| === arosales_ is now known as arosales | ||
| === coreycb_ is now known as coreycb | ||
| === plars_ is now known as plars | ||
| === oh4_ is now known as oh4 | ||
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| === internethulksvij is now known as svij | ||
| mup | PR snapcraft#1413 opened: core: minimal windows support <Created by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/1413> | 06:23 |
|---|---|---|
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| mup | PR snapcraft#1414 opened: cmake plugin: call the cmake using build dir as source <Created by elopio> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/1414> | 06:59 |
| zyga-ubuntu | jjohansen: hey | 07:49 |
| zyga-ubuntu | jjohansen: I'm working on a larger tool patch for for aa-binary-policy-inspector | 07:49 |
| zyga-ubuntu | jjohansen: should be out by the end of the week | 07:49 |
| zyga-ubuntu | jjohansen: I sent some smallish patches to the ML and you acked one (thank you!) | 07:49 |
| zyga-ubuntu | jjohansen: if you have a moment could you look at the remaining two please? | 07:50 |
| * zyga-ubuntu wonders where Chipaca might be | 07:50 | |
| zyga-ubuntu | fgimenez: hey | 07:51 |
| zyga-ubuntu | I have a thing I'd like to discuss with you | 07:51 |
| fgimenez | hi zyga-ubuntu | 07:52 |
| zyga-ubuntu | fgimenez: last night we had a PR that was fixing a bug in nested re-exec | 07:52 |
| zyga-ubuntu | fgimenez: and I saw the upgrade/basic test fail on debian | 07:52 |
| zyga-ubuntu | fgimenez: it failed a few times in a row | 07:52 |
| zyga-ubuntu | fgimenez: the error was about /usr/lib/snapd/snap-update-ns not being there (it's not a part of the stable package in debian) | 07:53 |
| zyga-ubuntu | fgimenez: the test just passed on both qemu and linode today | 07:53 |
| zyga-ubuntu | fgimenez: without any changes in the PR | 07:53 |
| fgimenez | zyga-ubuntu: sounds bad | 07:53 |
| zyga-ubuntu | fgimenez: and here's the question, do you know of any store quirks that could explain this? | 07:53 |
| zyga-ubuntu | fgimenez: (normally we should execute snap-update-ns from the core snap) | 07:53 |
| fgimenez | zyga-ubuntu: nope afaik, do we have a log of the failed builds? | 07:54 |
| zyga-ubuntu | fgimenez: I'm running it again a few more times just to be sure it's not a race | 07:54 |
| zyga-ubuntu | fgimenez: (well, to be more convinced, not sure) | 07:54 |
| zyga-ubuntu | fgimenez: let me check, but I think I killed it :/ | 07:54 |
| zyga-ubuntu | yeah, I killed it | 07:54 |
| fgimenez | zyga-ubuntu: i'll try to reproduce too, not sure if upgrade/basic has been always enabled for debian | 07:54 |
| zyga-ubuntu | let's see if it passes now | 07:54 |
| zyga-ubuntu | it has | 07:54 |
| zyga-ubuntu | remember that refresh --beta core thing we did just for debian? | 07:55 |
| fgimenez | zyga-ubuntu: np, let's see if we can get it to fail again | 07:55 |
| zyga-ubuntu | when the stable channel was somewhat broken there? | 07:55 |
| fgimenez | zyga-ubuntu: ah yep | 07:55 |
| zyga-ubuntu | I'm trying to understand what changed since last evening | 07:55 |
| zyga-ubuntu | and since the branch did not, it could point towards the store | 07:55 |
| fgimenez | zyga-ubuntu: makes sense, is there an apt upgrade in the upgrade/basic test? maybe the debian unstable repo could have changed too | 07:56 |
| zyga-ubuntu | fgimenez: ah, interesting question, let me check | 07:57 |
| zyga-ubuntu | fgimenez: according to https://packages.debian.org/sid/snapd it seems to be the exact same version we have uploaded ages ago | 07:58 |
| zyga-ubuntu | fgimenez: 2.21-2+b1 | 07:58 |
| zyga-ubuntu | fgimenez: (which is also surprising because I would have assumed we'd keep sid updated frequently) | 07:59 |
| zyga-ubuntu | mwhudson: hey ^ is debian snapd updated for each release? are you still the one doing those updates? | 07:59 |
| fgimenez | zyga-ubuntu: i've just reproduced the upgrade/basic issue on debian http://paste.ubuntu.com/25117441/ | 08:20 |
| fgimenez | zyga-ubuntu: the session is open in case you want to have a look | 08:21 |
| fgimenez | there's a /usr/lib/snapd/snap-discard-ns but not /usr/lib/snapd/snap-update-ns... | 08:22 |
| zyga-ubuntu | fgimenez: excellent, please keep it | 08:28 |
| zyga-ubuntu | fgimenez: thank you, please keep the session | 08:29 |
| zyga-ubuntu | fgimenez: can you share credentials to mvo | 08:30 |
| zyga-ubuntu | fgimenez: so that we can ssh and explore | 08:30 |
| fgimenez | zyga-ubuntu: sure, 1sec | 08:30 |
| zyga-ubuntu | fgimenez: how many times did you run it? | 08:31 |
| zyga-ubuntu | fgimenez: I'm at my ~6th iteration locally and on linode | 08:31 |
| zyga-ubuntu | it's clearly a race somewhere | 08:31 |
| fgimenez | zyga-ubuntu: it failed on the 2nd execution, running on linode | 08:31 |
| zyga-ubuntu | fgimenez: interesting, thank you! | 08:31 |
| zyga-ubuntu | fgimenez: we're with mvo looking at the code there onw | 08:31 |
| zyga-ubuntu | now* | 08:31 |
| zyga-ubuntu | fgimenez: thanks for the credentials | 08:53 |
| fgimenez | zyga-ubuntu: np :) | 08:53 |
| magicaltrout | hi folks newb when i run a script inside a snap installed in devmode and reference /etc is that /etc on the host or the snap? | 08:57 |
| magicaltrout | it seems to be the host | 08:57 |
| magicaltrout | okay crickets on that one lets try this question instead | 09:46 |
| magicaltrout | I have a config that includes a sub config file: include: file:///etc/openldap/schema/core.ldif | 09:46 |
| magicaltrout | but I can't put env vars in there, is there anything in snappy that lets me define a concrete path? | 09:47 |
| magicaltrout | or something relative | 09:49 |
| magicaltrout | i don't care partiulcarly it just needs to be able to find the file | 09:49 |
| mup | PR snapd#3599 opened: Fix/clasic schizofrenia bug <Created by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/3599> | 10:34 |
| mup | PR snapd#3600 opened: many: expose service status in 'snap info' <Created by chipaca> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/3600> | 10:38 |
| Chipaca | wooo PR #3600 | 10:38 |
| Chipaca | where is my cake | 10:38 |
| Chipaca | zyga-ubuntu: ^ you were making noises about reviewing the services thing, here's your chance :-D | 10:38 |
| Chipaca | magicaltrout: I think you'll be luckier on the forum | 10:39 |
| Chipaca | magicaltrout: IRC is too synchronous | 10:39 |
| Chipaca | magicaltrout: the people that could properly answer your questions are sprinting and won't be listening on here for much of this week | 10:39 |
| magicaltrout | no probs Chipaca i cross posted anyway thanks | 10:41 |
| zyga-ubuntu | Chipaca: hey | 10:54 |
| zyga-ubuntu | Chipaca: haha, good one :) | 10:54 |
| zyga-ubuntu | Chipaca: I'lll do my best | 10:54 |
| zyga-ubuntu | fgimenez: did you run the whole suite or just that specific test? | 10:58 |
| fgimenez | zyga-ubuntu: just that test | 11:01 |
| zyga-ubuntu | fgimenez: thank you! | 11:08 |
| * zyga-ubuntu scratches head :) | 11:08 | |
| zyga-ubuntu | we've been running that test all day without failure (locally and in linode) | 11:08 |
| zyga-ubuntu | we'd like to test a theory but for whatever reason it won't break now | 11:09 |
| * Chipaca shakes his fist at interfaces-avahi-observe | 11:11 | |
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| Chipaca | is spread being funny, or am I being unlucky? | 11:47 |
| * Chipaca restarts the run | 11:48 | |
| zyga-ubuntu | Chipaca: what are you seeing? | 11:52 |
| zyga-ubuntu | Chipaca: we're chasing a heisenbug all morning | 11:52 |
| Chipaca | zyga-ubuntu: failed prepares | 11:52 |
| zyga-ubuntu | Chipaca: I saw that once | 11:52 |
| zyga-ubuntu | Chipaca: we're really chasing tests/upgrade/basic on debian | 11:52 |
| Chipaca | nice | 11:52 |
| === ahasenac` is now known as ahasenack | ||
| === ahasenack is now known as Guest49405 | ||
| Chipaca | third's the charm, or something | 12:18 |
| zyga-ubuntu | Chipaca: hey | 13:23 |
| zyga-ubuntu | Chipaca: how do you feel like looking at release-critical https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/3598 | 13:23 |
| mup | PR snapd#3598: cmd,tests: fix classic confinement confusing re-execution code <Critical> <Created by zyga> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/3598> | 13:23 |
| zyga-ubuntu | Chipaca: it's green now and we'd like to land it and release it | 13:24 |
| === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun | ||
| zyga-ubuntu | and please hold for merging as we want to squash merge | 13:24 |
| === JanC is now known as Guest76357 | ||
| * Chipaca on it | 13:26 | |
| zyga-ubuntu | fgimenez: I logged out of the linode machine, I think we can recycle it now | 13:26 |
| zyga-ubuntu | Chipaca: thanks | 13:27 |
| fgimenez | zyga-ubuntu: great thanks! | 13:27 |
| zyga-ubuntu | Chipaca: I'll get to your branches ASAP but not sure if I can sneak out of kubernetes talk ;) | 13:27 |
| zyga-ubuntu | the snap info services | 13:27 |
| Chipaca | zyga-ubuntu: +1 | 13:29 |
| Son_Goku | zyga-ubuntu: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/ngompa/snapd-prerel-fedora/fedora-rawhide-i386/00579417-snapd/build.log.gz ? | 13:29 |
| Chipaca | zyga-ubu1tu: you also get a +1 | 13:31 |
| zyga-ubu1tu | thank you | 13:35 |
| zyga-ubu1tu | Chipaca: I learned a new thing just now | 13:39 |
| Chipaca | zyga-ubu1tu: go on | 13:39 |
| zyga-ubu1tu | Chipaca: var *stuff; stuff.CalledOnNil() | 13:40 |
| Chipaca | mhmm | 13:40 |
| zyga-ubu1tu | queer :) | 13:40 |
| Chipaca | zyga-ubu1tu: we've corrected some of those in review of your code, fwiw :-) | 13:40 |
| Chipaca | where something could be nil and you weren't checking it | 13:41 |
| zyga-ubu1tu | Chipaca: I was expecting the compiler to complain | 13:45 |
| zyga-ubu1tu | Chipaca: I did some python lately and I just fell in love with mypy's static type checks and also, more importantly, None checks, so Optional[T] | 13:46 |
| Chipaca | zyga-ubu1tu: that's probably the work of a friend of mine :-) | 13:46 |
| zyga-ubu1tu | Chipaca: jukka? | 13:47 |
| * zyga-ubu1tu might be doing a disservice to the mypy developer | 13:47 | |
| zyga-ubu1tu | (I know mypy is improved by lots of people now) | 13:47 |
| Chipaca | ah, no, my friend is into bringing mypy to django | 13:47 |
| Chipaca | https://2017.djangocon.eu/schedule/using-type-checking-in-django-projects-with-mypy/ | 13:47 |
| zyga-ubu1tu | ah | 13:48 |
| zyga-ubu1tu | I was doing just plain CLI stuff | 13:48 |
| zyga-ubu1tu | Chipaca: I found it hard to publish a pypi package with type introspection data though | 13:48 |
| mup | PR snapd#3598 closed: cmd,tests: fix classic confinement confusing re-execution code <Critical> <Created by zyga> <Merged by zyga> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/3598> | 13:51 |
| mup | PR snapd#3601 opened: cmd,tests: fix classic confinement confusing re-execution code <Created by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/3601> | 13:57 |
| zyga-ubu1tu | Chipaca: half review up | 14:02 |
| === zyga-ubu1tu is now known as zyga-ubuntu | ||
| === kjackal_ is now known as kjackal | ||
| niemeyer | cachio: Heya | 14:51 |
| niemeyer | cachio: Thanks for the changes in snadp#3483.. | 14:51 |
| niemeyer | cachio: Not sure if we talked about this before: we try hard not to rebase after a pull request is up | 14:52 |
| niemeyer | cachio: It removes the ability to follow through changes during the review process | 14:53 |
| niemeyer | cachio: "We went looking everywhere, but couldn’t find those commits." | 14:54 |
| niemeyer | Changing history is fine before the PR is pushed up, though | 14:54 |
| cachio | niemeyer, ok | 14:56 |
| cachio | niemeyer, first time you mention that | 14:56 |
| niemeyer | cachio: Cool, np | 14:56 |
| niemeyer | cachio: The PR looks good, thanks again for the changes | 14:56 |
| niemeyer | cachio: We just a second review on it.. | 14:57 |
| niemeyer | Any takers? | 14:57 |
| cachio | niemeyer, great, thanks | 14:57 |
| Chipaca | niemeyer: I recently explicitly asked for a rebase on a PR | 15:01 |
| Chipaca | niemeyer: it hadn't had any reviews and was a mess, very very hard to follow as it stood | 15:01 |
| Chipaca | (talking something like 50 commits in there) | 15:01 |
| niemeyer | Chipaca: That's the exception that validates the rule :) | 15:01 |
| Chipaca | :-) | 15:02 |
| Chipaca | cachio: +1'ed | 15:09 |
| Chipaca | cachio: niemeyer: is that one to be squashed as well? | 15:09 |
| niemeyer | Chipaca: Yeah, definitely | 15:11 |
| niemeyer | We've been squashing pretty much every merge | 15:11 |
| cachio | Chipaca, tx | 15:26 |
| mup | PR snapd#3601 closed: cmd,tests: fix classic confinement confusing re-execution code <Created by mvo5> <Merged by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/3601> | 15:46 |
| === Guest49405 is now known as ahasenack | ||
| mup | PR snapd#3589 closed: tests: remove unneeded check for re-exec in InternalToolPath() <Created by mvo5> <Merged by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/3589> | 16:25 |
| cachio | Chipaca, ahey, any idea about why gpg 2 in opensuse is not getting the passphrase from the fake pinentry to export a key? | 16:28 |
| Chipaca | cachio: no | 16:28 |
| cachio | Chipaca, do you knowin which other systems are we using gpg 2? | 16:29 |
| ogra_ | zyga-ubuntu, https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/core-2381-breaks-ld-linux-so-2/1362 smells like some snap-confine/seccomp/namespaces issue (i dont think the linker or either of the two libc's we ship in core has changed recently) | 16:29 |
| Chipaca | cachio: does it look for the pinentry in the same place? | 16:29 |
| Chipaca | cachio: that is, the first thing I'd suspect is that for whatever reason it isn't even looking at ~/.snap/gnupg/gpg-agent.conf | 16:30 |
| zyga-ubuntu | ogra_: looking | 16:31 |
| Chipaca | cachio: second thing I'd suspect is that they don't have the pinentry-program option in their gpg2 | 16:31 |
| cachio | Chipaca, I'll check that | 16:31 |
| ogra_ | zyga-ubuntu, i actually wonder if we have any testing for the i386 libc we ship in the amd64 core for multiarch support | 16:32 |
| * ogra_ bets we dont | 16:32 | |
| zyga-ubuntu | ogra_: replied on the forum, thank you | 16:32 |
| ogra_ | thanks ! | 16:32 |
| cachio | Chipaca, I think pinentry is used starting on gpg 2.1 | 16:36 |
| cachio | and in opensuse we have 2.0.8 | 16:37 |
| Chipaca | cachio: you think, or you know? :-) | 16:37 |
| cachio | Chipaca, based on the doc | 16:38 |
| cachio | Unattended passphrase | 16:38 |
| cachio | Starting with GnuPG 2.1.0 the use of gpg-agent and pinentry is required, which may break backwards compatibility for passphrases piped in from STDIN using the --passphrase-fd 0 commandline option. In order to have the same type of functionality as the older releases two things must be done: | 16:38 |
| zyga-ubuntu | cachio: something broke with gpg upgrade? | 16:39 |
| zyga-ubuntu | do we actually talk to running instance of gpg or do we just link to some libraries? | 16:39 |
| cachio | zyga-ubuntu, I understand we actually talk to running instance, but not totally sure | 16:40 |
| zyga-ubuntu | ouch, that would be unnice | 16:43 |
| zyga-ubuntu | cachio: are you trunning tumbleweed or leap? | 16:43 |
| cachio | zyga-ubuntu, in leap | 16:45 |
| zyga-ubuntu | cachio: thanks, interesting | 16:47 |
| cachio | zyga-ubuntu, I'll research a bit more | 16:48 |
| cachio | after lunch | 16:48 |
| === cachio is now known as cachio_lunch | ||
| Chipaca | zyga-ubuntu: we run gpg | 16:50 |
| Chipaca | it's in asserts/gpgkeypairmgr.go | 16:50 |
| Chipaca | somewhat convoluted because gpg1 vs gpg2 | 16:50 |
| zyga-ubuntu | yes | 16:51 |
| Chipaca | zyga-ubuntu: we "talk to running instance" in the sense that we exec it and read its output :-) | 16:51 |
| Chipaca | this isn't bidirectional communication :-) | 16:52 |
| * ogra_ sees the linker issue in the forum is actually around a 64bit classic snap executing 32bit binaries and runs away screaming :P | 16:56 | |
| ogra_ | classic snaps should die ! | 16:57 |
| === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk | ||
| * ogra_ will show up with a sign on a stick saying that at the next sprint :P | 16:57 | |
| Pharaoh_Atem | Chipaca: I'm surprised you're not using gpgme | 17:02 |
| Pharaoh_Atem | there's a go binding for it: https://github.com/proglottis/gpgme | 17:04 |
| Chipaca | Pharaoh_Atem: is it pure go? | 17:06 |
| Chipaca | answer: nope | 17:06 |
| Chipaca | Pharaoh_Atem: so that's probably a chunk of why not | 17:06 |
| Chipaca | of course, we could still use it as a helper, but it's not like we don't have other things to do :-) | 17:08 |
| zyga-ubuntu | ogra_: hello | 17:10 |
| ogra_ | zyga-ubuntu, yo | 17:10 |
| zyga-ubuntu | ogra_: do oyu have a armv7 device around? | 17:10 |
| zyga-ubuntu | ogra_: one that rhymes with erry | 17:11 |
| zyga-ubuntu | ogra_: we need a hand | 17:11 |
| ogra_ | well, remote | 17:11 |
| zyga-ubuntu | ogra_: put rasbian on one | 17:11 |
| zyga-ubuntu | ogra_: and install snapd | 17:11 |
| ogra_ | oh | 17:11 |
| zyga-ubuntu | ogra_: and tell us what breaks when you install core | 17:11 |
| zyga-ubuntu | ogra_: I think there's a syscall missing | 17:11 |
| ogra_ | can that wait til tomorrow morning ? | 17:11 |
| zyga-ubuntu | ogra_: but my hardware is at home and I cannot check | 17:11 |
| ogra_ | (i'mm also not near the HW ... testing stuff remotely isnt a prob but physical access is a bit bad tonight) | 17:12 |
| zyga-ubuntu | ogra_: ok, I think we can do that tomorrow | 17:12 |
| ogra_ | ok | 17:12 |
| zyga-ubuntu | ogra_: I have a pi at home I can test but I'm at the sprint hotel | 17:12 |
| ogra_ | yeah, i grokked that | 17:12 |
| kyleN | hey zyga-ubuntu. I'm doing an interface for a customer and using refresh-bits.sh. the interface appears but I get these seccomp profile errors: https://pastebin.canonical.com/193757/ | 17:17 |
| kyleN | zyga-ubuntu, notably: "fork/exec /usr/lib/snapd/snap-seccomp: no such file or directory" | 17:18 |
| kyleN | zyga-ubuntu, which is correct, that snap-seccomp file does not exist. any tips to get passed this? | 17:19 |
| zyga-ubuntu | interesting | 17:21 |
| zyga-ubuntu | kyleN: so is this on raspbian? | 17:22 |
| zyga-ubuntu | kyleN: on armv7? | 17:22 |
| kyleN | zyga-ubuntu, no: amd64 ubuntu server 16.04 | 17:22 |
| zyga-ubuntu | o!? | 17:23 |
| kyleN | what | 17:23 |
| zyga-ubuntu | kyleN: can you do snap version | 17:23 |
| kyleN | https://pastebin.canonical.com/193758/ | 17:24 |
| kyleN | i guess snapd is UNKNOWN because I am currently running the script to use the locally built snapd.... | 17:24 |
| zyga-ubuntu | kyleN: apt-cache policy snapd | 17:24 |
| ogra_ | 4.4.0-59-generic !!! | 17:24 |
| kyleN | when I stop the script I get: snapd 2.26.9 | 17:25 |
| kyleN | all of these exclamation points!! l) | 17:25 |
| ogra_ | :) | 17:25 |
| ogra_ | well,that kernel is *pretty* old ... | 17:26 |
| mvo | kyleN: or apt list snapd | 17:26 |
| kyleN | yes hang on | 17:26 |
| kyleN | Installed: 2.22.3 | 17:26 |
| kyleN | snapd/xenial-updates 2.25 amd64 [upgradable from: 2.22.3] | 17:27 |
| * zyga-ubuntu brb | 17:27 | |
| mvo | kyleN: please keep it as it is for now (this version) | 17:28 |
| mvo | kyleN: I suspect we know what is going on | 17:28 |
| kyleN | darn, mvo I just upgrade snapd | 17:28 |
| mvo | kyleN: no worries | 17:28 |
| kyleN | upgradeD | 17:28 |
| mvo | kyleN: if you just upgraded it, did the problem go away? | 17:28 |
| mvo | kyleN: or stil lthe same error? | 17:28 |
| kyleN | checking | 17:28 |
| ogra_ | you surely also want a new kernel ... one that has less open security holes :) | 17:29 |
| === cachio_lunch is now known as cachio | ||
| kyleN | no, problem still exists. | 17:30 |
| ogra_ | (and also apparmor fixes that landed since -59-generic) | 17:30 |
| ogra_ | (we're at -83- currently) | 17:30 |
| kyleN | ogra this is a hand crafted system (not by me) with hand installed kernel modules to support broadcom asic | 17:30 |
| kyleN | so I don't want to muck with the kernel (but I can get Luke to if needed) | 17:31 |
| ogra_ | kyleN, well, i dont know wher, but there were seccomp and apparmor fixes since ... | 17:31 |
| ogra_ | s/wher/when/ | 17:31 |
| zyga-ubuntu | kyleN: can you pastebin the journal/syslog | 17:31 |
| kyleN | ogra: ok, so you think this might be due to an old kernel? | 17:31 |
| ogra_ | i think it is likely they happened after the 53 revision | 17:31 |
| ogra_ | err | 17:32 |
| ogra_ | 59 | 17:32 |
| ogra_ | if they use a server install with extra modules, someone should help them to make them dkms modules so you dont get stuck on the kernel version | 17:32 |
| ogra_ | else the system is vulnerable ... | 17:33 |
| kyleN | zyga-ubuntu, here's the last part of the journal, its long: https://pastebin.canonical.com/193763/ | 17:35 |
| zyga-ubuntu | looking | 17:36 |
| zyga-ubuntu | kyleN: can you please restart snapd (systemc restart snapd.service) | 17:37 |
| zyga-ubuntu | kyleN: while having look at the logs | 17:37 |
| zyga-ubuntu | kyleN: (journalctl -f) | 17:37 |
| zyga-ubuntu | kyleN: and then pastebin the new parts that show up after the restart | 17:37 |
| kyleN | ok | 17:37 |
| kyleN | sorry for the delay | 17:43 |
| mvo | kyleN: could you please snap refresh --edge core and see if that fixes the problem? we fixed a releated bug vsome minutes ago | 17:45 |
| kyleN | zyga-ubuntu, https://pastebin.canonical.com/193766/ | 17:45 |
| kyleN | mvo, ok | 17:45 |
| zyga-ubuntu | thank you, looking | 17:46 |
| kyleN | mvo, after refreshing core from edge, I get the same error. of course the error occurs when using the locally built snapd with my dev interface. I am not clear whether it should be trying to find /usr/lib/snapd/snap-seccomp on that path or on the path of the temporary snapd... | 17:48 |
| zyga-ubuntu | kyleN: ok, very interesting | 17:49 |
| zyga-ubuntu | kyleN: did you change anything in /etc/ related to snapd reexec? | 17:49 |
| kyleN | no | 17:49 |
| kyleN | kust run: ubuntu@wedge100:~/go/src/github.com/devtools$ ./refresh-bits snapd setup run-snapd restore | 17:50 |
| kyleN | Just run | 17:50 |
| kyleN | then the error occurs when I do somethign with snap, like sudo snap interaces, or snap try... | 17:50 |
| zyga-ubuntu | kyleN: OMG | 17:50 |
| kyleN | not sure if that is good OMG or bad OMG ;) | 17:51 |
| kyleN | I'll go with bad OMG as a starting position ;) | 17:51 |
| mup | PR snapd#3602 opened: snap-seccomp: add secondary arch for unrestricted snaps as well <Created by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/3602> | 17:51 |
| zyga-ubuntu | kyleN: sorry | 17:51 |
| kyleN | quite alright, this is fun | 17:52 |
| zyga-ubuntu | kyleN: so, I think devtools is somewhat unmaintained | 17:52 |
| kyleN | ah | 17:52 |
| zyga-ubuntu | kyleN: and some things are missing | 17:52 |
| mup | PR snapd#3603 opened: snap-seccomp: add secondary arch for unrestricted snaps as well <Created by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/3603> | 17:52 |
| kyleN | zyga-ubuntu, so I need to test my local snapd with my dev interface to prove it works before making PR. what do you recommend | 17:52 |
| zyga-ubuntu | kyleN: if you are hacking on a core device you may need to update devtools to copy new things over | 17:52 |
| kyleN | is not a core device. is server | 17:52 |
| zyga-ubuntu | kyleN: if you are hacking on a classic device it may be easier to just hack on it directly/build package/run commands from core/etc | 17:53 |
| zyga-ubuntu | kyleN: if you need a hand I can elp | 17:53 |
| zyga-ubuntu | kyleN: including in updating devtools to the point where it works again | 17:53 |
| zyga-ubuntu | kyleN: but it's totally my fault that it's an unmaintained thing that poses as somethin that still works | 17:53 |
| kyleN | zyga-ubuntu, I very much want to get this PR to snapd this week. can you perhaps fix up devtools so I can try again tomorrow? | 17:54 |
| kyleN | I am totally open to whatever appraoch works for you zyga | 17:55 |
| kyleN | zyga-ubuntu, ^ | 17:55 |
| zyga-ubuntu | kyleN: what's the PR? | 17:55 |
| kyleN | broadcom-asic-control intefaces for customer | 17:55 |
| kyleN | interface (not plural) | 17:56 |
| zyga-ubuntu | kyleN: aha | 17:56 |
| zyga-ubuntu | kyleN: well, can you please push the PR up (not sure if you already did, sorry about that) and we review it | 17:57 |
| zyga-ubuntu | kyleN: for hacking locally just build the package (dpkg-buildpackage) | 17:57 |
| zyga-ubuntu | kyleN: install it | 17:57 |
| zyga-ubuntu | kyleN: and then you can just hack on interfaces | 17:57 |
| kyleN | zyga-ubuntu, well, I wanted to prove to myself that it works before making the PR | 17:57 |
| zyga-ubuntu | kyleN: and run sudo ./snapd from the tree | 17:57 |
| zyga-ubuntu | kyleN: you may need to sudo systemctl stop snapd.{socket,service} | 17:58 |
| zyga-ubuntu | kyleN: you can propose it even before it's finished | 17:58 |
| zyga-ubuntu | kyleN: and update it mid way | 17:58 |
| zyga-ubuntu | kyleN: as I suspect there may be more things than just the security bits | 17:58 |
| kyleN | ok. it's pretty simple. just apparmor snippet | 17:59 |
| zyga-ubuntu | kyleN: but the dpkg-buildpackage + install freshly built snapd.deb + stop / disable snapd.{socket,service} + sudo ./snapd approach will get you going | 17:59 |
| kyleN | I find taht with my hand overriden snap command appA profile, I get no DENIED when the kernel module is used by the snap | 17:59 |
| zyga-ubuntu | tyhicks, jdstrand could you please look at trivial/emergency PR: https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/3603 | 18:00 |
| mup | PR snapd#3603: snap-seccomp: add secondary arch for unrestricted snaps as well <Created by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/3603> | 18:00 |
| zyga-ubuntu | kyleN: can you push your branch anywhere? I'd like to see the apparmor snippet | 18:00 |
| kyleN | ok hang on | 18:00 |
| mup | PR snapd#3599 closed: Fix/clasic schizofrenia bug <Created by mvo5> <Closed by zyga> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/3599> | 18:04 |
| kyleN | zyga-ubuntu, https://github.com/knitzsche/snapd/tree/broadcom-asic-interface | 18:12 |
| mup | PR snapd#3595 closed: debian: update debian/tests/control to use isolation-machine <Created by mvo5> <Merged by zyga> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/3595> | 18:14 |
| mup | Bug #1705091 opened: unable to use snap after install <Snappy:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1705091> | 18:29 |
| mup | PR snapd#3603 closed: snap-seccomp: add secondary arch for unrestricted snaps as well <Created by mvo5> <Merged by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/3603> | 19:04 |
| zyga-ubuntu | kyleN: thank you | 19:13 |
| zyga-ubuntu | kyleN: if you don't need udev tagging you can just use commonInterface | 19:13 |
| zyga-ubuntu | kyleN: less code to write | 19:14 |
| zyga-ubuntu | kyleN: not sure if this interface should be implicit | 19:14 |
| zyga-ubuntu | kyleN: that needs some more discussion | 19:14 |
| niemeyer | Anyone around to handle a snap in the review queue? | 20:08 |
| mwhudson | enozyga | 21:12 |
| tyhicks | zyga-ubuntu: done! (I see that it was already merged and that's fine since it was a urgent issue that was trivial) | 21:18 |
| mup | PR snapd#3604 opened: tests: enable main suite for opensuse <Created by sergiocazzolato> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/3604> | 22:02 |
| invapid | anyone know if there is an easy way to get snappy to pull from ubuntu src? | 23:13 |
| invapid | most packages' source can be downloaded with "apt source packagename" | 23:14 |
| invapid | so wondering if snappy can pull src similarly | 23:14 |
| kyrofa | invapid, I'm afraid not | 23:16 |
| magicaltrout | hooks........ | 23:33 |
| magicaltrout | docs say i just need a hooks/configure file | 23:33 |
| magicaltrout | if i copy this one https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/tree/master/demos/hooks/snap/hooks | 23:33 |
| magicaltrout | and deploy my snap | 23:33 |
| magicaltrout | Run configure hook of "openldap" snap (snap "openldap" has no "configure" hook) | 23:33 |
| magicaltrout | what moronic thing have i got wrong/ | 23:33 |
| magicaltrout | ? | 23:33 |
| magicaltrout | bugg@tom-laptop2:~/Projects/openldap-snap$ ll /snap/openldap/current/hooks/configure | 23:39 |
| magicaltrout | seems legit | 23:39 |
| magicaltrout | hmm the demos dont work either | 23:46 |
| magicaltrout | https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/configure-hook-doesnt-run/1365 if anyone gets bored | 23:48 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!