[03:24] <slangasek> doko: according to http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/artful/update_output_notest.txt pillow (via the libwebp transition) is entangled with perl
[03:36] <slangasek> it's also entangled with qtwebengine-opensource-src, which is dep-wait in artful-proposed
[03:37] <slangasek> so I think that gets dealt with by a temporary downgrade and no-change rebuild, since tying this to the Qt 5.9 transition would be unfun++
[04:07] <slangasek> ... except, well, qtwebengine-opensource-src FTBFS, so digging into that
[05:09] <cpaelzer> hi, I wanted to ask for bug 1540323 - it is hanging around a while and I want to ensure it isn't forgotten this cycle
[05:09] <cpaelzer> The TL;Dr is for an AA to please remove src:ubuntu-virt and all binary packages it builds from Artful.
[05:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: winff [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.5.5-3] (no packageset)
[05:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: winff [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.5.5-3] (no packageset)
[05:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: winff [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.5.5-3] (no packageset)
[05:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: winff [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.5.5-3] (no packageset)
[05:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cheshire-clojure [amd64] (artful-proposed) [5.7.1-1]
[05:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted math-numeric-tower-clojure [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.0.4-1]
[05:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-wither [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.1-1]
[05:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted winff [arm64] (artful-proposed) [1.5.5-3]
[05:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted winff [i386] (artful-proposed) [1.5.5-3]
[05:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted math-combinatorics-clojure [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.1.4-1]
[05:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted winff [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.5.5-3]
[05:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted medley-clojure [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.0.0-1]
[05:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted winff [armhf] (artful-proposed) [1.5.5-3]
[05:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted at-at-clojure [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.2.0-1]
[05:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted core-match-clojure [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.2.2-1]
[05:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted java-jmx-clojure [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.3.4-1]
[05:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libundead [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.0.7-1]
[05:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libundead [i386] (artful-proposed) [1.0.7-1]
[05:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted weechat-el [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.3.1-2]
[05:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted bdfproxy [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.3.9-1]
[05:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lazymap-clojure [amd64] (artful-proposed) [3.1.1-1]
[05:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted polygen [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.0.6.ds2-16]
[05:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted java-classpath-clojure [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.2.3-1]
[05:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libundead [armhf] (artful-proposed) [1.0.7-1]
[07:26] <slangasek> apw_: I think your commit of a 'block-all source' hint was accidental; reverting it
[07:27] <apw_> slangasek, *beep* yes, please kill that
[08:45] <LocutusOfBorg> per is candidate, thanks slangasek :)
[09:51] <LocutusOfBorg> can anybody please ignore libreoffice/s390x to make debhelper migrate?
[09:55] <LocutusOfBorg> any archive admin, can please remove visp on i386? it has been removed long time ago in debian too
[09:56] <LocutusOfBorg> perl/gsl are blocked by it and I can't parse britney output, because of it (lots of false positive
[09:56] <LocutusOfBorg> )
[10:22] <LocutusOfBorg> apw, ^^
[10:24] <LocutusOfBorg> also, please ignore libffi-platypus-perl/amd64 test
[10:25] <LocutusOfBorg> with the above two, perl should be ready for britney
[10:25] <LocutusOfBorg> or really close
[11:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-shell-extension-tilix-dropdown [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [5-1] (no packageset)
[12:50] <LocutusOfBorg> nobody wants to help me in clicking the silo qt publish button?
[12:53] <mitya57> LocutusOfBorg, hi!
[12:53] <LocutusOfBorg> welcome back mitya57 <3
[12:54] <LocutusOfBorg> I hope I didn't mess too much with the silo
[12:54] <jbicha> LocutusOfBorg: one idea would be to make a new silo without qtwebengine?
[12:55] <mitya57> LocutusOfBorg, aren’t we still blocked by ubuntu-ui-toolkit removal?
[12:55] <mitya57> jbicha, what is wrong with qtwebengine?
[12:56] <mitya57> Without it will mean without some other packages too, like pyqt5.
[12:57] <mitya57> (You are talking about silo 2819 aka Qt 5.9, right?)
[12:57] <jbicha> ok, I guess you just need an AA admin then
[12:57] <LocutusOfBorg> qtwebengine is sad on two architectures
[12:57] <LocutusOfBorg> so, the publish fails
[12:57] <LocutusOfBorg> we need an AA, indeed
[12:58] <jbicha>  Publish failed: Failed to build (artful/qt3d-opensource-src-gles, artful/qtdeclarative-opensource-src-gles, artful/qtlocation-opensource-src-gles, artful/qtmultimedia-opensource-src-gles, artful/qtwebengine-opensource-src)
[12:58] <LocutusOfBorg> also all the -gles packages needs to be removed
[12:58] <LocutusOfBorg> that one yes
[12:58] <mitya57> We can always copy everything manually, i.e. using copy-package from lp:ubuntu-archive-tools
[12:58] <mitya57> But we need an AA to remove the -gles ones, yes.
[13:01] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, sync gsl?
[13:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvirt (trusty-proposed/main) [1.2.2-0ubuntu13.1.20 => 1.2.2-0ubuntu13.1.21] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server, virt)
[13:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvirt (xenial-proposed/main) [1.3.1-1ubuntu10.12 => 1.3.1-1ubuntu10.13] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[13:59] <doko> LocutusOfBorg: please don't. will trigger rebuilds again
[14:00] <LocutusOfBorg> will also need new queue
[14:00] <LocutusOfBorg> this is why I asked :)
[14:04] <doko> slangasek: remove the version from -proposed for now?
[14:08] <doko> and it's broken anyway ...
[14:08] <doko>  trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgslcblas.so.0.0.0', which is also in package libgsl23:amd64 2.4+dfsg-3
[14:08] <doko> dpkg-deb: error: subprocess paste was killed by signal (Broken pipe)
[14:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected xorg-server [source] (xenial-proposed) [2:1.18.4-0ubuntu0.4]
[14:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xorg-server (xenial-proposed/main) [2:1.18.4-0ubuntu0.3 => 2:1.18.4-0ubuntu0.4] (desktop-core, xorg)
[14:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected xorg-server [source] (xenial-proposed) [2:1.18.4-0ubuntu0.4]
[14:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xorg-server (xenial-proposed/main) [2:1.18.4-0ubuntu0.3 => 2:1.18.4-0ubuntu0.4] (desktop-core, xorg)
[15:54] <ahoneybun> heyo could anyone look at : https://code.launchpad.net/~aaronhoneycutt/ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu/artful3
[15:54] <ahoneybun> cyphermox: maybe? ;)
[16:05] <cyphermox> of course
[16:06] <cyphermox> someone else was pointing me at it before
[16:06] <ahoneybun> greyland I believe
[16:06] <cyphermox> yep
[16:06] <cyphermox> ahoneybun: I apologize, reviewing html just tends to not quite get my full attention quickly
[16:06] <ahoneybun> I started from the bottom on it
[16:07] <ahoneybun> cyphermox: it's all good
[16:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected miral [sync] (zesty-proposed) [1.3.3+17.04.20170714.1-0ubuntu1]
[16:07] <ahoneybun> I'm sure it will have those div errors but I'm not sure how you fixed them
[16:07] <ahoneybun> all tests show that they are ok as is
[16:08] <cyphermox> did you try to build it? the unclosed div failures would happen there
[16:09]  * cyphermox merges the code now
[16:09] <ahoneybun> no but I did merge mine into the main and it gave no errors
[16:09] <ahoneybun> I don't remember how to build that
[16:10] <ahoneybun> I don't understand what the build does differnt
[16:10] <ahoneybun> *different
[16:10] <ahoneybun> must be that lintian crap
[16:10] <cyphermox> ok, let me look at it for a second and I'll explain how to build it and what the errors mean if there are any
[16:11] <ahoneybun> alrightly
[16:11] <ahoneybun> thanks
[16:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-applets [source] (zesty-proposed) [3.22.0-2ubuntu0.2]
[16:35] <tsimonq2> mitya57: copy-package won't work, remember the weird compilation error when compiling using a Qt lower than 5.8?
[16:35] <tsimonq2> mitya57: We need to copy binaries from what I can tell
[16:36] <tsimonq2> mitya57: And yes we'll still need to take care of ubuntu-ui-toolkit, but I figure we keep having to update packages in the PPA with newly updated things (telegram-desktop anyone?) so landing it in -proposed even if it stays there for a week or two isn't that bad of an idea in my eyes.
[17:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libjs-emojify [amd64] (artful-proposed/none) [1.1.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[17:16] <cyphermox> ahoneybun: do you run ./test-slideshow ?
[17:16] <cyphermox> ahoneybun: I'd have some fixes to apply so the spacing is the same between slides, etc.
[17:20] <ahoneybun> Yep
[17:20] <ahoneybun> which spacing?
[17:46] <slangasek> xnox: what do you know today wrt systemd and autopkgtests?  I'm ignoring the perl systemd test failure to get perl as a candidate, but I guess a generally passing test would make everyone happier
[18:10] <tkamppeter> Hi, I have a problem with ippusbxd. It is stuck in artful-proposed, probably because it does not build on the exotic PPC64 arch. See http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/artful/update_excuses.html#ippusbxd
[18:11] <tkamppeter> Anyone can help me to get it into the artful release?
[18:12] <nacc> tkamppeter: i'm looking (i can try and reproduce and debug it on a machine in the lab if need be)
[18:12] <nacc> tkamppeter: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=865026
[18:13] <tkamppeter> nacc, this would be great. Please do so.
[18:13] <nacc> tkamppeter: it might just need a rebuild now
[18:14] <nacc> tkamppeter: i'll trigger it
[18:14] <tkamppeter> OK.
[18:14] <tkamppeter> The Debian bug shows exactly what the log of the failed ippusbxd build shows.
[18:16] <nacc> tkamppeter: yep, the build that failed in LP was using -1, so it just needs to rerun using -2 (now in artful)
[18:16] <nacc> tkamppeter: and it just succeeded :)
[18:17] <tkamppeter> I have seen the successful build, too. Thank you very much.
[18:18] <nacc> tkamppeter: yw
[18:22] <cyphermox> ahoneybun: basically, padding-top; or spacing between paragraphs, or use of * instead of ul/li tags, etc ;)
[18:22] <cyphermox> spacing around the icon at the bottom right of slides too
[18:23] <cyphermox> just so that everything looks consistent
[18:28] <slangasek> doko: LocutusOfBorg highlighted vips/i386 for removal because "it has been removed a long time ago in Debian" but that's not true and it looks like the build failure is simply due to using wrong math compiler flags on i386 ( vpMath::equal(regular_sumSquare, sse_sumSquare, std::numeric_limits<double>::epsilon()) ).  Do you know offhand what the correct compiler flags are these days for sane
[18:28] <slangasek> floating point on i386?
[18:28] <cyphermox> ahoneybun: my suggestion: http://paste.ubuntu.com/25264527/
[18:28] <doko> slangasek: you could try with -ffloat-store
[18:29] <slangasek> doko: will do, thanks
[18:32] <slangasek> doko: also, looks like this package FTBFS in Debian with illegal instruction, so there's some other problems there, heh
[18:36] <ginggs> slangasek: swarmoflocusts was referring to visp not vips
[18:36] <doko> slangasek: at a first glance, I don't see any obvious math configury in the vips build log
[18:36] <slangasek> ginggs: yes, sorry, transposition typo on my part there
[18:37] <slangasek> doko: visp, as ginggs says
[18:37] <slangasek> finger race condition with dvorak keymap
[19:01] <slangasek> doko: thanks, confirmed success with -ffloat-store
[19:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: postfix (xenial-proposed/main) [3.1.0-3 => 3.1.0-3ubuntu0.1] (core)
[22:32] <wallyweek> Hello everyone!
[22:32] <wallyweek> I'm looking for help to migrate mame package from proposal to release
[22:33] <wallyweek> can anyone help me please? :)
[22:34] <wallyweek> update_excuses says it's a valid candidate
[22:34] <wallyweek> but it's still stuck after 2 days
[22:34] <nacc> wallyweek: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_output.txt implies that src:mame breaks mess-desktop-entries
[22:34] <nacc> wallyweek: that is the mame from the new package
[22:34] <wallyweek> I see
[22:35] <wallyweek> but mess-desktop-entries was in mess package
[22:35] <wallyweek> which is long gone now
[22:35] <nacc> wallyweek: hrm? mess-desktop-entries is in artful still
[22:35] <wallyweek> mess was already a transitional package back in version 0.182
[22:35] <nacc> wallyweek: it's a binary and source package name
[22:38] <wallyweek> ok, I found it, even if I can't figure out where it comes from... :/
[22:39] <wallyweek> I'll have a closer look
[22:39] <wallyweek> Please, , what should I do should I find it's to be removed from repo?
[22:40] <nacc> wallyweek: hrm? you mean mess-desktop-entries should be removed?
[22:40] <wallyweek> I'll talk about this with Jordi Mallach (we are both maintainers in Debian) and see
[22:40] <wallyweek> but it could be an option
[22:41] <wallyweek> mess doesn't exist anymore since source merge occured into mame
[22:42] <wallyweek> so I see no reason for mess-desktop-entries to be in repo
[22:42] <nacc> wallyweek: right, binary mess does exist, though
[22:42] <nacc> wallyweek: you're referring to src:mess?
[22:43] <wallyweek> nacc: no, I'm referring to binary mess and mess-data
[22:44] <wallyweek> nacc: both mame and mess already shared source, they were built with different tag in the same makefile
[22:44] <nacc> wallyweek: ah i see
[22:44] <nacc> wallyweek: yeah, it seems like mess and mess-data could have been deleteda fter 16.04?
[22:44] <wallyweek> nacc: yes, they could have been
[22:45] <nacc> wallyweek: but even so, that won't fix this issue (afaict), mess-desktop-entries is from src:mess-desktop-entries
[22:45] <nacc> wallyweek: unless you mean it also can be deleted if mess is deleted?
[22:46] <wallyweek> nacc: yes, that's what I mean
[22:46] <nacc> wallyweek: if so, i'd file a bug and subscribe ~ubuntu-archive
[22:46] <wallyweek> nacc: ok!
[22:47] <wallyweek> nacc: thank you for your help, I'll try to sort this out before FF
[22:48] <nacc> wallyweek: np, sorry for being a bit dense :)
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: blag-fortune [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.2-1] (no packageset)
[23:34] <doko> tsimonq2: could you or some other kubuntu guy look at calligra? last package blocking the gsl transition
[23:41] <valorie> doko: it's very late for acheronuk and clivejo
[23:41] <valorie> and I believe that tsimonq2 is at work
[23:41] <valorie> :(
[23:41] <valorie> santa_ doesn't seem to be around either
[23:41] <doko> well, please forward it
[23:41] <valorie> I will, thanks
[23:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gjs [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/main) [1.49.90-0ubuntu0~artful1] (desktop-extra, mozilla, ubuntu-desktop)
[23:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gjs [amd64] (artful-proposed/main) [1.49.90-0ubuntu0~artful1] (desktop-extra, mozilla, ubuntu-desktop)
[23:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gjs [i386] (artful-proposed/main) [1.49.90-0ubuntu0~artful1] (desktop-extra, mozilla, ubuntu-desktop)
[23:43] <valorie> I'll drop a note to the list as well
[23:45] <acheronuk> doko: looking
[23:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted blag-fortune [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.2-1]
[23:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libjs-emojify [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.1.0+dfsg-1]
[23:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-shell-extension-tilix-dropdown [amd64] (artful-proposed) [5-1]
[23:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gjs [arm64] (artful-proposed/main) [1.49.90-0ubuntu0~artful1] (desktop-extra, mozilla, ubuntu-desktop)
[23:49] <valorie> oooo, what are you doing up so late, acheronuk?
[23:50] <jbicha> oops
[23:50] <jbicha> could an Archive Admin reject gjs for now?
[23:51] <acheronuk> valorie: not quite 1am yet!
[23:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: logcheck (trusty-proposed/main) [1.3.16 => 1.3.16ubuntu0.1] (ubuntu-server)
[23:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gjs [armhf] (artful-proposed/main) [1.49.90-0ubuntu0~artful1] (desktop-extra, mozilla, ubuntu-desktop)
[23:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: logcheck (xenial-proposed/main) [1.3.17 => 1.3.17ubuntu0.1] (ubuntu-server)