[00:14] <wgrant> kyrofa: I think we'll need to extend the way snap builds work now that branches are widely supported. Can you file a bug detailing your specific use case?
[00:14] <nacc> kyrofa: if you do file a bug, i'd be really interested as well
[16:36] <johnl> hi, I can't get my launchpad recipe to use the specified git branches. It defaults to a branch literally named "HEAD" instead. Is this a launchpad bug maybe? https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/654438
[17:22] <kyrofa> wgrant, nacc sure thing. Against launchpad-buildd?
[17:42] <kyrofa> wgrant, nacc here is my tome of a bug report: https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad-buildd/+bug/1709416
[17:50] <nacc> kyrofa: well written, I'll be curious to see what wgrant thinks
[17:51] <kyrofa> Thanks nacc :)
[21:29] <geekgonecrazy> Anyone aware of amd64 snap build workers being locked up?  Keeps saying 1 hour to build even after several hours.  armhf seems to be processing like usual
[21:39] <dobey> https://launchpad.net/builders
[21:39] <dobey> lots of private jobs building, and probably taking too much time for some reason
[21:40] <geekgonecrazy> ah! Thanks for the link.  Some point in past probably saw that but forgot about it :D
[21:40] <geekgonecrazy> yeah looks like very high compared to arm which is pretty empty
[21:41] <dobey> x86 is likely to be a bit slower in any case, given all the PPAs/recipes on launchpad, and most probably not building on arm
[21:41] <geekgonecrazy> i'm guessing build.snapcraft.io probably comes over as private job
[21:41] <dobey> no idea
[21:43] <geekgonecrazy> dobey: thanks for think.  I guess at least I have a reason as to the slowness :D I guess if I get impatient enough i'll have to go the local lxd route to get this release out
[21:43] <geekgonecrazy> link*
[21:44] <kyrofa> Hey dobey, good to see you :)