH THOSE LETTERS!!" and finishing an entirely different word.
[16:59] <nacc> courgette?
[16:59] <infinity> I'd suggest my fingers were programmed by Apple, but I've yet to call someone a ducking idiot on IRC, so it's probably not that.
[17:00] <nacc> heh
[17:02] <sil2100> slangasek: thanks for merging those in!
[17:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-image [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.1+16.04ubuntu1]
[17:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libqtpas [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.6~beta-3] (no packageset)
[17:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libqtpas [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.6~beta-3] (no packageset)
[17:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libqtpas [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.6~beta-3] (no packageset)
[17:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libqtpas [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.6~beta-3] (no packageset)
[17:40] <infinity> slangasek: Yo, you removed grafana but not its rdeps.
[17:40] <slangasek> wut
[17:40] <infinity> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/artful_uninst.txt
[17:41] <slangasek> I mean, I know I removed grafana
[17:41] <slangasek> but I don't do that without looking at the output of process-removals
[17:43] <infinity> slangasek: Curious.  reverse-depends shows zabbix for me (well, when called with -r zesty, since it won't work on artful anymoe)
[17:44] <infinity> slangasek: Anyhow, can probably just demote-to-proposed, since it can't possibly migrate back until a working grafana appears.
[17:44] <slangasek> infinity: yeah, it could simply be a matter of me having misread while clicking through a dozen-plus prompts
[17:44] <slangasek> agreed re: demote-to-proposed; are you doing or shall I?
[17:45] <infinity> slangasek: I'll do it now.
[17:45] <infinity> slangasek: And done.
[17:46] <infinity> I wonder what a zabbix is.
[17:47] <slangasek> a cross between a zebra, a rabbit, and a unix
[17:47] <infinity> And now I want a zebra-striped rabbit.
[17:47] <infinity> That explodes in 2038.
[17:48] <slangasek> and is full of daemons
[17:49] <infinity> slangasek: I still can't decide if that debian-project mail was sincere or a super-clever parody.
[17:49] <slangasek> hah
[18:08] <ahoneybun> infinity: who do I talk to about ubiquity merges?
[18:10] <infinity> ahoneybun: Generally cyphermox.
[21:16] <mwhudson> can an AA look at why src:astroid is in main and maybe demote it?
[21:19] <jbicha> mwhudson: I believe it's in main because of https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu-seeds/ubuntu.artful/view/head:/development#L51
[21:20] <mwhudson> jbicha: ah yeah, that explains why but not why, if that makes sense :)
[21:20] <jbicha> one of its rdepends is pylint which dropped to universe when we no longer required build-depends to be in main just before xenial's release
[21:21] <mwhudson> yeah i think it's probably leftover from that
[21:25] <jbicha> merge proposal welcome :)
[21:26] <chiluk> rbasak, slangasek, I'm going to rebackport intel-microcode once again and base it on the 20170707 revision, as that includes kabylake and skylake-x ..... previously it wasn't clear if they were fixed in 20170511, now we know for certain.. I'll try to package up the changes tonight.
[21:26] <chiluk> I plan on doing x, y, and z..
[21:27] <chiluk> rbasak / slangasek, should I open a new bug?  I'm not sure what to do since z is already marked resolved
[21:30] <rbasak> chiluk: in what way is Z not resolved?
[21:30] <rbasak> Am I missing some context here?
[21:58] <chiluk> rbasak intel just released a new microcode version on 7/7
[21:58] <chiluk> rbasak it autosynced to A, but Z is still on 20170511..
[21:59] <chiluk> the 20170511 doesn't include the fix for kabylake or skylake-x apparently
[21:59] <chiluk> I haven't been able to find a good page showing their changelog.
[22:04] <chiluk> best thing I have descibing changes is upstream debian.
[22:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (trusty-proposed/universe) [20170622-0ubuntu1~14.04.0 => 20170622-0ubuntu1~14.04.1] (ubuntu-cloud)
[22:27] <LocutusOfBorg> god, strip-nondeterminism is making everything fail to build
[22:28] <LocutusOfBorg> I'm doing a fake sync of 0.037 to avoid 0.036 being picked up by lp
[22:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [source] (trusty-proposed) [20170622-0ubuntu1~14.04.1]
[22:28] <LocutusOfBorg> hopefullly I did it in time
[22:28] <LocutusOfBorg> :(
[22:29] <LocutusOfBorg> (and correctly)
[22:29] <LocutusOfBorg> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=filezilla&suite=unstable
[22:29] <LocutusOfBorg> dh_strip_nondeterminism: debian/filezilla-common/usr/share/filezilla/resources/leds.png: Can't locate object method "new" via package "File::Temp" (perhaps you forgot to load "File::Temp"?) at /usr/share/perl5/File/StripNondeterminism/handlers/png.pm line 55.
[22:29] <LocutusOfBorg> https://bugs.debian.org/868077
[23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected shim-signed [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.32~17.04.1]
[23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (zesty-proposed/main) [1.28 => 1.32~17.04.1] (core)
[23:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected shim-signed [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.32~16.10.1]
[23:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected shim-signed [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.32~16.04.1]
[23:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (yakkety-proposed/main) [1.28~16.10.1 => 1.32~16.10.1] (core)
[23:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected shim-signed [source] (trusty-proposed) [1.32~14.04.1]
[23:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (xenial-proposed/main) [1.28~16.04.1 => 1.32~16.04.1] (core)
[23:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (trusty-proposed/main) [1.19~14.04.1 => 1.32~14.04.1] (core)
[23:34] <slangasek> xnox: do you know why ocaml appears to be terrible on arm64?
[23:37] <xnox> slangasek, i believe upstream is not ready for pie-by-default toolchain and the asm they emit is not PIC/PIE compatible for arm64 and s390x. https://lists.debian.org/debian-ocaml-maint/2017/07/msg00044.html
[23:38] <slangasek> xnox: so this is all broken in Debian also?
[23:38] <xnox> slangasek, i do not have any further assement, and I worry that to unwind coq and the rest, on arm64 and s390x i will need to revert ocaml from PIE to non-PIE and means rebuilding everything. I guess in a silo this time around.
[23:38] <slangasek> Did Debian do binary removals for the release?  Or do they have a pile of silently FTBFS packages on arm64+s390x?
[23:38] <slangasek> also, s390x was PIE-by-default from inception in Ubuntu
[23:39] <xnox> right, but 4.04 brings s390x native port, instead of byte-compiled port.
[23:39] <slangasek> ok
[23:39] <xnox> so this is the first native s390x.
[23:40] <xnox> slangasek, for FTBFS I am requesting these demotions to -proposed https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/polygen/+bug/1702913
[23:40] <xnox> 7 packages,
[23:40] <infinity> xnox: See debian/patches/pie-on-amd64.diff
[23:40] <xnox> but coq chain should be fixed / fixable, and dinto ppx chain of packages.
[23:40] <infinity> xnox: Could it be as simple as adding more arches to that (or just not making it conditional in our case)?
[23:41] <slangasek> ok well I won't be demoting to -proposed, I'll be removing from release
[23:41] <xnox> infinity, i saw that, and also the armhf pie patches. I've tried that in my nonvirt ppa, but I think i am missbuilding stuff on downgrade from pie to pic - cause i'm getting relocation errors in src:ocaml builds in my nonvirt ppa
[23:41] <xnox> slangasek, quite.
[23:41] <slangasek> xnox: also, if the packages in -proposed won't build without sourceful fixes, I'll be removing those too
[23:41] <xnox> infinity, but i may have confused myself, therefore need to try harder / more methodical.
[23:42] <xnox> slangasek, but then the fixes will not migrate from debian =(
[23:42] <slangasek> xnox: they won't get autosynced back, they'll get vorlonsynced
[23:42] <infinity> xnox: Ahh, yes, the arm PIC patch looks relevant too indeed.
[23:42] <xnox> slangasek, but i guess it is easy enough to scan for packages that are in testing; but not in devel-proposed.
[23:43] <xnox> infinity, sure, but the arm port in ocaml, has different codepaths / different asm emitted for pic=true vs false;
[23:43] <slangasek> xnox: the autosync script when run interactively gives you the option to re-sync newer versions of removed packages
[23:43] <xnox> infinity, no such thing for arm64 port though =(
[23:43] <slangasek> I just haven't automated that
[23:43] <xnox> slangasek, oooooh =)
[23:44] <infinity> xnox: s390, amd64, and arm have:
[23:44] <infinity> asmcomp/amd64/arch.ml:  [ "-fPIC", Arg.Set Clflags.pic_code,
[23:44] <infinity> asmcomp/amd64/arch.ml:    "-fno-PIC", Arg.Clear Clflags.pic_code,
[23:44] <slangasek> cappuccino is a genuine demote-to-proposed, though
[23:44] <infinity> xnox: I would expect adding something similar to arm64 would be trivial.
[23:44] <xnox> infinity, hm, that smells on the money
[23:45] <xnox> slangasek, also i am dubious about its usefulness - it is a dummy CPU spinner
[23:45] <xnox> intended to make ones machine look busy, whilst one is getting cappuccino from fresh pot
[23:46] <infinity> xnox: I use cappuccino to replace my broken Ctrl key.
[23:46] <slangasek> I completely misread that and thought you said from /a/ fresh pot
[23:46] <slangasek> and I was like, that's not how you cappuccino
[23:47] <infinity> slangasek: Yes, obtaining cappuccino from fresh marijuana makes a lot more sense.
[23:47] <slangasek> infinity: it does if you were paying attention in Portland
[23:48] <xnox> infinity, yeah oregon decriminsalised small scale possesion of pretty much everything.
[23:48] <infinity> Is it non-sequitor Tuesday?
[23:49] <xnox> Including heroin, cocaine, meth
[23:49] <xnox> infinity, Wednesday here
[23:50] <infinity> Oh, well, that makes sense then.  If it's Wednesday, decriminalising possession obviously means cappuccino is derived from weed.
[23:50] <infinity> I think.
[23:50] <infinity> I need to lie down.  My head hurts.
[23:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: marionnet (artful-proposed/primary) [0.90.6+bzr457-1build1]
[23:51]  * xnox ponders if queuebot is announcing vorlonsync in funny ways
[23:52] <infinity> It always announces New.
[23:52] <slangasek> xnox: that was me removing it and then noticing marionnet didn't actually need source changes, just fixed build-dep
[23:52] <slangasek> (and forgetting the --auto-approve)
[23:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted marionnet [sync] (artful-proposed) [0.90.6+bzr457-1build1]