/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2017/08/10/#ubuntu-devel.txt

=== led2 is now known as led1
tsimonq2rbasak: Hey there! You're probably EOD a while ago, but when you have a chance, could you take a look at bug 1641912? It's been verification-done for more than a week. ;)03:03
ubottubug 1641912 in gtk+2.0 (Ubuntu Zesty) "Please backport two recent-manager patches" [Critical,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/164191203:03
tsimonq2(or any other member of the SRU team for that matter ^^^^^^)03:03
slangasektsimonq2: there's an autopkgtest regression listed on http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html which should be resolved05:43
acheronukdoku: with latest GCC7 I am getting failures building 2 packages against hunspell. e.g. http://paste.ubuntu.com/25282312/08:42
ackkhi, is this the right place to ask about https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1697450 ?09:19
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1697450 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Installer freezes at session startup" [Undecided,New]09:19
LocutusOfBorgjbicha, can you please ping upstream about geary/s390x?10:24
LocutusOfBorgit seems a showstopper for gmime10:24
Mirvtsimonq2: I'll be available for Qt excuses retry dance when I'm around, since it doesn't distract me from work really much to click those buttons :) but you'll need probably release team again to ignore bunch of KDE packages as usual. anyway, congrats on the proposed upload!11:48
Mirvdidrocks: dear one of the just four memebers of ubuntu-mir, if you have time before feature freeze please check bug #1708428 MIR request - the HFST, Giellatekno etc people would be happy to get the spell-checking support into next Ubuntu LTS too similar to Debian 9.0, and 17.10 would be good time for it to be enabled11:50
ubottubug 1708428 in hfst-ospell (Ubuntu) "[MIR] hfst-ospell" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/170842811:50
didrocksMirv: unsure I'll have time before FF but I'll have a look afterwards if nobody beats me to it! Thanks for looking into this :)11:52
Mirvno problem, and thanks for trying! ;)11:52
didrocksyw! :-)11:52
acheronukenchant will FTBFS against new hspell 1.4-1 if it is rebuilt http://paste.ubuntu.com/25283249/12:09
acheronukseeded on most desktops AFAIK12:09
acheronukKDE's sonnet and and kde4libs also fail in the same way if built with it12:09
acheronukdoko: apologies. thought that was GCC7, bit seems not12:10
jbichaLocutusOfBorg: I filed https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78388212:29
ubottuGnome bug 783882 in build "geary fails to build on s390x" [Normal,New]12:29
LocutusOfBorgthanks!12:32
jbichabut sometimes we just remove desktop apps on s390x…12:38
LocutusOfBorgso will you ask to remove it?12:40
jbichaLocutusOfBorg: since you're working on that transition, could you? the bug I filed upstream is ~2 months old12:45
LocutusOfBorgI'm wondering about adding a cast12:48
didrocksxnox: hey, are you looking at systemd migrating to the release pocket? It seems you fixed some tests that will help glib migrating as well (and others depending on it)13:21
LocutusOfBorgand also some testsuite hangs :)13:23
didrocksindeed13:25
LocutusOfBorgwell, systemd fails testsuite against itself13:28
tseliotDesktop team, willcooke: is this a mistake? "Ubuntu 16.04.3 LTS will be supported for 5 years for Ubuntu Desktop". It's the .3 bit that I'm asking about, as it should be 6 months for each backported stack https://wiki.ubuntu.com/XenialXerus/ReleaseNotes13:31
tseliot... and I used the wrong room13:32
willcooketseliot, just looks like an over-zealous search and replace13:35
tseliotwillcooke: yes, that's what I thought too, thanks13:36
willcookechecking the logs13:36
tseliotok, I'll wait13:36
willcooketseliot, hrm, I cant seem to log in for some reason... bear with me13:37
willcooketseliot, something not right his sso login to the wiki by the looks of things.  If you are able to edit, please do, otherwise I'll try again later13:38
willcookes/his/this13:39
willcookeer, with even.  meh13:39
tseliotwillcooke: ok, let me try that13:39
tseliotwillcooke: shall I just replace 16.04.3 with 16.04, or shall I say it will be supported for 6 months?13:41
mdeslaur16.04.3 is the point release version, it has nothing to do with the HWE stack13:43
mdeslaurit's supported by updating to the next stack13:43
tseliotmdeslaur: but then, when you get a newer stack, it won't be 16.04.3 any more, it will be .413:47
mdeslaurI'm running 16.04.3 and I don't have the HWE stack13:47
tseliotmdeslaur: what is it that makes it 16.04.3 then?13:49
mdeslaurnew installation media that includes the latest updates, that's all13:50
jbichaLocutusOfBorg: thanks for fixing geary :)13:50
mdeslaurI don't think it's important to note that certain packages will only get supported for 6 months if they will be automatically replaced without anything special the user needs to do13:50
* mdeslaur shrugs13:51
mdeslaurthe blurb can certainly be changed to "16.04" instead of "16.04.3"13:52
tseliotmdeslaur: it's all fine, except for people running or developing binary drivers. If the X ABI changes, or the kernel breaks, the binaries won't work any more, and avoiding to upgrade to the new stack will lead to a dead end (security issues, etc.)13:53
tseliotthis was my main point13:53
tseliotit's a bit misleading in that specific case13:54
tseliotI corrected that13:54
tsimonq2slangasek: I've already asked about it ;) https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2017/08/03/%23ubuntu-release.html#t10:1514:20
tsimonq2Mirv: ok :D14:21
LocutusOfBorgtsimonq2, please fix qtwebengine14:28
LocutusOfBorgjbicha, I hope to have fixed it14:28
LocutusOfBorgI'm not sure14:28
tsimonq2LocutusOfBorg: sure14:29
tsimonq2LocutusOfBorg: Although didn't slangasek say to hold off on 5.9 for QtWebEngine until the GCC transition was done or something?14:29
LocutusOfBorgi386 and amd64 were fine14:30
LocutusOfBorgtsimonq2, perl, gcc, binutils, kernel and so on migrated 10 hours ago14:30
tsimonq2LocutusOfBorg: :D14:30
LocutusOfBorgthe excuses file went from 11Mb to ~514:30
* LocutusOfBorg my firefox is happier14:31
tsimonq2hahahahahahahahahahahaha seriously? :D14:31
* tsimonq2 's firefox is also quite a bit happier <314:31
LocutusOfBorghttps://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtwebengine-opensource-src/5.9.1+dfsg-2build1/+build/1322303014:31
LocutusOfBorgplease also take the ball to fix arm6414:31
LocutusOfBorgeven if the build went successful at the end, not sure why14:32
LocutusOfBorgwell, please also fix amd64 and i38614:32
LocutusOfBorgyou have logs for everything, and they match with the ongoing build2 build14:33
LocutusOfBorgbecause they were on the same toolchain (removed for other reasons)14:33
tsimonq2ic14:33
tsimonq2ok14:33
tsimonq2LocutusOfBorg: side note, while I'm getting my coffee, could you help me look into why ben isn't migrating? I think it depends on something that needs a piuparts pass but doesn't have one14:34
LocutusOfBorgforget about ben14:35
LocutusOfBorghttp://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/ocaml.html14:35
LocutusOfBorgthis is why14:35
LocutusOfBorgmaybe xnox slangasek ^^14:36
LocutusOfBorgthere is some ocaml arm64 regression out there14:38
tsimonq2LocutusOfBorg: ack14:42
* tsimonq2 is caffeinated14:43
acheronukLocutusOfBorg tsimonq2 what is wrong with? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtwebengine-opensource-src/5.9.1+dfsg-2build214:57
tsimonq2acheronuk: symbols14:57
tsimonq2acheronuk: working on it atm14:57
acheronukah14:57
tsimonq2LocutusOfBorg: Your fixed qtwebengine: http://people.ubuntu.com/~tsimonq2/packages/qtwebengine-opensource-src_5.9.1+dfsg-2ubuntu1.dsc :D (should be done uploading in a couple of mins)15:37
tsimonq2RIP my connection :P15:37
LocutusOfBorgtsimonq2, dpkg-buildpackage -S -d15:39
LocutusOfBorgnot -sa15:39
tsimonq2ok15:39
tsimonq2Lintian takes a looooooooong time with this large of a package...15:41
LocutusOfBorgno need to run lintian15:42
tsimonq2LocutusOfBorg: debuild does it automatically15:42
LocutusOfBorgthey are just symbols15:42
tsimonq2LocutusOfBorg: And it's uploaded already, same URL15:43
tsimonq2I know15:43
LocutusOfBorgit does *after* having generated the tarballs I guess15:43
LocutusOfBorgso you can ctrl+c it15:43
tsimonq2ok well it's done now :P15:43
LocutusOfBorgalso uploaded :p15:52
tsimonq2:D15:53
tsimonq2Thanks!15:53
=== JanC is now known as Guest25300
=== JanC_ is now known as JanC
=== nacc_ is now known as nacc
LocutusOfBorgjbicha, do you feel openbox syncy?17:28
LocutusOfBorgit is not really a no-change sync, you added some newer split?17:28
LocutusOfBorgI'm talking about "org.gnome.SettingsDaemon.XRANDR"17:29
jbichaLocutusOfBorg: go ahead and sync, I want the 3.26 compatibility in Ubuntu17:38
LocutusOfBorgsyncd!17:39
LocutusOfBorgta17:39
mitya57tsimonq2, thanks for qtwebengine upload, looks like it should fix some autopkgtest failures17:43
LocutusOfBorghopefully17:43
LocutusOfBorgI also retried some of them17:43
LocutusOfBorgdue to network failures17:43
tsimonq2mitya57: You're welcome :)17:43
mitya57LocutusOfBorg, thanks to you too :)17:44
LocutusOfBorgwe will have a clear picture in 24h17:45
LocutusOfBorgbut at least 20 packages seems to need fixes17:47
tsimonq2LocutusOfBorg: Mhhhh, KDE packages just like to break their autopkgtests :P17:48
tsimonq2acheronuk: ^17:48
tsimonq2He knows :P17:48
LocutusOfBorgyep, some of k* and libk* needs fixes17:48
acheronukthey do!17:48
LocutusOfBorgI'm worried about the failures on some-arch-but-not-others17:49
LocutusOfBorgfor now, I don't see arch-specific regressions in qt17:50
LocutusOfBorge.g. armhf needs udev/systemd fixes17:50
LocutusOfBorgor retried17:50
LocutusOfBorg*s, while some amd64 were just faster and failed because of qtwebengine17:50
LocutusOfBorgonce it is in place we might do a retry of all of them17:50
tsimonq2LocutusOfBorg: we can just completely ignore packages that depend on qtwebengine that fail on s390x or ppc64el because QtWebEgnine simply will not build on those arches (not something we can control, upstream thing)17:50
tsimonq2We should fix the failures on the other arches, but that's a special case17:51
LocutusOfBorg(probably against proposed, since this seems to be a lock-in transition that is not always retro-compatible)17:51
tsimonq2LocutusOfBorg: It is17:51
LocutusOfBorgtsimonq2, yes, we should get them removed into artful, and testsuite will be ignore automagically IIRC17:51
acheronukyes, tests run without that are doomed for trouble17:51
tsimonq2Yeahp.17:51
LocutusOfBorgmaybe we can rerun all the tests against a fast architecture, like ppc64el and elsewhere in case we see it "fixes"the issue17:52
* acheronuk peers at QtWebEngine17:53
LocutusOfBorgto avoid bothering the infra with uselesss rebuilds17:53
acheronukbuilding.......17:53
jbichaLocutusOfBorg: you're going to have lots of autopkgtest failures from dh-acc, see my comments in #ubuntu-release17:58
LocutusOfBorglol I answered that some seconds ago18:00
slangasektsimonq2: ah, so infinity had told you we didn't need to hint the autopkgtest regressions for gtk+2.0... he and I have a vigorous difference of opinion there, then :)  they should be hinted so that you don't have to chase multiple SRU team members around with copies of IRC logs ;)19:06
tsimonq2slangasek: fair :)19:06
tsimonq2jbicha: Mind if I steal your yelp-tools merge?20:21
LocutusOfBorgjbicha, abi should be fixed20:26
tsimonq2oooooooooooooh, LocutusOfBorg and acheronuk, looks like QtWebEngine might be done building!20:33
tsimonq2Just needs an Archive Admin now to approve binaries.20:33
LocutusOfBorgnot so fast20:34
acheronukarm* is still building (no surprise)20:34
LocutusOfBorgstill needs arm*20:34
LocutusOfBorgexactly20:34
tsimonq2ah ok20:35
=== nacc is now known as Guest76500
=== nacc_ is now known as nacc
kwardneed some advice on what to do with LP: #1706284 At the moment i've got it at "In Progress" , but no-one else has had the chance to reproduce it, and I've attached all the debdiffs and patches to it that fixes the issue, so what status do i set it to?21:40
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1706284 in sssd (Ubuntu) "sssd fails to Update PTR if any A record update fails." [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/170628421:40
tjaaltonnacc: ok, uploaded a new mesa to xenial that adds the dummy libgles1-mesa21:58
nacctjaalton: thanks! i think it makes sense to do that, just for self-consistency, right?22:00
tjaaltonsure22:02
tjaaltondidn't think of 3rd party packages actually depending on it..22:02
tjaaltonsilly intel22:02
naccyeah :)22:02
tjaaltonnow to fix libxfont1..22:03
=== ppisati is now known as ppisati_afk
naccslashd: are you going to merge nagios-nrpe? You TIL22:43
naccslashd: i might just do it myself22:43
naccslashd: just uploaded (fyi) so you're off the hook :)23:53
naccmdeslaur: looks like src:nspr can be synced right? you did an artful update to bump to 4.13.1 but debian now has 4.1523:54
mdeslaurprobably, it usually goes with nss, but they're pretty good about not breaking abi23:55
mdeslaurnacc: ^23:55
naccmdeslaur: ack, i'm looking at nss too23:55
naccmdeslaur: i think, if i'm reading it right, nss can be synced too (need to check on the ubuntu2 upload to see if it's an upstream fix or not)23:57
mdeslaurnothing in the nss release notes strikes me at being particularly problematic23:58
naccmdeslaur: ack, i'll review our delta more closely tmrw, but i'll probably submit the syncs tmrw23:59
naccmdeslaur: thanks!23:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!