[00:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (trusty-proposed) [2]
[00:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: ubuntu-advantage-tools (trusty-proposed/primary) [2]
[00:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected update-manager [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:16.04.8]
[00:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.21.63.4]
[00:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted whoopsie [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.2.52.5]
[00:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted whoopsie [source] (zesty-proposed) [0.2.55.2]
[00:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools [source] (trusty-proposed) [2]
[00:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-advantage-tools [i386] (trusty-proposed/none) [2] (no packageset)
[01:09] <bashfulrobot> slangasek: Yup - I'm around for sure. Just ping when ready.
[01:09] <slangasek> bashfulrobot: that was the ping :)
[01:09] <bashfulrobot> ok, Will announce!
[01:09] <slangasek> mirroring is triggered, the rest is up to you
[01:09] <bashfulrobot> Thanks!
[01:10] <bashfulrobot> On it!
[01:10] <slangasek> you might want to check that it's visible on the mirrors before announcing just to be sure
[01:10] <slangasek> i.e. that cdimage.ubuntu.com shows what you expect
[01:56] <bashfulrobot> slangasek: Good point. I'm still editing the email anyways. Will check before sending.
[04:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libhtp [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/none) [1:0.5.25-1] (no packageset)
[04:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: suricata [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [4.0.0-beta1-1~exp1] (no packageset)
[04:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libhtp [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1:0.5.25-1] (no packageset)
[04:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libhtp [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [1:0.5.25-1] (no packageset)
[04:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libhtp [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1:0.5.25-1] (no packageset)
[04:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libhtp [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [1:0.5.25-1] (no packageset)
[04:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: suricata [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [4.0.0-beta1-1~exp1] (no packageset)
[04:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libhtp [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [1:0.5.25-1] (no packageset)
[04:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: suricata [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [4.0.0-beta1-1~exp1] (no packageset)
[04:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: suricata [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [4.0.0-beta1-1~exp1] (no packageset)
[04:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: suricata [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [4.0.0-beta1-1~exp1] (no packageset)
[04:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: suricata [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [4.0.0-beta1-1~exp1] (no packageset)
[05:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted suricata [amd64] (artful-proposed) [4.0.0-beta1-1~exp1]
[05:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted suricata [armhf] (artful-proposed) [4.0.0-beta1-1~exp1]
[05:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted suricata [arm64] (artful-proposed) [4.0.0-beta1-1~exp1]
[05:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted suricata [s390x] (artful-proposed) [4.0.0-beta1-1~exp1]
[05:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libhtp [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1:0.5.25-1]
[05:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libhtp [armhf] (artful-proposed) [1:0.5.25-1]
[05:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libhtp [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [1:0.5.25-1]
[05:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-tty-browserify [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.0.0-2]
[05:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted suricata [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [4.0.0-beta1-1~exp1]
[05:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libhtp [arm64] (artful-proposed) [1:0.5.25-1]
[05:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libhtp [s390x] (artful-proposed) [1:0.5.25-1]
[05:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libhtp [i386] (artful-proposed) [1:0.5.25-1]
[05:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted suricata [i386] (artful-proposed) [4.0.0-beta1-1~exp1]
[05:49] <tsimonq2> doko, Laney: Hello, when would be a good time to land the Qt 5.7.1 -> 5.9.1 transition? Feature Freeze is in less than a month, and we have a Perl transition going on, GCC next week... could I get your thoughts on when we can land it?
[05:59] <tsimonq2> (to be clear, I just pinged those people because they were on the release team, thoughts from anyone else are appreciated)
[05:59] <tsimonq2> s/were/are/
[06:10] <tsimonq2> doko, Laney: I'd also like to note that it's ready to land whenever, it's in https://bileto.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/2819 and LocutusOfBorg has been my sponsor to get things in there, so he'll likely be the one to press the button to land if it's approved.
[06:10] <slangasek> tsimonq2: "on the release team" - https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/+members
[06:10] <slangasek> but I don't have a particular sense of when is a good time to land it
[06:11] <tsimonq2> slangasek: LocutusOfBorg told me to ping them and to get a release team ack, didn't check that page and assumed they were both release team members  :P
[06:12] <tsimonq2> s/told me to/suggested I/
[07:44] <LocutusOfBorg> asking doko was not with his RT hat, but because he will start a big transition and I don't want to delay it :)
[07:44] <LocutusOfBorg>  and Laney, I would like to know your opinion wrt autopkgtestsuites, will qt trigger too many of them? will they have higher priority than perl ones?
[07:44] <LocutusOfBorg> (sorry I was on train, and I couldn't be here)
[08:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gjs [source] (zesty-proposed) [1.48.5-0ubuntu0.1]
[08:55] <acheronuk> morning: could someone please temp badtest the kmail test here for 4:16.12.3 against qtbase http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/k/kmail/artful/armhf to hopefully get that qtbase migrated
[08:56] <acheronuk> failing due to new cmake 3.9 as far as I can see. the replacement kmail 17.04.3 kmail that I'll be uploading sometime reasonably soon seems not to fail, but it would be good to get that qtbase migrated in the meantime if possible
[09:04] <LocutusOfBorg> I agree, that migration is blocking the qt5.9 transition, and the SRU in zesty for a crash with file opener
[09:31] <LocutusOfBorg> btw getting emails because something has not migrated in *one* day is somewhat strange
[09:40] <rbasak> Only for transitions, surely? Usually if it's not migrated in a day something's wrong.
[09:40] <LocutusOfBorg> only when the package doesn't trigger an hundred autopkgtests :)
[09:41] <rbasak> Ah. There is that.
[09:42] <LocutusOfBorg> e.g. if the package is haskell or perl or transition, do not bother for at least a week or two
[09:42] <LocutusOfBorg> if autopkgtests are still running, do not bother
[09:43] <rbasak> Could the presence of an entry in the transtiion tracker be used?
[09:43] <rbasak> Just a thought. I'm not proposing to write any of this.
[09:43] <LocutusOfBorg> mmm lots of transitions have no tracker
[09:43] <LocutusOfBorg> I would appreciate the "auto-trackers" appear as in the debian way
[09:44] <LocutusOfBorg> they will save people from asking britney and understanding its answers :)
[09:48] <LocutusOfBorg> (if uploader==me, don't send emails :D)
[10:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.10.0-29.33~16.04.1] (kernel)
[10:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.10.0-29.33~16.04.1]
[10:35] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: "If tests are still running, don't bother" is meant to be true.
[10:35] <infinity> But maybe that bit's buggy.
[10:36] <apw> there are some oddities with NBS bits when those clear you are assume guilty for all of the delay to that point and emailed instantly
[10:37] <LocutusOfBorg> infinity, I honestly don't know if it is buggy or not, I receive too many emails to understand why I got them :)
[10:51] <sil2100> jamespage: hey! Did you have a moment to take a look if that SRU template on the wiki sounds okayish to you?
[11:52] <jamespage> sil2100: +1 lgtm coreycb ^^
[12:42] <coreycb> sil2100: can you pass me a link to the sru template?
[12:42] <teward> coreycb: this one?  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#SRU_Bug_Template
[12:43] <teward> oh a different one.  Nevermind.  :)
[12:44] <coreycb> teward: maybe, thanks anyway :)
[12:44] <teward> coreycb: i only saw your question, that's why I was confused :)
[12:44]  * teward has an issue where HexChat doesn't show all the scrollback from ZNC
[12:44] <sil2100> coreycb: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/OpenStackUpdates at the bottom
[12:45] <teward> *updates lists*
[12:45] <teward> oops wrong window
[12:45] <teward> damned laptop..
[12:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sysdig (xenial-proposed/universe) [0.8.0-1ubuntu1 => 0.8.0-1ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[12:50] <coreycb> sil2100: looks good. i'd probably drop "new features" from the impact section since SRUs typically don't include any.
[12:51] <coreycb> sil2100: thanks for providing the template
[12:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sysdig [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.8.0-1ubuntu2]
[12:58] <sil2100> coreycb: that's the feedback I wanted, thanks!
[12:58] <sil2100> Since I wasn't sure if new point-releases have usually features or not
[13:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools [i386] (trusty-proposed) [2]
[13:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: ubuntu-advantage-tools (xenial-proposed/primary) [2]
[13:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: ubuntu-advantage-tools (artful-proposed/primary) [2]
[13:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: ubuntu-advantage-tools (zesty-proposed/primary) [2]
[13:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools [sync] (artful-proposed) [2]
[13:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools [sync] (xenial-proposed) [2]
[13:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools [sync] (zesty-proposed) [2]
[13:27] <rbasak> [2]
[13:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gettext-maven-plugin [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.2.9-1] (no packageset)
[13:28] <rbasak> Took me a while to figure out WTF that meant.
[13:28] <infinity> Heh.
[13:28] <infinity> Not a lot of single-digit versions out there.
[13:29] <acheronuk> could someone please temp badtest the kmail test here for 4:16.12.3 against qtbase http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/k/kmail/artful/armhf to hopefully get that qtbase migrated
[13:29] <acheronuk> failing due to new cmake 3.9 as far as I can see. the replacement kmail 17.04.3 kmail that I'll be uploading sometime reasonably soon seems not to fail, but it would be good to get that qtbase migrated in the meantime if possible
[13:45] <LocutusOfBorg> autopkgtest for foo/unknown: armhf: failed :(
[13:45] <LocutusOfBorg> lots of them
[13:48] <LocutusOfBorg> oh it seems the systemd armhf udev bug
[13:51] <ginggs> why does that bug only appear on weekends?
[13:53] <LocutusOfBorg> mmm friday is not weekend :p
[14:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gettext-maven-plugin [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.2.9-1]
[14:10] <xnox> infinity, but binutils/arm64 will remain strict then? so i cannot build a few ocaml things now.
[14:11] <xnox> infinity, one solution is to disable dynamic linking and/or some thing on arm64 that debian maintainers are proposing, until ocaml is fixed to emit better assembly.
[14:11] <xnox> i fear i will need to rebuild ocaml on arm64 /o\ and thus rebuild the world.....
[15:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted keystone [source] (xenial-proposed) [2:9.3.0-0ubuntu3]
[15:04] <xnox> the systemd I uploaded is really bad /o\
[15:04] <xnox> fails to upgrade udev on armhf it seems in a container.
[15:08]  * apw wishes he could remember what xnox told me i should be doing before i uploaded a kernel which was sick; so i could tell him to have done it
[15:10] <xnox> apw, burn baby burn
[15:10]  * xnox is dying
[15:10] <xnox> FATALITY
[15:11] <apw> xnox, is this the systemd in -proposed ?
[15:12] <xnox> apw, yes. I will check that ADT is not insane, by reproducing the test locally, and if it really bad, I think it will make sense to remove that upload from proposed.
[15:12] <apw> xnox, ok
[15:12] <xnox> but failing to upgrade udev in lxc is critical.
[15:18] <LocutusOfBorg> do you remember that sigkill invalid instruction that was probably a glibc/binutils/gcc regression? I did a strace of that notmuch test, and the output is there
[15:18] <LocutusOfBorg> https://launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/+archive/ubuntu/locutusofborg-ppa/+build/13161434
[15:18] <LocutusOfBorg> this happens only on armhf, and started a while ago (before xenial and zesty)
[15:19] <LocutusOfBorg> I would appreciate help in debugging it, the strace is between lines "BEGIN OUTPUT" and "END OUTPUT"
[15:25] <sil2100> ahasenack: hey! I'm doing some SRU -proposed cleanup - I see that LP: #1574900 is verification-failed for xenial and from the discussion I see it's been agreed that the proposed solution is not good enough
[15:26] <sil2100> ahasenack: can I trash it?
[15:26] <sil2100> ahasenack: it's in -proposed for too long so it's a candidate for removal
[15:33] <ahasenack> sil2100: let me check
[15:33] <LocutusOfBorg> here a log with valgrind instead of strace https://launchpadlibrarian.net/331034962/buildlog_ubuntu-artful-armhf.notmuch_0.25~rc1-2ubuntu3_BUILDING.txt.gz
[15:33] <ahasenack> sil2100: correct, that package does not have the right fix
[15:33] <LocutusOfBorg> maybe we should blame python?
[15:33] <sil2100> ahasenack: thanks!
[15:33] <LocutusOfBorg> infinity, ^^ :)
[16:09] <xnox> apw, cannot reproduce with arm64 on arm64 lxd; nor armhf on arm64 lxd; onto lxc testing.
[16:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (xenial-proposed/main) [1:16.04.7 => 1:16.04.8] (core)
[17:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lua-torch-sys [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [0~20161027-gf073f05-1] (no packageset)
[17:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ulfius [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[17:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lua-torch-sys [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0~20161027-gf073f05-1] (no packageset)
[17:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ulfius [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[17:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ulfius [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[17:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lua-torch-sys [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [0~20161027-gf073f05-1] (no packageset)
[17:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ulfius [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[17:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lua-torch-sys [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [0~20161027-gf073f05-1] (no packageset)
[17:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lua-torch-sys [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [0~20161027-gf073f05-1] (no packageset)
[17:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ulfius [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[17:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ulfius [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[17:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lua-torch-sys [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0~20161027-gf073f05-1] (no packageset)
[17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.14.17+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[18:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.14.17+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[18:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.14.17+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[18:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.14.17+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[18:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.14.17+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[18:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.14.17+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[18:59] <tsimonq2> Hey Archive Admins/Release Team (cc infinity, slangasek), I saw acheronuk said something earlier, but it would be really great to have this temp badtested so that qtbase can migrate: http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/k/kmail/artful/armhf
[19:08] <slangasek> tsimonq2: my stock policy for such requests is to ignore them in favor of someone actually fixing the autopkgtest regression
[19:08] <slangasek> unless you can show me that this is not a regression vs. the set of packages currently in the release pocket
[19:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lua-torch-sys [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0~20161027-gf073f05-1]
[19:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lua-torch-sys [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0~20161027-gf073f05-1]
[19:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lua-torch-sys [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0~20161027-gf073f05-1]
[19:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lua-torch-sys [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0~20161027-gf073f05-1]
[19:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lua-torch-sys [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0~20161027-gf073f05-1]
[19:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lua-torch-sys [i386] (artful-proposed) [0~20161027-gf073f05-1]
[19:09] <tsimonq2> slangasek: ack
[19:09] <slangasek> (which can be done by triggering a test of the package with itself as the trigger)
[19:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [amd64] (artful-proposed) [2.14.17+dfsg-1]
[19:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [armhf] (artful-proposed) [2.14.17+dfsg-1]
[19:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [2.14.17+dfsg-1]
[19:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ulfius [amd64] (artful-proposed) [2.1.0-1]
[19:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ulfius [armhf] (artful-proposed) [2.1.0-1]
[19:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ulfius [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [2.1.0-1]
[19:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [arm64] (artful-proposed) [2.14.17+dfsg-1]
[19:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [s390x] (artful-proposed) [2.14.17+dfsg-1]
[19:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ulfius [i386] (artful-proposed) [2.1.0-1]
[19:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qgis [i386] (artful-proposed) [2.14.17+dfsg-1]
[19:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ulfius [s390x] (artful-proposed) [2.1.0-1]
[19:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ulfius [arm64] (artful-proposed) [2.1.0-1]
[19:10] <tsimonq2> slangasek: Ok.
[19:14] <acheronuk> kmail {"requester": "rikmills", "triggers": ["kmail/4:16.12.3-0ubuntu1"]}
[19:15] <tsimonq2> slangasek: ^
[19:15] <slangasek> ok
[19:28] <acheronuk> a test build in a ppa shows that for amd64 so far, that version FTBFS with cmake 3.9 https://launchpadlibrarian.net/331058888/buildlog_ubuntu-artful-amd64.kmail_4%3A16.12.3-0ubuntu2~ppa1_BUILDING.txt.gz
[19:29] <acheronuk> so can't see why that test would be different. but lets see
[19:37] <acheronuk> slangasek: http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/k/kmail/artful/armhf
[19:38] <slangasek> acheronuk: thanks, happily badtesting
[19:38] <acheronuk> tahnk you
[19:38] <acheronuk> *thank
[19:38] <tsimonq2> Thanks slangasek :)
[20:04] <LocutusOfBorg> hello, did the kmail bad-testing force fail somewhere? it should make qtbase and mesa migrate finally :)
[20:04] <tsimonq2> slangasek: ^ :)
[20:09] <LocutusOfBorg> also, please force it everywhere, not just armhf (since the failure is cmake specific)
[20:09]  * LocutusOfBorg thinks that cmake should rebuild the world before migrate :p
[20:15] <slangasek> it didn't fail; it was committed after the most recently-completed britney run had started
[20:17] <slangasek> wrt ignoring it everywhere, only armhf appears to be currently failing; http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/k/kmail/artful/amd64 and http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/k/kmail/artful/i386 show recent successes
[20:18] <slangasek> retrying kmail against the new mesa
[20:19] <acheronuk> slangasek: success on the 20th. whereas new cmake landed on 25th
[20:20] <slangasek> acheronuk: ok, but I still expect to see something on those pages above showing me (and others who look) that it's regressed in the release before I add a hint
[20:21] <acheronuk> re-runs some tests and I'm pretty certain you will get just that
[20:22] <slangasek> it's fine that you're certain of it, but the tests need to actually be run so that this is logged
[20:22] <slangasek> so that someone can work out what's going on from the results page, and not based on opaque knowledge
[20:25] <acheronuk> fair enough
[20:28] <acheronuk> fail http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/k/kmail/artful/s390x
[20:30] <acheronuk> duh. that wouldn't build anyway.
[20:33] <LocutusOfBorg> retried
[20:33] <LocutusOfBorg> (on amd64)
[20:38] <LocutusOfBorg> slangasek, can we please force badtest disaspora? rationale is: it can't be installed because it depends on a ruby-twitter that depends on equalizer 0.0.10, but 0.0.11 landed some hours ago
[20:38] <LocutusOfBorg>     twitter (~> 5.16) was resolved to 5.16.0, which depends on
[20:38] <LocutusOfBorg>       equalizer (= 0.0.10)
[20:39] <LocutusOfBorg> (speaking for imagemagick,, not diaspora in general, because there is a new twitter in proposed that might have some fixes)
[20:41] <slangasek> Setting up diaspora (0.6.0.1+debian-1) ...
[20:41] <slangasek> /var/lib/dpkg/info/diaspora.postinst: 38: /var/lib/dpkg/info/diaspora.postinst:
[20:41] <slangasek> -e: not found
[20:42] <slangasek> Setting up environment varibales...
[20:42] <slangasek> good show
[20:42] <slangasek> LocutusOfBorg: adding the hint; but is someone going to lart the ruby-twitter maintainer for not having correct versioned dependencies?
[20:42] <LocutusOfBorg> well, this isn't actually the problem
[20:42] <LocutusOfBorg> yep sure
[20:42] <LocutusOfBorg> this is also failing in -proposed
[20:42] <LocutusOfBorg> because of the new twitter
[20:42] <slangasek> yes, the stuff I quoted isn't the cause of the autopkgtest failure, it just shows questionable packaging quality
[20:42] <LocutusOfBorg> so, ruby itself is self contained correctly, but disaspora needs fixed
[20:43] <LocutusOfBorg> slangasek, I got it, sure :)
[20:43] <LocutusOfBorg> I would even open an RC probably
[20:43] <LocutusOfBorg> #866877
[20:43] <LocutusOfBorg> nevermind
[20:45] <LocutusOfBorg>  It depends (transitively) on ruby-actionpack-action-caching, ruby-devise, ruby-jquery-rails, ruby-kaminari, ruby-net-scp, ruby-sass-rails and ruby-sham-rack, affected by RC bug(s) 868750, 869033, 869039, 869044, 869050, 869052 and 869164
[20:45] <LocutusOfBorg> sigh, I would personally kick everything out, since it requires sourceful uploads anyway
[20:46] <LocutusOfBorg> but this will kick out gitlab and a lot of other stuff :(
[20:46] <acheronuk> hmmm. I wonder if these kmail tests might pass if the autotest builders do the build phase slightly different to the main ppa builders
[20:50] <LocutusOfBorg> slangasek, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-3to2 please kick it out :) (already removed in debian)
[20:50] <acheronuk> if they build in the tests, but FTBFS in my staging ppa, then that will be another oddity to chalk up for the tests
[20:50] <LocutusOfBorg> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-3to2/+bug/1705136
[21:01] <acheronuk> looks like the amd64 is building in the kmail tests. I wonder how the test manages that, when it fails in any normal build elsewhere?
[21:02] <acheronuk> something about the test build is sidestepping the issue with new cmake. not that I am complaining at all :)
[21:11] <slangasek> xnox: count(https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.tag=u8rm) == 0
[21:12] <xnox> slangasek, i have been getting emails. thank you. waiting for reverse-depends cache to update, to file more.
[21:12] <xnox> biased towards unity8 / ubuntu-settings apps a bit, thus a set higher priority from bugs of that chain.
[21:33] <jbicha> please remove python-3to2 to help with the py36 transition LP: #1705136
[23:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mythtv [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/multiverse) [2:29.0+fixes.20170728.696806310a-0ubuntu1] (mythbuntu)