[03:24] doko: according to http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/artful/update_output_notest.txt pillow (via the libwebp transition) is entangled with perl [03:36] it's also entangled with qtwebengine-opensource-src, which is dep-wait in artful-proposed [03:37] so I think that gets dealt with by a temporary downgrade and no-change rebuild, since tying this to the Qt 5.9 transition would be unfun++ [04:07] ... except, well, qtwebengine-opensource-src FTBFS, so digging into that === maclin1 is now known as maclin [05:09] hi, I wanted to ask for bug 1540323 - it is hanging around a while and I want to ensure it isn't forgotten this cycle [05:09] bug 1540323 in ubuntu-virt (Ubuntu) "ubuntu-virt is not generated from seeds" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1540323 [05:09] The TL;Dr is for an AA to please remove src:ubuntu-virt and all binary packages it builds from Artful. [05:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: winff [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.5.5-3] (no packageset) [05:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: winff [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.5.5-3] (no packageset) [05:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: winff [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.5.5-3] (no packageset) [05:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: winff [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.5.5-3] (no packageset) [05:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cheshire-clojure [amd64] (artful-proposed) [5.7.1-1] [05:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted math-numeric-tower-clojure [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.0.4-1] [05:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-wither [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.1-1] [05:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted winff [arm64] (artful-proposed) [1.5.5-3] [05:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted winff [i386] (artful-proposed) [1.5.5-3] [05:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted math-combinatorics-clojure [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.1.4-1] [05:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted winff [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.5.5-3] [05:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted medley-clojure [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.0.0-1] [05:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted winff [armhf] (artful-proposed) [1.5.5-3] [05:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted at-at-clojure [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.2.0-1] [05:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted core-match-clojure [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.2.2-1] [05:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted java-jmx-clojure [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.3.4-1] [05:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libundead [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.0.7-1] [05:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libundead [i386] (artful-proposed) [1.0.7-1] [05:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted weechat-el [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.3.1-2] [05:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted bdfproxy [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.3.9-1] [05:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lazymap-clojure [amd64] (artful-proposed) [3.1.1-1] [05:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted polygen [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.0.6.ds2-16] [05:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted java-classpath-clojure [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.2.3-1] [05:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libundead [armhf] (artful-proposed) [1.0.7-1] === fabo_ is now known as fabo [07:26] apw_: I think your commit of a 'block-all source' hint was accidental; reverting it [07:27] slangasek, *beep* yes, please kill that === apw_ is now known as apw [08:45] per is candidate, thanks slangasek :) [09:51] can anybody please ignore libreoffice/s390x to make debhelper migrate? [09:55] any archive admin, can please remove visp on i386? it has been removed long time ago in debian too [09:56] perl/gsl are blocked by it and I can't parse britney output, because of it (lots of false positive [09:56] ) [10:22] apw, ^^ [10:24] also, please ignore libffi-platypus-perl/amd64 test [10:25] with the above two, perl should be ready for britney [10:25] or really close [11:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-shell-extension-tilix-dropdown [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [5-1] (no packageset) === ogra_ is now known as ogra === freyes__ is now known as freyes [12:50] nobody wants to help me in clicking the silo qt publish button? [12:53] LocutusOfBorg, hi! [12:53] welcome back mitya57 <3 [12:54] I hope I didn't mess too much with the silo [12:54] LocutusOfBorg: one idea would be to make a new silo without qtwebengine? [12:55] LocutusOfBorg, aren’t we still blocked by ubuntu-ui-toolkit removal? [12:55] jbicha, what is wrong with qtwebengine? [12:56] Without it will mean without some other packages too, like pyqt5. [12:57] (You are talking about silo 2819 aka Qt 5.9, right?) [12:57] ok, I guess you just need an AA admin then [12:57] qtwebengine is sad on two architectures [12:57] so, the publish fails [12:57] we need an AA, indeed [12:58] Publish failed: Failed to build (artful/qt3d-opensource-src-gles, artful/qtdeclarative-opensource-src-gles, artful/qtlocation-opensource-src-gles, artful/qtmultimedia-opensource-src-gles, artful/qtwebengine-opensource-src) [12:58] also all the -gles packages needs to be removed [12:58] that one yes [12:58] We can always copy everything manually, i.e. using copy-package from lp:ubuntu-archive-tools [12:58] But we need an AA to remove the -gles ones, yes. [13:01] doko, sync gsl? [13:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvirt (trusty-proposed/main) [1.2.2-0ubuntu13.1.20 => 1.2.2-0ubuntu13.1.21] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server, virt) [13:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvirt (xenial-proposed/main) [1.3.1-1ubuntu10.12 => 1.3.1-1ubuntu10.13] (ubuntu-server, virt) === marcoceppi_ is now known as marcoceppi [13:59] LocutusOfBorg: please don't. will trigger rebuilds again [14:00] will also need new queue [14:00] this is why I asked :) [14:04] slangasek: remove the version from -proposed for now? [14:08] and it's broken anyway ... [14:08] trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgslcblas.so.0.0.0', which is also in package libgsl23:amd64 2.4+dfsg-3 [14:08] dpkg-deb: error: subprocess paste was killed by signal (Broken pipe) [14:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected xorg-server [source] (xenial-proposed) [2:1.18.4-0ubuntu0.4] [14:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xorg-server (xenial-proposed/main) [2:1.18.4-0ubuntu0.3 => 2:1.18.4-0ubuntu0.4] (desktop-core, xorg) [14:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected xorg-server [source] (xenial-proposed) [2:1.18.4-0ubuntu0.4] [14:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xorg-server (xenial-proposed/main) [2:1.18.4-0ubuntu0.3 => 2:1.18.4-0ubuntu0.4] (desktop-core, xorg) === fginther` is now known as fginther [15:54] heyo could anyone look at : https://code.launchpad.net/~aaronhoneycutt/ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu/artful3 [15:54] cyphermox: maybe? ;) [16:05] of course [16:06] someone else was pointing me at it before [16:06] greyland I believe [16:06] yep [16:06] ahoneybun: I apologize, reviewing html just tends to not quite get my full attention quickly [16:06] I started from the bottom on it [16:07] cyphermox: it's all good [16:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected miral [sync] (zesty-proposed) [1.3.3+17.04.20170714.1-0ubuntu1] [16:07] I'm sure it will have those div errors but I'm not sure how you fixed them [16:07] all tests show that they are ok as is [16:08] did you try to build it? the unclosed div failures would happen there [16:09] * cyphermox merges the code now [16:09] no but I did merge mine into the main and it gave no errors [16:09] I don't remember how to build that [16:10] I don't understand what the build does differnt [16:10] *different [16:10] must be that lintian crap [16:10] ok, let me look at it for a second and I'll explain how to build it and what the errors mean if there are any [16:11] alrightly [16:11] thanks [16:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-applets [source] (zesty-proposed) [3.22.0-2ubuntu0.2] [16:35] mitya57: copy-package won't work, remember the weird compilation error when compiling using a Qt lower than 5.8? [16:35] mitya57: We need to copy binaries from what I can tell [16:36] mitya57: And yes we'll still need to take care of ubuntu-ui-toolkit, but I figure we keep having to update packages in the PPA with newly updated things (telegram-desktop anyone?) so landing it in -proposed even if it stays there for a week or two isn't that bad of an idea in my eyes. [17:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libjs-emojify [amd64] (artful-proposed/none) [1.1.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset) [17:16] ahoneybun: do you run ./test-slideshow ? [17:16] ahoneybun: I'd have some fixes to apply so the spacing is the same between slides, etc. [17:20] Yep [17:20] which spacing? [17:46] xnox: what do you know today wrt systemd and autopkgtests? I'm ignoring the perl systemd test failure to get perl as a candidate, but I guess a generally passing test would make everyone happier [18:10] Hi, I have a problem with ippusbxd. It is stuck in artful-proposed, probably because it does not build on the exotic PPC64 arch. See http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/artful/update_excuses.html#ippusbxd [18:11] Anyone can help me to get it into the artful release? [18:12] tkamppeter: i'm looking (i can try and reproduce and debug it on a machine in the lab if need be) [18:12] tkamppeter: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=865026 [18:12] Debian bug 865026 in libusb-1.0-0-dev "libusb.h: __linux usage makes ippusbxd FTBFS on ppc" [Serious,Fixed] [18:13] nacc, this would be great. Please do so. [18:13] tkamppeter: it might just need a rebuild now [18:14] tkamppeter: i'll trigger it [18:14] OK. [18:14] The Debian bug shows exactly what the log of the failed ippusbxd build shows. [18:16] tkamppeter: yep, the build that failed in LP was using -1, so it just needs to rerun using -2 (now in artful) [18:16] tkamppeter: and it just succeeded :) [18:17] I have seen the successful build, too. Thank you very much. [18:18] tkamppeter: yw [18:22] ahoneybun: basically, padding-top; or spacing between paragraphs, or use of * instead of ul/li tags, etc ;) [18:22] spacing around the icon at the bottom right of slides too [18:23] just so that everything looks consistent [18:28] doko: LocutusOfBorg highlighted vips/i386 for removal because "it has been removed a long time ago in Debian" but that's not true and it looks like the build failure is simply due to using wrong math compiler flags on i386 ( vpMath::equal(regular_sumSquare, sse_sumSquare, std::numeric_limits::epsilon()) ). Do you know offhand what the correct compiler flags are these days for sane [18:28] floating point on i386? [18:28] ahoneybun: my suggestion: http://paste.ubuntu.com/25264527/ [18:28] slangasek: you could try with -ffloat-store [18:29] doko: will do, thanks [18:32] doko: also, looks like this package FTBFS in Debian with illegal instruction, so there's some other problems there, heh [18:36] slangasek: swarmoflocusts was referring to visp not vips [18:36] slangasek: at a first glance, I don't see any obvious math configury in the vips build log [18:36] ginggs: yes, sorry, transposition typo on my part there [18:37] doko: visp, as ginggs says [18:37] finger race condition with dvorak keymap [19:01] doko: thanks, confirmed success with -ffloat-store [19:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: postfix (xenial-proposed/main) [3.1.0-3 => 3.1.0-3ubuntu0.1] (core) [22:32] Hello everyone! [22:32] I'm looking for help to migrate mame package from proposal to release [22:33] can anyone help me please? :) [22:34] update_excuses says it's a valid candidate [22:34] but it's still stuck after 2 days [22:34] wallyweek: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_output.txt implies that src:mame breaks mess-desktop-entries [22:34] wallyweek: that is the mame from the new package [22:34] I see [22:35] but mess-desktop-entries was in mess package [22:35] which is long gone now [22:35] wallyweek: hrm? mess-desktop-entries is in artful still [22:35] mess was already a transitional package back in version 0.182 [22:35] wallyweek: it's a binary and source package name [22:38] ok, I found it, even if I can't figure out where it comes from... :/ [22:39] I'll have a closer look [22:39] Please, , what should I do should I find it's to be removed from repo? [22:40] wallyweek: hrm? you mean mess-desktop-entries should be removed? [22:40] I'll talk about this with Jordi Mallach (we are both maintainers in Debian) and see [22:40] but it could be an option [22:41] mess doesn't exist anymore since source merge occured into mame [22:42] so I see no reason for mess-desktop-entries to be in repo [22:42] wallyweek: right, binary mess does exist, though [22:42] wallyweek: you're referring to src:mess? [22:43] nacc: no, I'm referring to binary mess and mess-data [22:44] nacc: both mame and mess already shared source, they were built with different tag in the same makefile [22:44] wallyweek: ah i see [22:44] wallyweek: yeah, it seems like mess and mess-data could have been deleteda fter 16.04? [22:44] nacc: yes, they could have been [22:45] wallyweek: but even so, that won't fix this issue (afaict), mess-desktop-entries is from src:mess-desktop-entries [22:45] wallyweek: unless you mean it also can be deleted if mess is deleted? [22:46] nacc: yes, that's what I mean [22:46] wallyweek: if so, i'd file a bug and subscribe ~ubuntu-archive [22:46] nacc: ok! [22:47] nacc: thank you for your help, I'll try to sort this out before FF [22:48] wallyweek: np, sorry for being a bit dense :) [23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: blag-fortune [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.2-1] (no packageset) [23:34] tsimonq2: could you or some other kubuntu guy look at calligra? last package blocking the gsl transition [23:41] doko: it's very late for acheronuk and clivejo [23:41] and I believe that tsimonq2 is at work [23:41] :( [23:41] santa_ doesn't seem to be around either [23:41] well, please forward it [23:41] I will, thanks [23:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gjs [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/main) [1.49.90-0ubuntu0~artful1] (desktop-extra, mozilla, ubuntu-desktop) [23:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gjs [amd64] (artful-proposed/main) [1.49.90-0ubuntu0~artful1] (desktop-extra, mozilla, ubuntu-desktop) [23:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gjs [i386] (artful-proposed/main) [1.49.90-0ubuntu0~artful1] (desktop-extra, mozilla, ubuntu-desktop) [23:43] I'll drop a note to the list as well [23:45] doko: looking [23:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted blag-fortune [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.2-1] [23:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libjs-emojify [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.1.0+dfsg-1] [23:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-shell-extension-tilix-dropdown [amd64] (artful-proposed) [5-1] [23:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gjs [arm64] (artful-proposed/main) [1.49.90-0ubuntu0~artful1] (desktop-extra, mozilla, ubuntu-desktop) [23:49] oooo, what are you doing up so late, acheronuk? [23:50] oops [23:50] could an Archive Admin reject gjs for now? [23:51] valorie: not quite 1am yet! [23:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: logcheck (trusty-proposed/main) [1.3.16 => 1.3.16ubuntu0.1] (ubuntu-server) [23:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gjs [armhf] (artful-proposed/main) [1.49.90-0ubuntu0~artful1] (desktop-extra, mozilla, ubuntu-desktop) [23:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: logcheck (xenial-proposed/main) [1.3.17 => 1.3.17ubuntu0.1] (ubuntu-server)