| tsimonq2 | Logan: Hey, so what did you find out with kanatest? | 02:10 |
|---|---|---|
| === giraffe is now known as Guest17892 | ||
| === AdmWiggin is now known as tianon | ||
| Unit193 | Hey, so after seeing some tests that should not be failing, I ran autopkgtest -U --apt-pocket=proposed -- lxc autopkgtest-artful on ruby-net-scp and that passed for me. | 07:01 |
| Unit193 | http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/r/ruby-net-sftp/artful/amd64 also shouldn't have failed. | 07:01 |
| Unit193 | 34 tests, 66 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors, 0 pendings, 0 omissions, 0 notifications | 07:03 |
| Unit193 | 100% passed | 07:03 |
| mwhudson | nice | 07:04 |
| Unit193 | I know because I prepped several uploads in Debian for ruby-net-ssh. :P | 07:05 |
| Unit193 | mwhudson: Should I ask where you are? You seem to always be alive in the 'dead zone'. | 07:08 |
| Unit193 | Is there a way to get them testing against -proposed? | 07:11 |
| ginggs | Unit193: the tests can be triggered against additional packages | 07:15 |
| Unit193 | ginggs: ruby-net-scp/ruby-net-sftp need --apt-pocket=proposed=src:ruby-net-ssh | 07:16 |
| ginggs | Unit193: retrying | 07:20 |
| Unit193 | Thanks! | 07:20 |
| Unit193 | I understand I don't have permissions for it, but how? | 07:20 |
| ginggs | Unit193: do you see the links for retrying (they look like recycle icons) on http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/r/ruby-net-sftp/artful/amd64 ? | 07:22 |
| Unit193 | ginggs: I did, but since it needed a package from -proposed I thought the fine tuning would be different. | 07:24 |
| ginggs | Unit193: ok, so look at the URL of one of the retry links, then add '&trigger=ruby-net-ssh%2F1%3A4.1.0-1' | 07:24 |
| Unit193 | That's officially 'fun'. Thanks. | 07:25 |
| mwhudson | Unit193: nz | 07:49 |
| mwhudson | yes, retry url hacking is fun | 07:50 |
| mwhudson | you can also add &all-proposed=1 | 07:50 |
| Unit193 | Ah. I'm not core nor motu (just packageset), so not (yet) really able to useit. | 07:52 |
| LocutusOfBorg | mwhudson, what is the last thing blocking python3.6? | 07:52 |
| LocutusOfBorg | Unit193, I stole your wine-development merge | 07:52 |
| Unit193 | I had one? | 07:53 |
| Unit193 | Thanks, LocutusOfBorg! | 07:53 |
| LocutusOfBorg | you asked me to sponsor that for you | 07:53 |
| Unit193 | Good enough. :) | 07:53 |
| LocutusOfBorg | go cmake, go | 07:57 |
| mwhudson | LocutusOfBorg: yara ftbfs on armhf | 08:21 |
| LocutusOfBorg | ack | 08:21 |
| mwhudson | LocutusOfBorg: which i am hacking almightily now | 08:21 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I'm fixing the last gtk-d failures | 08:21 |
| LocutusOfBorg | oh wonderful | 08:21 |
| mwhudson | oh boy this code really expects aligned access to work | 08:27 |
| mwhudson | like, a lot | 08:44 |
| mwhudson | xnox: what do you think about removing the existing yara binaries on armhf? (and rdeps i guess) | 08:57 |
| mwhudson | xnox, slangasek, doko: sent an update to ubuntu-devel about yara | 09:13 |
| === nikow1 is now known as nikow | ||
| LocutusOfBorg | can I ask for a little perl advice? | 10:34 |
| LocutusOfBorg | Laney, the debhelper merge is ready, but I fail to parse the Ubuntu version | 10:34 |
| Laney | you what? | 10:34 |
| LocutusOfBorg | perl -e ' undef $/; foreach (@ARGV) { open (IN, $_) or die "$_: $!"; $file=<IN>; close IN; if ($file=~m/=head1 .*?\n\n(.*?) - (.*?)\n\n/s) { my $item="=item $1(1)\n\n$2\n\n"; if (" dh_installmanpages " !~ / $1 /) { $list.=$item; } else { $list_deprecated.=$item; } } } END { my $recommended_compat = 10.6.4ubuntu1; $recommended_compat =~ s{\..*}{}; while (<STDIN>) { s/#LIST#/$list/; s/#LIST_DEPRECATED#/$list_deprecated/; | 10:35 |
| LocutusOfBorg | s/#RECOMMEDED_COMPAT#/$recommeded_compat/; print; }; }' dh_auto_build dh_auto_clean dh_auto_configure dh_auto_install dh_auto_test dh_bugfiles dh_builddeb dh_clean dh_compress dh_fixperms dh_gconf dh_gencontrol dh_icons dh_install dh_installcatalogs dh_installchangelogs dh_installcron dh_installdeb dh_installdebconf dh_installdirs dh_installdocs dh_installemacsen dh_installexamples dh_installgsettings dh_installifupdown | 10:35 |
| LocutusOfBorg | dh_installinfo dh_installinit dh_installlogcheck dh_installlogrotate dh_installman dh_installmanpages dh_installmenu dh_installmime dh_installmodules dh_installpam dh_installppp dh_installudev dh_installwm dh_installxfonts dh_link dh_lintian dh_listpackages dh_makeshlibs dh_md5sums dh_missing dh_movefiles dh_perl dh_prep dh_shlibdeps dh_strip dh_systemd_enable dh_systemd_start dh_testdir dh_testroot dh_ucf dh_update_autotools_c | 10:35 |
| LocutusOfBorg | onfig dh_usrlocal | \ | 10:35 |
| LocutusOfBorg | pod2man --utf8 -c Debhelper -r "10.6.4ubuntu1" --name="debhelper" --section=7 > debhelper.7 | 10:35 |
| LocutusOfBorg | https://launchpadlibrarian.net/330668177/buildlog_ubuntu-artful-amd64.debhelper_10.6.4ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz | 10:35 |
| LocutusOfBorg | bad copy-paste | 10:35 |
| LocutusOfBorg | forcing VERSION=10 "fixes" it, but it is hacky and bad | 10:35 |
| LocutusOfBorg | solution is to drop that ubuntu in recommended compat, right? | 10:35 |
| LocutusOfBorg | the question is: should I revert somewhere this? https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debhelper/debhelper.git/commit/?id=d2ca3a7f964eb915035c4526baa92325d3f6dbd7 | 10:37 |
| LocutusOfBorg | $$recommended_compat =~ s{\..*}{}; | 10:37 |
| LocutusOfBorg | this is what fails | 10:37 |
| Laney | is it calculating that variable wrong? | 10:38 |
| LocutusOfBorg | the problem is that rege | 10:40 |
| LocutusOfBorg | with the debian version 10.6.4 is returning "10" | 10:40 |
| LocutusOfBorg | with the ubuntu version, 10.6.4ubuntu1 it returns "can't parse foobar" | 10:40 |
| LocutusOfBorg | Bareword found where operator expected at -e line 1, near "10.6.4ubuntu1" | 10:40 |
| LocutusOfBorg | so, this code "$recommended_compat =~ s{\..*}{};" is having issues | 10:41 |
| LocutusOfBorg | FWIW doing this VERSION=$(shell dpkg-parsechangelog -SVersion |cut -f 1 -d "u") also works, because it strips the "ubuntu" part from version | 10:43 |
| Laney | LocutusOfBorg: Looks like it should be quoted? | 10:43 |
| Laney | my $recommended_compat = 10.6.4ubuntu1; | 10:43 |
| cjwatson | Yeah that probably just wants to be my $$recommended_compat = q($(VERSION)); | 10:44 |
| cjwatson | or similar | 10:44 |
| cjwatson | hmm, do I have upstream commit access | 10:46 |
| cjwatson | doesn't look like it | 10:49 |
| LocutusOfBorg | sorry, bad connection sigh | 10:54 |
| LocutusOfBorg | seems not good, man ./debhelper.7 shows: "#RECOMMEDED_COMPAT#" instead of 10 | 10:55 |
| cjwatson | I'm preparing a patch | 10:56 |
| LocutusOfBorg | ack, do you want to directly upload debhelper? I can give you the merge, or you can just grab from the ppa above | 10:56 |
| cjwatson | not especially | 10:57 |
| cjwatson | I'll send a patch to Debian | 10:57 |
| LocutusOfBorg | ok thanks | 10:58 |
| Laney | There's some "recommeded" / "recommended" confusion too. | 11:02 |
| cjwatson | yes, I'm fixing that | 11:04 |
| Laney | Nod | 11:05 |
| LocutusOfBorg | so also debian manpages should be bad | 11:05 |
| LocutusOfBorg | yes lol | 11:06 |
| cjwatson | indeed | 11:10 |
| cjwatson | ... and a lack of s///g ... | 11:14 |
| cjwatson | LocutusOfBorg,Laney: https://bugs.debian.org/869780 | 11:24 |
| ubottu | Debian bug 869780 in debhelper "debhelper: recommended compat version substitution is totally broken" [Normal,Open] | 11:24 |
| cjwatson | feel free to cherry-pick or whatever | 11:25 |
| Laney | cjwatson: Ta | 11:36 |
| Laney | LocutusOfBorg: You going to take that? | 11:36 |
| rbalint | juliank: are you ok with the smaller patch against apt in LP: #1690980 ? | 12:11 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1690980 in OEM Priority Project "unattended-upgrades does not block shutdown of system, as it is designed to" [Critical,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1690980 | 12:11 |
| LocutusOfBorg | Laney, will upload in ppa | 12:12 |
| LocutusOfBorg | sorry I was @lunch | 12:12 |
| * Laney nod | 12:12 | |
| juliank | rbalint: Tech side is OK, but I'm thinking about the commit message summary. It's a bit long, does not mention the timeout, and mentions shutdown, whereas it's any service stop that is affected? | 12:14 |
| juliank | Gracefully terminate processes apt-daily-upgrade.service on stop? | 12:15 |
| LocutusOfBorg | Laney, do you want to do some testing before I upload to Ubuntu? I admit, I'm worried about it :) | 12:15 |
| rbalint | juliank: thanks that's clear and short | 12:16 |
| juliank | oh, it's missing a word | 12:16 |
| rbalint | juliank: so sure, feel free to change it | 12:16 |
| juliank | Gracefully terminate processes *in* apt-daily-upgrade.service on stop | 12:16 |
| rbalint | do you plan landing 1.2.25 in xenial in the near future? | 12:17 |
| juliank | Let's go with "Gracefully terminate process when stopping apt-daily-upgrade" | 12:18 |
| juliank | rbalint: Hey, I'm waiting for 1.2.24 since 5 weeks or so to enter proposed. 1.2.25 is basically scheduled now-ish, after the next 1.5 beta (and 1.4.8) | 12:19 |
| juliank | I did not yet push even 1.4.7 to zesty, as I'm waiting for 1.4.6 to be approved first | 12:20 |
| juliank | And AFAIUI, updates are supposed to be in newer suites before older ones. | 12:20 |
| juliank | So, the plan would be to have the service fix in 1.5~beta2, cherry pick to a 1.4.8 release, and cherry-pick that and the stuff from 1.4.7 into 1.2.25 | 12:22 |
| juliank | see bug 1702326 for the changes in 1.4.7 | 12:23 |
| ubottu | bug 1702326 in apt (Ubuntu Zesty) "New microrelease 1.4.7 for zesty" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1702326 | 12:23 |
| juliank | (basically minor (in size) fixes to the http method to correctly handle some server responses) | 12:24 |
| rbalint | juliank: ok, thanks! | 12:24 |
| juliank | There are no other fixes scheduled for 1.4.8 at the moment, so that would be just the service change :) | 12:24 |
| juliank | Oh, I see DonKult has some fixes in his repo he did not push yet | 12:27 |
| rbalint | mvo: i'm fairly confident in the u-u PR, maybe could you please take a look again? | 12:29 |
| mvo | rbalint: sure, let me do that now | 12:29 |
| LocutusOfBorg | mapreri, diffoscope: error: unrecognized arguments: --thisflagdoesntexistandwontexist | 12:34 |
| LocutusOfBorg | diffoscope on s390x seems sad | 12:34 |
| LocutusOfBorg | https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-artful/artful/s390x/d/diffoscope/20170726_103422_64cc6@/log.gz | 12:34 |
| mapreri | LocutusOfBorg: that's not an error | 12:35 |
| mapreri | indeed that autpkgtest test passes | 12:35 |
| mapreri | and yeah, that thing is another failure that is fixed by another commit I forgot about… | 12:35 |
| mapreri | (btw, that test is there to test that if you pass an invalid argument diffoscope exists with code 2) | 12:35 |
| LocutusOfBorg | ack | 12:37 |
| LocutusOfBorg | mwhudson, why python3-defaults is not pointing at the right python? I'm lost | 12:37 |
| LocutusOfBorg | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python3-defaults/3.6.1-0ubuntu2 | 12:37 |
| LocutusOfBorg | it should be 3.6.2 | 12:37 |
| LocutusOfBorg | sagemath is picking up Get:10 http://ftpmaster.internal/ubuntu artful-proposed/main amd64 libpython3-stdlib amd64 3.6.1-0ubuntu2 [7012 B] | 12:37 |
| LocutusOfBorg | and not sure if this is the reason for its failure | 12:38 |
| mapreri | LocutusOfBorg: https://anonscm.debian.org/git/reproducible/diffoscope.git/commit/?id=7e16cecb98ec2e874da4f3ea291e276602852dcd | 12:38 |
| mapreri | and probably will need https://anonscm.debian.org/git/reproducible/diffoscope.git/commit/?id=fe57c99828060ae77af2784961d47beb44eb74f5 as well.. | 12:38 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I uploaded with the first patch, since I can't test s390x | 12:39 |
| mapreri | it's weird that only s390x failed | 12:40 |
| mapreri | that thing failed in debian as well, on amd64 | 12:40 |
| LocutusOfBorg | Laney, https://launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/+archive/ubuntu/locutusofborg-ppa/+packages | 12:49 |
| LocutusOfBorg | do you want to test it out? :p | 12:49 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I uploaded wxwidgets3.0 on that ppa, lets see if it works or not | 12:51 |
| juliank | rbalint: I forgot to tell you, I committed it in https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/apt/apt.git/commit/?id=78bc10d4702b30b46d802294ac43cffc34d9c431 | 12:55 |
| juliank | rbalint: Feel free to do a 1.5~beta1ubuntu1 now if you want it now, 1.5~beta2 comes in a few days | 12:56 |
| juliank | Well, it might come today, but I'm not sure what DonKult is up to exactly | 12:56 |
| ogra_ | arges, hmm, how did my name end up in that livecd-rootfs changelog ? i cant remember ever touching any of this | 13:00 |
| arges | ogra_: I didn't put it there... | 13:00 |
| ogra_ | arges, well, you upploaded it | 13:02 |
| ogra_ | (but i see, seems rcj assembled it) | 13:02 |
| ogra_ | well, not that important anyway ... i was just wondering how my name got on there | 13:03 |
| arges | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/2.408.13 looks correct, I think my 'sru-release' script seems to have printed incorrect info on the bug | 13:04 |
| ogra_ | yeah, that was the trusty sru | 13:04 |
| ogra_ | not the xenial one :) | 13:04 |
| ogra_ | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/2.208.14 | 13:05 |
| arges | ah, yea I think rcj included other patches in his upload | 13:06 |
| ogra_ | (thats fine, but i still cant remember ever touching any vmdk, ova or vargrat stuff in my life ;) ) | 13:13 |
| ogra_ | (at least not in livecd-rootfs ... but perhaps my memory fades :P i'm getting old ... :) ) | 13:13 |
| arges | pkkk~. | 13:25 |
| arges | ~ | 13:25 |
| arges | .~. | 13:25 |
| arges | whoops | 13:26 |
| LocutusOfBorg | arges, this seems the command used to kill a stuck ssh connection, correct? | 13:29 |
| rcj | ogra_: I pulled in contributions to livecd-rootfs in the utopic->xenial timeframe for that trusty upload to support build of cloud-images. I kept all the contributors names. I can't recall which you contributed to but it must have been in there ;) | 13:29 |
| === dja_ is now known as dja | ||
| rbalint | juliank: thanks, in a few days is ok i would not create a delta for a few days in in this case | 13:42 |
| xnox | mwhudson, it is landing =) | 13:59 |
| xnox | i'm sure it will spill over two publications and screw people up for an hour or so. | 13:59 |
| doko | yeah, got 56 migration mails ... | 14:09 |
| zhongjun | nacc: hi | 15:11 |
| nacc | zhongjun: hello | 15:12 |
| zhongjun | nacc: I got this error in ubuntu 16.04 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=847557 | 15:13 |
| ubottu | Debian bug 847557 in nfs-kernel-server "/usr/sbin/exportfs: exportfs cannot handle IPv6 addresses" [Important,Open] | 15:13 |
| zhongjun | nacc: This bug has been fixed in nfs-kernel-server version 1:1.3.4-1 | 15:13 |
| zhongjun | nacc: Could we backport the "fix" in nfs-kernel-server version 1:1.2.8 | 15:14 |
| zhongjun | nacc: Could we backport the "fix" in ubuntu 16.04 | 15:16 |
| nacc | zhongjun: do you know the specific fix? | 15:16 |
| zhongjun | nacc: Actually, I am not sure about the specifix fix | 15:17 |
| nacc | zhongjun: if you want it in xenial-backports, you can request it (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBackports). But for a bugfix to go into xenial-updates, you have to know what the bugfix is (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates). | 15:18 |
| zhongjun | nacc: Is there a fast way or some links that I could make me find the specific fix quickly? | 15:22 |
| zhongjun | nacc: Is there a fast way or some links that it could make me find the specific fix quickly? | 15:22 |
| rbasak | zhongjun: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bisection_(software_engineering) maybe? | 15:26 |
| nacc | zhongjun: you would need to look at what was fixed in teh debian upload. More than likely it's an upstream fix (not a debian-specific one). Generally, no, there's not a 'quick way' | 15:26 |
| rbasak | Or yeah, look through the commit messages and changelogs. | 15:26 |
| zhongjun | rbasak, nacc: Thanks, if anyone familiar with exportfs IPv6, please tell me | 15:29 |
| roaksoax_ | 4/win 3 | 15:35 |
| doko | xnox: do you know if LocutusOfBorg will do the perl merge and start the perl transition? | 15:52 |
| xnox | no idea. | 15:52 |
| doko | ok, then I'll do the merge | 15:54 |
| Laney | why not wait and ask? | 15:55 |
| ginggs | doko, Laney: lemme ask him | 15:58 |
| mapreri | last I heard from him he said "I won't until python is good" | 16:06 |
| LocutusOfBorg | doko, why do you think this is a merge? | 16:08 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I'm uploading a no-change rebuild in a ppa | 16:08 |
| doko | was zlib updated in Debian? | 16:08 |
| LocutusOfBorg | some of the patches I'm carrying are fixed in new perl, so probably a plain sync will work | 16:09 |
| LocutusOfBorg | no doko it wasnt | 16:09 |
| LocutusOfBorg | btw I just uploaded debhelper, for sure I would wait a little bit before syncing perl | 16:09 |
| LocutusOfBorg | uploaded in my ppa | 16:09 |
| doko | LocutusOfBorg: so you are handling this? | 16:09 |
| LocutusOfBorg | if you want to help, please help :) | 16:09 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I can do the sync/merge, but for sure I can't handle perl alone | 16:10 |
| LocutusOfBorg | (I was waiting for python3-defaults to land) | 16:10 |
| LocutusOfBorg | does this sound ok for you? | 16:11 |
| LocutusOfBorg | sync/merge in one hour or two | 16:11 |
| LocutusOfBorg | and then do the rebuilds tonight/later | 16:11 |
| doko | I only want to make sure that it's done mid next week, before I start with gcc-7 | 16:11 |
| LocutusOfBorg | this sounds like a good plan | 16:12 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I'm just worried about the testsuite | 16:12 |
| LocutusOfBorg | but yeah, lets sync and start rebuilds in one hour | 16:12 |
| LocutusOfBorg | builders are bad now, amd64 is sloooow | 16:12 |
| LocutusOfBorg | not sure what they are building, hopefully they will be green soon | 16:13 |
| LocutusOfBorg | we still have that perl "hey don't build arch:all before arch:any or rmadison will be sad" stuff | 16:13 |
| LocutusOfBorg | so, I want amd64 ready before syncing | 16:14 |
| doko | which ppa? | 16:14 |
| LocutusOfBorg | ~costamagnagianfranco/locutusofborg-ppa | 16:14 |
| LocutusOfBorg | ppc64el started, so I guess we can just wait for it | 16:15 |
| LocutusOfBorg | test failures were common | 16:15 |
| LocutusOfBorg | doko, can you please bump debhelper priority? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debhelper/10.6.4ubuntu1 | 16:19 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I don't want the egg and cichken issue | 16:19 |
| * LocutusOfBorg chicken | 16:19 | |
| jbicha | tumbleweed: reverse-depends doesn't seem to handle '-r testing' or '-r buster' | 16:21 |
| LocutusOfBorg | jbicha, would be nice to see also -r artful-proposed, to understand which stuff has already been rebuilt on top of the new library :) | 16:22 |
| LocutusOfBorg | thanks to whoever did it | 16:25 |
| cjwatson | LocutusOfBorg: security updates, but it'll get there in a bit | 16:38 |
| ginggs | why would objcopy fail to extract debug info on the buildds when FPC calls it, but works fine if I call it with the same arguments from a build script? | 16:47 |
| LocutusOfBorg | cjwatson, I mean, thanks to whoever bumped the priority of perl and debhelper :) | 16:48 |
| LocutusOfBorg | no problem cjwatson, breaking the whole world can wait some hours I hope :p | 16:48 |
| cjwatson | not I | 16:48 |
| LocutusOfBorg | doko, the plain sync seems to have worked on ppc64el | 16:55 |
| LocutusOfBorg | so, lets wait for builders to settle down and I'll force-sync | 16:55 |
| * LocutusOfBorg leaves | 16:57 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | cheers! | 16:57 |
| bluefoxxxx | which channel for help with community documentation issues? Just #ubuntu? | 17:03 |
| tsimonq2 | bluefoxxxx: I assume #ubuntu-doc? | 17:04 |
| bluefoxxxx | thanks | 17:04 |
| tumbleweed | jbicha: ah, I think the distro-info-data was out of date, re-running it now | 17:06 |
| LocutusOfBorg | doko, sync? | 17:27 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I'm doing it, done | 17:30 |
| tumbleweed | jbicha: fixed | 18:18 |
| jbicha | thanks! | 18:19 |
| === sergiusens_ is now known as sergiusens | ||
| tsimonq2 | slangasek, infinity, jbicha: Hey there! I'll be helping with the Qt transition while mitya57 is off on vacation, what's the status of getting the Ubuntu Touch packages removed from the archive? If a new Qt version is uploaded, it probably won't migrate from -proposed unless those are removed... | 18:51 |
| slangasek | tsimonq2: from my perspective, xnox was driving these removals; I'd check with him on status | 18:57 |
| tsimonq2 | slangasek: Thanks. | 18:58 |
| doko | LocutusOfBorg: I'm uploading the first batch of perl rebuilds | 19:47 |
| nacc | mdeslaur: fyi, apache2 2.4.27-3 is now in unstable. I'll merge up to that, which should be past the version that declares http2 stable. | 20:14 |
| mdeslaur | nacc: great, thanks | 20:17 |
| mwhudson | xnox: \o/ | 21:50 |
| LocutusOfBorg | doko, ack thanks | 22:37 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I'll rekick some stuff | 22:43 |
| Unit193 | infinity: I don't suppose you're online? | 22:56 |
| infinity | Unit193: I might be. | 22:57 |
| Unit193 | I was wondering why specifically in https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby-specinfra/2.66.0-1ubuntu1 you added that, I don't see it in the requirements and autopkgtests pass without it. | 22:57 |
| Unit193 | Based on grep, I do see how one might use it, but I'm wondering 1. How you saw that. 2. If the build-dep is still needed. | 22:57 |
| infinity | Unit193: If I recall, it actually showed us as failures in rdeps. | 22:58 |
| Unit193 | I wondered if that was the case, if it were I wouldn't think build-depend... | 22:59 |
| infinity | Build-dep was probably to cover a build-time testsuite or something, but might possibly have been a paranoid error. | 23:00 |
| infinity | I don't see how it hurts either, mind you. :P | 23:00 |
| Unit193 | I see "spec/command/debian/port_spec.rb: it { should eq 'netstat -tunl | grep -- :80\ ' }" in that version, and "lib/specinfra/command/base/port.rb: "netstat -tunl | grep -- #{escape(pattern)}"" in the new. | 23:00 |
| infinity | Lots of calls to netstat in the source. | 23:00 |
| Unit193 | infinity: Right, but if I push to Debian, specifically in a package I'm not an uploader, I want to make dang sure it's needed. :) | 23:00 |
| Unit193 | Yeah, though a lot under 'freebsd' | 23:01 |
| Unit193 | infinity: Thanks for explaining, and for remembering that long ago! | 23:01 |
| infinity | Unit193: Well, I would test it without the build-dep, but apparently the testsuite breaks earlier. :P | 23:06 |
| infinity | /usr/lib/ruby/2.3.0/rubygems/specification.rb:1436:in `block in activate_dependencies': can't satisfy 'net-ssh (< 4.0, >= 2.7)', already activated 'net-ssh-4.1.0' (Gem::LoadError) | 23:06 |
| Unit193 | sudo autopkgtest -U --apt-pocket proposed=ruby-net-ssh -- lxc autopkgtest-artful | 23:06 |
| infinity | Unit193: But I'd posit that if it passes for you, your chroot is dirty (ie: has net-tools in it) | 23:06 |
| Unit193 | I have no idea about the autopkgtests, it shouldn't have been installed (it's a new container, nothing abnormal), and the base chroot I used to build didn't have it either. | 23:08 |
| infinity | And the testsuite ran? | 23:08 |
| infinity | I mean, I literally just tried to build it and the testsuite doesn't run at all. | 23:09 |
| infinity | So, I kinda want to know how you managed. | 23:09 |
| Unit193 | The old one I think I targetted for Zesty, I'm working on a new version that of course handles net-ssh 4.x | 23:10 |
| infinity | Anyhow, it's possible the build-dep was in error if the ruby-specinfra testsuite doesn't exercise that bit of code (though, that would be a bug in lack of coverage of the testsuite, then), but the dependency is obviously correct. | 23:11 |
| infinity | And was needed for testsuites of OTHER rdeps to pass. | 23:11 |
| infinity | (And just needed because duh) | 23:11 |
| Unit193 | infinity: Re-running the autopkgtest, something else is pulling net-tools in, that could be the answer. :P | 23:18 |
| Unit193 | Err.. | 23:18 |
| Unit193 | infinity: SO yes, for sure no net-tools in the autopkgtest..container, and it still passed. No idea how to give you the log for autopkgtest run though. | 23:27 |
| infinity | Unit193: autopkgtest isn't relevant here, though. | 23:46 |
| infinity | Unit193: The direct dependency is correct *even if* the testsuite doesn't exercise that code. | 23:47 |
| infinity | Unit193: We don't add deps just to satsify testsuites. | 23:47 |
| infinity | Unit193: Now for *building*, the build-dep might not be relevant if the testsuite doesn't run that code, but also meh? | 23:47 |
| Unit193 | infinity: In this case, autopkgtest also builds it. And I figured good to specifically run with autopkgtests as they're a bit of a blackbox to me still. Of course building runs the tests, and the build passes. :) | 23:48 |
| Unit193 | To be clear, no I agree with your first point, net-tools should be a *depend*, but *build-depend* was what I was trying to figure out. | 23:49 |
| Unit193 | (https://deb.li/3PbhA) | 23:50 |
| infinity | Unit193: Sure. Build-dep might have just been a belt-and-bracers thing because I knew the build ran a testsuite and I didn't care to check if it had decent coverage. | 23:51 |
| Unit193 | Good enough. | 23:52 |
| infinity | Unit193: And path of least resistance, since it had literally always built with net-tools in the past. | 23:52 |
| Unit193 | Sure, understandable. | 23:52 |
| infinity | Unit193: I do know some OTHER testsuite exercises that code, cause that's how I noticed the bug, but damned if I can figure out what it was now. :P | 23:52 |
| Unit193 | ruby-serverspec or chef, likely. | 23:52 |
| infinity | Didn't seem to be either of them at a glance. | 23:53 |
| infinity | But there's also serverspec-runner, which might be a test-depend somewhere or something. | 23:53 |
| infinity | I dunno. I gave up looking, I have a dinner to run off to. :P | 23:53 |
| Unit193 | Food is always a good reason. | 23:54 |
| infinity | Free food. | 23:54 |
| infinity | Paid for by parents. | 23:54 |
| Unit193 | Ooooooh. | 23:54 |
| infinity | So, +1/-1 | 23:54 |
| infinity | But steak, so maybe another +1? | 23:54 |
| Unit193 | Yes very much so. | 23:54 |
| Unit193 | But, anywho if all goes well that package is syncable now. \o/ | 23:55 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!