[00:15] <nacc> dpb1: fyi, https://code.launchpad.net/~nacc/usd-importer/+git/usd-importer/+merge/327399
[00:17] <nacc> rbasak: i'm likely to only be working my AM tmrw and may not have access to my computer, if you review and ack something for the importer code, do you mind just pushing it yourself?
[00:17] <nacc> *access in the afternoon, that is
[00:17] <nacc> i'd like to get this pile of stuff landed :)
[00:28] <Epx998> what is the upstream kernel exactly?
[00:34] <sarnold> that usually means a tarball downloaded from kernel.org
[00:34] <sarnold> but could include a git clone and build..
[00:34] <Epx998> hmm
[00:35] <sarnold> the ubuntu kernel team has some debs of pre-built 'upstream kernels' that they offer to people when testing issues -- if it works with plain upstream, that means the patches to fix or enable something can usually be cherry-picked from the upstream git trees
[00:36] <Epx998> reason I ask is on this new hp gen10, hp is releasing stuff for kernels, mentions their stuff is added to the upstream kernel, then found the upstream kernel.ubuntu.org, date looks recent-ish, but its 3.10 vs 3.13 in repos
[00:38] <Epx998> i think answeer to my latest issue is to remove the scsi controller and toss it in the trash
[00:38] <Epx998> 6TB raid 0 shows up as 600GB in ubuntu, 63GB in centos
[00:39] <sarnold> I went out of my way to buy non-raid HBA
[00:39] <sarnold> it feels like raid cards are more trouble than they're worth
[00:41] <Epx998> yeah they are, we are trying to improve build times as best we can - so mgmt is buying all sorts of hardware
[00:41] <Epx998> this 360 g10 is nice, but i dont like the hba
[00:41] <sarnold> can you flash it with an IT mode firmware?
[00:41] <Epx998> no firmware for it yet
[00:42] <Epx998> just the sizes the drivers are seeing is weird, 63gb on centos..
[00:43] <sarnold> both 63 and 600 sound ominous
[00:43] <sarnold> something
[00:43] <sarnold> something's badly broken sort of thing
[00:43] <Epx998> im going to toss different drives in it tomorrow
[00:43] <sarnold> an ancient switch from the dark ages was flipped somewhere
[00:43] <Epx998> im wondering if im hitting 512e 4kn or whatever issue
[00:44] <Epx998> something to explore tomorrow, cheers
[01:00] <rbasak> nacc: sorry only just seen this. I gave up this evening due to connectivity issues. ack on pushing myself.
[01:17] <nacc> rbasak: ack, np!
[01:18] <nacc> rbasak: i think gu-lint (and the branch it is based off of) is good to go. I believe I have instructions in there for squashing as appropriate in each commit and I'm fine for you to do that)
[01:18] <nacc> rbasak: and/or feel free to do fixlets on top of my branch after squashing
[01:18] <rbasak> OK, thanks!
[01:19] <nacc> rbasak: if you're feeling inspired, feel free to add `git ubuntu review` (which for now can just take a mp as an argument and run `git ubuntu lint` on it)
[01:19] <rbasak> You want me to squash fixlets into your branch? Or add on top?
[01:19] <rbasak> :-)
[01:19] <nacc> rbasak: i think (for clarity) it's probably easiest to squash all of my stuff first, then put fixlets on top. But since you're going to end up being the pusher (most likely), you can just squash them all together (as in, I'm probably not going to review your fixlets before you're ready to push)
[01:20] <nacc> rbasak: if you want, i can squash what i have now
[01:20] <rbasak> OK. Leave as is, that's fine.
[02:05] <hehehe> rbasak:  :) I have compiled 2 versions of latest nginx stable 1 with simply configure add module modsecurity ... and one with same + 16.04 distro nginx params https://pastebin.com/0MRQgt4c
[02:05] <hehehe> version 1 works with modsecurity version 2 not
[02:06] <hehehe> I wonder if anything in configure may conflict with mod secure
[02:06] <hehehe> I double checked both configure both do find and add modsecure
[05:18] <cathode> hi i'm currently running a FreeBSD 11 system as a NAS/SAN server for a small home lab. I'm trying to downsize and considering replacing the BSD with Ubuntu Server 17.04 and using KVM to host VMs instead of a separate VM host machine
[05:19] <cathode> I'm assuming that Ubuntu server should have no problems running Samba 4.5 to host windows-compatible shares?
[05:42] <andol> cathode: Are you aware that Ubuntu 17.04 is a non-LTS release, which is only supported with security upgrades, etc for 9 month?
[05:54] <cathode> i mean, i can read, so yes i was aware of that statement. i guess I don't understand the implication?
[05:54] <cathode> does ubuntu / linux not have ways to upgrade a host to a newer release?
[05:56] <cncr04s> run 16.04
[06:07] <Seveas> cathode: sure, upgrades work fine :)
[06:07] <Seveas> cathode: I think andol just wanted to make you aware that with non-lts releases you have to do this every 6 months instead of every two years
[06:07] <lordievader> Good morning
[06:07] <Seveas> \o
[06:09] <cathode> ok gotcha
[06:09] <cathode> like i said it's a home lab so downtime is not really a big deal
[06:09] <cathode> and i wanted to go with 17.04 because it apparently has ZFS support built right in without installing anything other than zfsutils
[06:12] <Seveas> then 17.04 is an excellent choice :)
[06:17] <cpaelzer> jamespage: are you planning to up ovs to 2.7.1?
[06:18] <cpaelzer> there is a bunch of nice fixes that avoid hard fails due to use afer free, faults, ...
[06:34] <cathode> how long does 'update-grub' normally take when installing ubuntu server?
[06:38] <cpaelzer> cathode: I think it scans all partitions, but if that scanning has issues it needs a lot of timeouts
[06:38] <cpaelzer> cathode: depending on your setup and potential issues it can be quite a while, but usually not that long that you'd wonder
[06:39] <cpaelzer> cathode: do you have any I/O errors on dmesg while this hangs?
[06:40] <cathode> didn't see anything
[06:40] <cathode> theres 27 disks connected though
[06:40] <cathode> i let it sit for like 15 minutes before killing the install process
[06:40] <cathode> it sat at 66% the entire time
[06:44] <cpaelzer> cathode: any other odd devcies plugged in - a flaky usb to disk converter or sdcards or such
[06:44] <cpaelzer> that could stall the scan as well
[07:05] <cathode> can i skip installing grub and use the rescue mode to reinstall it after?
[07:20] <cpaelzer> cathode: sorry never tried that
[07:20] <Sourcey> Hello. Hope someone can help me. I have set up a A and MX record. email.example.com and want to run PostFix on my server. Im struggling with understanding the hosts and aliases
[07:20] <cpaelzer> cathode: I'd more try to check what it actually does while it appears hanging
[07:21] <Sourcey> seems like the guides online shows different things. what exactly in /etc/hosts and /etc/aliases has to be setup?
[08:11] <jamespage> cpaelzer: yup
[08:26] <cpaelzer> thanks jamespage!
[09:28] <jamespage> cpaelzer: just uploaded
[09:31] <cpaelzer> prepare to wait on armhf test ressources :-)
[09:31] <cpaelzer> thanks jamespage
[09:32] <jamespage> cpaelzer: btw happy for you todo those as well - but please push commits to the git repo on launchpad :)
[09:37] <cpaelzer> jamespage: you are right I missed that on the last fix
[09:38] <cpaelzer> I have one in the queue that I can do better as soon as it is upstream accepted :-)
[09:41] <cpaelzer> jamespage: I guess since you upload you did already clean for the ones I missed - or is there anything I can still help to complete?
[09:43] <cpaelzer> I see you added them already as I expected, thanks
[09:44] <jamespage> cpaelzer: I did no further action required for now
[09:44] <cpaelzer> you get a +1 on my "spend a beer once I see them" paper
[11:57] <alexII> hi, Software RAID is extremely slow, why?
[12:33] <lordievader> Quite fast here.... What flavour of raid?
[15:04]  * teward pokes rbasak
[15:04] <teward> you rang?
[15:09] <teward> anyone seen rbasak around?
[15:09] <teward> he pinged, but i was busy in a meeting.
[15:12] <dpb1> he's here
[15:13] <dpb1> give him a sec, I'm sure he'll reply
[15:13] <dpb1> :)
[15:13] <teward> dpb1: yep he's repkying now :)
[15:13] <teward> heck i can't type
[15:13] <dpb1> hehe
[15:13]  * teward chugs what's left of his bottle of pepsi.
[15:14] <teward> time to work on the mountain dew now.
[15:32] <cathode> hi
[15:35] <nacc> rbasak: your review for gitubuntu-submit-fixes is a bit confusing, as the first diff comment conflicts with the suggested rewrite
[15:59] <rbasak> nacc: sorry. Which bit?
[16:01] <nacc> rbasak: it's ok, i think i resolved it
[16:01] <nacc> rbasak: you gave a full replacement implementation and commented on the old one
[16:01] <nacc> rbasak: which was a bit confusing at first, but after a cup of tea, i followed
[16:02] <rbasak> Sorry, I'll try and explain better next time. The comments on the old one were the rationale for my changes, but by the time I was done it seemed easier to demonstrate what I meant with the replacement.
[16:02] <nacc> yep
[16:02] <nacc> rbasak: that's fine, i just wanted to make sure i wasn't missing something
[16:03] <nacc> rbasak: gitubuntu-submit-fixes updated
[16:04] <rbasak> ack
[16:05] <nacc> rbasak: i can rebase gu-lint on it, once you've reviewed, as they are dependent (so that i can pick up the api change to nearest_remote_branch)
[16:05] <rbasak> Thanks for the docstring corrections. I never understood how I was supposed to do that.
[16:08] <nacc> rbasak: np, I've seen it elsewhere, I'm pretty sure that's correct
[16:12] <nacc> rbasak: ok, gu-lint is ready to push whenever you are
[16:13] <nacc> rbasak: for gitubuntu-submit-fixes, i'll do those fixlets and push, if that's ok with you?
[16:20] <nacc> rbasak: done
[17:40] <Epx998> Mmm it gave me access to infoblox
[17:40] <Epx998> it = IT
[17:41] <sarnold> Epx998: did you sort out that 69gb / 600gb thing?
[17:43] <Epx998> sarnold: not yet, vendor is supposed to come onsite today - but im 99% sure its a firmware problem
[17:45] <sarnold> Epx998: hopefully they'll have some answers :)
[17:45] <Epx998> sarnold: I think in the end, my mgr wont order the G10 with any controller cards. ha.
[17:46] <sarnold> Epx998: heh, that's one way to side-step the whole thing
[17:47] <Epx998> sarnold: i hate not solving it, but i think its out of my hands
[17:50] <Epx998> sarnold: on a good note, today is all about provisioning ub14 servers
[17:50] <Epx998> slowly we are moving away from 12
[17:51] <sarnold> woot
[17:51] <sarnold> progress :)
[17:51] <Epx998> sarnold: had to, docker wasnt working on 12 appearently
[17:52] <sarnold> heh yeah 12.04's kernel predates most ofthe features docker would use
[17:52] <sarnold> the ESM HWE kernel might be new enough but don't let them hear it
[17:54] <Epx998> sarnold: yeah we need to get off of 12, wanting docker has made that happen, so im good with it
[17:54] <Epx998> note: not all of nvidia uses 12, just parts of the mobile unit :D
[18:03] <Epx998> yeah so I added ilo IP's to DNS instead of system IPs. gg me.
[18:04] <sarnold> good thing it's friday
[19:03] <jonfatino> Hello my ubuntu livecd for some reason is only running my cpus at 800mhz
[19:11] <dpb1> probably because of the powersave governor
[19:12] <jonfatino> echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor
[19:12] <jonfatino> echo "3800000" | sudo tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_min_freq
[19:12] <jonfatino> echo "3800000" | sudo tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq
[19:12] <jonfatino> Still nothing :-(
[19:14] <sarnold> anything in dmesg?
[19:15] <sarnold> how about thermald's logs?
[19:15] <dpb1> Also, there was something about intel_pstate and a grub setting
[19:15] <dpb1> not sure if that is still applicable
[19:16] <jonfatino> [    3.096939] Intel pstate controlling: cpu 7
[19:16] <jonfatino> I see this
[22:38] <hehehe> whats the difference between using alphabetical and numerical command with chmod?
[22:38] <hehehe> if any
[22:41] <sarnold> numerical is easier to understand; alphabetical lets you say "add this permission to whatever it already has" or "remove this permission from whatever it already has"
[23:21] <cathode> i think i screwed up. i installed samba 4.6 by building from source following a guide, but then i installed winbind via 'apt install winbind'. should i have built winbind from source too?
[23:22] <cathode> right now i'm looking at a bunch of wierd errors, like my samba deployment got reset back to defaults
[23:22] <sarnold> if you choose to use upstream for one of them you'd probably be best served by using upstream for them all
[23:23] <cathode> what would be the best way to get everything back to a clean slate?
[23:26] <sarnold> copy aside the files you know you've configured; apt-get purge the packages that you installed via the distro but want to use upstream stuff
[23:26] <sarnold> re-install all the upstream stuff
[23:26] <sarnold> and copy back your config files
[23:33] <cathode> ok thanks
[23:37] <sarnold> cathode: it's actually really good timing, https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2017-11103.html was released recently
[23:49] <cathode> ah yea