[08:07] <jamespage> coreycb: unblocked pike-staging - needed newer python-idna to resolve crypto installability
[12:17] <coreycb> jamespage: thanks. i've been moving forward with b3 without bumping deps for the following: http://paste.ubuntu.com/25212923/
[12:17] <coreycb> jamespage: the new versions should be coming soon
[13:09] <soren> Hey, party people.  I realised I still own ~ubuntu-virt on Launchpad. That seems... anachronistic. Is there an heir apparent?
[13:09] <rbasak> soren: o/
[13:09] <rbasak> soren: is that team actually used for anything?
[13:10] <rbasak> soren: cpaelzer is probably the obvious heir. But perhaps it should be something more generic like ~ubuntu-server-dev?
[13:10] <soren> It's racb on Launchpad?
[13:10] <rbasak> I'm racb, yes.
[13:10] <soren> Oh, you weren't volunteering?
[13:11] <rbasak> No, I'm volunteering ~ubuntu-server-dev :-)
[13:11] <soren> Careful raising your hand like that. :)
[13:11]  * rbasak was waving hello!
[13:11] <soren> I'm not sure if ubuntu-virt membership grants any upload rights in addition to what ubuntu-server-dev provides.
[13:11] <rbasak> I hope it doesn't.
[13:12] <rbasak> But by making it owned by ~ubuntu-server-dev, you make sure that the set of people who can manage it includes a current ubuntu-server packageset uploader as approved by the DMB. So it shouldn't get stale.
[13:12] <rbasak> (and the Ubuntu project can trust all of those people)
[13:13] <soren> That makes sense.
[13:13] <soren> My only concern is that I realised that I owned it because I started getting build failure e-mails.
[13:13] <soren> And as team owner, you can't opt out of those, apparently.
[13:13] <soren> (from the virt-daily-upstream ppa)
[13:13] <rbasak> You're both the owner and a member.
[13:14] <rbasak> I suspect the notification goes to members?
[13:14] <soren> "You are receiving this email because your team Ubuntu Virtualisation
[13:14] <soren> team is the owner of this archive."
[13:14] <rbasak> It's possible to deactivate the owner from being a member.
[13:14] <rbasak> (as just discovered by ahasenack as it happens)
[13:14] <soren> It's been half a decade since I used Launchpad for anything serious. I honestly don't recall all the details of when what gets e-mailed to whom.
[13:15] <rbasak> soren: if you like, just switch the owner to me and I'll sort it out :)
[13:15] <soren> rbasak: That's the spirit!
[13:15] <rbasak> soren: I think you need to leave the team if you want to stop receiving the emails. I can do that for you if you like.
[13:16] <soren> rbasak: Congrats. You now own ubuntu-virt.
[13:16] <rbasak> Thanks. I think :)
[13:17] <soren> Wow. Certainly the end of an era. Leaving the team now.
[13:18] <rbasak> soren: looks like there's also https://launchpad.net/~openstack-ubuntu-packagers that you own
[13:19] <soren> Do you want that one, too?
[13:19] <rbasak> If you like. I'll do the same thing and hand it over to a team.
[13:19] <soren> Done.
[13:19] <rbasak> Thanks!
[13:23] <rbasak> soren: you want out of that team too?
[13:27] <soren> Oh. Yeah, I should.
[13:28] <soren> Done.
[13:28] <soren> rbasak: Thanks!
[16:07] <strixUK> hi; i'm exploring lvm raid1.  so far it seems pretty good, seems to work well.  one weirdness, though:
[16:09] <strixUK> by default, lvcreate will try to synchronise the two volumes.  for large volumes, this can take a lot of time to synchronise nothing at all, especially when you're about to mkfs it.  you can add the --nosync to lvcreate, but then the type flag in 'lvs' indicates 'raid without initial sync'.
[16:09] <strixUK> i'm wondering how to get rid of this or whether i even need to.
[19:30] <pmatulis> how do i update (or remove) a snap? --> http://paste.ubuntu.com/25215218/
[19:49] <pmatulis> disregard, i tore down the system and started again
[19:50] <hashwagon> Anyone know why the CUPS web interface crashes half of the time when doing admin operations? My /var/log/cups/error_log shows cupsdStopSelect()
[19:51] <DammitJim> what application comes already installed that uses the gui?
[19:52] <DammitJim> I'm trying to test launching a GUI app through ssh -X
[19:52] <sarnold> the server install may not have any, since that'd requir linking against x libs, which drags in huge amounts of x libs :)
[19:52] <DammitJim> oh man
[19:52] <sarnold> gvim or xterm or xeyes come to mind
[19:52] <DammitJim> yeah, it says 42 for xterm
[19:53] <sarnold> lstopo is actually kind of useful on servers
[19:54] <DammitJim> lstopo? hhmmmm
[19:57] <DammitJim> ok, so xterm did the job
[19:57] <DammitJim> thanks
[21:25] <ahasenack> nacc: around? Could you check libvirt in ~usd-importer-team for xenial-devel? I think it's behind the archive
[21:25] <ahasenack> ubuntu/xenial-devel has 1.3.1-1ubuntu10.8
[21:25] <ahasenack> rmadison shows 1.3.1-1ubuntu10.11 for xenial-updates, and 10.12 in xenial-proposed
[21:26] <nacc> ahasenack: let me look
[21:39] <nacc> ahasenack: i think because smb and cpaelzer maintain libvirt in their own repo, I was not importing it
[21:39] <nacc> ahasenack: i'll refresh the repo now, but you may want to consult with them
[21:39] <ahasenack> nacc: why does it matter where they maintain it? Doesn't it end up in the archive eventually?
[21:40] <nacc> ahasenack: yes, but they stage changes, etc.
[21:40] <ahasenack> nacc: are you going to refresh from the archive now?
[21:40] <nacc> ahasenack: i am, but you should still coordinate with them
[21:41] <ahasenack> ok
[21:41] <ahasenack> thx
[21:43] <nacc> ahasenack: also, libvirt is large and a bit slow to import :)
[21:45] <docmur> Hey guys, I have a bunch of VMs encrypted, I want to set them up so I can enter the phrase during boot remotely, is that possible and how would I do that?
[22:22] <drab> docmur: maybe not very useful as I looked at this for LUKS about 5yrs ago, but back then you had to create a custom initrd image that allowed you to insert the pwd
[22:22] <drab> so yes it was possible and that's how you did it (in a very very short pinch)
[22:22] <drab> the principle still seems to be valid tho, initrd is what is loaded before the actual kernel/OS
[22:22] <drab> so if the OS is on encrypted root to have that functionality in initrd makes sense to me
[22:30] <drab> docmur: this seems to be what you're after and jives with what I remember: https://askubuntu.com/questions/59487/how-to-configure-lvm-luks-to-autodecrypt-partition
[22:31] <drab> with the nice plus of also shwoing how to use a keyfile on a thumbdrive
[22:33] <drab> http://www.pavelkogan.com/2014/05/23/luks-full-disk-encryption/
[22:33] <drab> justging from that "more recent" post it seems that now asking for pwd is
[22:33] <drab> default and just works, but haven't tried