[03:35] <marco25> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=860805...im having similiar issue in ubuntu..anyone know of a fix
[04:19] <mwhudson> well that's odd
[04:19] <mwhudson> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-argcomplete/1.8.1-1/+build/12554534 fails in strange explosive ways on lp but passes locally for me
[04:20] <mwhudson> oh well, time to go for now
[13:47] <jamespage> sil2100: hi!
[13:48] <jamespage> bug 1649616 is now verification complete - so could we get the updates from that release and for bug 	1696139   into -updates please?
[13:48] <jamespage> that made no-sense
[13:48] <doko> willcooke: who is currently caring about libreoffice? asking because the failing autopkg tests on i386 is blocking gcc/binutils migration to the release pocket
[13:49] <jamespage> sil2100: basically the bugs we discussed last week are all ready to roll :)
[13:53] <rbasak> I'm unable to contact micahg. I haven't seen him here in a while and his @ubuntu.com email bounces.
[13:54] <rbasak> Does anyone have an alternate contact for him?
[13:56] <willcooke> doko, osomon, but he's on PTO.  seb128 might be able to help there
[14:01] <seb128> doko, willcooke, it's a kernel bug
[14:02] <seb128> doko, https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=865303
[14:04] <seb128> doko, willcooke, oSoMon handed me a libreoffice update that disable tests as a workaround before going on holidays but I would prefer the kernel to be fixed because if we ignore the issue at build we are still going to get a libreoffice that segfaults at runtime
[14:09] <sil2100> jamespage: ah! Excellent, thanks for the reminder
[14:09] <sil2100> jamespage: on it in a minute :)
[14:40] <jamespage> sil2100: ta
[16:37] <rbasak> bdmurray, cyphermox , sil2100: I'd like to miss the DMB meeting tonight if possible as I have somewhere better to be. We don't have any applications. There's one ML request I'm happy to take, and I've completed my one action.
[16:37] <rbasak> So rather than me waiting to find out that there's nothing to discuss: anything to discuss?
[16:38] <cyphermox> rbasak: sounds good
[16:38] <rbasak> Thanks! Also I presume people will want longer to consider my email.
[16:41]  * bdmurray is aghast at somewhere better to be
[16:42] <bdmurray> rbasak: I've nothing else to discuss at the meeting though.
[16:56] <rbasak> Thanks :)
[16:57] <sil2100> rbasak: yeah, nothing here as well - I saw your e-mail and I still need to think about it
[16:58] <sil2100> rbasak: I'll add the ML action to the agenda and assign it to you so we don't lose track
[16:58] <sil2100> Is that ok?
[16:58] <rbasak> sil2100: sure. Thanks!
[19:37] <jackpot51> Is there a reason gnome-initial-setup doesn't get started from GDM when no users are present?
[19:37] <jackpot51> (In Artful)
[21:06] <jbicha> jackpot51: could you file a bug? I believe that worked in zesty
[21:34] <jackpot51> Sure jbicha, it is here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-initial-setup/+bug/1704879