[10:24] <RAOF> alan_g: Ooh, hypothesis!
[10:24] <alan_g> RAOF: ?
[10:24] <RAOF> alan_g: The test fails in CI because it's on an old kernel that doesn't support getrandom.
[10:25] <alan_g> Doh! that even makes sense.
[10:25] <RAOF> You could test this by LD_PRELOADinf a shim that returns ENOTSUPP from the call m
[10:27] <RAOF> This would imply that the fallback code in libuuid is faulty.
[10:28] <RAOF> Which is entirely possible! It doesn't try reading from urandom if libc exposes getrandom()
[10:29] <RAOF> So this would be a seldom-hit Falcao path
[10:29] <alan_g> Although... why would this only affect artful/amd64? Surely the kernel is the same
[10:29] <RAOF> Newer glibc, newer libuuid?
[10:30] <alan_g> I'd guess glibc, but can check
[10:30] <RAOF> It might have just gained the getrandom code path.
[10:32] <RAOF> util-linux (source package for libuuid) was updated on the first of August.
[10:32] <RAOF> Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm
[13:54] <bub_> Is it possible to run software using Qt in Mir for Ubuntu Core?
[13:56] <xnox> yes
[13:57]  * ogra_ applauds xnox for that excessive answer :P
[14:00] <ogra_> alan_g, bub_ just asked in #snappy about this and i wanted to point him to the mir demo docs, but that seems to be still down ... is anyone from the mir team after it to get it back in place ?
[14:00] <ogra_> ( https://developer.ubuntu.com/snappy/guides/mir-snaps that is)
[14:03] <alan_g> ogra_: last I heard Saviq was chasing davidcalle about it
[14:04] <ogra_> yeah, i saw that too, but that was ages ago
[14:04] <ogra_> i would have expected it to be fixed by now
[14:05] <ogra_> (and david being french ... and france having hilariously long summer vacation times ... i suspect we wont be able to catch him soon)
[14:36] <alan_g> ogra_: Saviq says he's on vacation
[14:36] <ogra_> alan_g, yeah, see what i wrote in brackets ;)
[14:36] <ogra_> frenchies ...
[14:38]  * alan_g feels in no position to comment on national behaviours. (Not since June 2016)
[15:47] <xnox> alan_g, yeah, we are all just local milk people now.
[16:09] <alan_g> I don't know what that means but it sounds sad.
[17:28] <JanC> why is that hilarious?