=== Guest77276 is now known as karstensrage === maclin1 is now known as maclin === JanC_ is now known as JanC === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun [10:40] https://launchpad.net/~rip84 seems to be a spammer, can something be done about this? Or perhaps have his ability to send to lists revoked at least? [10:40] Subject: ☢beautiful things several messages like this, clearly unwanted. [10:47] Those are usually not actually the user's fault [10:47] But let's see [10:48] Unit193: Actually could you just report this on https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+addquestion? I don't have time to look into non-trivial things right now [10:49] Hmm, interesting. Thanks. [14:46] hello, I am hoping someone could process this https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/647848 [15:08] ricotz: Do you really still need the precise packages in that PPA, given that precise is EOL? [15:09] cjwatson, I will consider dropping them, the yakkety packages will go away sooner though [15:09] cjwatson, but I have enabled armhf/arm64/ppc64 which will take more space [15:12] ricotz: If we don't put at least a bit of pressure on then nobody bothers to remove things for EOL series :) [15:12] ricotz: I've bumped to 25GiB - let's see how much removals will help [15:13] cjwatson, already got blamed for dropping older LO releases (which were EOL some time too) once [15:13] Sure, but PPAs can't be a perpetual archive of everything [15:14] https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ubuntu/libreoffice-prereleases/+packages has 30GB which I assume should be enough [15:14] but ok, lets see if 25GB suffice [15:14] thanks [15:15] cjwatson, could you bump this to 25GB too? https://launchpad.net/~ricotz/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+packages [15:16] ricotz: done [15:16] usually the problem is the space after a new release build [15:16] thanks === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk [15:19] cjwatson, I see 12.04/precise like windows xp ;) it can be used on older offline systems [15:20] e.g. medical systems admins demanded nvidia-blob updates for precise in past too [15:22] ricotz: So this is all well and good but we have finite and exhaustible space [15:22] I suggest using some other site for long-term archiving if you need it [15:25] The PPA hosting system isn't very easily expandable without some significant infrastructure work, and at the moment it's at about 81% used - i.e. you just asked for over 1% of the total remaining capacity [15:26] So we have to ensure there's at least some pushback or we will run out [15:26] It's there to be used, but don't be surprised when we raise eyebrows at large quota requests [15:27] I see, are there any actions on ppa which already exceed their limit? [15:28] cjwatson, look at the quota https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-security/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+packages [15:29] 16:26 It's there to be used, but don't be surprised when we raise eyebrows at large quota requests [15:29] Exceeding the limit should at least be a prompt to remove publications for obsolete series [15:30] Yeah, a few security PPAs have effectively unlimited quotas because the cost of delay if they overshoot during a tight embargo period is worse than the cost of disk [15:30] That one isn't expected to be anything close to used [15:30] Hm from your ping timeout I guess you missed a bit more [15:30] 16:25 The PPA hosting system isn't very easily expandable without some significant infrastructure work, and at the moment it's at about 81% used - i.e. you just asked for over 1% of the total remaining capacity [15:30] 16:26 So we have to ensure there's at least some pushback or we will run out [15:34] cjwatson, alright, thanks for the info === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk === rumble is now known as grumble