=== mup_ is now known as mup === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun [06:16] good morning [06:20] * zyga-ubuntu packs and goes to the sprint [07:03] PR snapcraft#1415 opened: tests: run the tests in travis using LXC containers === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk === chihchun_afk is now known as chihchun [08:24] zyga-ubuntu: good morning! [08:34] Bug #1653286 changed: When connecting App to platform, needs a reboot to use [08:36] Chipaca: hi [08:37] pedronis: greetings, stranger! [08:37] pedronis: I'm assuming you're so suntanned I wouldn't recognise you [08:37] actually, no, just a little bit [08:37] aw :-) [08:38] * pedronis isn't into suntanning, though he went to a place that would have allowed that [08:39] pedronis: at this point I'm so pale I'd get a comparatively decent suntan from just _being_ in places that allowed for it [08:39] mmm... a week in brasil does not sound like a terrible idea [08:40] * Chipaca should expand his list of places to catch the sun in [09:03] jdstrand: o/! hope you're enjoying the weather in warsaw (?) [09:04] jdstrand: WRT snapd#3548, was it being on openvswitch instead of openvswitch-support your only objection? if so i'll merge it :-) [09:04] PR snapd#3548: interfaces: Add /run/uuid/request to openvswitch [09:07] o/ [09:07] zyga-ubuntu: \o [09:08] zyga-ubuntu: are you here to continue a certain review? :-) [09:12] Chipaca: yep, I've started reviewing branches just now [09:12] Chipaca: I'll do top-to-bottom unless you want me to jump to your PR quickly [09:12] actually [09:12] it's third on the list [09:12] so in 2 minutes [09:13] seems fine to me, it'll take me longer than that to check some things in the polkit branch [09:14] PR snapd#3602 closed: snap-seccomp: add secondary arch for unrestricted snaps as well (2.26) [09:32] Bug #1705220 opened: Removing desktop-ubuntu-app-platform broke any app relying on the webapp-helper

[09:44] zyga-ubuntu:fyi https://github.com/conjure-up/conjure-up/issues/683#issuecomment-316321509 3 more confirmations the snap rexec bug is fixed [09:58] zyga-ubuntu: I expect you'll have fun with snapd#3587 [09:58] PR snapd#3587: Using udev tagging for snap interfaces [10:03] stokachu: fantastic news, thank you [10:03] Chipaca: yes, I already replied to the forum theread, I need to read that :) [10:04] ty! [10:35] PR snapd#3605 opened: fix LP: #1628289, have Ubuntu snapd package recommend squashfuse === matteo` is now known as mcroce [11:11] Chipaca: reviewed [11:13] more reviews after returning to the main area [11:34] * zyga-ubuntu kicked some PRs for a fresh run with green master === chihchun is now known as chihchun_afk [11:45] Chipaca: can you confirm one thing for me please [11:45] https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/small-issue-with-snap-debug-confinement/1374 [11:45] zyga-ubuntu, so you are doing the raspbian stuff ... ? do you still need me ? [11:47] zyga-ubuntu: i can confirm that panic, if that's what you meant [11:47] ogra_: no, thank you, I brouht the raspberry pi now and I have hands on testing [11:47] Chipaca: yes, exactly, thank you [11:47] ok [11:47] * zyga-ubuntu is never sure if this is just his system being in a wonky state [11:48] (i still dont get what the purpose of snapd in raspbian is without having a v6 core snap) [11:48] * zyga-ubuntu just fixes bugs [11:48] (well, probably i should say "base" nowadays :) ) [11:57] zyga-ubuntu: thank you for the review! I'll implement fixes for all the nitses [11:58] Chipaca: thank you for the branch, as I indicated you don't have to apply everything [11:58] Chipaca: the branch was very nice [12:00] zyga-ubuntu: ah, i'll only address the ones that are N such that when x= sin(t) and y=sin(t/N), the lissajous curve is closed [12:05] ogra_: re: gpio on the pi. Who shall I bug regarding availability of the GPIO interface in the stable channel ? [12:05] om26er, we need support for gadget upgrades first ... it is on the list but i dont know the prio they have given it === JanC is now known as Guest74368 === JanC_ is now known as JanC [12:09] ogra_: is there a bug report for that ? We(Crossbar) might need that interface on the stable channel for commercial reasons. [12:09] om26er, for the missing gadget update feature, yeah [12:11] bug 166438, bug 1636927, bug 1654362 [12:11] Bug #166438: XML::Parser installation instructions needed [12:11] Bug #1636927: upgrading kernel/gadget snap on Pi3 did not update dtb files [12:11] Bug #1654362: updating gadget snaps does not update config files [12:12] (there are more iirc but i cant find them right now ... make a pick) [12:12] hmm [12:13] bug 1664388 [12:13] Bug #1664388: No way to update kernel cmdline via gadget snap update [12:13] thats better [12:13] yeah [12:13] (ignore the first one above) [12:16] any chance these may get fixed before Ubuntu Core update ? [12:16] ;) [12:17] Ubuntu Core update ? [12:19] I might be not clear on the release cycle here. Maybe I meant on next snapd update, not sure. [12:20] thats up to the snapd team (though it might also require changes on the kernel and gadget packages) [12:20] perhaps ask on the forum ... [12:21] will do. [12:21] om26er, also https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/development-sprint-june-26th-2017/415/46?u=ogra [12:22] thats the outcome of the sprint discussion [12:38] * Chipaca sees https://github.com/kragniz/anyprint and thinks of sergiusens [12:41] that is clearly missing echo "foobar" [12:48] Chipaca, could you please re-run the spread tests for PR 3483? [12:52] cachio: you can't? [12:52] niemeyer: i'm assuming that's something you need to fix ^ plz [12:52] cachio: done [12:53] Chipaca, sorry, I can now [12:53] I didn't realize it :) [12:53] ah [12:53] niemeyer: never mind then :-) [13:04] Chipaca: no standups? [13:09] pedronis: no standups [13:10] pedronis: it's like a miny staycation [13:10] mini* [13:10] heh [13:10] :) [13:10] mostly catching up on stuff today [13:11] (and also not feeling 100%, not sure why, came back from spain over the weekend, and was fine until yesterday) [13:19] Welcome back pedronis! [13:19] Chipaca: Consider it nevermind :) [13:19] neverminded [13:19] The spell checker screwed the joke [13:28] pedronis: you're allergic to work /o\ [13:32] PR snapd#3483 closed: tests: dependency packages installed during prepare-project [13:34] Chipaca, if you usually don't rebase the PR, how do you add the changes in trunk, with merge? [13:35] Chipaca, I ask because the dependencies branch is merged now and I would like to integrate that change in the branches to support fedora and opensuse [13:42] niemeyer: is there a trick to drinking brazilian yerba with argentine kit? The shop only had brazilian, and I'm drinking way too many bits :-) [13:43] cachio: a merge, yes [13:44] cachio: it's less a rule and more a guideline, but if you've got to ask, stick to the rule :-) [13:44] Chipaca, sure :) [13:47] Chipaca: that would be scary news [13:48] pedronis: I'm allergic to being awake [13:48] pedronis: o/ hey [13:48] how are you? [13:48] pedronis: it makes me tired and drowsy [13:50] Chipaca: :) [13:56] zyga-ubuntu, I run the test confinement-classic with opensuse and I am getting this error [13:57] cachio: yes? [13:57] https://paste.ubuntu.com/25125697/ [13:57] oh, nice [13:57] can you fix it, it seems easy (altough annoying) [13:58] what does uname -a say? [13:58] Linux li166-151 4.9.36-x86_64-linode85 #1 SMP Thu Jul 6 15:31:23 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux [14:00] zyga-ubuntu, it should just to edit the snap makefile? [14:07] Chipaca: The only trick I know of is buying "good" yerba.. I drink of a single local brand which is pure leaves, and really good at not having that "powder".. I don't know what to do if they go out of business :) [14:09] niemeyer: I was once friends with a guy that sourced shade-grown stuff, but it was out of my reach at the time (and now i could afford it, i've lost touch) [14:09] Chipaca: A lot of people use small filters.. they look a bit like a tea filter, tied into the straw.. I find it a bit.. unfortunate :P [14:10] I think I'm going to chuck this (use it for the garden?) and get some proper stuff [14:13] That's what I do too.. and it's not even a matter of price.. there are pretty expensive packs that are still mostly powder.. even the ones saying "thick" in the pack, are often just pieces of the branch, and the powder [14:15] niemeyer, have you seen morphis or zyga around lately? [14:15] I was wondering if either them have gotten around to fixing the breakage for 32-bit architecture builds of snap-confine [14:16] Son_Goku: They are both here at the sprint, which is why they haven't been super active here this week [14:16] niemeyer, ah okay [14:16] yeah, because currently the latest 2.27 release code fails to build [14:16] Son_Goku: Yeah, I think we have a new build from last night [14:16] mvo was on it [14:17] oh okay [14:17] I didn't see any new commits here, so I wasn't sure: https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/commits/release/2.27 [14:17] Son_Goku: What issue, just to be sure we're talking about the same thing? [14:17] Son_Goku: It was a critical update on 2.26 I think [14:18] # github.com/snapcore/snapd/cmd/snap-seccomp [14:18] In file included from /usr/include/xfs/xqm.h:21:0, [14:18] from src/github.com/snapcore/snapd/cmd/snap-seccomp/main.go:49: [14:18] /usr/include/xfs/xfs.h:51:12: error: size of array 'xfs_assert_largefile' is too large [14:18] extern int xfs_assert_largefile[sizeof(off_t)-8]; [14:18] ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ [14:18] error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.LDoJXq (%build) [14:18] from: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/ngompa/snapd-prerel-fedora/fedora-rawhide-i386/00579417-snapd/build.log.gz [14:18] this affects armv7hl and i686 [14:18] Son_Goku: Thanks, I'll confirm with them here [14:18] thanks [14:25] Son_Goku: I don't recall that being an issue, btw.. and it's definitely not a general problem on 32bit otherwise our tests would break [14:25] I think it has to do with new libxfs [14:25] Son_Goku: Do you have a suggested fix for the issue already? [14:25] Or do we have to investigate what the proper change is? [14:25] I know that zyga actually fixed this before for the C snap-confine code [14:26] Aha, that's good info, thanks [14:26] it's just cropped up again for the snap-seccomp which pulls this in [14:26] niemeyer: something like a missing -D_I_LIKE_BIG_FILES_AND_I_CANNOT_LIE [14:29] That's what I was thinking we well :) [14:29] as well [14:34] cachio: re [14:36] zyga-ubuntu: Son_Goku was just reporting a 32bit issue building 2.27 on Fedora above [14:37] zyga-ubuntu: Apparently something you've fixed before the snap-seccomp change [14:37] Son_Goku: Do we have a forum topic on it? [14:37] it predates forum [14:37] the last time we fixed this was around 2.16, I think [14:39] niemeyer: I think this is lack of -D something something large file support that's set by default on ubuntu i386 but not on fedora [14:39] Son_Goku: can you drop me a quick forum post about this, I'm finding it hard to keep track of all the things in flight today [14:39] Son_Goku: Yeah, sorry, I meant just now about the problem we need to address [14:49] PR snapcraft#1416 opened: core: a clean command should clean [15:01] PR snapcraft#1354 closed: catkin plugin: fix pythonpath for catkin_find [15:23] zyga-ubuntu: Yeah, that's what we had guessed as well [17:23] zyga-ubuntu: did you see mattdm's reply to you on the mailing list? [17:32] Pharaoh_Atem: no, not yet [17:32] * zyga-ubuntu looks [17:38] Pharaoh_Atem: interesting [17:47] zyga-ubuntu: this echoes what I've said the last few times we've talked about it [18:06] Pharaoh_Atem: I'm making a reply but still distracted by the re-exec but we found [18:07] cool [18:33] * zyga-ubuntu -> supper [19:36] Pharaoh_Atem: replied [21:23] PR snapcraft#1400 closed: lxd: Distingish FileNotFoundError if not installed [21:26] PR snapd#3606 opened: cmd: fix broken double re-executiong from snapd 2.21