| RAOF | robert_ancell: I'm happy to look at any SRUs you want to drive through. | 01:28 |
|---|---|---|
| RAOF | As long as you also make sure they're tested, so they don't sit on our pending dashboard for the better part of a year :) | 01:29 |
| robert_ancell | RAOF, \o/ | 01:39 |
| robert_ancell | RAOF, the first one is snapd-glib - bug 1699005 | 01:40 |
| ubot5 | bug 1699005 in snapd-glib (Ubuntu Zesty) "Update to 1.13" [Wishlist,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1699005 | 01:40 |
| robert_ancell | This one should be fairly uncontroversial, since it's mostly about matching functionality with snapd and it wasn't used in any depth until artful. | 01:40 |
| RAOF | “Doesn't support new APIs” is not normally SRU material :) | 01:46 |
| RAOF | But, obviously, snapd-glib is different. | 01:46 |
| robert_ancell | RAOF, yeah, is there a more paperwork required to make that more palatable? | 01:46 |
| robert_ancell | I need to write a Wiki page for an SRU exception, but plan to do that for the next SRU | 01:47 |
| RAOF | robert_ancell: You probably want to do somethinrg based on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SnapdUpdates | 01:47 |
| robert_ancell | RAOF, so, I need to write that page for this SRU or we can continue without it? | 02:08 |
| RAOF | We can probably continue without it this time. | 02:08 |
| RAOF | Please get one in future, though :) | 02:08 |
| RAOF | Actually, what are the rdepends on snapd-glib in 16.04? and 17.04? | 02:08 |
| robert_ancell | RAOF, nothing | 02:10 |
| robert_ancell | Actually, no, gnome-software is using it but only one method call (to access snapd-login-service) | 02:10 |
| === maclin1 is now known as maclin | ||
| RAOF | My, my, that's a lot of code. | 02:25 |
| RAOF | robert_ancell: So, what's the test plan for snapd-glib? | 02:26 |
| robert_ancell | RAOF, check that gnome-software still works | 02:26 |
| robert_ancell | And run the tests inside the source tree | 02:26 |
| RAOF | We might need to have something a little more detailed :) | 02:26 |
| RAOF | The thing you'd need to test in gnome-software is that (a) it starts up, (b) you can try and install a snap without being logged in to your SSO account and it'll prompt you to log in, and (c) once you're logged in you can install a snap? | 02:28 |
| RAOF | Oh, and I guess that being logged in to the SSO account persists. | 02:28 |
| RAOF | ? | 02:28 |
| robert_ancell | Just that it prompts you when you don't have credentials and can install with them | 02:28 |
| robert_ancell | The credentials are managed by g-s, so that shouldn't need testing | 02:28 |
| RAOF | OK. Stick that up on the bug, and I'll wave in into -proposed. | 02:34 |
| robert_ancell | RAOF, as a comment or the test case? | 02:38 |
| RAOF | As the test case (please edit the bug description) | 02:38 |
| robert_ancell | RAOF, done | 02:40 |
| robert_ancell | RAOF, I didn't propose this to Yakkety since it's days from EOL. That wont be an issue will it? | 02:41 |
| RAOF | Nope. | 02:41 |
| robert_ancell | RAOF, OK, next one is updating gnome-software to 3.20.5 in xenial (bug 1703461) | 02:42 |
| ubot5 | bug 1703461 in gnome-software (Ubuntu Xenial) "Update to 3.20.5" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1703461 | 02:42 |
| robert_ancell | This one is a bit scary, but ultimately I think puts us in a better position than we are currently | 02:43 |
| robert_ancell | There's a couple of uploads, but 3.20.5-0ubuntu0.16.04.5 should be the right one (reject the others) | 02:44 |
| RAOF | Well, at least you've pre-filed the paperwork for this one (the GNOME standing exception) ☺ | 02:44 |
| RAOF | I shall check gnome-software after lunch. | 02:44 |
| robert_ancell | RAOF, cool, thanks | 02:44 |
| === marlinc_ is now known as marlinc | ||
| didrocks | good morning | 06:12 |
| jibel | morning didrocks | 06:12 |
| didrocks | duflu: on bug #1704050, how do you try to force the wayland session in gdm? I only have one entry "ubuntu", which should prefers X right now | 06:19 |
| ubot5 | bug 1704050 in gdm3 (Ubuntu) "[regression] Can't log in to Wayland Gnome sessions at all" [Critical,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1704050 | 06:20 |
| didrocks | there is no "ubuntu on wayland" session like in lightdm | 06:20 |
| duflu | didrocks, There is Ubuntu on Wayland _and_ GNOME on Wayland :) | 06:20 |
| didrocks | duflu: hum, I don't see that one, despite having the session available | 06:20 |
| didrocks | (on disk) | 06:20 |
| duflu | Also, I'm working on Wayland :) | 06:20 |
| didrocks | duflu: I would like to have that session to reproduce :p | 06:21 |
| * duflu uploads ThinkStation to didrocks | 06:21 | |
| * didrocks waits :) | 06:21 | |
| didrocks | duflu: more seriously, do you think there can be some autodetection making my hw blacklisted in some way? | 06:22 |
| didrocks | like does wayland has a helper to test like we had in nux? | 06:22 |
| duflu | didrocks, I don't know... The only error I get is from X | 06:22 |
| duflu | Is there a gdm3 log? | 06:22 |
| didrocks | duflu: unrelated to that error | 06:22 |
| didrocks | duflu: just in general, as you are working on wayland, you may know about that detection mechanism | 06:23 |
| didrocks | duflu: yes, in the journal | 06:23 |
| * didrocks doesn't see anything related | 06:23 | |
| duflu | didrocks, No like many people I'm just fighting to make things work with Wayland. I don't really *get it* :) | 06:23 |
| didrocks | duflu: it's an interesting side-effect of some code I changed (appending a session before prepending) | 06:24 |
| didrocks | but grrrr that I can't get a wayland option | 06:24 |
| duflu | didrocks, my artful install is old. Started with Unity7, then added Ubuntu Gnome, then lots of updates... | 06:25 |
| didrocks | same here | 06:25 |
| didrocks | I wonder if the list is built twice in gdm | 06:25 |
| didrocks | and so, there is an index mismatch | 06:25 |
| didrocks | which might explain your bug | 06:26 |
| duflu | In fact I have 8 shells to choose from :) | 06:26 |
| didrocks | :p | 06:26 |
| duflu | Oops, no errors logged because I'm using the workaround | 06:27 |
| didrocks | I bet something is assuming in the code to have wayland sessions before X one on their list | 06:28 |
| duflu | Oh I see. Yes maybe something is assuming the array order never changes | 06:29 |
| didrocks | mind running with debug enabled? https://help.gnome.org/admin/gdm/stable/troubleshooting.html.en | 06:31 |
| duflu | OK, will reproduce and check for logs in a sec | 06:31 |
| didrocks | as I can't reproduce as not having that session listed, I would like to keep the same logic of appending wayland sessions and fixing the other part of the code making a wrong assumption | 06:31 |
| duflu | didrocks, Jul 13 14:31:15 haz gdm3[1046]: Cannot find a command for specified session: ubuntu-wayland | 06:33 |
| didrocks | hum, anything else more helpful in debug mode? | 06:34 |
| didrocks | I can try a patch in the dark and push to a ppa for you to test | 06:35 |
| duflu | didrocks, lots in debug: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/328568645/gdmfail-debug-log.txt | 06:38 |
| didrocks | Jul 13 14:35:32 haz gdm3[1050]: GdmSession: File 'ubuntu-wayland.desktop' not found: Valid key file could not be found in search dirs | 06:38 |
| didrocks | so, changing the session order hide it | 06:38 |
| didrocks | you have only one desktop file with that name on your disk, correct? | 06:39 |
| didrocks | under /usr/share/wayland-sessions/ubuntu-wayland.desktop | 06:39 |
| duflu | didrocks, $ ls -l /usr/share/wayland-sessions | 06:39 |
| duflu | total 12 | 06:39 |
| duflu | -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 218 Jul 12 18:18 gnome-wayland.desktop | 06:39 |
| duflu | -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 221 Jul 12 18:18 ubuntu-wayland.desktop | 06:39 |
| duflu | -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 126 Feb 5 17:57 weston.desktop | 06:39 |
| didrocks | yep, all looks good | 06:39 |
| didrocks | so, libgdm reads in revert orders | 06:40 |
| didrocks | I wonder if that's this list which is unsync | 06:40 |
| duflu | If it's an array, maybe something is already assuming the order is fixed? So prepending is dangerous | 06:40 |
| didrocks | duflu: it's the contrary | 06:41 |
| didrocks | duflu: it was prepending | 06:41 |
| didrocks | we are appending | 06:41 |
| didrocks | https://launchpad.net/~didrocks/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+build/13081407 is a stab in the dark, continuing to look meanwhlie | 06:42 |
| didrocks | hum | 06:45 |
| didrocks | with the older version | 06:45 |
| didrocks | when you log into the "ubuntu" session (X one) | 06:45 |
| didrocks | was it really starting X? | 06:45 |
| didrocks | or wayland? | 06:45 |
| duflu | didrocks, does appending break the 0 element on the end? https://developer.gnome.org/glib/stable/glib-Arrays.html#g-array-new | 06:45 |
| didrocks | duflu: I've used glist appending for years, no, it does the right thing and shift the 0 element on the end | 06:46 |
| didrocks | duflu: but yeah, do you mind trying this? ^ | 06:47 |
| didrocks | so downgrade to working gdm | 06:47 |
| didrocks | try the ubuntu session | 06:47 |
| didrocks | check if it's running wayland | 06:47 |
| didrocks | (I bet it does) | 06:47 |
| didrocks | where you expect X | 06:47 |
| duflu | didrocks, failed to build? | 06:47 |
| didrocks | duflu: yeah, let's not worry about the small patch right now | 06:48 |
| didrocks | just downgrade to -5 | 06:48 |
| * duflu reboots to check it's really X | 06:48 | |
| didrocks | I'm pretty sure I understand the issue | 06:48 |
| jbicha | duflu: The gGNOME on Wayland session comes from the gnome-session binary package | 06:48 |
| duflu | Yes it's really Xorg | 06:48 |
| didrocks | ah, so scratch that | 06:49 |
| didrocks | or maybe… it has smart checks in that way | 06:49 |
| jbicha | I had the same problem with "Ubuntu on Wayland" not working today, but I had a kernel upgrade and more and hadn't tried isolating the cause yet | 06:49 |
| duflu | jbicha, bisected to gdm already | 06:50 |
| duflu | jbicha, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm3/+bug/1704050/comments/1 | 06:50 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1704050 in gdm3 (Ubuntu) "[regression] Can't log in to Wayland Gnome sessions at all" [Critical,Confirmed] | 06:50 |
| didrocks | jbicha: the issue is the append instead of prepend | 06:50 |
| didrocks | search_dirs = get_system_session_dirs (self), | 06:50 |
| jbicha | thanks | 06:50 |
| didrocks | no debug to know what are search_dirs (it should be the list with Xorg, then wayland) | 06:51 |
| jbicha | speaking of gdm, did you see Security's response at LP: #1686393 :( | 06:51 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1686393 in gdm3 (Ubuntu) "[MIR] gdm3" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1686393 | 06:51 |
| duflu | That said I shall reapply the workaround to reconfirm | 06:51 |
| didrocks | duflu: ah, you are not in -5? | 06:52 |
| duflu | Yep, 3.24.2-1ubuntu5 works fine | 06:52 |
| didrocks | and if you log into ubuntu | 06:52 |
| didrocks | you have the X session | 06:52 |
| duflu | didrocks, my above debugging was from 7 (where it's broken) | 06:52 |
| didrocks | with that gdm version? ^ | 06:52 |
| didrocks | ahhhh | 06:52 |
| didrocks | please try with 5 | 06:52 |
| duflu | didrocks, OK I have 5. Retry what part? | 06:53 |
| didrocks | log into the ubuntu session (the X one) | 06:53 |
| didrocks | check it's running X and not wayland | 06:53 |
| didrocks | jbicha: do you know what checks are done on gdm startup? I don't have any wayland session available on my machine | 06:53 |
| duflu | didrocks, Yes Ubuntu is 'Xorg' | 06:54 |
| duflu | in 5 | 06:54 |
| didrocks | ok, so definitively not that theory | 06:54 |
| didrocks | thanks duflu | 06:54 |
| didrocks | ok, let's revert the order and set a default session for now | 06:54 |
| didrocks | sounds like the sanest | 06:54 |
| duflu | Weird. It looks like private information within that function. Order wouldn't matter | 06:54 |
| didrocks | yeah | 06:55 |
| didrocks | that's why I'm really puzzled | 06:55 |
| jbicha | didrocks: do you want to merge this in when you do the upload? https://code.launchpad.net/~willcooke/gdm/ubuntu/+merge/327165 | 06:55 |
| didrocks | jbicha: maybe will should first fix the changelog conflicts | 06:56 |
| didrocks | that would be a good exercise for him :) | 06:56 |
| didrocks | duflu: the issue is from https://github.com/GNOME/gdm/blob/master/daemon/gdm-session.c#L401 | 06:57 |
| didrocks | it can't find that ubuntu-wayland.desktop here | 06:57 |
| didrocks | which is the list we just build… | 06:57 |
| didrocks | with append instead of prepend | 06:57 |
| jbicha | stop changing the changelog then ;) but yeah, his changelog does need cleaning up :) | 06:58 |
| duflu | Also willcooke has a pending proposal that will conflict | 06:58 |
| duflu | Oh, you mean that one | 06:59 |
| didrocks | the 2 others parts of the code depending on #ENABLE_USER_DISPLAY_SERVER doesn't seem related to anything order related | 06:59 |
| didrocks | (so meaning: if people build with that disabled, maybe they face the same bug) | 06:59 |
| didrocks | duflu: do you have time for a quick local test + build? | 06:59 |
| didrocks | I would be interested in printing out search_dirs after the line I pointed ^ to know the list content | 07:00 |
| duflu | Sure, I've been distracted from my actual work for days already :) | 07:00 |
| didrocks | duflu: keep me posted once you get that value | 07:01 |
| duflu | Ah, I forgot I hadn't answered some upstream questions yet. Even more behind | 07:03 |
| duflu | In other news: Is there a reason why the Gnome Software icon is different between artful machines? Is that an upgrade issue ? | 07:04 |
| duflu | (so it's only changed in fresh installs) | 07:04 |
| didrocks | duflu: like fresh install has an ubuntu icon, but not on upgrade, it's the Gnome one? | 07:05 |
| duflu | Yeah | 07:05 |
| didrocks | duflu: XDG_DATA_DIRS is correct and I have an impacted machine | 07:05 |
| jbicha | duflu: for me, I get the Ubuntu Software branding in 'Ubuntu' but GNOME Software in 'Ubuntu on Wayland' | 07:05 |
| didrocks | so need to look at it, I filed a bug for this already | 07:05 |
| didrocks | jbicha: yeah, that's expected (and we should fix that) | 07:05 |
| duflu | OK, no problem. | 07:05 |
| duflu | In other other news: Whose idea was it to design buttons that don't look like buttons in Gnome? | 07:06 |
| didrocks | I wonder if G_N_ELEMENTS() isn't puzzled by NULL though | 07:06 |
| duflu | didrocks, It's a null terminated array so maybe that flag tells it to count the size manually | 07:07 |
| === [PARTY]Varka3rd is now known as [PARTY]Varka | ||
| didrocks | yeah | 07:07 |
| duflu | Interesting | 07:07 |
| didrocks | mind priniting its result? | 07:07 |
| didrocks | (the G_N_ELEMENTS() count) | 07:08 |
| didrocks | I really wonder if that code branch never worked | 07:08 |
| jamesh | G_N_ELEMENTS() is compile time: it doesn't know what is stored in the array | 07:08 |
| duflu | Yeah that's for C arrays not GArray | 07:09 |
| duflu | #define G_N_ELEMENTS(arr) (sizeof (arr) / sizeof ((arr)[0])) | 07:09 |
| oSoMoN | good morning desktoppers | 07:09 |
| didrocks | hey oSoMoN, jamesh | 07:09 |
| duflu | Hi oSoMoN | 07:09 |
| oSoMoN | salut didrocks, hey duflu, jamesh | 07:09 |
| duflu | didrocks, actually I can tell you just by reading it that use if G_N_ELEMENTS is wrong | 07:14 |
| duflu | It won't find the wayland entry because that's after a NULL | 07:14 |
| duflu | Problem solved | 07:15 |
| didrocks | duflu: wait, the count doesn't have NULL, so only the number of elements | 07:15 |
| didrocks | as it's based on sizeof(arr)/sizeof(elem) | 07:15 |
| duflu | didrocks, yeah NULL gets appended, before wayland | 07:15 |
| duflu | So only prepending works | 07:16 |
| didrocks | hum | 07:16 |
| didrocks | G_N_ELEMENTS (x_search_dirs) is 4 | 07:16 |
| didrocks | no? | 07:16 |
| duflu | Should be 5 (I am not up to debugging yet) | 07:16 |
| didrocks | as NULL takes 0? | 07:16 |
| didrocks | (in term of size) | 07:16 |
| duflu | didrocks, No it's the number of pointers in the array, hence 5 | 07:16 |
| didrocks | ohhhh | 07:16 |
| didrocks | yeah, it's pointers ofc | 07:17 |
| didrocks | so yeah, NULL is set in search_array | 07:17 |
| duflu | Good news - didrocks did the right thing and was fooled by bad code | 07:17 |
| didrocks | and then, wayland is appended | 07:17 |
| duflu | Maybe | 07:17 |
| didrocks | yeah, that code branch never worked | 07:17 |
| didrocks | tell me once you get that debug printed out :p | 07:18 |
| duflu | Actually the code is good, but it was nonobvious that append would not work | 07:18 |
| didrocks | well | 07:18 |
| didrocks | look at the original code | 07:18 |
| didrocks | https://github.com/GNOME/gdm/blob/master/daemon/gdm-session.c#L360 | 07:18 |
| didrocks | if you define ENABLE_WAYLAND_SUPPORT and not define ENABLE_USER_DISPLAY_SERVER, you are in that case | 07:18 |
| didrocks | (which doesn't work) | 07:18 |
| duflu | didrocks, Oh yes, the bug already existed | 07:19 |
| duflu | So indeed "Good news - didrocks did the right thing and was fooled by bad code" | 07:19 |
| didrocks | :p | 07:19 |
| duflu | didrocks, I think someone can fix that without further testing...? | 07:20 |
| didrocks | yeah | 07:20 |
| didrocks | do you want to do it? I can do it, just don't want to steal your commit :) | 07:21 |
| duflu | didrocks, well I can test and verify it for sure... no problem | 07:21 |
| didrocks | and praise when reported upstream | 07:21 |
| didrocks | ;) | 07:21 |
| didrocks | duflu: tell me once you get your patch tested and I'll just sponsor it | 07:37 |
| duflu | didrocks, yeah I'll do it today. Probably Ubuntu before upstream tho | 07:38 |
| didrocks | duflu: sounds good | 07:38 |
| didrocks | duflu: just open a bug in bugzilla and reference it on the quilt patch | 07:38 |
| didrocks | (even if I think next time we touch that patch we'll just inverse the logic back to favor wayland sessions) | 07:39 |
| Laney | morning | 08:02 |
| flexiondotorg | Morning Laney didrocks duflu oSoMoN jamesh | 08:03 |
| didrocks | hey Laney, flexiondotorg | 08:03 |
| oSoMoN | good morning Laney, flexiondotorg | 08:03 |
| duflu | Morning flexiondotorg | 08:04 |
| duflu | Morning Laney | 08:04 |
| Laney | hey flexiondotorg hey didrocks hey oSoMoN hey duflu | 08:06 |
| Laney | how's it going? | 08:06 |
| oSoMoN | not too bad round here | 08:06 |
| didrocks | good, started with some interesting gdm bug :p | 08:06 |
| Laney | oh yeah | 08:07 |
| Laney | what's that? | 08:07 |
| didrocks | but everything is under control once someone has a session to test :) | 08:07 |
| didrocks | Laney: basically, the branch with "append" instead of "prepend" never worked | 08:07 |
| didrocks | the bottom of it is that the previous list we append to already has a NULL pointer | 08:07 |
| didrocks | so, the wayland session was never found | 08:07 |
| didrocks | (patch to get upstream, even if I don't think anyone is building with the 2 #ifdef condition) | 08:08 |
| Laney | ah right | 08:08 |
| willcooke | morning all | 08:08 |
| didrocks | hey willcooke | 08:11 |
| * didrocks needs to add a new expection in the seed for a -dbg package | 08:11 | |
| didrocks | thunderbird pulls thunderbird-gnome-support-dbg in main, which brings thunderbird-gnome-support, which brings indicator-messages, which pulls libindicator-messaging-menu, which … | 08:13 |
| seb128 | hey Laney willcooke | 08:17 |
| seb128 | or and other desktopers, looks like I was too busy to chat on other channels and forgot to say hi here | 08:17 |
| flexiondotorg | Morning willcooke seb128 | 08:18 |
| seb128 | hey flexiondotorg | 08:19 |
| oSoMoN | salut seb128 | 08:21 |
| oSoMoN | good morning willcooke | 08:21 |
| === JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
| willcooke | How's it going oSoMoN? I'm reading good comments about the new LO snap - great stuff! | 08:21 |
| oSoMoN | willcooke, doing good, thanks! trying to wrap up everything that’s on my list before I leave for holidays | 08:22 |
| ricotz | hey desktopers | 08:22 |
| oSoMoN | hey ricotz | 08:22 |
| ricotz | hey oSoMoN | 08:23 |
| willcooke | duflu, still around? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sound-theme-freedesktop/+bug/1703946 | 08:24 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1703946 in sound-theme-freedesktop (Ubuntu) "Dedicated mono test sound is unavailable" [Undecided,New] | 08:24 |
| willcooke | Do I just update the changelog to say artful? is it that simple? | 08:24 |
| duflu | willcooke, yes I think so | 08:26 |
| Laney | it's quite normal for the uploader to do that too | 08:27 |
| willcooke | ah, good to know. Well, I'm happy to just edit the debdiff and reattach it, if that helps | 08:27 |
| willcooke | I'll attach one with the change anywy, wont take a sec | 08:27 |
| duflu | Laney: I was wondering that, thanks | 08:34 |
| duflu | Not like it's checksummed | 08:34 |
| duflu | didrocks: OK, done. Works too. | 08:43 |
| seb128 | lut oSoMoN | 08:44 |
| Laney | hey seb128 | 08:45 |
| Laney | you good? | 08:45 |
| didrocks | duflu: excellent, MP against the ubuntu branch? | 08:46 |
| duflu | didrocks, https://code.launchpad.net/~vanvugt/gdm/fix-1704050/+merge/327360 | 08:46 |
| didrocks | duflu: does it work with the prepend case still? | 08:47 |
| didrocks | (when you submit it upstream) | 08:47 |
| didrocks | duflu: just: mind opening a bug upstream and reference it from your patch? | 08:47 |
| duflu | didrocks, already have an upstream bug with the patch | 08:48 |
| didrocks | duflu: just add it on top of debian/patches/Avoid-double-NULL-terminated-array-LP-1704050.patch | 08:48 |
| didrocks | that way, we can track | 08:48 |
| duflu | didrocks, I was reluctant to reformat as I could not remember the rules. Also upstream already have that patch. The upstream bug is linked in Launchpad now | 08:49 |
| didrocks | duflu: linking in LP is good enough, thanks! | 08:49 |
| didrocks | merging and sponsoring | 08:49 |
| didrocks | hum, no tag and you set it to artful | 08:51 |
| * didrocks adds a tag | 08:51 | |
| duflu | didrocks, we were just talking about that. Do you prefer UNRELEASED if not tagged? | 08:52 |
| didrocks | duflu: I generally prefer UNRELEASED not tagged, but not a biggie | 08:52 |
| duflu | OK then willcooke got it more right | 08:53 |
| duflu | For reviewer=didrocks | 08:53 |
| didrocks | (so, basically, a separate commit to set it to artful + tag for release) | 08:53 |
| duflu | didrocks, cool will do in future | 08:54 |
| duflu | I don't think I usually/ever propose to ubuntu branches | 08:54 |
| didrocks | duflu: no worry! sponsored :) | 08:54 |
| duflu | So sorry in advance to willcooke. I am making new conflicts in gdm | 08:55 |
| didrocks | ;) | 08:55 |
| didrocks | highly demanded package | 08:56 |
| duflu | didrocks, I _assume_ and it seems to be true that append does go before the implicit NULL :) | 08:56 |
| didrocks | duflu:yeah, I hope that the prepend case does have an implicit NULL so that your fix is accepted :) | 08:57 |
| duflu | didrocks, I think prepend will always work regardless of the contents | 08:58 |
| didrocks | I meant, if there is no match and the list isn't ended by NULL… | 08:58 |
| duflu | didrocks, I think new = {NULL} | 08:59 |
| seb128 | Laney, I'm good thanks, you? | 09:02 |
| Laney | good! | 09:03 |
| Laney | went to folk club last night, was funny | 09:03 |
| seb128 | nice | 09:05 |
| duflu | didrocks, do you recomment UNRELEASED for debdiffs too? | 09:06 |
| duflu | recommend | 09:06 |
| didrocks | duflu: no, debdiff can be the final thing, ready to sponsor | 09:09 |
| duflu | Makes sense | 09:10 |
| duflu | both ways | 09:10 |
| didrocks | the only thing with UNRELEASED in a branch is that the author can ammend, commit separated a fix while still being in the "UNRELEASED" part | 09:10 |
| didrocks | amend* | 09:10 |
| flexiondotorg | Could one of the desktopers merge this please - https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mate-dev/indicator-session/mate-integration/+merge/325600 | 09:13 |
| flexiondotorg | I've addressed all the feedback and been running a PPA build for several weeks. All good from my point of view. | 09:13 |
| duflu | didrocks, next time please copy the commit message field :) | 09:19 |
| didrocks | duflu: I didn't commit anything | 09:19 |
| didrocks | duflu: as you set it to "artful" | 09:20 |
| duflu | OK I'm confused | 09:20 |
| duflu | The Ubuntu branch history shows my garbage commit messages, but failed to use the formal commit message from the MP | 09:21 |
| didrocks | just bzr pull && bzr push (after adding the tag): the git way when you are on align with master | 09:21 |
| didrocks | aligned* | 09:22 |
| duflu | didrocks, yeah the bzr way is different. If landing by hand you need to copy the commit message from the MP because it's not in bzr | 09:22 |
| didrocks | duflu: depends on the branch, some prefer to always merge, some not. | 09:23 |
| duflu | didrocks, fair enough. I'll keep it in mind | 09:23 |
| didrocks | we should just standardize on one way to do it IMHO | 09:23 |
| didrocks | so that you don't have wrong expectations, I see what you wanted… | 09:24 |
| didrocks | (also one tool, not some branches in git vs other in bzr) | 09:24 |
| didrocks | I guess a discussion at the start of a cycle, one all the transitions are over and polish done :) | 09:24 |
| seb128 | L_aney is going to work on the git-for-packaging for Debian pkg-gnome during debconf | 09:37 |
| seb128 | so we might want to look at building on top of that next cycle then | 09:37 |
| didrocks | nice! | 09:37 |
| seb128 | a discussion to have for when we get our team week | 09:37 |
| didrocks | yep | 09:37 |
| * duflu -> vegetable peeling fun | 09:57 | |
| willcooke | quick reboot | 10:27 |
| didrocks | popey: if you are too impatient to wait for gdm to published in the release pocket, it's in -proposed right now | 10:29 |
| Laney | a gdm3 upload a day | 10:30 |
| Laney | keeps the something something away | 10:30 |
| didrocks | ;) | 10:30 |
| didrocks | "bugs" for one someting | 10:30 |
| didrocks | but need another adjective | 10:30 |
| didrocks | am I the only one to get this with wayland + our theme on gnome-terminal: http://imgur.com/a/k48Se ? | 10:31 |
| didrocks | ah, that's the transparency feature | 10:31 |
| jibel | didrocks, it's a known bug | 10:31 |
| Laney | it's reported | 10:32 |
| didrocks | ah nice, do you know if our transparency patch is the same than in fedora? | 10:32 |
| * didrocks will look | 10:32 | |
| jibel | bug 1650395 | 10:32 |
| ubot5 | bug 1650395 in gnome-terminal (Ubuntu) "Large grey border around gnome-terminal shadows when transparency is enabled (wayland)" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1650395 | 10:32 |
| Laney | more or less | 10:33 |
| didrocks | interesting that the color is theme-dependent | 10:33 |
| * didrocks likes | 10:33 | |
| Laney | but maybe rishi fixed it or something | 10:33 |
| didrocks | my borders are bigger :) | 10:33 |
| Laney | and we need to pull i again | 10:33 |
| didrocks | yeah, would worth a look | 10:33 |
| Laney | he's got a repo with it in | 10:33 |
| didrocks | hum, do you want to test it? (I'm not going to do it today, just as you seem to know more where things are…) | 10:34 |
| didrocks | I'm happy next week to have a look otherwise | 10:34 |
| Laney | https://github.com/debarshiray/gnome-terminal | 10:34 |
| * didrocks got a new tab | 10:34 | |
| didrocks | thx | 10:34 |
| Laney | we took that and then added the theme colours stuff | 10:34 |
| Laney | will look eventually, but not right now | 10:35 |
| Laney | so whoever gets there first can :-) | 10:35 |
| didrocks | deal! | 10:35 |
| didrocks | :-) | 10:35 |
| Laney | actually I'll ask him quickly, that'll be easier | 10:36 |
| willcooke | has anyone tried artful on a wired ethternet connection? I can't get it to accept a DHCP address. Its being offered one, but seems to be ignoring it. cyphermox perhaps? | 11:09 |
| popey | didrocks: will test! | 11:14 |
| willcooke | popey, be a love and test wired network as well would you? | 11:17 |
| Laney | I'm on wired right now | 11:18 |
| Laney | these bits are wires alllllllll the way baby | 11:18 |
| willcooke | mannn | 11:19 |
| willcooke | that means its something on my network. Damn it. | 11:19 |
| * willcooke tries a live session | 11:19 | |
| popey | willcooke: i am on wired | 11:31 |
| willcooke | and it just works? | 11:32 |
| willcooke | curses | 11:32 |
| popey | wfm | 11:32 |
| * willcooke breaks out tcpdump | 11:33 | |
| popey | what does "nmcli d" say? | 11:33 |
| willcooke | I know it's requesting a dhcp address, I can see it on the server | 11:33 |
| willcooke | and in syslog | 11:33 |
| popey | i haven't setup wifi on this laptop yet | 11:34 |
| popey | only wired | 11:34 |
| popey | ok, connected to wifi, also works, and doesn't seem to have a problem switching between wired and wifi | 11:36 |
| andyrock | anyone aware of touchpad issues with xenial in the last few weeks? | 11:41 |
| andyrock | mostly with double finger scrolling and syntaptic device | 11:41 |
| popey | i haven't. been using a touchpad for the first time in a while these last couple of weeks and it's just as crazy as ever (ie. not a nipple) :D | 11:43 |
| seb128 | andyrock, what sort of issues? | 11:48 |
| Trevinho | popey: it's impossible to stay away from nipples :-D | 12:01 |
| Trevinho | I can't too | 12:01 |
| * Laney titters | 12:01 | |
| Trevinho | Laney: you should get a thinkpad or at least a thinkpad BT keyboard to love it more :-D | 12:01 |
| Trevinho | mpt: hey, remember that change for u-c-c, we defined the graphics levels as "High" and "Low", but I think we should also add the "auto-detect" mode... As by default we use that way, while we use the setting only when set | 12:04 |
| Trevinho | are you ok with that? | 12:04 |
| didrocks | FINALLY indicator-messages off main | 12:55 |
| seb128 | didrocks, well done | 13:05 |
| jbicha | seb128: upstreams says "no, fix your tools" :) https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=784877 | 13:08 |
| ubot5 | Gnome bug 784877 in general "Don't use variable for gettext package name" [Minor,Resolved: wontfix] | 13:08 |
| andyrock | seb128: seems like it does not work after login (the mouse) | 13:17 |
| andyrock | or a new created user session it works fine | 13:17 |
| popey | didrocks: nice work fixing gdm :) | 13:17 |
| andyrock | probably not a but (just a misconfiguration) | 13:17 |
| andyrock | but I'm wondering how I could fix it | 13:17 |
| didrocks | popey: well, it was co-analyze with duflu (I don't have the wayland session displayed at all here, had to force it) :) | 13:18 |
| didrocks | but thanks for confirming the fix worked! | 13:18 |
| seb128 | jbicha, I'm not surprised ;-) thanks for trying though! | 13:18 |
| jbicha | didrocks: I'm going to go ahead and merge and upload will's GDM bluetooth workaround now if you don't object | 13:18 |
| seb128 | andyrock, settings doesn't work? | 13:19 |
| jbicha | seb128: I might push it to Debian though since we're nearly in sync there | 13:19 |
| didrocks | jbicha: all is fine for me, I guess nobody plans to upload GDM in the next 20 minutes… :p | 13:19 |
| jbicha | lol | 13:19 |
| andyrock | seb128: there is no setting for the mouse | 13:20 |
| andyrock | at least for the touchpad | 13:20 |
| seb128 | andyrock, weird | 13:20 |
| seb128 | did you try binput? | 13:20 |
| andyrock | xinput? | 13:21 |
| andyrock | yep but the weird thing it that it's an user session problem | 13:21 |
| jbicha | didrocks: I'm fine with uploading the debdiff from LP: #1130137 now | 13:28 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1130137 in adwaita-icon-theme (Ubuntu) "Better sound settings icons" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1130137 | 13:28 |
| didrocks | jbicha: if you think upstream is going to fix it, yeah, feel free to sponsor it | 13:30 |
| didrocks | willcooke: ^ | 13:30 |
| didrocks | if it's something we will carry in the long term, a more maintainable solution is needed | 13:31 |
| seb128 | jbicha, unsure uploading the bluetooth workaround is right, that removes the motivation to push toward the real fix | 13:45 |
| seb128 | we can do workarounds around beta time if needed as plan B | 13:46 |
| jbicha | seb128: the bug affects Ubuntu GNOME since 16.04 LTS; the workaround kills bluetooth audio on the login screen but bluetooth audio in the session seems a lot more important | 14:01 |
| seb128 | jbicha, right, doesn't change my statement | 14:07 |
| seb128 | I mean devel is to fix issues the proper way | 14:08 |
| seb128 | workarounds are backup solutions when we can't get the proper fix | 14:08 |
| seb128 | jbicha, btw I'm surprised that it's affecting most distros, some have wiki instructions to workaround and nobody opened an upstream gdm bug about that before (I did it yesterday) | 14:08 |
| seb128 | jbicha, anyway I'm not strongly against it so if you want to upload the workaround feel free, I would just have done that at beta time (and SRU to help stable users) | 14:09 |
| jbicha | seb128: by the time you spoke up, I had already pushed gdm to bzr and tagged it but didn't quite dput yet, so I'm not sure how to fix it now | 14:15 |
| Laney | didrocks: http://people.canonical.com/~laney/weird-things/transparent.png | 14:16 |
| seb128 | jbicha, just dput it's not the end of the world | 14:16 |
| willcooke | I can add a known issue to the release notes now | 14:16 |
| seb128 | jbicha, and might make artful more enjoyable for those who are on it | 14:16 |
| jbicha | thanks, done | 14:17 |
| willcooke | popey, looks like we're going to "fix" the bt audio issue re: your blog post for testing ^ | 14:17 |
| popey | I'll add wording to say "this may or may not be fixed by the time you come to test", or something? | 14:17 |
| willcooke | popey, sure | 14:18 |
| didrocks | Laney: nice! with a new version of the patch? | 14:18 |
| Laney | rishi pointed me to one from fedora | 14:18 |
| didrocks | excellent! :) | 14:18 |
| willcooke | is it possible that two things are fighting over apt/sources.list? I've got loads of errors about things being configured multiple times all of a sudden | 14:22 |
| willcooke | I'm fixing it manually, but I dont know how it came to be like this | 14:22 |
| jbicha | Laney: btw, I'm interested in rishi's notifications patches for vte/terminal but I had trouble getting it to work months ago | 14:24 |
| jbicha | willcooke: that's LP: #1697120 and LP: #1579372 I believe you can workaround it by uninstalling apt-file | 14:25 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1697120 in apt-file (Ubuntu) "artful's apt-file complains about Ubuntu sources.list" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1697120 | 14:25 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1579372 in Launchpad itself "Update location of the Contents files on the mirrors" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1579372 | 14:25 |
| willcooke | jbicha, ahh | 14:25 |
| willcooke | jbicha, that's almost certainly what it was, thanks! | 14:25 |
| Laney | jbicha: vte.sh isn't run for us, because we run bash as a non-login shell. you'll need to change that option in your gnome-terminal profile preferences at least. | 14:29 |
| === Guest43546 is now known as fredp | ||
| === fredp is now known as Guest76071 | ||
| jbicha | did you see the response from Security on LP: #1686393 ? | 15:19 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1686393 in gdm3 (Ubuntu) "[MIR] gdm3" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1686393 | 15:19 |
| jbicha | Laney: were you planning on SRUing the terminal transparency fix? or I could… | 16:22 |
| Laney | No | 16:22 |
| Laney | Fixing things on wayland in old releases isn't a good use of my work time - so feel free | 16:22 |
| pitti | Laney: oh dear @ http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/running -- glibc plus KDE fun | 16:55 |
| Laney | pitti: and lgw01 is down | 16:55 |
| pitti | Laney: how are the minions holding up so far? | 16:56 |
| pitti | ouch | 16:56 |
| Laney | been hassling to get it fixed | 16:56 |
| pitti | glad that we have the -huge queues | 16:56 |
| Laney | hopefully we'll get back up to full capacity soon | 17:05 |
| Laney | otherwise I'll think about killing some of the queue | 17:06 |
| willcooke | night all | 18:45 |
| immu | hmm | 18:58 |
| * oSoMoN falls off the face of the internet for two weeks | 20:23 | |
| oSoMoN | see you! | 20:23 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
