| jk^ | hi all | 05:50 |
|---|---|---|
| jk^ | why at this link https://www.ubuntu.com/download/desktop it doesn't let me choose between 32 bit and 64 bit version and offers me just 64 bit version? | 05:59 |
| tsimonq2 | jk^: Ask them yourself ;) https://github.com/canonical-websites/www.ubuntu.com/issues/new | 06:02 |
| jk^ | tsimonq2 | 06:03 |
| jk^ | i'm not registered | 06:04 |
| jk^ | i can't | 06:04 |
| jk^ | :\ | 06:04 |
| tsimonq2 | Ah k | 06:06 |
| SwedeMike | jk^: press "alternative downloads", then scrool down and there are multiple ways to get 32bit | 06:14 |
| SwedeMike | jk^: btw, why do you want the 32bit version? | 06:17 |
| === floccula1t is now known as flocculant | ||
| jk^ | SwedeMike, what means "btw"? | 07:18 |
| tsimonq2 | jk^: By The Way, it's like saying "while we're at it" | 07:19 |
| jk^ | my pc is at 32 bit | 07:23 |
| jk^ | however in the "alternative download" there aren't the direct link for 32 bit version | 07:23 |
| jk^ | just link for torrents | 07:23 |
| jk^ | tsimonq2 | 07:23 |
| jk^ | SwedeMike | 07:23 |
| SwedeMike | jk^: http://www.mirrorservice.org/sites/cdimage.ubuntu.com/cdimage/netboot/xenial/ has both amd64 and i386 | 07:49 |
| jk^ | it isn't the official site | 07:49 |
| SwedeMike | jk^: *Sigh* http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/cdimage/netboot/xenial/ | 07:50 |
| SwedeMike | better? | 07:50 |
| jk^ | what means "netboot"? | 07:53 |
| tsimonq2 | jk^: Here: http://releases.ubuntu.com/ | 07:54 |
| jk^ | mmmmh :| | 07:56 |
| jk^ | one time, i can download it from the link i pasted .( | 07:56 |
| jk^ | :( | 07:56 |
| jk^ | i remember it let me choose between 32 and 64 :| | 07:56 |
| SwedeMike | jk^: since most processors from the past 10 years can do 64bit, 32bit is not the recommended choice for most people. | 08:01 |
| === Guest34295 is now known as |Night| | ||
| === flocculant is now known as flocculant_ | ||
| === flocculant_ is now known as flocculant | ||
| scenick | Hi, can I be any good? | 11:29 |
| GumiBot | Hello! I've installed 17.10 pre-release on a laptop that I'm using every day | 12:56 |
| GumiBot | and I've already found some weird "bugs" but I'm not sure if these are related to Ubuntu itself | 12:57 |
| GumiBot | Can I still report them to the Ubuntu team? | 12:57 |
| === IRCGate23448 is now known as jk^ | ||
| lotus|artfulbox | anyone else has empty icons in gnome software in 17.10 when launching? | 16:35 |
| lotus|artfulbox | after a while package icons showup afterall | 16:35 |
| lotus|artfulbox | just wanna know if its worth making a bug | 16:36 |
| oerheks | lotus|artfulbox, | 16:43 |
| oerheks | what gives: killall gnome-software ; gnome-software --verbose | 16:43 |
| oerheks | .. and from what mirror do you update? | 16:45 |
| oerheks | https://askubuntu.com/questions/760278/the-new-software-center-in-ubuntu-16-04-shows-no-application-data-found also gives a weird answer: System Settings > Language Support, re-apply system-wide, and reboot. Now the new app store actually functions. | 16:48 |
| oerheks | maybe this is still the same for 17.10 | 16:49 |
| lotus|artfulbox | oerheks, im installing languages right now, lets c what that gives | 16:53 |
| oerheks | :-) | 16:54 |
| lotus|artfulbox | oerheks, bingo! that worked like a charm | 16:55 |
| oerheks | i was reading this old bug too, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1563155 | 16:55 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1563155 in gnome-software (Ubuntu) "No Application Data Found" [High,Confirmed] | 16:55 |
| lotus|artfulbox | oerheks, weather banner shows up gnome software in my language now | 16:55 |
| oerheks | maybe you can confirm that this solution works for 17.10, perhaps for those xenial users too | 16:56 |
| lotus|artfulbox | oerheks, ill do that right away, didnt test on xenial yet | 16:56 |
| oerheks | did it happen after install or updates? | 16:56 |
| lotus|artfulbox | oerheks, updates didnt solve problem was from the fresh iso install | 16:57 |
| lotus|artfulbox | oerheks, just now language support fixxed it | 16:57 |
| oerheks | good :-) | 16:57 |
| oerheks | just asking, to determin when this happens | 16:57 |
| oerheks | you just saved 100.000 systems :-P | 16:58 |
| lotus|artfulbox | lol | 16:59 |
| lotus|artfulbox | oerheks, too bad the 17.10 devs wont notice this when i just add comment on existing old bug? | 16:59 |
| lotus|artfulbox | oerheks, isnt there a trick to force ubuntu-bug onto an existing bug? | 17:00 |
| lotus|artfulbox | without making a dupe | 17:00 |
| oerheks | if you file a bug, you get some examples of same bugs, no? | 17:01 |
| lotus|artfulbox | yeah | 17:01 |
| oerheks | search for the same in a 2nd browser | 17:01 |
| oerheks | i https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1706488 | 17:03 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1706488 in gnome-software (Ubuntu Zesty) "Snaps without icons not showing" [High,New] | 17:03 |
| lotus|artfulbox | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1563155 | 17:03 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1563155 in gnome-software (Ubuntu) "No Application Data Found" [High,Confirmed] | 17:03 |
| lotus|artfulbox | #46 | 17:03 |
| lotus|artfulbox | gonna remind in #ubuntu-devel oerheks | 17:03 |
| oerheks | i am sure they read back here too | 17:05 |
| lotus|artfulbox | kk | 17:05 |
| lotus|artfulbox | oerheks, tnx for the fix | 17:06 |
| oerheks | have fun :-) | 17:09 |
| lotus|artfulbox | really hope they will fix a quicker way then activities | 17:11 |
| oerheks | it is holliday time also, but the belgium-dutch bughunt-team lotuspsychje&oerheks are on it :-P | 17:12 |
| lotus|artfulbox | lol | 17:12 |
| lotus|artfulbox | bughunting never sleeps | 17:12 |
| lotus|artfulbox | cu next session oerheks | 17:13 |
| === JanC is now known as Guest48595 | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!