/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2017/08/08/#juju.txt

=== frankban|afk is now known as frankban
=== salmankhan1 is now known as salmankhan
=== jcsackett_ is now known as jcsackett
D4RKS1D3Hi, I want to know why when I put the command "juju add-machine <machinenameinmaas>" is too slow11:44
D4RKS1D3when I had the old version of juju works quickest!!11:45
D4RKS1D3Any suggestion?11:45
=== Guest13936 is now known as med_
=== med_ is now known as medberry
=== admcleod_ is now known as admcleod
=== medberry is now known as med_
=== frankban is now known as frankban|afk
=== salmankhan1 is now known as salmankhan
kwmonroecory_fu: i seem to recall you having an issue with travis.. was it by chance calling proof?  i'm not sure what i'm missing here:  https://travis-ci.org/juju-solutions/layer-apache-bigtop-base/builds/262305210?utm_source=github_status&utm_medium=notification19:31
kwmonroein that scenario, my travis.yml is calling make sysdeps lint, which works fine until it gets to proof on line 24: https://github.com/juju-solutions/layer-apache-bigtop-base/blob/9fca22db0e3f77921dcfa5058c3402d32e5ea1cb/Makefile#L1919:33
cory_fukwmonroe: I saw that error with the charm-tools snap when it was unconfined because there was a version conflict between the library provided by the system and one of the CT deps19:34
cory_fukwmonroe: It looks like sysdeps isn't using the snapped version of charm-tools19:34
kwmonroecory_fu: how'd you fix it?19:34
cory_fuThe charm-tools snap is now confined, so it doesn't care what libs are installed at the system level19:35
kwmonroecory_fu: "now confined" as in the edge version?19:35
cory_fuI'd recommend switching to the charm-tools snap19:35
cory_fuPretty sure it's released to stable19:35
cory_fuLet me check19:35
kwmonroehm, i got this when i tried to snap install the snap without --classic:  https://travis-ci.org/juju-solutions/layer-apache-bigtop-base/builds/262285702?utm_source=github_status&utm_medium=notification19:35
cory_fuHrm.  Yeah, apparently it wasn't released to stable19:36
kwmonroeoooooh.. charm-tools vs charm?  i didn't know there were 2 things19:36
cory_fuNo, it should just be charm, it seems19:36
kwmonroeack, charm edge ftw.19:36
cory_fumarcoceppi: What's the process for moving that up to stable?19:36
kwmonroemarcoceppi: you in charge of charm snaps moving....19:36
kwmonroe:)19:36
cory_fuheh19:36
marcoceppicory_fu: which revision?20:03
cory_fumarcoceppi: 17 is currently in edge, and that's the fully confined one we came up with in Warsaw20:04
cory_fustable is currently on 1520:05
marcoceppicory_fu: does it currently corrospond to a release in charm-tools repo? or is it all snap fixes?20:05
cory_fuJust snap changes, as far as I can recall20:05
cory_fuIt does double the size of the snap, though, unfortunately20:06
cory_fuWe could investigate paring it back down20:06
marcoceppicory_fu: I just moved it to candidate to bake for a day or two20:07
cory_fuk20:08
hloeungmarcoceppi, cory_fu: so is the charm snap the recommended path forward now, with the deb package no longer supported?23:11
hloeungmarcoceppi, cory_fu: I'm using the snap (currently 15) but just thought I'd ask23:11
marcoceppihloeung: yes, the deb is being deprecated23:11
hloeungmarcoceppi, cory_fu: also, any ideas if there will be a bundletester snap?23:11
marcoceppihloeung: good question, cory_fu would be best to field that question23:11
marcoceppiwell, cory_fu and tvansteenburgh23:12
hloeungah thanks. It's just a bit of work to get an environment set up for charming. "Install some of these packages", "install some snaps", "pip install bundletester"23:12

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!