[00:35] smoser: I was out for a while but can look now [00:59] smoser: bug 1691489 is missing the SRU template [00:59] bug 1691489 in cloud-init (Ubuntu Zesty) "fstab entries written by cloud-config may not be mounted" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1691489 [01:03] smoser: bug 1701097 is also missing some SRU information [01:03] bug 1701097 in cloud-init (Ubuntu Zesty) "eni rendering of ipv6 gateways fails" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1701097 [01:37] bdmurray, sorry.. i added the first. i'll get the second tomorrow. [01:37] :-( [02:46] I've posted an updated version of init-zram-swapping on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zram-config/+bug/1654777 [02:46] Launchpad bug 1654777 in zram-config (Ubuntu) "zram-config control by maximum amount of RAM usage" [Undecided,New] [02:47] This should be suitable for use in the installer [02:47] It limits the actual memory usage of zram, rather than just setting a swap size and hoping for the best. [02:48] (also the installer complains if you don't set a swap partition; that should probably not be a thing anymore) [07:38] cjwatson: do we publish buildinfo files for artful anywhere? [08:07] mwhudson: They're stashed away in the DB, but not exposed anywhere yet. === JanC is now known as Guest77859 === JanC_ is now known as JanC [08:13] Yeah, that. On the to-do to at least make them downloadable from the web UI [11:48] cyphermox, hey, do you plan any ubiquity upload? I would like to land https://code.launchpad.net/~seb128/ubiquity/new-gsd-binaries/+merge/327611 . I can handle the upload if nothing else is scheduled though (I'm not familiar with ubiquity uploads though, is there any special process?) [11:52] seb128: I can merge it for you. The release process is a bit involved if you work from bzr, but if you're just committing a code change you can cheat by applying it on top of the last source package upload. [11:53] infinity, that would be great, thanks! [11:53] bonus if somebody do an ubiquity source upload [11:53] seb128: I'll just merge and upload, so you don't have to worry about that distinction. :P [11:53] but I guess that's going to happen at some point anyway ;-) [11:53] infinity, great, thanks [11:57] seb128: And done. [12:01] infinity, and of course it fails to build :-/ I'm going to do a fixup update, line > 79 makes tools sad it seems [12:02] seb128: Hah, pep8 strikes again. Yeah, maybe I should have run that before I merged. :P [12:07] seb128: I assume your intended fix is: http://paste.ubuntu.com/25239648/ [12:08] seb128: If so, feel free to just upload directly, I'll grab the diff and apply it to bzr in your name. [12:09] * infinity goes to get pancakes. [12:12] infinity, right, thanks [13:06] @pilot in === udevbot changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Zesty Released | Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support or app devel) | build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of precise-zesty | #ubuntu-app-devel for app development on Ubuntu http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment | Patch Pilots: slashd [13:06] sil2100 ^ [13:10] Yass, more patch pilots :D [13:39] infinity: I'll fix ubiquity [13:53] cyphermox: I got the impression seb was going to. [13:53] cyphermox: Otherwise, I'd have just done it myself. :P [14:03] uploaded an hour ago or so, and fails to build? [14:05] seems like seb is already on it [14:10] cyphermox: Well, like I said, he claimed he'd upload a fix, and I said I'd commit said fix. But I see no upload, so maybe I'll JFDI. [14:10] seb128: ^ [14:11] you see no upload? [14:11] infinity, cyphermox , I was at lunch and I'm in a meeting now, I can have a look after that call but if somebody wants to beat me to it please do [14:12] seb128: Yeah, I'll just do it. [14:12] infinity, thanks [14:12] alrighty then [14:16] slashd: \o/ [14:17] bdmurray, those bugs have sru templates in them now. sorry for the noise, thank you for the help. === ogra_ is now known as ogra [15:23] infinity, so you do the ubiquity fix or should I have a look? [15:23] seb128: Oh, I "did" it locally already and ran into an entirely different (and not your fault) problem that cyphermox is looking into. [15:24] oh ok [15:24] seb128: Looks like some bitrot exposed by the perl transition. [15:24] I let it to you then, I'm not going to complain about one less thing to do :-) [15:24] seb128: So, you'll get a ubiquity when cyphermox fixes console-setup. [15:24] k === smoser` is now known as smoser [16:46] tjaalton, if you're around and sru-teaming, i have two requests for review [16:46] pollinate and cloud-init [16:46] pollinate should be easy [16:47] cloud-init more involved. [16:47] bdmurray, started cloud-init for me yesterday [16:47] and slangasek if you were sitting bored, since your backup, i'll ping you too [16:56] smoser: roaksoax has already jumped the queue this morning with maas, then when I'm done with that I'll look at how far bdmurray has gotten and see what I can do [16:59] slangasek: I didn't get that far, noticed some incomplete SRU bugs [17:01] bdmurray, do you clicky clicky ? or is there somethign that told you that the bugs in changelog did not have an sru template ? [17:02] ie, i'd like to run something like that so as to not bother people early. [17:04] smoser: sru-review opens all the linked bugs in browser; we have talked about having a bot insta-reject uploads that are missing templates, but that's not implemented yet [17:04] smoser: I manually read through the bugs, but sru-review from ubuntu-archive-tools opened all the tabs for me. It might work for you too. [17:04] yeah you shouldn't need SRU privs to run sru-review [17:04] (only to accept) [17:47] smoser: looking at the cloud-init upload it seems to me like it falls into the new upstream microrelease category. Are there any plans to get request a special case for cloud-init? [17:51] bdmurray, yes there are. [17:52] you have a link to that ? [17:52] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Documentation_for_Special_Cases [17:52] slangasek, hi, could you retry https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rustc/1.18.0+dfsg1-4/+build/13149357 ? it build on debian https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=rustc&suite=unstable so it seems worth another try [17:52] https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-announce/2015-September/001152.html [17:53] yeah... so we do want to get that in there the way we did for curtin [17:53] but we have not done it due to currently limited automated tests. [17:53] we're working on automated test improvement [17:55] without a lot of automated tests I think we'd need bugs for things like "sysconfig: fix ipv6 gateway routes [Ryan Harper]" [17:55] The test changes are okay IMO without bugs [18:06] ricotz: at least one of the failures is a SIGBUS which is a known difference between the launchpad and Debian builders. Also in general I'm not going to throw a 24-hour build back at the wall to see if it sticks without a specific reason to believe the result might be different [18:08] slangasek, ok, I see, the buildtime was not normal and should take around 5 hours [18:08] ricotz: in this case, I have a specific expectation that the build failure will be reproducible because of SIGBUS === JanC_ is now known as JanC [18:19] slangasek, alright [20:58] @pilot out === udevbot changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Zesty Released | Archive: open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support or app devel) | build failures: http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of precise-zesty | #ubuntu-app-devel for app development on Ubuntu http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment | Patch Pilots: