[02:22] <sary> Salutations!
[02:23] <sary> can anuone please teel me which mainline kernel should ethan test.. https://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2367549&page=2
[02:23] <sary> s/teel/tell
[02:26] <apw> sary, i would advise he file a bug against the ubuntu kernel rather than use the forums
[02:27] <apw> as for testing mainline, the norm is to test the latest -rc as that represents the current state of the art
[02:27] <sary> apw: sure right , he did .. does this looks okay! https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-hwe/+bug/1708191
[02:28] <sary> Ok, so he should go for kernel v4.13-rc3 first..
[02:30] <sary> doen't seem like he ever did install a kernel manually with the debs files , i suppose it's time he learns how to , or is it okay to use ukuu ..!
[02:31] <apw> i would teach them to use the .debs
[02:32] <sary> Ok.
[02:39] <sary> thanks apw , will advise him on that. anything else he should collect for the bug report!
[02:40] <apw> i suspect that is all, depending on the h/w this might be something we have knowledge of, not sure right now and its too late in the day to be thinking too hard
[02:41] <sary> noted. have a good one.
[03:08] <White_Light> are debug packages made for the mainline ppa kernels?
[03:08] <apw> White_Light, nope
[03:08] <White_Light> too bad
[03:09] <apw> too big to keep so very many of them
[03:09] <White_Light> I understand
[05:38] <icey> PHLin: hey, thanks for assigning me https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1708120 , not sure what to do with it now though, this has been my first time working with kernel ;-)
[06:09] <PHLin> icey, sure thing, and thanks for spotting this
[06:09] <PHLin> icey, now we wait for ACK (and comments, if any)
[06:10] <PHLin> icey, you might be asked to verify it if the patch got applied and pushed to -proposed pocket
[06:18] <tjaalton> sary: it's a dupe of 1680904 most likely
[07:50] <sary> tjaalton: it looks as there're few bug with a comment " duplicate of: Bug #1680904 ".
[07:53] <tjaalton> sary: you mean many dupes? yes and more on the way I bet :/
[07:53] <sary> Chea!
[08:51] <apw> tjaalton, do we have a fix for that yet ?
[09:06] <tjaalton> apw: already acked on the list
[13:46] <tinoco> smb: hi, not sure i understood what you said in reply to v2 for the "xfs: xfs_log_ticket leak" patch I submitted. 1st one missed "cherry picked from", there were 2 ACKs with comments on the missing part, I replied back asking if you wanted me to amend and resubmit on the same thread, got no response, submitted again. I have only insisted because master-next branch seems not updated to latest "acks" from the mailing list, so I wasn't aware if
[13:46] <tinoco>  the patch had already been picked to the branch or not.
[13:47] <smb> tinoco, normally if someone applies it they (should) send a reply to the thread with "APPLIED", which has not happened
[13:48] <tinoco> smb: gotcha. so submitting the v2. was it needed ?
[13:48] <smb> So that might have been pending still. That is why I send the nack to the old thread and acked the new patch again
[13:48] <tinoco> smb: gotcha. 
[13:48] <tinoco> smb: tks. just wanted to make i wouldn't do something bad next time this happens (hopefully i wont miss this again :o)
[13:48] <tinoco> smb: tku
[13:49] <smb> tinoco, maybe not. must admit I was distracted with other things this cycle so I may have missed something. the mailing list is my memory extension in those cases ;)
[13:49] <tinoco> smb: i know that. sorry for extra burden, i know you guys are super loaded. tks for the sru
[13:51] <smb> tinoco, np. just for you as my excuse in case it was incorrect. anything not on the list might be forgotten
[13:53] <icey> sforshee: sorry about the shitty email patch, thanks for getting it up :) As soon as it's in proposed, I'm happy to switch from my self-built kernel back to a signed one :)
[14:00] <sforshee> icey: np, will hopefully have a new kernel in proposed by early next week