[06:40] <marco25> are you guys getting any reports of any issues with the current 3 series for tor network or even tor broswer with zesty and yes I did try to look at bug reports
[06:42] <marco25> zesty is complete shitware if it all these issues i have had are a result of zesty
[06:42] <marco25> this is my post from #ubuntu
 in ubuntu 17.04 my pc randomly freezed for like 2 months finally fixed and hundreds of comments from people with same issue...tor series 3 is having problems in zesty seems to work for a lot of other people..tor browswer is crashing again..seems to be working for a lot of other people..and now chromium is not working....should i just go back to ubuntu 16.04 can i take a poll?
 i also had a issue with ubuntu going into a login loop as well
[06:43] <tsimonq2> Got a bug number?
[06:43] <marco25> which part
[06:43] <marco25> the first thing i said
[06:43] <tsimonq2> All of them if possible :P
[06:43] <marco25> that freezing that was fixed?
[06:44] <tsimonq2> If it's fixed, a bug report isn't needed
[06:44] <marco25> there is one for that and the rest i dont
[06:44] <marco25> the rest are new and i have looked
[06:44] <marco25> the first i have and had hundreds of comments
[06:44] <marco25> and like 20 duplicated
[06:44] <marco25> duplicates
[06:44] <marco25> your right but i wanted to say how many issues i had
[06:44] <tsimonq2> Ok.
[06:44] <marco25> but i did state it was fixed :P
[06:45] <tsimonq2> Alright :P
[06:45] <tsimonq2> Well to be fair, this isn't necessarily the place for this sort of thing. Two places I can think of are #ubuntu-bugs and #ubuntu. :)
[06:45] <marco25> someone from tor is supposed to try to replicate the issue i had later with zesty
[06:45] <marco25> they may issue a ticket depending on if he can replicate it
[06:45] <tsimonq2> But thanks for helping to make Ubuntu better by letting us know. :)
[06:46] <marco25> why dont you call no lts beta? cause thats basically what it is
[06:46] <marco25> non lts
[06:46] <marco25> call non lts beta that is more accurate dont you think?
[06:47] <tsimonq2> Because I think the fact that it's not a Long Term Support version sort of articulates that. :P
[06:47] <marco25> no THE WORDS BETA would articulate it :P
[06:48] <tsimonq2> That's subjective. :P
[06:48] <marco25> obviously thats the reason ubuntu chose NOT to use those words right?
[06:48] <marco25> i call a cookie a cookie what about you?
[06:49] <tsimonq2> Anyways, like I said before, if you have bug numbers (it makes things easier to track), please do let us know in #ubuntu or #ubuntu-bugs :)
[06:49] <marco25> just about everyone knows what beta means..so choosing not to call it that...seems to be a motive for NOT wanting people to know that
[06:50] <tsimonq2> Regardless of the terminology, if you'd like to help us better test releases before they come out, I highly suggest you join the Ubuntu QA Team. :)
[06:50] <marco25> well that tor bug is probably coming cause when the tor guys runs 3 series in zesta its not going to work..bug report probably incoming *wink*
[06:51] <tsimonq2> Apologies, but I have to go get something to eat. Again, thanks for bringing this to our attention, and I hope we can get this issue solved. :)
[06:51] <marco25> seems like im on the QA team right now with all these bugs ive dealt with
[06:51] <tsimonq2> :P
[06:52] <marco25> I hope so too..what you plan on eating?
[06:53] <marco25> im just curious if you call your food by its name or just make up an entirely new name :P
[07:12] <tsimonq2> marco25: Just ate some chicken nuggets :P
[07:15] <marco25> well maybe we can make up an entirely new name for the same thing? what you think? it could be something personal between me and you :P
[07:16] <tsimonq2> :P
[09:07] <Adri2000> stgraber: hello, isn't https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxd/+bug/1699010 a bug in lxc/lxcfs rather than lxd? I think I've hit it with xenial/lxc, do you know the status of SRUing the fix for xenial?
[09:59] <sil2100> jamespage: hey! Any luck on getting LP: #1649616 verified for keystone? I'd like to release the ocata stable releases SRU for zesty sooner or later
[10:01] <jamespage> sil2100: funnily enough I was just thinking about that
[13:57] <seb128> willcooke, awe_, https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=737362
[13:59] <willcooke> thanks seb128
[15:21] <jbicha> bdmurray: hi, see LP: #1701943 (in case you missed it)
[15:22] <bdmurray> jbicha: will look, thanks
[15:24] <jbicha> bdmurray: could you review gnome-software/zesty from unapproved when you work on SRUs (today?) ?
[15:25] <jbicha> becuase gnome-software/zesty has been stuck in phased-updates for months for various reasons :(
[15:27] <stgraber> Adri2000: the sru has been released two days ago
[15:44] <seb128> wgrant, I feel like I've hit that issue before and asked some previous cycle, but any idea why the evolution-data-server artful .po files from the package build aren't getting listed on https://translations.launchpad.net/ubuntu/artful/+source/evolution-data-server/+imports ?
[15:54] <Adri2000> stgraber: ah nice! :) https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxcfs/+bug/1654310 then. thanks
[15:56] <stgraber> Adri2000: yup
[17:54] <zyga> seb128: hey
[17:55] <zyga> seb128: how can I quickly contribute a two-character fix to /usr/bin/gvfs-trash
[17:55] <zyga> seb128: the shell script uses == instead of = for comparison and doesn't actually work in ubuntu/debian
[17:55] <zyga> seb128: (on artful)
[18:44] <jbicha> zyga: I guess short answer is attach a patch to https://bugzilla.gnome.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=gvfs
[19:04] <bdmurray> jbicha: Im going to reject the gnome-session SRU because of bug 1700485 and to avoid any accident acceptances.
[19:05] <jbicha> ok
[19:06] <jbicha> bdmurray: is it fine if I put the bug status back to Triaged though?
[19:09] <bdmurray> jbicha: the gnome-session task? sure
[20:43]  * hallyn looks for mvo
[20:43] <hallyn> cpaelzer: hi, so i think mvo, slangasek, and stgraber may be of help wrt sandbox-upgrader and auto-upgrade-tester
[20:44] <hallyn> and whether they are active or should also be pulled
[20:44] <hallyn> (re bug 1260062)
[20:46] <stgraber> I'm not running an auto-upgrade-tester setup anymore. Not sure if someone else is
[20:47] <slangasek> I am surely not
[20:47] <slangasek> bdmurray or jibel might know if this code is in use
[20:50] <bdmurray> jibel: would know best
[20:50] <bdmurray> I actually hadn't heard of sandbox-upgrader. ;-)
[21:09] <nacc> hallyn: thanks for brining that up -- i'll follow up on it
[21:23] <hallyn> bitrot :)
[21:23] <hallyn> cool - thanks - \o
[22:45] <mwhudson> Laney: wtf that session-migration thing we cooked up fails on !amd64
[23:46] <mwhudson> Laney: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/session-migration/+bug/1704238