sary | Salutations! | 02:22 |
---|---|---|
sary | can anuone please teel me which mainline kernel should ethan test.. https://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2367549&page=2 | 02:23 |
sary | s/teel/tell | 02:23 |
apw | sary, i would advise he file a bug against the ubuntu kernel rather than use the forums | 02:26 |
apw | as for testing mainline, the norm is to test the latest -rc as that represents the current state of the art | 02:27 |
sary | apw: sure right , he did .. does this looks okay! https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-hwe/+bug/1708191 | 02:27 |
ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1708191 in linux-hwe (Ubuntu) "Xubuntu complete freeze with Intel atomic i915" [Undecided,New] | 02:27 |
sary | Ok, so he should go for kernel v4.13-rc3 first.. | 02:28 |
sary | doen't seem like he ever did install a kernel manually with the debs files , i suppose it's time he learns how to , or is it okay to use ukuu ..! | 02:30 |
apw | i would teach them to use the .debs | 02:31 |
sary | Ok. | 02:32 |
sary | thanks apw , will advise him on that. anything else he should collect for the bug report! | 02:39 |
apw | i suspect that is all, depending on the h/w this might be something we have knowledge of, not sure right now and its too late in the day to be thinking too hard | 02:40 |
sary | noted. have a good one. | 02:41 |
White_Light | are debug packages made for the mainline ppa kernels? | 03:08 |
apw | White_Light, nope | 03:08 |
White_Light | too bad | 03:08 |
apw | too big to keep so very many of them | 03:09 |
White_Light | I understand | 03:09 |
icey | PHLin: hey, thanks for assigning me https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1708120 , not sure what to do with it now though, this has been my first time working with kernel ;-) | 05:38 |
ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1708120 in linux (Ubuntu) "Lenovo Yoga 910 Sensors" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 05:38 |
PHLin | icey, sure thing, and thanks for spotting this | 06:09 |
PHLin | icey, now we wait for ACK (and comments, if any) | 06:09 |
PHLin | icey, you might be asked to verify it if the patch got applied and pushed to -proposed pocket | 06:10 |
tjaalton | sary: it's a dupe of 1680904 most likely | 06:18 |
sary | tjaalton: it looks as there're few bug with a comment " duplicate of: Bug #1680904 ". | 07:50 |
ubot5 | bug 1680904 in linux (Ubuntu Zesty) "zesty unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1680904 | 07:50 |
tjaalton | sary: you mean many dupes? yes and more on the way I bet :/ | 07:53 |
sary | Chea! | 07:53 |
apw | tjaalton, do we have a fix for that yet ? | 08:51 |
tjaalton | apw: already acked on the list | 09:06 |
=== klebers_ is now known as klebers | ||
=== cascardo` is now known as cascardo | ||
=== cachio is now known as cachio_afk | ||
=== mhcerri_ is now known as mhcerri | ||
tinoco | smb: hi, not sure i understood what you said in reply to v2 for the "xfs: xfs_log_ticket leak" patch I submitted. 1st one missed "cherry picked from", there were 2 ACKs with comments on the missing part, I replied back asking if you wanted me to amend and resubmit on the same thread, got no response, submitted again. I have only insisted because master-next branch seems not updated to latest "acks" from the mailing list, so I wasn't aware if | 13:46 |
tinoco | the patch had already been picked to the branch or not. | 13:46 |
smb | tinoco, normally if someone applies it they (should) send a reply to the thread with "APPLIED", which has not happened | 13:47 |
tinoco | smb: gotcha. so submitting the v2. was it needed ? | 13:48 |
smb | So that might have been pending still. That is why I send the nack to the old thread and acked the new patch again | 13:48 |
tinoco | smb: gotcha. | 13:48 |
tinoco | smb: tks. just wanted to make i wouldn't do something bad next time this happens (hopefully i wont miss this again :o) | 13:48 |
tinoco | smb: tku | 13:48 |
smb | tinoco, maybe not. must admit I was distracted with other things this cycle so I may have missed something. the mailing list is my memory extension in those cases ;) | 13:49 |
tinoco | smb: i know that. sorry for extra burden, i know you guys are super loaded. tks for the sru | 13:49 |
smb | tinoco, np. just for you as my excuse in case it was incorrect. anything not on the list might be forgotten | 13:51 |
icey | sforshee: sorry about the shitty email patch, thanks for getting it up :) As soon as it's in proposed, I'm happy to switch from my self-built kernel back to a signed one :) | 13:53 |
=== cachio_afk is now known as cachio | ||
sforshee | icey: np, will hopefully have a new kernel in proposed by early next week | 14:00 |
=== cachio is now known as cachio_afk | ||
=== cachio_afk is now known as cachio |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!